Road Cycling · Public discussion

Michelin Dynamic - review

Started by Garth Vader · · Last activity · 11 posts · 4,507 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
11 August 2004
Last activity
13 August 2004
Original author
Garth Vader
Posts
11
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
4,507
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–11 of 11
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Well, the Dyanmic tires came in today. First, a bit about what I've used
    before.

    I bought the Miyata Civicross Hybrid around 1998. It came with 700x35 Cheng
    Shin tires. These were pretty good tires. When the rear one blew, I
    replaced it with a Vee Rubber 700x38 tire. It seemed very 'squishy'. Ever
    time I pushed down on a pedal, the bike would slide sightly to the opposite
    side.

    After a 2 year hiatus from biking, I replaced both tires (now weathered and
    cracked). I used Kenda K-180 in 700x35. They have a directional tread. I
    found riding difficult on these tires. The ride was rough, and it seemed
    like I had been away from biking far too long. I was about ready to hang up
    the bike when I thought I'd try the Michelin Dynamic.

    The Dynamic has almost no tread, with only a slight pattern in it. I'm not
    sure why it's there, perhaps for decoration or to be used as a tire wear
    pattern? The Dynamic's largest size is 700x32. They fit easily on my rim.
    The Kenda were nearly impossible to remove, with the rigid steel bead. The
    Dynamic also has a rigid bead, but the tires were easy to install by hand.
    They fit fine on my rim, although I did have some trouble getting my hand
    pump to get them pumped up enough. The inflation on these tires is much
    more than on the Kenda. I don't have them in front of me, so I don't know
    the exact specs.

    After recalculating my spedometer for 700x32 tires, I took the bike for a
    spin. I thought that narrower tires with higher pressure would give a
    rougher ride. This isn't the case at all. While I still feel the bumps, it
    feels like I have shock absorbers compared to the Kendas. The ride is much
    smoother, and even in gravel & sand, the bike is easier to pedal. My
    coasting speed seems to have improved, and uphill climbs are not nearly as
    hard. My average uphill speed has increased about 1 km/hr I think.

    There is a very looong, steep hill near me, and I have been able to get the
    bike up to 40 km/hr with the Kendas (coming downhill, of course!). With the
    Dynamic, I reached 59.1 km/hr. I can't believe the difference. I guess
    with the narrower tire and lack of tread, there is less rolling resistance.

    I'm going to try it out on a longer run tomorrow, but in the short time I
    tested it, I can't believe the improvement. It seems more like the bike did
    when I first bought it.

  2. I forgot to mention one item. The tires seem to be much noisier than the
    Kenda's were. It's not really a problem,
    but you can definitely hear them. I'd rather have the noise than the
    friction, thought!

  3. Darth Vader said:

    Well, the Dynamic tires came in today. First, a bit about what I've
    used before.

    Quoted message said:

    The Dynamic has almost no tread, with only a slight pattern in it.
    I'm not sure why it's there, perhaps for decoration or to be used as
    a tire wear pattern? The Dynamic's largest size is 700x32. They
    fit easily on my rim. The Kenda were nearly impossible to remove,
    with the rigid steel bead. The Dynamic also has a rigid bead, but
    the tires were easy to install by hand. They fit fine on my rim,
    although I did have some trouble getting my hand pump to get them
    pumped up enough. The inflation on these tires is much more than on
    the Kenda. I don't have them in front of me, so I don't know the
    exact specs.

    http://cycleus.webmichelin.com/tires/dynamic.htm

    There are still many bicyclists who are afraid of smooth tread, so I
    believe this tread pattern is to give the best performance while
    soothing riders who feel unsafe without some grooves in the tread,
    regardless how small or useless. This is unfortunate because this
    looks like an otherwise excellent tire.

    Quoted message said:

    After recalculating my speedometer for 700x32 tires, I took the bike
    for a spin. I thought that narrower tires with higher pressure
    would give a rougher ride. This isn't the case at all. While I
    still feel the bumps, it feels like I have shock absorbers compared
    to the Kendas. The ride is much smoother, and even in gravel &
    sand, the bike is easier to pedal. My coasting speed seems to have
    improved, and uphill climbs are not nearly as hard. My average
    uphill speed has increased about 1 km/hr I think.

    To asses how well a tire absorbs road roughness requires a better test
    than going for a ride. As has been shown, a freshly washed car runs
    better and feels smoother according to many tests that have been made
    over many years. The same goes for new tires, especially if there are
    any expectations of better performance.

