1) Max Van Heeswijk (USPSPBBF)
2) Erik Zabel(T-Mobile)
3) Peter Wrolich (Gerolsteiner)
Road Cycling · Public discussion
Murcia stage 3 results
Thread navigation
Jump through the discussion
Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.
Thread details
What we know about this thread
- Original section
- Road Cycling
- Published
- 5 March 2004
- Last activity
- 9 March 2004
- Original author
- Trg
- Posts
- 7
- Discussion status
- Public discussion
- Total views
- 756
- Views / 30 days
- 0
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
-
-
"trg" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
1) Max Van Heeswijk (USPSPBBF)
2) Erik Zabel(T-Mobile)
3) Peter Wrolich (Gerolsteiner)there, that's better now
-
Peter Allen said:
"trg" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
1) Max Van Heeswijk (USPSPBBF)
2) Erik Zabel(T-Mobile)
3) Peter Wrolich (Gerolsteiner)there, that's better now
No, actually that's worse. The unwritten R.B.R ettiquete is
to never announce the results in the header. It seriously
pisses off some folks who have taped the race and want to
watch it later. They'll call you all sorts of names and sick
the spambots on you (Voice of experience here.)You've been duly warned. 🙁
-
trg said:
Peter Allen said:
"trg" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
1) Max Van Heeswijk (USPSPBBF)
2) Erik Zabel(T-Mobile)
3) Peter Wrolich (Gerolsteiner)there, that's better now
No, actually that's worse. The unwritten R.B.R ettiquete
is to never announce the results in the header. It
seriously pisses off some folks who have taped the race
and want to watch it later. They'll call you all sorts
of names and sick the spambots on you (Voice of
experience here.)You've been duly warned. 🙁
I'm an agnostic on the race-results-in-headers thing. There
is no unwritten etiquette on this issue -- what there *is*
is complaining by the people who don't like it, and who
would like everyone else to believe that there is an
unwritten etiquette. -
"Robert Chung" <[email hidden]> wrote in
:"]news:[email hidden]:Quoted message said:
I'm an agnostic on the race-results-in-headers thing.
There is no unwritten etiquette on this issue -- what
there *is* is complaining by the people who don't like it,
and who would like everyone else to believe that there is
an unwritten etiquette.Actually, because of the is complaining by the people who
don't like it, the official RBR etiquette is to put the
podium in the message header.NS
-
Nev Shea said:
Actually, because of the is complaining by the people who
don't like it, the official RBR etiquette is to put the
podium in the message header.I stand corrected.
-
"trg" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...
Quoted message said:
Peter Allen said:
"trg" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
1) Max Van Heeswijk (USPSPBBF)
2) Erik Zabel(T-Mobile)
3) Peter Wrolich (Gerolsteiner)there, that's better now
No, actually that's worse. The unwritten R.B.R ettiquete
is to never announce the results in the header. It
seriously pisses off some folks who have taped the race
and want to watch it later. They'll call you all sorts
of names and sick the spambots on you (Voice of
experience here.)You've been duly warned. 🙁
It'll [censored] of about 10 guys and big deal...[censored] 'em off.
Nobody who matters truly gives a [censored] whether the results
are there or not. If I had nothing else to do, I'd post
results in the header every chance I got!
Active in the last 60 minutes
Active in this thread
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.