Mountain Biker Breaks Collarbone: Evolution at work!



On Wed, 21 May 2008 03:48:46 -0700 (PDT), Siskuwihane
<[email protected]> wrote:

>On May 20, 11:29 pm, Mike Vandeman <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Tue, 20 May 2008 17:53:06 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero
>>
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >On May 20, 5:34 pm, Mike Vandeman <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> On Tue, 20 May 2008 14:50:28 -0700 (PDT), "[email protected]"
>>
>> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> >post the link?
>>
>> >> Post the link, if it exists. Or are you LYING again?
>>
>> >Typing the name into Google works.
>>
>> It doesn't return just one link. I want that link, not a million
>> others.
>
>A million? Let's not exagerate like you do on your webpages, it only
>brings up 554 in "images" and the picture in question is the first
>one, dummy.

No, it doesn't. Are you talking about the same image we are?
--
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande
 
On Wed, 21 May 2008 05:04:15 -0700 (PDT), "[email protected]"
<[email protected]> wrote:

>I swear, I am two steps away from contacting this poor gentleman as it
>is obvious you are a stalker and sociopath. poor Mike Vanderman.
>Someday we can sit down and go through the prior directions we type in
>for you so you can use the web as a well informed user.

Why are you afraid to provide the link? Afraid we'll find out you LIED
again?
--
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande
 
On May 22, 9:14 pm, Mike Vandeman <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, 20 May 2008 21:03:51 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero
>
>
>
>
>
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >On May 20, 8:29 pm, Mike Vandeman <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> On Tue, 20 May 2008 17:53:06 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero
>
> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >On May 20, 5:34 pm, Mike Vandeman <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >> On Tue, 20 May 2008 14:50:28 -0700 (PDT), "[email protected]"
>
> >> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >> >post the link?
>
> >> >> Post the link, if it exists. Or are you LYING again?
>
> >> >Typing the name into Google works.
>
> >> It doesn't return just one link. I want that link, not a million
> >> others.
>
> >Your lack of simple researching ability is not a surprise.  Odd how it
> >just popped up for me, yet you were unable to follow simple
> >directions.
>
> >Your inability to perform this very simple data collection task calls
> >into serious question your ability to collect and evaluate *any* data.
>
> Why are you afraid to provide the link?

Where did I claim to be afraid of providing the link?

>Afraid we might find out you
> lied?

"We" Who is "we"? The only "we" here is the folks who have
successfully searched Google.

> Again?

Since you can't show any time I actually did lie, then someone else
must be fabricating something. Hmmm....

E.P.
 
On May 22, 9:16 pm, Mike Vandeman <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, 21 May 2008 03:48:46 -0700 (PDT), Siskuwihane
>
>
>
>
>
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >On May 20, 11:29 pm, Mike Vandeman <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> On Tue, 20 May 2008 17:53:06 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero
>
> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >On May 20, 5:34 pm, Mike Vandeman <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >> On Tue, 20 May 2008 14:50:28 -0700 (PDT), "[email protected]"
>
> >> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >> >post the link?
>
> >> >> Post the link, if it exists. Or are you LYING again?
>
> >> >Typing the name into Google works.
>
> >> It doesn't return just one link. I want that link, not a million
> >> others.
>
> >A million? Let's not exagerate like you do on your webpages, it only
> >brings up 554 in "images" and the picture in question is the first
> >one, dummy.
>
> No, it doesn't.

It sure does. I guess your research skills are lacking. Well, that's
obvious from your website, but that's neither here nor there.

E.P.
 
On May 23, 12:16 am, Mike Vandeman <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, 21 May 2008 03:48:46 -0700 (PDT), Siskuwihane
>
>
>
>
>
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >On May 20, 11:29 pm, Mike Vandeman <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> On Tue, 20 May 2008 17:53:06 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero
>
> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >On May 20, 5:34 pm, Mike Vandeman <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >> On Tue, 20 May 2008 14:50:28 -0700 (PDT), "[email protected]"
>
> >> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >> >post the link?
>
> >> >> Post the link, if it exists. Or are you LYING again?
>
> >> >Typing the name into Google works.
>
> >> It doesn't return just one link. I want that link, not a million
> >> others.
>
> >A million? Let's not exagerate like you do on your webpages, it only
> >brings up 554 in "images" and the picture in question is the first
> >one, dummy.
>
> No, it doesn't.

Yes it does, idiot.