    Jobst Brandt
    [email hidden]

  4. On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 16:07:58 -0500, Garth Vader wrote:

    and.

    Quoted message said:

    I thought that narrower tires with higher pressure would give a
    rougher ride. This isn't the case at all.

    Often higher quality tires have more supple casings and thus are more
    comfortable.

    BTW, as you mentioned about ease of mounting, I've found the same to be
    true--never needed a tool to install my wider Michelins.

    Glad to hear they worked out for you.

    😄

  5. "Garth Vader" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]

    [...]

    Quoted message said:

    The Dynamic has almost no tread, with only a slight pattern in it.
    I'm not sure why it's there, perhaps for decoration or to be used as
    a tire wear pattern?

    Marketing.

    Quoted message said:

    The Dynamic's largest size is 700x32. They fit
    easily on my rim. The Kenda were nearly impossible to remove, with
    the rigid steel bead. The Dynamic also has a rigid bead, but the
    tires were easy to install by hand. They fit fine on my rim, although
    I did have some trouble getting my hand pump to get them pumped up
    enough. The inflation on these tires is much more than on the Kenda.
    I don't have them in front of me, so I don't know the exact specs.

    What is the recommended pressure? It's not on Michelin's web site.

    [...]

    Quoted message said:

    There is a very looong, steep hill near me, and I have been able to
    get the bike up to 40 km/hr with the Kendas (coming downhill, of
    course!). With the Dynamic, I reached 59.1 km/hr. I can't believe
    the difference. I guess with the narrower tire and lack of tread,
    there is less rolling resistance.

    I doubt a simple change of tyre can explain such a radical speed difference.
    Are you absolutely sure about those numbers?

    --

    A: Top-posters.
    Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?

  6. Quoted message said:

    Often higher quality tires have more supple casings and thus are more
    comfortable.

    Yes, I suppose that's it. The sidewalls on the Dynamic (when not on the
    rim) seemed very thin. They almost gave you the impression that they
    wouldn't be strong enough to hold air.

    Quoted message said:

    BTW, as you mentioned about ease of mounting, I've found the same to be
    true--never needed a tool to install my wider Michelins.

    BTW, the tubes I have in right now are 700-35 to 700-40. The seem to work
    ok, but with the tires being 700-32, am I risking anything? Will the tubes
    wrinkle and blow out, or will the larger tube exert too much pressure on the
    tire? I didn't have a 700-32 tube, but I wanted to try out the tires, so I
    just tried the larger tube.

  7. Quoted message said:

    What is the recommended pressure? It's not on Michelin's web site.

    I just checked the tires. The Dynamic is 58-87 psi, and the Kenda is 50-75.
    Not as much
    difference in pressure as I thought! How do you tell the pressure with a
    Presta valve? I haven't
    seen a presta-valve gauge, any my hand pump doesn't have a pressure gauge.
    I was thinking of
    getting a 99-cent Presta to Schraeder adapter and then using my car's tire
    pressure gauge. I'm
    sure they do make a presta-gauge, though.

    Quoted message said:

    I doubt a simple change of tyre can explain such a radical speed


    difference.

    Quoted message said:

    Are you absolutely sure about those numbers?

    Positive! I'll try the hill out again and see how the numbers look. But,
    that's what happened!

  8. Garth Vader said:

    BTW, the tubes I have in right now are 700-35 to 700-40. The seem to work
    ok, but with the tires being 700-32, am I risking anything?

    Officially you should replace with proper sized tubes...

    but in my world I'd see if the tube when outside the tire and barely
    inflated is actually larger in diameter than the tire. If not, don't worry
    about it. The larger tube, if it fits, won't stretch as much during
    inflation and will remain thicker, thwarting flats.

    😄

  9. Mr Pook said:

    Don't know if Schwalbe are available back in the States

    Yes they are, and you can order tires in the obscure sizes that your bike
    shop won't carry directly from the Schwalbe American website.

    They make tires for old roadsters and 590mm rubber as well--gets my thumbs
    up.

    😄

  10. Mr Pook said:

    [email hidden] wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:
    Darth Vader said:

    Well, the Dynamic tires came in today. First, a bit about what I've
    used before.

