more flak

Oh it is you!! Knew you couldn't stay away too long. You'll do it again
yourself sweetheart( hang yourself). You always run out of here
pouting,crying and dragging your whooped ass out of here, swearing
you're leaving and never coming back but you love your punishment now
dontcha Darlin? <wink>
Laureen

Jaime said:

"Laureen" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Who has more "whinny whoa is me" posts?.... You (or
can I say her name without her reappearing?)... Miss Jaime!

I don't *need* to say a thing. You'll put the noose around your *own* neck
and it looks like you are doing so.

Why just last week you were talking about the dumb [censored] people say to
you and how much it bothered you. If I liken it to my post you have
been making reference to then you too were hysterical.

Luna said:

Mmk. I'm trying to remember when I complained about what I was eating
or what I was going to eat. I've complained about having to cut the
_amount_ of food in order to lose weight, because being hungry sucks,
but I'm nearly certain I'm not the only one who's done that. And I
don't think I've ever gotten hysterical about any small things. Can you
cite examples please?

In article <[email hidden]>,

Laureen said:

Nope not mean at all but you started a pissing match so I took my turn.
I quote you: "There are some of us in here who aren't "punctuation
police" but
read your posts and get the impression you're a hysterical 14 year old
on too much caffeine". Just who are you speaking for???? You mean YOU
get the impression I am a hysterical 14 year old on too much caffeine?
Speak for yourself and not others OK? Who has the past with all the
drama cast in her posts? You're the one who gets hysterical over the
small [censored] in life. Who has more "whinny whoa is me" posts?.... You (or
can I say her name without her reappearing?)... Miss Jaime!
Only YOU complain about what you're having to eat, what you're going to
eat, and the stupid things people say to you in your boring day to day
life.
Laureen

Luna said:

In article <[email hidden]>,
"Laureen" <[email hidden]> wrote:

> And I am a very jubilant, happy go lucky, animated, out spoken, unshy
> human being.

And kinda mean.

> I'm not freak with fake burgundy wine hair, nor do I think
> I look good as Thelma Thick Thigh in cheap pleather pants ROFL!!!
> Laureen
>
>

No, you're a freak for much more fundamental reasons than hair color and
pants. And, when I bought those pants they were in. ;o)

>
> Sherry wrote:
> > "Luna" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
> > news:[email hidden]...
> > > Why? There are some of us in here who aren't "punctuation police"
> > > but
> > > read your posts and get the impression you're a hysterical 14 year
> > > old
> > > on too much caffeine.
> >
> > I get the impression that she's excited and enthusiastic about her
> > subject
> > 🙂.
> >
> > I've noticed that some people have a naturally ebullient nature and it
> > comes
> > through in their posts via punctuation, as it would in their voice
> > through
> > animated inflection. I'm usually drawn to such enthusiasm rather than
> > repelled by it 🙂.
> > --
> > Sherry
> > 364/311/195
> > http://lowcarb.owly.net

--
http://www.mindspring.com/~lunachick

--
http://www.mindspring.com/~lunachick

Quoting Luna:

Quoted message said:

Laureen said:

Quoted message said:

Laureen on Luna:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> I'm not freak with fake burgundy wine hair, nor do I think
> I look good as Thelma Thick Thigh in cheap pleather pants ROFL!!!

meoooooow!

I've not once seen Luna type any comment that could even be remotely
construed as her being overly prissy or prideful about her appearance.

Did you have a message-id that demonstrates such ?

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

That was totally uncalled for.

After reading a few of your posts. Laureen, I must say you come off as
lazy, homicidal, catty, and dumb. If that's the image you're trying to
project -- good job!

Two words: aggressively stupid.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

PS: Another benefit of exercise is relief from some of that "ebulience"
of yours. Jesus christ, girl, chill out. It's unattractive.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

She started it with "the 14 year old hysterical [censored]" post of hers.
My post was not out of the blue and unwarranted. She took it upon
herself to insult me and speak for others in the group before thinking.
I replied to her low blow. So peddle backwords and read what I replied
to before you judge me ok??