>Are you talking about the same image we are?

"We" as in everyone else but you, yes "we" are talking about the same
image. Seems "you" are the only dummy who cannot use a search engine.
 
Hmm...I just went through every step again and Mike VandeRman's image
still comes up. If you can't talk yourself through those steps...then
you're proving you're a mentally challenged or just totally non seeing
the obvious...like a sociopathic personality such as yourself would
do.
 
On Fri, 23 May 2008 10:04:37 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero
<[email protected]> wrote:

>On May 22, 9:16 pm, Mike Vandeman <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Wed, 21 May 2008 03:48:46 -0700 (PDT), Siskuwihane
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >On May 20, 11:29 pm, Mike Vandeman <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> On Tue, 20 May 2008 17:53:06 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero
>>
>> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> >On May 20, 5:34 pm, Mike Vandeman <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> >> On Tue, 20 May 2008 14:50:28 -0700 (PDT), "[email protected]"
>>
>> >> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> >> >post the link?
>>
>> >> >> Post the link, if it exists. Or are you LYING again?
>>
>> >> >Typing the name into Google works.
>>
>> >> It doesn't return just one link. I want that link, not a million
>> >> others.
>>
>> >A million? Let's not exagerate like you do on your webpages, it only
>> >brings up 554 in "images" and the picture in question is the first
>> >one, dummy.
>>
>> No, it doesn't.
>
>It sure does. I guess your research skills are lacking. Well, that's
>obvious from your website, but that's neither here nor there.

Which picture are YOU talking about? Are you even following this
conversation?
--
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande
 
On Fri, 23 May 2008 14:16:51 -0700 (PDT), Siskuwihane
<[email protected]> wrote:

>On May 23, 12:16 am, Mike Vandeman <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Wed, 21 May 2008 03:48:46 -0700 (PDT), Siskuwihane
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >On May 20, 11:29 pm, Mike Vandeman <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> On Tue, 20 May 2008 17:53:06 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero
>>
>> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> >On May 20, 5:34 pm, Mike Vandeman <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> >> On Tue, 20 May 2008 14:50:28 -0700 (PDT), "[email protected]"
>>
>> >> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> >> >post the link?
>>
>> >> >> Post the link, if it exists. Or are you LYING again?
>>
>> >> >Typing the name into Google works.
>>
>> >> It doesn't return just one link. I want that link, not a million
>> >> others.
>>
>> >A million? Let's not exagerate like you do on your webpages, it only
>> >brings up 554 in "images" and the picture in question is the first
>> >one, dummy.
>>
>> No, it doesn't.
>
>Yes it does, idiot.
>
>>Are you talking about the same image we are?
>
>"We" as in everyone else but you, yes "we" are talking about the same
>image. Seems "you" are the only dummy who cannot use a search engine.

What picture are YOU talking about?
--
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande
 
On Fri, 23 May 2008 17:45:01 -0700 (PDT), "[email protected]"
<[email protected]> wrote:

>Hmm...I just went through every step again and Mike VandeRman's image
>still comes up. If you can't talk yourself through those steps...then
>you're proving you're a mentally challenged or just totally non seeing
>the obvious...like a sociopathic personality such as yourself would
>do.

What are those steps? Why the secrecy? Afraid we'll find out you are
LYING again?
--
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande
 
On Fri, 23 May 2008 10:02:36 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero
<[email protected]> wrote:

>On May 22, 9:14 pm, Mike Vandeman <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Tue, 20 May 2008 21:03:51 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >On May 20, 8:29 pm, Mike Vandeman <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> On Tue, 20 May 2008 17:53:06 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero
>>
>> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> >On May 20, 5:34 pm, Mike Vandeman <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> >> On Tue, 20 May 2008 14:50:28 -0700 (PDT), "[email protected]"
>>
>> >> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> >> >post the link?
>>
>> >> >> Post the link, if it exists. Or are you LYING again?
>>
>> >> >Typing the name into Google works.
>>
>> >> It doesn't return just one link. I want that link, not a million
>> >> others.
>>
>> >Your lack of simple researching ability is not a surprise.  Odd how it
>> >just popped up for me, yet you were unable to follow simple
>> >directions.
>>
>> >Your inability to perform this very simple data collection task calls
>> >into serious question your ability to collect and evaluate *any* data.
>>
>> Why are you afraid to provide the link?
>
>Where did I claim to be afraid of providing the link?

