Road Cycling · Public discussion

Mouse kills Cyclist ?

Started by jk · · Last activity · 30 posts · 1,039 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
14 November 2006
Last activity
19 November 2006
Original author
jk
Posts
30
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,039
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–30 of 30
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Tom Keats said:

    I wonder just how much consideration this case received.
    There is a sense among many cyclists that accident investigations
    involving cyclists tend to get glossed-over. Rider sees mouse,
    hits the binders, goes over the handlebar, smashes his head open.
    End of story?

    If he had been travelling fast enough to go over the handlebar,
    I bet he wouldn't even have seen the mouse.

    In all my years of cycling, I've seen in the road (alive) horses, cows,
    deer, various birds (usually eating dead animals), a few snakes,
    countless rabbits (and once an owl catching a rabbit), numerous
    squirrels (often in the state of kamikaze), a number of turtles, a frog
    or two, a swarm of tarantulas (thankful I was in a car that time),
    countless dogs, and even an ostrich. The dead animals I've seen include
    most of the above (not the ostrich) plus raccoons, armadillos, and
    opposums. I'm sure there is more that I've seen but have forgotten.

    Never have I seen a mouse.

    Does this mean they aren't out there? No. I suppose that they are too
    small, too smart, or perhaps I am always moving too fast to notice
    them.

    What has this mouse to do with the death of this cyclist? I look
    forward to, as Paul Harvey says, the rest of the story....

    -Buck

  2. Why would avoiding hitting a mouse make you deceased. Far stretch if you
    think about it.

  3. In article <0k27h.328799$R63.29510@pd7urf1no>,

    nash said:

    Why would avoiding hitting a mouse make you deceased. Far stretch if you
    think about it.

    That's pretty much my thinking too.

    I'm not criticising the OP, nor the people who found the
    mouse thing funny. But looking beyond the foreground of
    the picture, we've got a mysteriously dead cyclist found
    on the roadside -- apparently, from the jist of the article,
    shrugged-off as "accidental" just because there was also a
    dead mouse and no skid marks found there.

    Is that good enough investigation? That the authorities are
    already giving their speculations to the public, indicates
    to me that official investigations have already been done,
    and the book closed.

    Like I said, there's a perception that "accidents" involving
    cyclists tend to get glossed-over.

    cheers,
    Tom

    --
    -- Nothing is safe from me.
    Above address is just a spam midden.
    I'm really at: tkeats [curlicue] vcn [point] bc [point] ca

  4. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Buck said:

    What has this mouse to do with the death of this cyclist?

    I'm more interested in what /really/ has to do with the death
    of this cyclist. Maybe the convenient mouse had something to
    do with it. Or maybe there are other factors.

    cheers,
    Tom

    --
    -- Nothing is safe from me.
    Above address is just a spam midden.
    I'm really at: tkeats [curlicue] vcn [point] bc [point] ca

  5. I wonder where they get the statistics that 99% of cycle accidents are
    caused by the cyclist. Bo hinky

    These investigators are obviously not biker friendly.

  6. On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 01:46:49 -0800, [email hidden] (Tom Keats)

    Quoted message said:

    Snip
    But, suppose there wasn't a dead mouse at the scene --
    just a mysteriously dead cyclist and a bike lying down on
    the roadside or in the ditch. What's funny about that?

    cheers,
    Tom


    When & Where did I describe it as funny. My only comment about the
    story was that it was unusual - which it is. Stop preaching to the
    choir.

  7. nash said:

    I wonder where they get the statistics that 99% of cycle accidents are
    caused by the cyclist. Bo hinky

    These investigators are obviously not biker friendly.

    I wonder where you get the statistic that you quoted. I've never seen a
    statement that 99% of cycle accidents are caused by the cyclist.

    Citation, please.

    -Buck

  8. "Buck" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    nash said:

    I wonder where they get the statistics that 99% of cycle accidents are
    caused by the cyclist. Bo hinky

    These investigators are obviously not biker friendly.

    I wonder where you get the statistic that you quoted. I've never seen a
    statement that 99% of cycle accidents are caused by the cyclist.

    Citation, please.

    -Buck

    I am quoting from a radio show about 4 years back in BC
    also government biased articles which I do not have anymore.
    Google it I guess. Attitudes have not changed. I do not agree with it if
    that is what you are wondering and it is from memory but trust me it was
    nothing like from my real experience because everyday I have to save myself
    from being creamed by all baby fed drivers on the road.

  9. In article <[email hidden]>,

    jk said:

    On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 01:46:49 -0800, [email hidden] (Tom Keats)

    Quoted message said:

    Snip
    But, suppose there wasn't a dead mouse at the scene --
    just a mysteriously dead cyclist and a bike lying down on
    the roadside or in the ditch. What's funny about that?

    cheers,
    Tom


    When & Where did I describe it as funny.

    When & where did I say /you/ described it as funny?

    Quoted message said:

    My only comment about the
    story was that it was unusual - which it is.

    And I'm just saying the dead rodent has apparently
    served well as a distraction to the general public
    from giving this case further (serious) consideration.

    cheers,
    Tom

    --
    -- Nothing is safe from me.
    Above address is just a spam midden.
    I'm really at: tkeats [curlicue] vcn [point] bc [point] ca

  10. I was visiting up in that area this weekend and learned that the
    deceased cyclist was the person who recently purchased VOMax, the
    cycling/X-country skiing clothing manufacturer based in Plainfield, MA.

    MCZ19

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.