Quoted message said:

I said you give the impression of a hysterical 14 year old, and you do.

You're too kind.

Quoted message said:

The multiple explanation marks, the misspellings, the ubiquitous lol's,
and the random capitalization all lend to that impression. You said you
do it on purpose to [censored] certain people off, and I said that it could
have another unintended effect on other people.

I don't buy for one second that she deliberately misspells to tick
people off.

Quoted message said:

As for speaking for others in the group, I'm sorry about that. It could
very well just be me who thinks your writing comes across that way.
Maybe everyone else here thinks you write like a mature, calm,
intelligent person. Could be, you never know.

There is really no need for you to be apologetic. You didn't do
anything wrong.

You properly qualified your statement by saying "some" or something to
that general effect. It's not as if you were doing the
"we/us/everybody" thing, which can be a bit arrogant and annoying.

I agree with your assessment (and can think of at least a few others
that also obviously do), so that easily constitutes "some".

I don't deliberately misspell to [censored] people off, I misspell,plain and
simple So? Is it an unpardonable sin to do it??? I was joking about it.
It's no big deal in my book but I have seen people get in missing
matches over spelling. People become HYSTERICAL over it!!!

Suze said:

Quoting Luna:

Quoted message said:

Laureen said:

[email hidden] wrote:
>Laureen on Luna:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> > I'm not freak with fake burgundy wine hair, nor do I think
> > I look good as Thelma Thick Thigh in cheap pleather pants ROFL!!!

meoooooow!

I've not once seen Luna type any comment that could even be remotely
construed as her being overly prissy or prideful about her appearance.

Did you have a message-id that demonstrates such ?

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> That was totally uncalled for.
>
> After reading a few of your posts. Laureen, I must say you come off as
> lazy, homicidal, catty, and dumb. If that's the image you're trying to
> project -- good job!

Two words: aggressively stupid.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> PS: Another benefit of exercise is relief from some of that "ebulience"
> of yours. Jesus christ, girl, chill out. It's unattractive.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

She started it with "the 14 year old hysterical [censored]" post of hers.
My post was not out of the blue and unwarranted. She took it upon
herself to insult me and speak for others in the group before thinking.
I replied to her low blow. So peddle backwords and read what I replied
to before you judge me ok??

Quoted message said:

I said you give the impression of a hysterical 14 year old, and you do.

You're too kind.

Quoted message said:

The multiple explanation marks, the misspellings, the ubiquitous lol's,
and the random capitalization all lend to that impression. You said you
do it on purpose to [censored] certain people off, and I said that it could
have another unintended effect on other people.

I don't buy for one second that she deliberately misspells to tick
people off.

Quoted message said:

As for speaking for others in the group, I'm sorry about that. It could
very well just be me who thinks your writing comes across that way.
Maybe everyone else here thinks you write like a mature, calm,
intelligent person. Could be, you never know.

There is really no need for you to be apologetic. You didn't do
anything wrong.

You properly qualified your statement by saying "some" or something to
that general effect. It's not as if you were doing the
"we/us/everybody" thing, which can be a bit arrogant and annoying.

I agree with your assessment (and can think of at least a few others
that also obviously do), so that easily constitutes "some".

As a long time lurker I enjoy Luna's posts, Laureen's posts are just
annoying and stupid.

Quoting Laureen:

Quoted message said:

Suze said:

Quoting Luna:

Quoted message said:

"Laureen" <[email hidden]> wrote:
> [email hidden] wrote:
>>Laureen on Luna:

Quoted message said:

> > > I'm not freak with fake burgundy wine hair, nor do I think
> > > I look good as Thelma Thick Thigh in cheap pleather pants ROFL!!!

meoooooow!

I've not once seen Luna type any comment that could even be remotely
construed as her being overly prissy or prideful about her appearance.