Right now, since you still haven't provided it.

>>Afraid we might find out you
>> lied?
>
>"We" Who is "we"? The only "we" here is the folks who have
>successfully searched Google.
>
>> Again?
>
>Since you can't show any time I actually did lie, then someone else
>must be fabricating something. Hmmm....
>
>E.P.
--
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande
 
On May 24, 2:26 am, Mike Vandeman <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, 23 May 2008 17:45:01 -0700 (PDT), "[email protected]"
>
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >Hmm...I just went through every step again and Mike VandeRman's image
> >still comes up. If you can't talk yourself through those steps...then
> >you're proving you're a mentally challenged or just totally non seeing
> >the obvious...like a sociopathic personality such as yourself would
> >do.
>
> What are those steps? Why the secrecy? Afraid we'll find out you are
> LYING again?

How long are you going to play dumb? Oh wait, maybe you're not
playing, at your age it may be dementia.
 
On Sat, 24 May 2008 04:44:38 -0700 (PDT), Siskuwihane
<[email protected]> wrote:

>On May 24, 2:26 am, Mike Vandeman <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Fri, 23 May 2008 17:45:01 -0700 (PDT), "[email protected]"
>>
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >Hmm...I just went through every step again and Mike VandeRman's image
>> >still comes up. If you can't talk yourself through those steps...then
>> >you're proving you're a mentally challenged or just totally non seeing
>> >the obvious...like a sociopathic personality such as yourself would
>> >do.
>>
>> What are those steps? Why the secrecy? Afraid we'll find out you are
>> LYING again?
>
>How long are you going to play dumb? Oh wait, maybe you're not
>playing, at your age it may be dementia.

I'm calling your bluff. Give us the link, or we will have to believe
that you are LYING again.
--
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande
 
On May 24, 1:09 pm, Mike Vandeman <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat, 24 May 2008 04:44:38 -0700 (PDT), Siskuwihane
>
>
>
>
>
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >On May 24, 2:26 am, Mike Vandeman <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> On Fri, 23 May 2008 17:45:01 -0700 (PDT), "[email protected]"
>
> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >Hmm...I just went through every step again and Mike VandeRman's image
> >> >still comes up. If you can't talk yourself through those steps...then
> >> >you're proving you're a mentally challenged or just totally non seeing
> >> >the obvious...like a sociopathic personality such as yourself would
> >> >do.
>
> >> What are those steps? Why the secrecy? Afraid we'll find out you are
> >> LYING again?
>
> >How long are you going to play dumb? Oh wait, maybe you're not
> >playing, at your age it may be dementia.
>
> I'm calling your bluff. Give us the link, or we will have to believe
> that you are LYING again.

"Us"? "We"? Get a grip, it's only "YOU" all by your lonesome, like at
work, at home, in Berkeley or San Ramone.
 
call your bluff? lies? You're an idiot. Here's the directions again.
Try and focus.

Go to www.google.com
Enter in Mike VANDERMAN...notice spelling Tard. It's not all about
you.
Then click on image. and the first...very first picture is Mike
VandeRman chasing a cyclist. That is what was said all along. No lies
you ass from Berkeley. Or to make it real simple...this is the
specific page.


The original description still reads the same. Mike VandeRman...not
you. Remember. Life is not all about you, you sociopath!
 
On Sat, 24 May 2008 14:49:41 -0700 (PDT), Siskuwihane
<[email protected]> wrote:

>On May 24, 1:09 pm, Mike Vandeman <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Sat, 24 May 2008 04:44:38 -0700 (PDT), Siskuwihane
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >On May 24, 2:26 am, Mike Vandeman <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> On Fri, 23 May 2008 17:45:01 -0700 (PDT), "[email protected]"
>>
>> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> >Hmm...I just went through every step again and Mike VandeRman's image
>> >> >still comes up. If you can't talk yourself through those steps...then
>> >> >you're proving you're a mentally challenged or just totally non seeing
>> >> >the obvious...like a sociopathic personality such as yourself would
>> >> >do.
>>
>> >> What are those steps? Why the secrecy? Afraid we'll find out you are
>> >> LYING again?
>>
>> >How long are you going to play dumb? Oh wait, maybe you're not
>> >playing, at your age it may be dementia.
>>
>> I'm calling your bluff. Give us the link, or we will have to believe
>> that you are LYING again.

