Note the clear view of left-turning traffic at the end
Happily cycling along the A41 with a nice tailwind. Is that a cycle facility I see on the opposite side of a dual carriageway?
I would really like to ask the designer exactly what they expected cyclists to do when they got to the end. The blue sigh says 'cycleway ends'. Cross 5 lanes of traffic and go straight ahead from a left-turn only lane perhaps?
and here is a cracker, Haldon forest near exeter. I couldn't understand it at first , but apparently it's a real cycle facility, which can make your journey safer along the A38. When he discovered this state of the art cycle lane he had his 4year old daughter on the back.I hope she was wearing a h...
and here is a cracker, Haldon forest near exeter. I couldn't understand it at first , but apparently it's a real cycle facility, which can make your journey safer along the A38. When he discovered this state of the art cycle lane he had his 4year old daughter on the back.I hope she was wearing a h...
TerryJ
Any idea why he chose to ride the wrong way up the side of a dual carriageway?
"Simon Proven" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
TerryJ said:
and here is a cracker, Haldon forest near exeter. I couldn't understand it at first , but apparently it's a real cycle facility, which can make your journey safer along the A38. When he discovered this state of the art cycle lane he had his 4year old daughter on the back.I hope she was wearing a h...
TerryJ
Any idea why he chose to ride the wrong way up the side of a dual carriageway?
We've got one of those, you got no option but to face the traffic. A cliff on one side and fast traffic on the other. The route is between Conway and Penmaenmawr - it is terrifying! Even our Chief Constable (dare I mention his name? Clue: starts with a B. and is listed on no.10 petitions! ) cycled it with his son once and promised to get something done about it , according to his Blog site - but that was some time ago - and nothing has happened. Fred
Any idea why he chose to ride the wrong way up the side of a dual carriageway?
I got the impression that if you take the cycleway signs out of Haldon forest literally you are instructed to do exactly that. Having said that it is fairly obvious it was never intended to be a contra-flow lane. Anyone know if there is a parallel path on the opposite carriageway?
and here is a cracker, Haldon forest near exeter. I couldn't understand it at first , but apparently it's a real cycle facility, which can make your journey safer along the A38. When he discovered this state of the art cycle lane he had his 4year old daughter on the back.I hope she was wearing a h...
"fred2" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
We've got one of those, you got no option but to face the traffic. A cliff on one side and fast traffic on the other. The route is between Conway and Penmaenmawr - it is terrifying! Even our Chief Constable (dare I mention his name? Clue: starts with a B. and is listed on no.10 petitions! ) cycled it with his son once and promised to get something done about it , according to his Blog site - but that was some time ago - and nothing has happened.
Do you mean the bit between Conwy and the tunnels where there's no crash barrier between you and the road? I've never had a problem with that bit and there is a wide shoulder between the cycle path and the inside lane. Due to the narrowness, the problem comes when you meet a cyclist coming the other way or worse, a couple of pedestrians. I find the bits with the barrier much better and reassuring but you have to get out of your mind how much those things are designed to deflect when a car hits them. Interestingly, this part always used to have signs saying "Pedestrians and dismounted cyclists" which implied you were supposed to walk your bike for half a mile along a national cycle route! -- peter
I found a good one today: There was a signed cycle route which avoided a semi busy expressway junction by going under the dual carriageway a bit further up. The underpass is actually several box culverts bridging old, water filled gravel pits and the one that the cycle lane goes through seems to be the emergency overflow as it was under water and the pedestrian side was covered in a layer of silt from the water.
"TerryJ" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
it was under water and the pedestrian side was covered in a layer of silt from the water.
Can you say where so we can lok at a map?
SK450294 ish. I don't know of any mapping sites using OS maps that let you direct link to that grid reference but www.getamap.co.uk will let you type it in.
The OS Explorer maps show it as cycle route 15 although it didn't say this on the signs. It's a bit of a cut through from Shardlow to Castle Donnington - not much shorter but cuts out a bit of an uphill! -- peter
SK450294 ish. Â I don't know of any mapping sites using OS maps that let you direct link to that grid reference but www.getamap.co.uk will let you type it in.
Any idea why he chose to ride the wrong way up the side of a dual carriageway?
Exactly my thoughts. At time interval 1:06 you can see he is going onto a path against the giveway sign. Also the path is not wide enough to be a two way cycle lane. Maybe the issue here is the signs were wrong, but no council could have possibly intended a cyclist to take that route, could they?
way cycle lane. Maybe the issue here is the signs were wrong, but no council could have possibly intended a cyclist to take that route, could they?
But cycling with the traffic flow would be more dangerous, not less, since against the flow you at least have some warning of what's coming at you.
No, that's a fallacy. Cycling on a cycle lane in the direction contrary to motorised traffic in an adjacent lane is about 300% more dangerous than cycling in same direction. Rear-ending or a bike by a motor vehicle is, despite Brendan's horrible experience early this week, thankfully rare.
But cycling with the traffic flow would be more dangerous, not less,
Quoted message said:
No, that's a fallacy. Cycling on a cycle lane in the direction contrary to motorised traffic in an adjacent lane is about 300% more dangerous than cycling in same direction. Rear-ending or a bike by a motor vehicle is, despite Brendan's horrible experience early this week, thankfully rare.
I do not know what is being compared there, but in this case the rider has to dodge out into the road on a few occasions, and much of the time the path is far too narrow. I would not fancy going either way, but any statistics there might be are probably affected by the question of who , in what mental condition, would cycle along that road as it is at all . I am not so sure that getting rear ended on that sort of dual carriageway is actually rare among the few cyclists who might use it.I remember one good cyclist Needham got it on the A50 in recent years then there was the racer in Yorkshire who the magistrate said was 'not there to be seen'( well, they didn't see him) and Zak Carr. Anyway, I have seen enough of that cyclepath whichever direction.
I saw this wonderful creation this morning and just had to take a photo of it. http://www.spod.org/~allyg/farcility-0001.jpg They've just spent quite a bit of time (and presumably therefore, money) remodelling that junction and I'm at a loss to explain quite what they where trying to achieve? -- These opinions might not even be mine ... Let alone connected with my employer ...
"Alistair Gunn" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
I saw this wonderful creation this morning and just had to take a photo of it. http://www.spod.org/~allyg/farcility-0001.jpg They've just spent quite a bit of time (and presumably therefore, money) remodelling that junction and I'm at a loss to explain quite what they where trying to achieve?
They were trying to spend some money, and succeeded. Presumably they need to spend their budget to justify it etc.