Road Cycling · Public discussion

Minivan hits 13 year old

Started by David Kerber · · Last activity · 7 posts · 510 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
31 March 2004
Last activity
3 April 2004
Original author
David Kerber
Posts
7
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
510
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–7 of 7
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Check out the dent in the front of this minivan from hitting
    a kid on a bike. She (the driver) must have been MOVING...

    tinyurl.com3bbcs

    Luckily the kid is still alive, though in critical
    condition.

    --
    Remove the ns_ from if replying by e-mail (but keep posts in
    the newsgroups if possible).

  2. Wed, 31 Mar 2004 12:33:17 -0500,
    <[email hidden]>, David Kerber

    ns_dkerber@ns_ids.net said:

    Check out the dent in the front of this minivan from
    hitting a kid on a bike. She (the driver) must have been
    MOVING...

    tinyurl.com3bbcs

    Luckily the kid is still alive, though in critical
    condition.

    Odds are that a SUV, pickup or full-size van would have
    killed him.

    The report doesn't say if it was a head-on or overtaking
    type collision on the "fairly quiet, but narrow." street.

    It does question the speed factor but not whether she was
    asleep or distracted when it happened.
    --
    zk

  3. In article <[email hidden]>,
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    Wed, 31 Mar 2004 12:33:17 -0500,
    <[email hidden]>, David Kerber

    ns_dkerber@ns_ids.net said:

    Check out the dent in the front of this minivan from
    hitting a kid on a bike. She (the driver) must have been
    MOVING...

    tinyurl.com3bbcs

    Luckily the kid is still alive, though in critical
    condition.

    Odds are that a SUV, pickup or full-size van would have
    killed him.

    The report doesn't say if it was a head-on or overtaking
    type collision on the "fairly quiet, but narrow." street.

    It does question the speed factor but not whether she was
    asleep or distracted when it happened.

    Yep. Because of the apparent relative speed, I'm guessing it
    was either a crossing or head-on situation, but the
    investigation is still in progress; I'm sure it will be on
    the local news when they come up with any results.

    --
    Remove the ns_ from if replying by e-mail (but keep posts in
    the newsgroups if possible).

  4. I don't think the damage shown indicates that the speed of
    the collision was necessarily that great. The grill work on
    quite a few vehicles these days is plastic and the hoods
    crumple easily. Without examining the vehicle and the size
    of the victom, I could see that one happening at 25 mph. Of
    course, that one then wonders, what is a driver doing
    plowing full tilt into a child on a residential street?

  5. In article <[email hidden]>,
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    I don't think the damage shown indicates that the speed
    of the collision was necessarily that great. The grill
    work on quite a few vehicles these days is plastic and
    the hoods crumple easily. Without examining the vehicle
    and the size of the victom, I could see that one
    happening at 25 mph. Of course, that one then wonders,
    what is a driver doing plowing full tilt into a child on
    a residential street?

    That's an older Chrylser minivan, and the hood is not that
    soft on those. I could see it being at 25 or 30 if the kid
    was doing 10 or so toward the van, causing a head-on
    collision. I don't think you'd get that much damage in an
    overtaking situation with a lower relative speed. But your
    question is still a good one, which I'm sure the police are
    trying to determine. I'm sure they also have better ways of
    determining the relative speed of the collision than you and
    I do just looking at a picture.

    --
    Remove the ns_ from if replying by e-mail (but keep posts in
    the newsgroups if possible).

  6. It's not been a good week in the streets; four more kids were hit by two
    cars in Tampa on Wednesday night:

    multimedia.tbo.comMGA0C3TTJSD.html

  7. "Pbwalther" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I don't think the damage shown indicates that the speed of
    the collision


    was

    Quoted message said:

    necessarily that great. The grill work on quite a few
    vehicles these days


    is

    Quoted message said:

    plastic and the hoods crumple easily. Without examining
    the vehicle and


    the

    Quoted message said:

    size of the victom, I could see that one happening
    at 25 mph.

    I could see that too ... anyone who's seen the damage
    resulting from vehicles hitting animals knows that flesh is
    surprisingly tough material as well.

    Quoted message said:

    Of course, that one then wonders, what is a driver doing
    plowing full tilt into a child on


    a

    Quoted message said:

    residential street?

    Sometimes kids just come out of nowhere. I know because I
    was that kid once, and came pretty darn close to getting hit
    a couple of times. Yes I did have good parents, but I still
    got away from them every once in a while.

    C.Q.C.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.