You are obviously LYING, or you would supply the link. What are you
trying to hide?????
--
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande
 
On Sat, 24 May 2008 20:54:20 -0700 (PDT), "[email protected]"
<[email protected]> wrote:

>call your bluff? lies? You're an idiot. Here's the directions again.
>Try and focus.
>
>Go to www.google.com
>Enter in Mike VANDERMAN...notice spelling Tard. It's not all about
>you.
>Then click on image. and the first...very first picture is Mike
>VandeRman chasing a cyclist.

Not every other time I searched. This is the first time it appeared.

That is what was said all along. No lies
>you ass from Berkeley. Or to make it real simple...this is the
>specific page.
>
>
>The original description still reads the same. Mike VandeRman...not
>you. Remember. Life is not all about you, you sociopath!

YOU wrote "Mike VandeRman". That is the lie: it isn't me, nor someone
called "Mike VandeRman". The original image didn't have my name
attached, because, of course, it isn't me, NOR Mike VandeRman. You
obviously have no idea who it is, and yet you LIED and said it's "Mike
VandeRman". What's so hard to understand, LIAR?:

http://bikehugger.com/images/blog/nugget-thumb.jpg

Still waiting for your explanation of why you deliberately LIED:

"I found this picture of Mike Vanderman protesting a bike race...he is
trying to run down the biker...that crazy Mike!! He's always good for
a laugh.

http://bikehugger.com/images/blog/nugget-thumb.jpg"

You aren't going to live this down, until you admit your dishonesty.
--
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande
 
On May 24, 11:54 pm, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
wrote:
> call your bluff? lies? You're an idiot. Here's the directions again.
> Try and focus.
>
> Go towww.google.com
> Enter in Mike VANDERMAN...notice spelling Tard. It's not all about
> you.
> Then click on image. and the first...very first picture is Mike
> VandeRman chasing a cyclist. That is what was said all along. No lies
> you ass from Berkeley. Or to make it real simple...this is the
> specific page.
>
> The original description still reads the same. Mike VandeRman...not
> you. Remember. Life is not all about you, you sociopath!

I also found this...

From: [email protected] (Mike Vanderman)
Subject: Why I'm such a jerk!
Date: 1999/11/05
Message-ID: <[email protected]>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 545061768
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: Text/Plain; Charset=US-ASCII
Mime-Version: 1.0 (WebTV)
X-WebTV-Signature: 1 ETAtAhUAjlU8ftoZzQWUWSFm6fJx/
bEGOmsCFFw37Xh0LD7W2Nv3yKy04u8nn/cg
Content-Disposition: Inline
Newsgroups: alt.mountain-bike

To shed some light on why I don't like mountain bikers, I will give
you
a little background.
As a geekish little troll, you understand it is next to impossible
for
me to get a woman. That led to my many excursions in the woods for
some
self gratification. Yes, just me and a copy of the Sierra Club
newsletter! What bliss!
It just so happened that one day as I was about to "arrive", I was
surprised by a couple of those lying, SUV driving, mountain bikers.
I got up and tried to run, but my pants were down around my
ankles,causing me to trip and injuring my little "tinkey winkey".
Those nasty mountain bikers did nothing but laugh at me while I lay
half
naked on the ground
trying to get my newsletter untangled from my underwear. I swore I
would seek revenge and do everything in my power to keep mountain bike
off the trails.

I may not have the sanctuary of the big woods, but I can find some
pleasure on the back row of the local truckstop.

Mike

I am trying to create pure wanking habitat. Off limits to heterosexual
activity. I spent the last 8 years fighting for the right hang out in
rest areas after dark.
 
That picture came up everytime I searched. You're just an idiot who is
lying your way out of this...or so your sociopathic sense is telling
you. The first time I searched was for Mike Vanderman. It wasn't
searching for you...remember, it isn't all about you! And if I contact
Mike Vanderman who is an avid archery expert in Iowa...I am sure he
would argue with you regarding his existence. Before you bellow like a
sissy girl for the link to this. Here *****:
http://atlanticarchers.com/06032007.pdf
Mike Vanderman also shot trial compound bows for Easton and is
featured in several of their videos on YouTube.,

So, yeah, he exists. You exist in your own mind as a hero...we see you
as a factless troll. Regarding the letter above on why you hate
MTBers...that is funny! and probably close to the truest fact about
you ever, and found in the archives from long ago.
 
