Road Cycling · Public discussion

Michaelsen bike change?

Started by Bret · · Last activity · 26 posts · 1,113 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
16 April 2007
Last activity
19 April 2007
Original author
Bret
Posts
26
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,113
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 26
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Anyone know what was up with the Michaelsen bike change late in P-R?
    It wasn't clear if he had a mechanical or just wanted a faster bike
    (deep section carbon wheels) for the finale. Anyway, he slipped and
    fell on his butt trying to do a cross-like bike exchange, then he
    promptly crashed the new bike in the first pave corner. If that was a
    strategic move, it backfired big time, especially considering the
    circumstances.

    Bret

  2. "Bret" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Anyone know what was up with the Michaelsen bike change late in P-R?
    It wasn't clear if he had a mechanical or just wanted a faster bike
    (deep section carbon wheels) for the finale. Anyway, he slipped and
    fell on his butt trying to do a cross-like bike exchange, then he
    promptly crashed the new bike in the first pave corner. If that was a
    strategic move, it backfired big time, especially considering the
    circumstances.

    The pave' was covered in sand. I'm quite sure that anyone traveling as fast
    as he was going there would have crashed as hard.

  3. Tom Kunich' cyclintom@yahoo. com said:

    "Bret" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Anyone know what was up with the Michaelsen bike change late in P-R?
    It wasn't clear if he had a mechanical or just wanted a faster bike
    (deep section carbon wheels) for the finale. Anyway, he slipped and
    fell on his butt trying to do a cross-like bike exchange, then he
    promptly crashed the new bike in the first pave corner. If that was a
    strategic move, it backfired big time, especially considering the
    circumstances.

    The pave' was covered in sand. I'm quite sure that anyone traveling as fast
    as he was going there would have crashed as hard.

    If he was taking that corner faster than the others it was only
    because he was trying to chase back on. My question, which you didn't
    address, was whether that situation was a tactical blunder or the
    necessary result of a mechancal problem.

    Bret

  4. Were all the other rider who preceded him traveling as fast? Did they crash
    as hard?

    "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "Bret" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Anyone know what was up with the Michaelsen bike change late in P-R?
    It wasn't clear if he had a mechanical or just wanted a faster bike
    (deep section carbon wheels) for the finale. Anyway, he slipped and
    fell on his butt trying to do a cross-like bike exchange, then he
    promptly crashed the new bike in the first pave corner. If that was a
    strategic move, it backfired big time, especially considering the
    circumstances.

    The pave' was covered in sand. I'm quite sure that anyone traveling as
    fast as he was going there would have crashed as hard.

  5. Bret said:

    Anyone know what was up with the Michaelsen bike change late in P-R?
    It wasn't clear if he had a mechanical or just wanted a faster bike
    (deep section carbon wheels) for the finale.

    He had a flat tire.

    Quoted message said:

    Anyway, he slipped and
    fell on his butt trying to do a cross-like bike exchange, then he
    promptly crashed the new bike in the first pave corner. If that was a
    strategic move, it backfired big time, especially considering the
    circumstances.

    It wasn't. The bike wasn't his own. After the crash on the borrowed
    bike he had to wait for a new bike. While dooing that he was caught by
    Boonen.

    Too bad for him he would have finnished 2nd in his last race ever. As he
    said: "I had diamonds in my legs". He was clearly the strongest man
    in the race, and would easyly have beaten Fletcha and Wesseman in
    the sprint or left them if the tactics would have allowed him.
    He rode his best P-R ever. I really feel sorry for him.

    --
    Morten Reippuert Knudsen :-) <http://blog.reippuert.dk>

    Merlin Works CR-3/2.5 & Campagnolo Chorus 2007.

  6. On Apr 16, 12:11 am, Morten Reippuert Knudsen<[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    Bret said:

    Anyone know what was up with the Michaelsen bike change late in P-R?
    It wasn't clear if he had a mechanical or just wanted a faster bike
    (deep section carbon wheels) for the finale.

    He had a flat tire.

    Quoted message said:

    Anyway, he slipped and
    fell on his butt trying to do a cross-like bike exchange, then he
    promptly crashed the new bike in the first pave corner. If that was a
    strategic move, it backfired big time, especially considering the
    circumstances.