Did you have a message-id that demonstrates such ?

Where's that message-id, Laureen?

Either refute or retract.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> > That was totally uncalled for.
> >
> > After reading a few of your posts. Laureen, I must say you come off as
> > lazy, homicidal, catty, and dumb. If that's the image you're trying to
> > project -- good job!

Two words: aggressively stupid.

Quoted message said:

> > PS: Another benefit of exercise is relief from some of that "ebulience"
> > of yours. Jesus christ, girl, chill out. It's unattractive.

Quoted message said:

> She started it with "the 14 year old hysterical [censored]" post of hers.
> My post was not out of the blue and unwarranted. She took it upon
> herself to insult me and speak for others in the group before thinking.
> I replied to her low blow. So peddle backwords and read what I replied
> to before you judge me ok??

Quoted message said:

I said you give the impression of a hysterical 14 year old, and you do.

You're too kind.

Quoted message said:

The multiple explanation marks, the misspellings, the ubiquitous lol's,
and the random capitalization all lend to that impression. You said you
do it on purpose to [censored] certain people off, and I said that it could
have another unintended effect on other people.

I don't buy for one second that she deliberately misspells to tick
people off.

Quoted message said:

As for speaking for others in the group, I'm sorry about that. It could
very well just be me who thinks your writing comes across that way.
Maybe everyone else here thinks you write like a mature, calm,
intelligent person. Could be, you never know.

There is really no need for you to be apologetic. You didn't do
anything wrong.

You properly qualified your statement by saying "some" or something to
that general effect. It's not as if you were doing the
"we/us/everybody" thing, which can be a bit arrogant and annoying.

I agree with your assessment (and can think of at least a few others
that also obviously do), so that easily constitutes "some".

Quoted message said:

I don't deliberately misspell to [censored] people off, I misspell,plain and
simple

Then why have you posted more than once that you deliberately misspell
'to [censored] people off' when that's really not the real reason?

Quoted message said:

So? Is it an unpardonable sin to do it??? I was joking about it.
It's no big deal in my book but I have seen people get in missing
matches over spelling.

It's not just about your misspellings, Laureen.

Quoted message said:

People become HYSTERICAL over it!!!

No one is being hysterical in this particular instance.

(Was the capitalizing of "hysterical" and the three exclamation points
really necessary?)

*** This post originated in alt.support.diet.low-carb -- it's appearance
in any other forum is deceptive and unauthorized. ***

In article <[email hidden]>,
[email hidden] says...

Quoted message said:

As for speaking for others in the group, I'm sorry about that. It could
very well just be me who thinks your writing comes across that way.
Maybe everyone else here thinks you write like a mature, calm,
intelligent person. Could be, you never know.

I think Luna is an intelligent person trying to find her way in life
just like the rest of us. She just expresses herself "out loud" on a
newsgroup as she works through things and wonders how to handle various
situations; she is generally quite articulate as she does so. She tries
on different looks and fashions trying to decide what fits her own
tastes and needs at different points in her life. Haven't we ALL done
that? I know *I* have.

People often think I'm kind of weird because I also have a tendency to
think and wonder out loud about things and to describe things in great
detail (usually way more than they want to HEAR :-) That's just my
personality. Depending upon how I channel those tendencies, it can come
out as entertaining or boring or just plain odd -- it depends on the
current audience and my own mood. Some people "get me" and some don't.
We all have our own style, and I think Luna's style is refreshing,
partly because it reminds me of myself and my own internal conversations
:-)

--
Saffire
205/134/125
Atkins since 6/14/03
Progress photo: http://photos.yahoo.com/saffire333

*** This post originated in alt.support.diet.low-carb -- it's appearance
in any other forum is deceptive and unauthorized. ***

As a long time poster, I enjoy both their posts. They both have
interesting things to say IMO. :-)

--
Cheri

Bonnie O wrote in message
<[email hidden]>...
As a long time lurker I enjoy Luna's posts, Laureen's posts are just
annoying and stupid.

