Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

More junk from the "unc" (RBR's Uncle Al)

Started by Matt O'Toole · · Last activity · 10 posts · 577 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
14 February 2008
Last activity
15 February 2008
Original author
Matt O'Toole
Posts
10
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
577
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–10 of 10
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. According RoadBikeRider's Uncle Al today:

    "If you're riding on an aluminum fork you should have replaced it eons
    ago. Aluminum forks become mushy and flexible over time. I've never
    thought aluminum is a good choice for a fork. The only time I had a bike
    with one, I worried so much that I got rid of that rig after only two
    months. The fork was way light and it was good on rough pavement, but it
    seemed like an accident waiting to happen."

    Would someone please give this "authority" a brief mechanical engineering
    lesson? I don't have the requisite letters after my name to make him
    listen.

    Matt O.

  2. Matt O'Toole said:

    According RoadBikeRider's Uncle Al today:

    "If you're riding on an aluminum fork you should have replaced it eons
    ago. Aluminum forks become mushy and flexible over time. I've never
    thought aluminum is a good choice for a fork. The only time I had a bike
    with one, I worried so much that I got rid of that rig after only two
    months. The fork was way light and it was good on rough pavement, but it
    seemed like an accident waiting to happen."

    Would someone please give this "authority" a brief mechanical engineering
    lesson? I don't have the requisite letters after my name to make him
    listen.

    Yeah, where are the failures?

    Cast aluminum forks did indeed have breakage from inclusions and air
    voids. Pretty much everything after 1978 risks an epoxy bond failure
    more than an aluminum failure and even those have proved rare.
    --
    Andrew Muzi
    www.yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

  3. Matt O'Toole said:

    "If you're riding on an aluminum fork you should have replaced it
    eons ago. Aluminum forks become mushy and flexible over time. I've
    never thought aluminum is a good choice for a fork. The only time I
    had a bike with one, I worried so much that I got rid of that rig
    after only two months. The fork was way light and it was good on
    rough pavement, but it seemed like an accident waiting to happen."

    Quoted message said:

    Would someone please give this "authority" a brief mechanical
    engineering lesson? I don't have the requisite letters after my
    name to make him listen.

    I agree on not riding aluminum forks, they being a springing element
    of the frame and aluminum doesn't make a good spring nor does it have
    a reasonable fatigue life in that function. However, aluminum or
    metals in general do not get mushy with use. Some get more durable
    from work "hardening" but the elastic modulus remains the same.

    As I have often mentioned, in winter bicycle shops advanced sales of
    bicycles and tires because the frames got mushy and the tires needed
    aging. These myths belong in the trash can along with many other old
    saws of bicycling.

    Hardening is a misnomer unless the term hard is qualified. The yield
    stress is increased in "hardening" but the springiness of the metal
    remains unchanged. A high speed steel drill has essentially the same
    elastic modulus as coat hanger wire of a DT spoke, the modulus coming
    from iron, the principal component of the metal.

    Jobst Brandt

  4. Quoted message said:
    Matt O'Toole said:

    "If you're riding on an aluminum fork you should have replaced it
    eons ago. Aluminum forks become mushy and flexible over time. I've
    never thought aluminum is a good choice for a fork. The only time I
    had a bike with one, I worried so much that I got rid of that rig
    after only two months. The fork was way light and it was good on
    rough pavement, but it seemed like an accident waiting to happen."
    Would someone please give this "authority" a brief mechanical
    engineering lesson?  I don't have the requisite letters after my
    name to make him listen.

    I agree on not riding aluminum forks, they being a springing element
    of the frame and aluminum doesn't make a good spring nor does it have
    a reasonable fatigue life in that function.  However, aluminum or
    metals in general do not get mushy with use.  Some get more durable
    from work "hardening" but the elastic modulus remains the same.

    As I have often mentioned, in winter bicycle shops advanced sales of
    bicycles and tires because the frames got mushy and the tires needed
    aging.  These myths belong in the trash can along with many other old
    saws of bicycling.

    Hardening is a misnomer unless the term hard is qualified.  The yield
    stress is increased in "hardening" but the springiness of the metal
    remains unchanged.  A high speed steel drill has essentially the same
    elastic modulus as coat hanger wire of a DT spoke, the modulus coming
    from iron, the principal component of the metal.