    It wasn't. The bike wasn't his own. After the crash on the borrowed
    bike he had to wait for a new bike. While dooing that he was caught by
    Boonen.

    Too bad for him he would have finnished 2nd in his last race ever. As he
    said: "I had diamonds in my legs". He was clearly the strongest man
    in the race, and would easyly have beaten Fletcha and Wesseman in
    the sprint or left them if the tactics would have allowed him.
    He rode his best P-R ever. I really feel sorry for him.

    --
    Morten Reippuert Knudsen :-) <http://blog.reippuert.dk>

    Merlin Works CR-3/2.5 & Campagnolo Chorus 2007.

    Thanks for clearing that up. I felt bad for him too. It reminded me
    some of Rasmussen's famous TT implosion.

    Bret

  7. Morten Reippuert Knudsen said:
    Bret said:

    Anyone know what was up with the Michaelsen bike change late in P-R?
    It wasn't clear if he had a mechanical or just wanted a faster bike
    (deep section carbon wheels) for the finale.

    He had a flat tire.

    Quoted message said:

    Anyway, he slipped and
    fell on his butt trying to do a cross-like bike exchange, then he
    promptly crashed the new bike in the first pave corner. If that was a
    strategic move, it backfired big time, especially considering the
    circumstances.

    It wasn't. The bike wasn't his own. After the crash on the borrowed
    bike he had to wait for a new bike. While dooing that he was caught by
    Boonen.

    Too bad for him he would have finnished 2nd in his last race ever. As he
    said: "I had diamonds in my legs". He was clearly the strongest man
    in the race, and would easyly have beaten Fletcha and Wesseman in
    the sprint or left them if the tactics would have allowed him.
    He rode his best P-R ever. I really feel sorry for him.

    --
    Morten Reippuert Knudsen :-) <http://blog.reippuert.dk>

    Merlin Works CR-3/2.5 & Campagnolo Chorus 2007.

    And his last day as a pro too. I nearly fell out of my chair when he
    crashed.

    Joseph

  8. On Apr 16, 12:57 am, "Richard Cheese" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    Were all the other rider who preceded him traveling as fast? Did they crash
    as hard?

    "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote in messagenews:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "Bret" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Anyone know what was up with the Michaelsen bike change late in P-R?
    It wasn't clear if he had a mechanical or just wanted a faster bike
    (deep section carbon wheels) for the finale. Anyway, he slipped and
    fell on his butt trying to do a cross-like bike exchange, then he
    promptly crashed the new bike in the first pave corner. If that was a
    strategic move, it backfired big time, especially considering the
    circumstances.

    Quoted message said:

    The pave' was covered in sand. I'm quite sure that anyone traveling as
    fast as he was going there would have crashed as hard.- Hide quoted text -

    Was it just me watching the actual racing? NO - the compressed TV
    coverage on Versus STILL managed to get O'Grady going around that same
    corner with comments from our intrepid announcers about how he had to
    be extra careful because of all of the sand covering the pave there.

    But you may demonstrate that you didn't actually watch the racing all
    you want.

  9. Bret said:
    Tom Kunich' cyclintom@yahoo. com said:

    "Bret" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

    Quoted message said:

    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Anyone know what was up with the Michaelsen bike change late in P-R?
    It wasn't clear if he had a mechanical or just wanted a faster bike
    (deep section carbon wheels) for the finale. Anyway, he slipped and
    fell on his butt trying to do a cross-like bike exchange, then he
    promptly crashed the new bike in the first pave corner. If that was a
    strategic move, it backfired big time, especially considering the
    circumstances.

    Quoted message said:

    The pave' was covered in sand. I'm quite sure that anyone traveling as fast
    as he was going there would have crashed as hard.

    If he was taking that corner faster than the others it was only
    because he was trying to chase back on.

    Certainly. What the hell else would it have been? He's an expert rider
    hyped to the gills with being near the front and simply made a
    judgement error.

    Quoted message said:

    My question, which you didn't
    address, was whether that situation was a tactical blunder or the
    necessary result of a mechancal problem.