Which dumb [censored]? The work rant? I believe I labeled that as a rant,
which gives fair warning that that's what it was. I don't think it was
dumb [censored], anyway.

I really care about my job. Maybe you don't think I should, maybe
because it's part time and it doesn't pay all that great. I could say I
care because parents trust us with their kids, and make it sound all
noble and [censored], but the truth is I care because it's my job. I always
care about whatever job I have. Even at the movie theater, where
literally each and every other employee there was a slacker, I cared
enough to wipe the countertops, sweep, throw out a popcorn bucket if it
fell on the floor instead of putting it back on the stack, answer the
phone instead of ignoring it, replace the toilet paper, all the little
things that you're supposed to do there. If you're hired to do
something, you should do it. Even though I didn't have any help, at
least no one got in my way like at the summer camp job.

I found out recently that the head of the camp which had no schedule,
used supplies indiscriminately, left them out to get destroyed, and
decided on a whim to take over the room I was in, is actually best
friends with one of the directors, which goes a long way towards
explaining why his behavior was tolerated. I'd say I'm rankled, but
hardly hysterical.

In article <[email hidden]>,

Laureen said:

Why just last week you were talking about the dumb [censored] people say to
you and how much it bothered you. If I liken it to my post you have
been making reference to then you too were hysterical.

Luna said:

Mmk. I'm trying to remember when I complained about what I was eating
or what I was going to eat. I've complained about having to cut the
_amount_ of food in order to lose weight, because being hungry sucks,
but I'm nearly certain I'm not the only one who's done that. And I
don't think I've ever gotten hysterical about any small things. Can you
cite examples please?

--
http://www.mindspring.com/~lunachick

"Sherry" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"Luna" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Why? There are some of us in here who aren't "punctuation police" but
read your posts and get the impression you're a hysterical 14 year old
on too much caffeine.

I get the impression that she's excited and enthusiastic about her subject
🙂.

I've noticed that some people have a naturally ebullient nature and it
comes
through in their posts via punctuation, as it would in their voice through
animated inflection. I'm usually drawn to such enthusiasm rather than
repelled by it 🙂.
--
Sherry
364/311/195
http://lowcarb.owly.net

I agree. Do people need me to send them some Xanax? [censored]. Quit worrying
about dumb [censored] and how people write. Some people here ponder deep thoughts
and it nauseates me. Lauren writes with enthusiasm---big deal. Let's all
lose some sleep over it.

Hello Laureen, everyone. I've been lurking here for quite some
time....*thinking I still cared about Laureen. I'm the old high school
friend you supposedly knew before you dropped out of H.S. Yeah, we
were really good friends. @@ I hardly knew you--saw you at church.
But after I recognized you at the ortho last fall, you *posed yourself
as a friend, and against better judgment, I signed on. Let's see...the
last time I saw you as a "friend" you weighed 380. When we were
dieting together last fall, I lost 33 pounds, you gained 40. I thought
maybe once you lost your weight, something resembling a normal person
would surface--obviously I was mistaken. Your rapid and effortless W/L
has given you nothing but a feeling of superiority to everyone who
struggles with obesity and dieting. You're right about one thing---I
sure was supportive. Your raunchy mouth, selfishness, hatred towards
your daughter and your poor beaten-down husband, indifference, and
complete lack of respect for people is what lost you my friendship. If
you think being "thin" is going to help you win friends and influence
people, think again.

Wow.

Don't hold back, tell us what you really think. LOL

Laureen's posts have made it clear that her current amazing weightloss is
not "effortless." It is, however, apparently, somewhat compulsory.

I find WLS frightening in its risks and disturbing in its re-engineering of
a healthy body. Laureen's weight plunge is so shockingly fast, that it
makes me think of a helicopter with no fuel. The pilot is confidently
saying that the chopper will just auto-rotate down. All I can see is the
ground coming up, up, up. There is also risk along the way down. The
critical parts have been reworked. This is a first test flight, and there
ain't no parchute.

