Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

More proprietary complexity.

Started by Luke · · Last activity · 2 posts · 318 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
8 October 2006
Last activity
8 October 2006
Original author
Luke
Posts
2
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
318
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–2 of 2
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Campagnolo's new BB design as featured at interbike:

    http://www.cyclesdeoro.com/Interbike/2006/DB/photos/photo110.html

    http://www.cyclesdeoro.com/Interbike/2006/DB/photos/photo111.html

    Campy's elaboration:

    http://www.campagnolo.com/ultratorque.php

  2. Luke said:

    Campagnolo's new BB design as featured at interbike:

    http://www.cyclesdeoro.com/Interbike/2006/DB/photos/photo110.html

    http://www.cyclesdeoro.com/Interbike/2006/DB/photos/photo111.html

    Campy's elaboration:

    http://www.campagnolo.com/ultratorque.php

    Have one in the shop..for display..neat design, took some of the
    features of the original OB bearing and improved them, IMO..says they
    are stiffer and lighter, implying that the old fashioned square taper
    was somehow heavy and flexy, neither of which were true but, one again,
    decisions by the marketing department instead of the racing department.
    Gonna sell a lot of them and the crank/lever/brake items of Campag
    overshadowing Sram, as if Sram is now 'old news'. Centaur(with carbon)
    and below levers functional like Sram but simplier and lighter and
    about 1/3 the price. (Centaur about $175, Force $550)..

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.