    How the hell would any of us know what the strategy behind that was?
    But as a guess - if he had mechanical problems I would have assumed
    that he would have been a great deal further back than he was. That
    would imply that this was a tactical change designed to give him a
    faster bike in the last 20 km of the race. However, it is possible
    that their testing led them to discover that frames may not take that
    much pounding and it was a strategic change to make sure that he
    didn't have a frame fallure in front of the entire cycling universe.
    That's not as far fetched as it would be if he were riding a steel
    bike.

  10. Bret said:

    On Apr 16, 12:11 am, Morten Reippuert Knudsen<[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    Bret said:

    Anyone know what was up with the Michaelsen bike change late in P-R?
    It wasn't clear if he had a mechanical or just wanted a faster bike
    (deep section carbon wheels) for the finale.

    Quoted message said:

    He had a flat tire.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Anyway, he slipped and
    fell on his butt trying to do a cross-like bike exchange, then he
    promptly crashed the new bike in the first pave corner. If that was a
    strategic move, it backfired big time, especially considering the
    circumstances.

    Quoted message said:

    It wasn't. The bike wasn't his own. After the crash on the borrowed
    bike he had to wait for a new bike. While dooing that he was caught by
    Boonen.

    Quoted message said:

    Too bad for him he would have finnished 2nd in his last race ever. As he
    said: "I had diamonds in my legs". He was clearly the strongest man
    in the race, and would easyly have beaten Fletcha and Wesseman in
    the sprint or left them if the tactics would have allowed him.
    He rode his best P-R ever. I really feel sorry for him.

    Quoted message said:

    --
    Morten Reippuert Knudsen :-) <http://blog.reippuert.dk>

    Quoted message said:

    Merlin Works CR-3/2.5 & Campagnolo Chorus 2007.

    Thanks for clearing that up. I felt bad for him too. It reminded me
    some of Rasmussen's famous TT implosion.

    Rassmussen wasn't fast enough and blew up trying to be better than he
    could be. Michaelsen was fast enough to beat everyone but O'Grady and
    had some bad luck and then tried to catch up too fast. Perfectly
    understandable and really sad for such a quality rider.

  11. Bret said:
    Quoted message said:

    The pave' was covered in sand. I'm quite sure that anyone traveling as fast
    as he was going there would have crashed as hard.

    If he was taking that corner faster than the others it was only
    because he was trying to chase back on. My question, which you didn't
    address, was whether that situation was a tactical blunder or the
    necessary result of a mechancal problem.

    Dumbass -

    If a racer crashes and there's no one else involved, then it's his/her
    fault. Especially if other people were making it around the turn w/out
    crashing.

    thanks,

    K. Gringioni.

  12. Kurgan Gringioni said:
    Bret said:
    Quoted message said:

    The pave' was covered in sand. I'm quite sure that anyone traveling as fast
    as he was going there would have crashed as hard.

    Quoted message said:

    If he was taking that corner faster than the others it was only
    because he was trying to chase back on. My question, which you didn't
    address, was whether that situation was a tactical blunder or the
    necessary result of a mechancal problem.

    Dumbass -

    If a racer crashes and there's no one else involved, then it's his/her
    fault. Especially if other people were making it around the turn w/out
    crashing.

    thanks,

    K. Gringioni.

    True, but I was still interested in the events leading up to the
    crash. If the bike change wasn't really necessary, then that would
    have compounded the mistake. Based on what Morten said, that wasn't
    the case.

    Bret

  13. Quoted message said:

    And his last day as a pro too. I nearly fell out of my chair when he
    crashed.

    Yes he rode pefectly and would have finnished 2nd without doubt. He
    was clearly the strongest rider that day. (Feltcha, Weseman and
    Leukenamns said they let O'Grady go because they feared that it was
    CSC's way of setting Michalsen up). He would easyly have beaten
    Fletcha, Weseman and Leukemans in a sprint. However i think that he
    would have left them on the cobbels once O'grady had a gap arround 45
    sec.

    --
    Morten Reippuert Knudsen :-) <http://blog.reippuert.dk>

    Merlin Works CR-3/2.5 & Campagnolo Chorus 2007.

  14. On Apr 17, 12:42 am, Morten Reippuert Knudsen<[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    And his last day as a pro too. I nearly fell out of my chair when he
    crashed.