"notafriend" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Hello Laureen, everyone. I've been lurking here for quite some
time....*thinking I still cared about Laureen. I'm the old high school
friend you supposedly knew before you dropped out of H.S. Yeah, we
were really good friends. @@ I hardly knew you--saw you at church.
But after I recognized you at the ortho last fall, you *posed yourself
as a friend, and against better judgment, I signed on. Let's see...the
last time I saw you as a "friend" you weighed 380. When we were
dieting together last fall, I lost 33 pounds, you gained 40. I thought
maybe once you lost your weight, something resembling a normal person
would surface--obviously I was mistaken. Your rapid and effortless W/L
has given you nothing but a feeling of superiority to everyone who
struggles with obesity and dieting. You're right about one thing---I
sure was supportive. Your raunchy mouth, selfishness, hatred towards
your daughter and your poor beaten-down husband, indifference, and
complete lack of respect for people is what lost you my friendship. If
you think being "thin" is going to help you win friends and influence
people, think again.

"Cubit" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

a healthy body. Laureen's weight plunge is so shockingly fast, that it
makes me think of a helicopter with no fuel. The pilot is confidently
saying that the chopper will just auto-rotate down. All I can see is the
ground coming up, up, up. There is also risk along the way down. The
critical parts have been reworked. This is a first test flight, and there
ain't no parchute.

I have been in a helicopter while it was landed by auto-rotation. It really
wasn't scary at all.

--
No Husband Has Ever Been Shot While Doing The Dishes

Cubit <[email hidden]> wrote:
:>I had an outing with several friends Friday. One of them seemed to
:> actually get angry about my lack of exercise. I explained that I
:> have been doing yardwork, walking at flea markets, and some roof
:> repairs, but he insisted that was not regular exercise. He does
:> regular bicycling, yet he has not lost a pound. I'm thinking he is
:> actually angry because of jealousy. Then he started in talking
:> about anorexia and such [censored], as if I were underweight. My BMI is
:> now 23.8. I'm far from anorexic.

Exercise is not required for weight loss. Existing in a calorie deficit is.

Yard- and housework are certainly not regular exercise UNLESS you do them
regularly. Any extra walking counts as exercise.

If your friend uses his cycling as an excuse to eat, then he won't lose a
pound. Is he trying to lose a pound?

He has been trying to lose weight for a long time.

"Roger Zoul" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Cubit <[email hidden]> wrote:
:>I had an outing with several friends Friday. One of them seemed to
:> actually get angry about my lack of exercise. I explained that I
:> have been doing yardwork, walking at flea markets, and some roof
:> repairs, but he insisted that was not regular exercise. He does
:> regular bicycling, yet he has not lost a pound. I'm thinking he is
:> actually angry because of jealousy. Then he started in talking
:> about anorexia and such [censored], as if I were underweight. My BMI is
:> now 23.8. I'm far from anorexic.

Exercise is not required for weight loss. Existing in a calorie deficit

is.

Quoted message said:

Yard- and housework are certainly not regular exercise UNLESS you do them
regularly. Any extra walking counts as exercise.

If your friend uses his cycling as an excuse to eat, then he won't lose a
pound. Is he trying to lose a pound?

You sound rather nasty Rhonda (No, Laureen didn't give me your name.
I websearched to ensure there was a reasonable chance this wasn't just
a drive-by trolling. Enough information - such as your geographic
location - matched to satisfy me.) You know damn well Laureen's been
through hell the past couple of years, and having known her since HS
you also know full well she's a tad bit high strung. I suspect that
things were hunky-dory as long as you were the one losing weight. You
had the upper hand. Now that you know she's losing lots of weight
(the pictures don't lie) every petty complaint you've harbored against
her for who knows how many years bubbled to the surface and spilled
out here.
It's not pretty. In one fell swoop you've put the lie to the
"supportive" act you'd been playing. IMO Laureen would have been far
better off with nobody than with you, reluctantly playing the role of
"friend" while you thought all sorts of nasty judgemental things about
her. That's just vile.

