pb wrote
Quoted message said:No one minds paying to park in a purpose built car park complete with a minder in a hut, I very
much object to paying through the nose just
because
Quoted message said:your council has painted yellow lines all over and stuck up a parking
meter
Quoted message said:on a patch of waste ground.
The land probably cost money, as did the construction of the car park. Who pays ?
Quoted message said:I also wonder why you think everyone else should subsidise your council tax? Your council's
expenses are no different to elsewhere.
I was trying to broaden the discussion but since you put it that way, the Peak Park is the second
most visited park in the world behind Yosemite and it inevitably suffers from a bit of wear and
tear. Some money to make good the wear and tear does come through the National parks scheme but some
of it inevitably comes out of my pocket. You could argue that that is an occupational hazard and
that I choose to live where I do. My argument is that asking people to make a small contribution, in
recognition of the enjoyment that they derive from having the area protected for everyone's benefit,
is reasonable. If the easiest way to implement that levy is by applying a small parking charge then,
to me, that is also reasonable. When faced with parking charges in other UK beauty spots I willingly
pay what I'm asked.
As I said, its a small amount and I don't see the problem and I was trying to understand it. One
person's reasonable charge is clearly another's paying through the nose. Everything's subjective,
I suppose.
Chris
--
Cressbrook on the web
cressbrook.netcressbrook.netOpen ↗