On Sun, 25 May 2008 04:09:14 -0700 (PDT), Siskuwihane
<[email protected]> wrote:

>On May 24, 11:54 pm, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>wrote:
>> call your bluff? lies? You're an idiot. Here's the directions again.
>> Try and focus.
>>
>> Go towww.google.com
>> Enter in Mike VANDERMAN...notice spelling Tard. It's not all about
>> you.
>> Then click on image. and the first...very first picture is Mike
>> VandeRman chasing a cyclist. That is what was said all along. No lies
>> you ass from Berkeley. Or to make it real simple...this is the
>> specific page.
>>
>> The original description still reads the same. Mike VandeRman...not
>> you. Remember. Life is not all about you, you sociopath!
>
>I also found this...
>
>From: [email protected] (Mike Vanderman)
>Subject: Why I'm such a jerk!
>Date: 1999/11/05
>Message-ID: <[email protected]>#1/1
>X-Deja-AN: 545061768
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
>Content-Type: Text/Plain; Charset=US-ASCII
>Mime-Version: 1.0 (WebTV)
>X-WebTV-Signature: 1 ETAtAhUAjlU8ftoZzQWUWSFm6fJx/
>bEGOmsCFFw37Xh0LD7W2Nv3yKy04u8nn/cg
>Content-Disposition: Inline
>Newsgroups: alt.mountain-bike
>
>To shed some light on why I don't like mountain bikers, I will give
>you
>a little background.
> As a geekish little troll, you understand it is next to impossible
>for
>me to get a woman. That led to my many excursions in the woods for
>some
>self gratification. Yes, just me and a copy of the Sierra Club
>newsletter! What bliss!
> It just so happened that one day as I was about to "arrive", I was
>surprised by a couple of those lying, SUV driving, mountain bikers.
> I got up and tried to run, but my pants were down around my
>ankles,causing me to trip and injuring my little "tinkey winkey".
>Those nasty mountain bikers did nothing but laugh at me while I lay
>half
>naked on the ground
> trying to get my newsletter untangled from my underwear. I swore I
>would seek revenge and do everything in my power to keep mountain bike
>off the trails.
>
> I may not have the sanctuary of the big woods, but I can find some
>pleasure on the back row of the local truckstop.
>
>Mike
>
>I am trying to create pure wanking habitat. Off limits to heterosexual
>activity. I spent the last 8 years fighting for the right hang out in
>rest areas after dark.

Your point?
--
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande
 
On Sun, 25 May 2008 05:56:31 -0700 (PDT), "[email protected]"
<[email protected]> wrote:

>That picture came up everytime I searched. You're just an idiot who is
>lying your way out of this...or so your sociopathic sense is telling
>you. The first time I searched was for Mike Vanderman. It wasn't
>searching for you...remember, it isn't all about you! And if I contact
>Mike Vanderman who is an avid archery expert in Iowa...I am sure he
>would argue with you regarding his existence.

But he's not the person in the photo you posted. So you LIED. I'm
still waiting to hear why you LIED.

Before you bellow like a
>sissy girl for the link to this. Here *****:
>http://atlanticarchers.com/06032007.pdf
>Mike Vanderman also shot trial compound bows for Easton and is
>featured in several of their videos on YouTube.,
>
>So, yeah, he exists. You exist in your own mind as a hero...we see you
>as a factless troll. Regarding the letter above on why you hate
>MTBers...that is funny! and probably close to the truest fact about
>you ever, and found in the archives from long ago.

Still waiting for your explanation of why you deliberately LIED:

"I found this picture of Mike Vanderman protesting a bike race...he is
trying to run down the biker...that crazy Mike!! He's always good for
a laugh.

http://bikehugger.com/images/blog/nugget-thumb.jpg"

You aren't going to live this down, until you admit your dishonesty.
--
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
"Top New Zealand Mountain Biker" Breaks Her Neck!
Replies
13
Views
811
Mountain Bikes
S Curtiss
S
M
"Champion" Mountain Biker Breaks His Neck
Replies
10
Views
602
Mountain Bikes
Andy H
A
B
Beginner Mountain Biker Help!
Replies
1
Views
1K
Mountain Bikes
alfeng
alfeng
L
beginning mountain biker - looking for advice on buying a bike
Replies
2
Views
4K
Mountain Bikes
stevegreer
stevegreer
M
Australia's "Best Mountain Biker" Is A CRIMINAL!
Replies
2
Views
9K
Mountain Bikes
Mike Vandeman
M
Top Bottom Back