    Quoted message said:

    The Dynamic has almost no tread, with only a slight pattern in it.
    I'm not sure why it's there, perhaps for decoration or to be used as
    a tire wear pattern? The Dynamic's largest size is 700x32. They
    fit easily on my rim. The Kenda were nearly impossible to remove,
    with the rigid steel bead. The Dynamic also has a rigid bead, but
    the tires were easy to install by hand. They fit fine on my rim,
    although I did have some trouble getting my hand pump to get them
    pumped up enough. The inflation on these tires is much more than on
    the Kenda. I don't have them in front of me, so I don't know the
    exact specs.

    http://cycleus.webmichelin.com/tires/dynamic.htm

    There are still many bicyclists who are afraid of smooth tread, so I
    believe this tread pattern is to give the best performance while
    soothing riders who feel unsafe without some grooves in the tread,
    regardless how small or useless. This is unfortunate because this
    looks like an otherwise excellent tire.

    Quoted message said:

    After recalculating my speedometer for 700x32 tires, I took the bike
    for a spin. I thought that narrower tires with higher pressure
    would give a rougher ride. This isn't the case at all. While I
    still feel the bumps, it feels like I have shock absorbers compared
    to the Kendas. The ride is much smoother, and even in gravel &
    sand, the bike is easier to pedal. My coasting speed seems to have
    improved, and uphill climbs are not nearly as hard. My average
    uphill speed has increased about 1 km/hr I think.

    To asses how well a tire absorbs road roughness requires a better test
    than going for a ride. As has been shown, a freshly washed car runs
    better and feels smoother according to many tests that have been made
    over many years. The same goes for new tires, especially if there are
    any expectations of better performance.

    Jobst Brandt

    Cycled London-Milan a couple of weeks ago with a friend from uni.
    Before we even got to Brussels I'd written off one tyre, and by
    Strasbourg the other was done for. Had to cycle 60 miles with neglible
    pressure due to the torn casing. The tyres in question were the only
    25mm black, steel-bead tyre from a 'reputable' brand available near
    where I live (S.E. London):
    Bontrager Select
    http://www.bontrager.com/roadtires/detail.asp?id=63&pt=9
    I'm pretty sure these were made by Kenda (the word 'Nylon' appears
    identically to another old (10 years!) Kenda mountain bike tyre I've
    lying around. The cuts revealed the casing to be made with a v.low
    TPI.

    Why do manufacturer's even bother quoting TPI as they all seem to
    measure it in a different way (cf. Michelin and Conti)?

    Despite Continental's bad rep, I rode a set of their cheapest road
    tyre, the Sport 1000 (
    http://www.conti-online.com/generator/www/de/en/continental/bicycle/general/news/reflective_en.html
    ) -- I think now discontinued -- over 2500 miles of Colorado's
    mountain unmade roads without incident.

    In Freiburg I was taken aback when my request for a 25mm black/wire
    tyre was greeted with a jah, and bought these:
    http://www.schwalbe.com/index.pl?bereich=produkte&einsatzbereich=2&produktgruppe=2&produkt=89

    Black smooth (except a small zig-zag on the shoulder) tread, high TPI
    casing, skinwall, wire bead and only 16 euros! They've a kevlar belt
    under the tread apparantly, but that doesn't bother me - I doubt one
    could feel the difference in RR.

    If you're not bothered about the wire bead business (which unless you
    live in serious mountains I doubt you are), it would appear Michelin
    offer an excellent choice:
    http://cycleus.webmichelin.com/tires/carbon.htm

    Don't know if Schwalbe are available back in the States, but certainly
    a Schwalbe dealer in the UK should be able to order some for those
    who're interested.

    Thomas Hood

    In fact the Scwalbe technical pages are full of surprisingly good
    information re. RR vs. width, rubber compounds etc. Not a lot to argue
    with -- they even half-conceed that treaded road tyres are a waste of time:
    http://www.schwalbe.com/index.pl?punkt=260

    Thomas Hood

  11. Garth Vader said:

    How do you tell the pressure with a
    Presta valve? I haven't
    seen a presta-valve gauge, any my hand pump doesn't have a pressure gauge.

    They do make them. Ask at a bike shop. Zefal and Topeak make ones that
    measure both. Schaeder and Presta. There is another type out there,
    made of brass, etc., that is specific to one type or the other.

    http://www.performancebike.com/shop/sub_cat.cfm?subcategory_id=5412

    Quoted message said:

    I was thinking of
    getting a 99-cent Presta to Schraeder adapter and then using my car's tire
    pressure gauge.

    Might not work- the adapter could be too tall to allow the pressure
    gauge's pin to depress the valve's pin. Won't hurt to try, and it's
    always good to have the adapters. Say what you will, I'm willing to
    walk a block to use a gas station's air hose instead of using any hand
    pump I have along on a ride.

    Quoted message said:

    I'm sure they do make a presta-gauge, though.


    Yep, they do.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.