    Jobst Brandt

    which aluminum type gets more durable from use ? or does "some" in
    your sentence exclude aluminum ?

  5. Matt O'Toole said:

    According RoadBikeRider's Uncle Al today:

    "If you're riding on an aluminum fork you should have replaced it eons
    ago. Aluminum forks become mushy and flexible over time. I've never
    thought aluminum is a good choice for a fork. The only time I had a bike
    with one, I worried so much that I got rid of that rig after only two
    months. The fork was way light and it was good on rough pavement, but it
    seemed like an accident waiting to happen."

    Would someone please give this "authority" a brief mechanical engineering
    lesson? I don't have the requisite letters after my name to make him
    listen.

    Matt O.

    does aluminum become more elastic over time? no.

    can a fatigue cracked component just a few cycles from failure feel
    mushy? yes, absolutely.

    is an aluminum fork more prone to failure? not when undamaged and made
    to a decent standard, no.

    is an aluminum fork "rougher" to ride? usually, yes. like most other
    aluminum bike tube, fork tubes are bigger and therefore stiffer. and
    therefore correspondingly much less pleasant on the hands.

    bottom line - if you want a reason to not ride one, it is the last one.

  6. A Muzi said:
    Matt O'Toole said:

    According RoadBikeRider's Uncle Al today:

    "If you're riding on an aluminum fork you should have replaced it eons
    ago. Aluminum forks become mushy and flexible over time. I've never
    thought aluminum is a good choice for a fork. The only time I had a bike
    with one, I worried so much that I got rid of that rig after only two
    months. The fork was way light and it was good on rough pavement, but it
    seemed like an accident waiting to happen."

    Would someone please give this "authority" a brief mechanical engineering
    lesson? I don't have the requisite letters after my name to make him
    listen.

    Yeah, where are the failures?

    Cast aluminum forks did indeed have breakage from inclusions and air
    voids. Pretty much everything after 1978 risks an epoxy bond failure
    more than an aluminum failure and even those have proved rare.

    but few are cast. most of the ones i've seen are separate forged crowns
    and epoxied drawn tube blades. that's a fairly reliable combo.

  7. Quoted message said:
    Matt O'Toole said:

    "If you're riding on an aluminum fork you should have replaced it
    eons ago. Aluminum forks become mushy and flexible over time. I've
    never thought aluminum is a good choice for a fork. The only time I
    had a bike with one, I worried so much that I got rid of that rig
    after only two months. The fork was way light and it was good on
    rough pavement, but it seemed like an accident waiting to happen."

    Quoted message said:

    Would someone please give this "authority" a brief mechanical
    engineering lesson? I don't have the requisite letters after my
    name to make him listen.

    I agree on not riding aluminum forks, they being a springing element
    of the frame and aluminum doesn't make a good spring nor does it have
    a reasonable fatigue life in that function.

    eh? aluminum frames are elastic and subject to all kinds of flex - how
    is it that the great jobst brandt, fatigue expert extraordinaire,
    doesn't seem to understand that wild speculation in one department is
    negated by oversight in the other?

    Quoted message said:

    However, aluminum or
    metals in general do not get mushy with use. Some get more durable
    from work "hardening" but the elastic modulus remains the same.

    you are correct that elasticity remains the same, and that u.t.s can
    increase from work hardening, but frames and forks are not subject to
    work hardening in use. if you want to grasp at straws for property
    changes, u.t.s can increase with age in aluminum systems because
    precipitation hardening can continue at room temperature, but that's not
    cold work.

    and it's not "hardening" in quotes - the metal really does harden.
    u.t.s increases in proportion as it does so.

    Quoted message said:


    As I have often mentioned, in winter bicycle shops advanced sales of
    bicycles and tires because the frames got mushy and the tires needed
    aging. These myths belong in the trash can along with many other old
    saws of bicycling.

    red herring.

    Quoted message said:


    Hardening is a misnomer unless the term hard is qualified. The yield
    stress is increased in "hardening" but the springiness of the metal
    remains unchanged. A high speed steel drill has essentially the same
    elastic modulus as coat hanger wire of a DT spoke, the modulus coming
    from iron, the principal component of the metal.

    it's true that the modulus for most steel alloys is pretty much the
    same, but the "springiness" of the steel in terms of the deformation it
    will withstand before onset of plasticity most definitely changes as a
    material hardens.

    you should go to a library and "refresh" your memory on the basics jobst.

