Road Cycling · Public discussion

moratorium on the beer defense

Started by Scott · · Last activity · 6 posts · 272 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
27 July 2006
Last activity
28 July 2006
Original author
Scott
Posts
6
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
272
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–6 of 6
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. No more posting articles or links to articles on the effects of ethanol
    on testosterone/epitestosterone levels, thinking you're being either
    cute or smart.

    I was first. All else followed. It's played. Wasn't very funny or
    convincing the first time, it get's less so each time after. We've
    seen it. Let's move on.

  2. Scott schreef:

    Quoted message said:

    I was first.

    No you weren't. See my post in the "What was he on" thread.

    --
    E. Dronkert

  3. Ewoud Dronkert said:

    Scott schreef:

    Quoted message said:

    I was first.

    No you weren't. See my post in the "What was he on" thread.

    --
    E. Dronkert

    My apologies. YOU were first. But, if for any reason you can't
    fulfill your responsibilities as winner, as first runner up I'll assume
    the crown on your behalf.

    Scott

  4. Scott schreef:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I was first.

    Ewoud Dronkert said:
    Quoted message said:

    No you weren't. See my post in the "What was he on" thread.

    Scott said:

    My apologies. YOU were first. But, if for any reason you can't
    fulfill your responsibilities as winner, as first runner up I'll assume
    the crown on your behalf.

    So what kind of dope do you think ewoud is doing ?

  5. in message <[email hidden]>, Ewoud Dronkert

    (') said:

    Scott schreef:

    Quoted message said:

    I was first.

    No you weren't. See my post in the "What was he on" thread.

    Yes, but you were doping, so Scott gets virtual first.

    --
    [email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/

    ;; IE 3 is dead, but Netscape 4 still shambles about the earth,
    ;; wreaking a horrific vengeance upon the living
    ;; anonymous

  6. Scott said:

    No more posting articles or links to articles on the effects of ethanol
    on testosterone/epitestosterone levels, thinking you're being either
    cute or smart.

    I was first. All else followed. It's played. Wasn't very funny or
    convincing the first time, it get's less so each time after. We've
    seen it. Let's move on.

    Why is it not convincing? They test the ratio to
    see if someone who has a _high_ test level used
    exogenous testosterone to achieve that level.

    Either Floyd normally has a near-zero test level
    and used "support" to get to just lower than
    normal or his alcohol intake and massive effort on
    stage 17 threw up a red flag with his T:E ratio.

    --
    Scott Johnson / johnson dot sa at comcast dot net

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.