    Yes he rode pefectly and would have finnished 2nd without doubt. He
    was clearly the strongest rider that day. (Feltcha, Weseman and
    Leukenamns said they let O'Grady go because they feared that it was
    CSC's way of setting Michalsen up). He would easyly have beaten
    Fletcha, Weseman and Leukemans in a sprint. However i think that he
    would have left them on the cobbels once O'grady had a gap arround 45
    sec.

    Dumbass -

    What a load of baloney. If he could have left them whenever he wanted,
    then he would have done it instead of waiting for O'Grady to do
    something.

    thanks,

    K. Gringioni.

  15. "Kurgan Gringioni" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Apr 17, 12:42 am, Morten Reippuert Knudsen<[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    And his last day as a pro too. I nearly fell out of my chair when he
    crashed.

    Yes he rode pefectly and would have finnished 2nd without doubt. He
    was clearly the strongest rider that day. (Feltcha, Weseman and
    Leukenamns said they let O'Grady go because they feared that it was
    CSC's way of setting Michalsen up). He would easyly have beaten
    Fletcha, Weseman and Leukemans in a sprint. However i think that he
    would have left them on the cobbels once O'grady had a gap arround 45
    sec.

    What a load of baloney. If he could have left them whenever he wanted,
    then he would have done it instead of waiting for O'Grady to do
    something.

    We are simply stunned with all of your poignant knowledge.

  16. Tom Kunich' cyclintom@yahoo. com said:

    "Kurgan Gringioni" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Apr 17, 12:42 am, Morten Reippuert Knudsen<[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    [email hidden] <[email hidden]> wrote:
    > And his last day as a pro too. I nearly fell out of my chair when he
    > crashed.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Yes he rode pefectly and would have finnished 2nd without doubt. He
    was clearly the strongest rider that day. (Feltcha, Weseman and
    Leukenamns said they let O'Grady go because they feared that it was
    CSC's way of setting Michalsen up). He would easyly have beaten
    Fletcha, Weseman and Leukemans in a sprint. However i think that he
    would have left them on the cobbels once O'grady had a gap arround 45
    sec.

    Quoted message said:

    What a load of baloney. If he could have left them whenever he wanted,
    then he would have done it instead of waiting for O'Grady to do
    something.

    We are simply stunned with all of your poignant knowledge.

    Jackass -

    You're the one who's making noise about how much O'Grady "deserved"
    it.

    thanks,

    K. Gringioni.

  17. "Kurgan Gringioni" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    You're the one who's making noise about how much O'Grady "deserved"
    it.

    And you're the one telling us he didn't?

  18. Kurgan Gringioni said:

    Jackass -

    You're the one who's making noise about how much O'Grady "deserved"
    it.

    thanks,

    K. Gringioni.- Hide quoted text -

    - Show quoted text -

    O'Grady did deserve it because he rode his ass off, especially the
    last 23Km and had a better race than anyone else. Gotta throw in a
    little kudos for Riis and the rest of the team for executing plan B,
    ulike Disco who apparently failed to execute any of their plans:

    http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2007/apr07/apr17news

    Demol questions Discovery tactics

    Discovery Channel had a largely unsuccessful Paris-Roubaix on Sunday,
    causing directeur sportif Dirk Demol to question why none of the
    designated team leaders made the early breakaway of 34 riders
    containing eventual winner Stuart O'Grady from arch rival Team CSC.

    <rest snipped>
    Bill C

  19. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Tom Kunich' cyclintom@yahoo. com said:

    "Kurgan Gringioni" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    You're the one who's making noise about how much O'Grady "deserved"
    it.

    And you're the one telling us he didn't?

    He deserved the win for the ride he did *that* day, not because of anything he'd
    done in the past.

    --
    tanx,
    Howard

    Never take a tenant with a monkey.

    remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?

  20. Kurgan Gringioni said:

    MRKnudsen said that Michaelson was the strongest and the reason
    O'Grady won was because everyone was sitting on him.

    It has happend in this race before, most obvious was 1996 and 2001. One
    could add 97 as well although that result wasn't dictated by team
    tactics. Then there was the year when ballerini wasn't allowed to
    bridge to his teammate in the front.

    --
    Morten Reippuert Knudsen :-) <http://blog.reippuert.dk>

    Merlin Works CR-3/2.5 & Campagnolo Chorus 2007.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.