  8. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Matt O'Toole said:

    "If you're riding on an aluminum fork you should have replaced it
    eons ago. Aluminum forks become mushy and flexible over time. I've
    never thought aluminum is a good choice for a fork. The only time I
    had a bike with one, I worried so much that I got rid of that rig
    after only two months. The fork was way light and it was good on
    rough pavement, but it seemed like an accident waiting to happen."
    Would someone please give this "authority" a brief mechanical
    engineering lesson? �I don't have the requisite letters after my
    name to make him listen.


    I agree on not riding aluminum forks, they being a springing element
    of the frame and aluminum doesn't make a good spring nor does it have
    a reasonable fatigue life in that function. �However, aluminum or
    metals in general do not get mushy with use. �Some get more durable
    from work "hardening" but the elastic modulus remains the same.

    As I have often mentioned, in winter bicycle shops advanced sales of
    bicycles and tires because the frames got mushy and the tires needed
    aging. �These myths belong in the trash can along with many other old
    saws of bicycling.

    Hardening is a misnomer unless the term hard is qualified. �The yield
    stress is increased in "hardening" but the springiness of the metal
    remains unchanged. �A high speed steel drill has essentially the same
    elastic modulus as coat hanger wire of a DT spoke, the modulus coming
    from iron, the principal component of the metal.

    Jobst Brandt

    which aluminum type gets more durable from use ? or does "some" in
    your sentence exclude aluminum ?

    he doesn't know - he's making stuff up. jobst is always foggy on the
    details when it comes to materials.

  9. jim beam said:
    A Muzi said:
    Matt O'Toole said:

    According RoadBikeRider's Uncle Al today:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    "If you're riding on an aluminum fork you should have replaced it eons
    ago. Aluminum forks become mushy and flexible over time. I've never
    thought aluminum is a good choice for a fork. The only time I had a bike
    with one, I worried so much that I got rid of that rig after only two
    months. The fork was way light and it was good on rough pavement, but it
    seemed like an accident waiting to happen."

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Would someone please give this "authority" a brief mechanical engineering
    lesson?  I don't have the requisite letters after my name to make him
    listen.

    Quoted message said:

    Yeah, where are the failures?

    Quoted message said:

    Cast aluminum forks did indeed have breakage from inclusions and air
    voids.  Pretty much everything after 1978 risks an epoxy bond failure
    more than an aluminum failure and even those have proved rare.

    but few are cast.  most of the ones i've seen are separate forged crowns
    and epoxied drawn tube blades.  that's a fairly reliable combo.

    I'll second that; I've had a Tange Fusion aluminum fork on one of my
    bikes for a long, long time, and many, many miles (I've all the
    mileage recorded, but without looking it up, I can safely say "way
    over fifteen thousand miles" [probably over 20k, but let's be
    conservative].) I have kept the fork polished, but never painted, so
    even the smallest signs of "danger" would be readily visible. Nothing,
    so far.

  10. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Matt O'Toole said:

    According RoadBikeRider's Uncle Al today:
    "If you're riding on an aluminum fork you should have replaced it eons
    ago. Aluminum forks become mushy and flexible over time. I've never
    thought aluminum is a good choice for a fork. The only time I had a bike
    with one, I worried so much that I got rid of that rig after only two
    months. The fork was way light and it was good on rough pavement, but it
    seemed like an accident waiting to happen."
    Would someone please give this "authority" a brief mechanical
    engineering
    lesson? I don't have the requisite letters after my name to make him
    listen.

    Quoted message said:
    A Muzi said:

    Yeah, where are the failures?
    Cast aluminum forks did indeed have breakage from inclusions and air
    voids. Pretty much everything after 1978 risks an epoxy bond failure
    more than an aluminum failure and even those have proved rare.

    jim beam said:

    but few are cast. most of the ones i've seen are separate forged crowns
    and epoxied drawn tube blades. that's a fairly reliable combo.

    Yes, we agree. I phrased that poorly.
    The cast fork debacle long predates Vitus' '78 pressed-epoxied design
    which was later copied by SR-Sakae and Kinesis, inter alia.
    --
    Andrew Muzi
    www.yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.