Luckily the kid is still alive, though in critical condition.
Odds are that a SUV, pickup or full-size van would have killed him.
The report doesn't say if it was a head-on or overtaking type collision on the "fairly quiet, but narrow." street.
It does question the speed factor but not whether she was asleep or distracted when it happened.
Yep. Because of the apparent relative speed, I'm guessing it was either a crossing or head-on situation, but the investigation is still in progress; I'm sure it will be on the local news when they come up with any results.
-- Remove the ns_ from if replying by e-mail (but keep posts in the newsgroups if possible).
I don't think the damage shown indicates that the speed of the collision was necessarily that great. The grill work on quite a few vehicles these days is plastic and the hoods crumple easily. Without examining the vehicle and the size of the victom, I could see that one happening at 25 mph. Of course, that one then wonders, what is a driver doing plowing full tilt into a child on a residential street?
In article <[email hidden]>, [email hidden] says...
Quoted message said:
I don't think the damage shown indicates that the speed of the collision was necessarily that great. The grill work on quite a few vehicles these days is plastic and the hoods crumple easily. Without examining the vehicle and the size of the victom, I could see that one happening at 25 mph. Of course, that one then wonders, what is a driver doing plowing full tilt into a child on a residential street?
That's an older Chrylser minivan, and the hood is not that soft on those. I could see it being at 25 or 30 if the kid was doing 10 or so toward the van, causing a head-on collision. I don't think you'd get that much damage in an overtaking situation with a lower relative speed. But your question is still a good one, which I'm sure the police are trying to determine. I'm sure they also have better ways of determining the relative speed of the collision than you and I do just looking at a picture.
-- Remove the ns_ from if replying by e-mail (but keep posts in the newsgroups if possible).
"Pbwalther" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
I don't think the damage shown indicates that the speed of the collision
was
Quoted message said:
necessarily that great. The grill work on quite a few vehicles these days
is
Quoted message said:
plastic and the hoods crumple easily. Without examining the vehicle and
the
Quoted message said:
size of the victom, I could see that one happening at 25 mph.
I could see that too ... anyone who's seen the damage resulting from vehicles hitting animals knows that flesh is surprisingly tough material as well.
Quoted message said:
Of course, that one then wonders, what is a driver doing plowing full tilt into a child on
a
Quoted message said:
residential street?
Sometimes kids just come out of nowhere. I know because I was that kid once, and came pretty darn close to getting hit a couple of times. Yes I did have good parents, but I still got away from them every once in a while.