notafriend said:

Hello Laureen, everyone. I've been lurking here for quite some
time....*thinking I still cared about Laureen. I'm the old high
school
friend you supposedly knew before you dropped out of H.S. Yeah, we
were really good friends. @@ I hardly knew you--saw you at church.
But after I recognized you at the ortho last fall, you *posed
yourself
as a friend, and against better judgment, I signed on. Let's
see...the
last time I saw you as a "friend" you weighed 380. When we were
dieting together last fall, I lost 33 pounds, you gained 40. I
thought
maybe once you lost your weight, something resembling a normal
person
would surface--obviously I was mistaken. Your rapid and effortless
W/L
has given you nothing but a feeling of superiority to everyone who
struggles with obesity and dieting. You're right about one
thing---I
sure was supportive. Your raunchy mouth, selfishness, hatred
towards
your daughter and your poor beaten-down husband, indifference, and
complete lack of respect for people is what lost you my friendship.
If
you think being "thin" is going to help you win friends and
influence
people, think again.

--
Lab Law 6: Carbon monoxide doesn't smell like anything. Be careful.

Carmen

Quoting Carmen:

Quoted message said:

I websearched to ensure there was a reasonable chance this wasn't just
a drive-by trolling. Enough information - such as your geographic
location - matched to satisfy me.)

oOooOOOOhhhh. You're. like, scary and stuff.

Where have you been lately, girl?

Hi,

Suze suze_anderson@spamcop/dot/obvious said:

Quoting Carmen:

Quoted message said:

I websearched to ensure there was a reasonable chance this wasn't
just a drive-by trolling. Enough information - such as your
geographic
location - matched to satisfy me.)

oOooOOOOhhhh. You're. like, scary and stuff.

Where have you been lately, girl?

That's me, all McScary and stuff. <G>
I've been hanging in alt.true-crime. Different dynamics. *Very*.
According to the Queen Bee I'm a troll 'cause anyone who disagrees
with her is automagically a troll <G> Interesting though. I pop in
here now and again to see what's going on. I noted She Who Is The
Curse Of ASDLC has been back around. Again. JC is still being a
pain, the vegan/vegetarian/meateating bashing has cropped up again for
the umpteenth time...IOW things are normal. :-)
--
Lab Law 6: Carbon monoxide doesn't smell like anything. Be careful.

Carmen

Quoted message said:

I've been hanging in alt.true-crime.
Different dynamics. *Very*.
According to the Queen Bee I'm a troll

That's so weird! I used to hang out in at-c quite a bit, then came over
here to asdl-c. We did a little switcheroo.

So who's this Queen Bee you speak of?

Hello,

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

I've been hanging in alt.true-crime.
Different dynamics. *Very*.
According to the Queen Bee I'm a troll

That's so weird! I used to hang out in at-c quite a bit, then came
over here to asdl-c. We did a little switcheroo.
So who's this Queen Bee you speak of?

Just Kris. She took it into her head to call me a troll because she
likes Sharon (AKA Sharonpo) and I called Sharon on being a troll based
on her extensive years of trolling, up to and including the present
day. I came across an entire website devoted to her exploits. To
make sure that the accusations on the site were true I checked the
headers on the messages cited in Google. They were, but somehow that
made *me* a troll for pointing out the truth. So be it. I also don't
think she cared for it when I tested a theory of mine that Kris was
summoning Sharon to attack people she had "killfiled" when she was
angry. I set Kris up, inserted proof of the set-up in my headers
(hidden but provable later) and sure enough along came Sharon in less
than a half hour after weeks of absence. Bad Carmen. <G>

--
Lab Law 6: Carbon monoxide doesn't smell like anything. Be careful.

Carmen