General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

MSR Pocket Rocket V Trangia

Started by Richard Baker · · Last activity · 9 posts · 787 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
9 September 2004
Last activity
11 September 2004
Original author
Richard Baker
Posts
9
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
787
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–9 of 9
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. No contest, the Trangia wins. The MSR is a good stove, quick to light, high
    output, but very expensive to use, OK on a day trip.

    The Trangia lights quick, very good output (loves windy weather), is dirt
    cheap to run, and will last a lifetime; no moving parts to go wrong, no jets
    to clog.

    As for weight, by the time you have packed a pan or two for the MSR, there
    is not a lot of difference between the two.

    I like gas stoves for what they are, a quick solution when you need a hot
    drink or quick noodles, I hate the idiots who leave empty gas cans all over
    the countryside (any empty cans / wrappers for that matter).

    Rik
    Classic stove collector (yes I know, its sad)

  2. Richard Baker said:

    As for weight, by the time you have packed a pan or two for the MSR, there
    is not a lot of difference between the two.

    A pan OR TWO? By heck ..... how many are you catering for?

    This newsgroup is getting like Trail magazine .... you know what
    threads are coming round again each month!

    MSR Pocket Rocket. I love it. I take one pan. I shelter the stove
    from the wind and stay with it while my dinner cooks. It is light; it
    is simple; it makes hot dinners; I like it.

    Trangia. I was not involved in the mass trespasses of Kinder Scout
    and other places. I wasn't born then. However, I did have a meths
    burner in my chemistry set, back in the 70s, so I do understand that
    liquid fuel can be used to cook dinner. Perhaps you had little choice
    back then, before Butane/Propane cannisters were widely available.
    However, we've moved on from then!

    Yes, yes, I know. Get a Trangia and a gas converter. Carry twice the
    kit!

    Horses for courses. Gas is good. (But anyone who dumps empty
    cannisters should have their legs slapped.)

    Judith

  3. Judith said:

    Yes, yes, I know. Get a Trangia and a gas converter. Carry twice the
    kit!

    The gas burner replaces the spirit burner: you don't have to carry them
    both, and then the Trangia is a more stable, better shielded unit than
    any other gas camping stove.

    But it's still heavy and bulky. Horses for courses, like you say. I
    have a T /and/ a micro gas stove. And a liquid fuel multi-fuel pressure
    stove too. I take the right one for the job, they all have their moments.

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
    Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
    Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
    net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/

  4. "Judith" <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:

    This newsgroup is getting like Trail magazine .... you know what
    threads are coming round again each month!

    Yup. It always was the case. Still, if we had a FAQ for all these
    threads and everyone looked at it, the only thing left would be
    photography <cheesy grin>.

    Quoted message said:


    MSR Pocket Rocket. I love it. I take one pan. I shelter the stove
    from the wind and stay with it while my dinner cooks. It is light;


    it

    Quoted message said:

    is simple; it makes hot dinners; I like it.

    On my own, I do the same. You can't travel much lighter.

    Quoted message said:


    Trangia. I was not involved in the mass trespasses of Kinder Scout
    and other places. I wasn't born then. However, I did have a meths
    burner in my chemistry set, back in the 70s, so I do understand that
    liquid fuel can be used to cook dinner. Perhaps you had little


    choice

    Quoted message said:

    back then, before Butane/Propane cannisters were widely available.
    However, we've moved on from then!

    Yes, yes, I know. Get a Trangia and a gas converter. Carry twice


    the

    Quoted message said:

    kit!

    The Trangia is a damn good bit of kit for young kids learning
    expeditioning. They can share the weight
    between them if there's three or four going, and its stability makes
    it the first choice stove.

    Graham

  5. Judith said:

    Horses for courses. Gas is good. (But anyone who dumps empty
    cannisters should have their legs slapped.)

    You misspelled snapped,

  6. "spongebob" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Judith" <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:

    This newsgroup is getting like Trail magazine .... you know what
    threads are coming round again each month!

    Yup. It always was the case. Still, if we had a FAQ for all these
    threads and everyone looked at it, the only thing left would be
    photography <cheesy grin>.

    Quoted message said:


    If you had an FAQ for each popular subject, you would have no newsgroup.
    What's the harm in asking questions (particularly those of us who haven't
    been here long enough to know all the answers anyway) and having discussion
    with other like-minded people whose greater experience can be shared? None
    at all as far as I can see.

  7. Woollyzone said:

    What's the harm in asking questions (particularly those of us who haven't
    been here long enough to know all the answers anyway) and having discussion
    with other like-minded people whose greater experience can be shared? None
    at all as far as I can see.

    I agree. Even questions which look the same are often subtly
    different because of the personal experience or requirements of the
    asker.

    Judith

  8. In article <[email hidden]>, Woollyzone
    <[email hidden]> writes

    Quoted message said:


    "spongebob" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Judith" <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:

    This newsgroup is getting like Trail magazine .... you know what
    threads are coming round again each month!

    Yup. It always was the case. Still, if we had a FAQ for all these
    threads and everyone looked at it, the only thing left would be
    photography <cheesy grin>.

    Quoted message said:


    If you had an FAQ for each popular subject, you would have no newsgroup.
    What's the harm in asking questions (particularly those of us who haven't
    been here long enough to know all the answers anyway) and having discussion
    with other like-minded people whose greater experience can be shared? None
    at all as far as I can see.

    Quite right. Although the same general subjects come up time and time
    again there is usually a different twist each time. I am happy reading
    much of the same opinion / comment as it often contains a newly
    discovered (for me) sparkling gem of information.

    --

    Dominic Sexton
    http://www.dscs.demon.co.uk/

  9. "Woollyzone" <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:

    If you had an FAQ for each popular subject, you would have no


    newsgroup.

    Quoted message said:

    What's the harm in asking questions (particularly those of us who


    haven't

    Quoted message said:

    been here long enough to know all the answers anyway) and having


    discussion

    Quoted message said:

    with other like-minded people whose greater experience can be


    shared? None

    Quoted message said:

    at all as far as I can see.


    I only pointed out that people have been ignoring the FAQ ever since
    I've been on the ng. I have no problem with people repeating
    questions, but additionally you COULD look at the FAQ, or try Google.
    I suppose I should have added a ;-)....It wasn't a critisism.

    Graham

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.