Anyone know what was up with the Michaelsen bike change late in P-R? It wasn't clear if he had a mechanical or just wanted a faster bike (deep section carbon wheels) for the finale. Anyway, he slipped and fell on his butt trying to do a cross-like bike exchange, then he promptly crashed the new bike in the first pave corner. If that was a strategic move, it backfired big time, especially considering the circumstances.
"Bret" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Anyone know what was up with the Michaelsen bike change late in P-R? It wasn't clear if he had a mechanical or just wanted a faster bike (deep section carbon wheels) for the finale. Anyway, he slipped and fell on his butt trying to do a cross-like bike exchange, then he promptly crashed the new bike in the first pave corner. If that was a strategic move, it backfired big time, especially considering the circumstances.
The pave' was covered in sand. I'm quite sure that anyone traveling as fast as he was going there would have crashed as hard.
Anyone know what was up with the Michaelsen bike change late in P-R? It wasn't clear if he had a mechanical or just wanted a faster bike (deep section carbon wheels) for the finale. Anyway, he slipped and fell on his butt trying to do a cross-like bike exchange, then he promptly crashed the new bike in the first pave corner. If that was a strategic move, it backfired big time, especially considering the circumstances.
The pave' was covered in sand. I'm quite sure that anyone traveling as fast as he was going there would have crashed as hard.
If he was taking that corner faster than the others it was only because he was trying to chase back on. My question, which you didn't address, was whether that situation was a tactical blunder or the necessary result of a mechancal problem.
Were all the other rider who preceded him traveling as fast? Did they crash as hard?
"Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
"Bret" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Anyone know what was up with the Michaelsen bike change late in P-R? It wasn't clear if he had a mechanical or just wanted a faster bike (deep section carbon wheels) for the finale. Anyway, he slipped and fell on his butt trying to do a cross-like bike exchange, then he promptly crashed the new bike in the first pave corner. If that was a strategic move, it backfired big time, especially considering the circumstances.
The pave' was covered in sand. I'm quite sure that anyone traveling as fast as he was going there would have crashed as hard.
Anyone know what was up with the Michaelsen bike change late in P-R? It wasn't clear if he had a mechanical or just wanted a faster bike (deep section carbon wheels) for the finale.
He had a flat tire.
Quoted message said:
Anyway, he slipped and fell on his butt trying to do a cross-like bike exchange, then he promptly crashed the new bike in the first pave corner. If that was a strategic move, it backfired big time, especially considering the circumstances.
It wasn't. The bike wasn't his own. After the crash on the borrowed bike he had to wait for a new bike. While dooing that he was caught by Boonen.
Too bad for him he would have finnished 2nd in his last race ever. As he said: "I had diamonds in my legs". He was clearly the strongest man in the race, and would easyly have beaten Fletcha and Wesseman in the sprint or left them if the tactics would have allowed him. He rode his best P-R ever. I really feel sorry for him.
On Apr 16, 12:11 am, Morten Reippuert Knudsen<[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:
Bret said:
Anyone know what was up with the Michaelsen bike change late in P-R? It wasn't clear if he had a mechanical or just wanted a faster bike (deep section carbon wheels) for the finale.
He had a flat tire.
Quoted message said:
Anyway, he slipped and fell on his butt trying to do a cross-like bike exchange, then he promptly crashed the new bike in the first pave corner. If that was a strategic move, it backfired big time, especially considering the circumstances.
It wasn't. The bike wasn't his own. After the crash on the borrowed bike he had to wait for a new bike. While dooing that he was caught by Boonen.
Too bad for him he would have finnished 2nd in his last race ever. As he said: "I had diamonds in my legs". He was clearly the strongest man in the race, and would easyly have beaten Fletcha and Wesseman in the sprint or left them if the tactics would have allowed him. He rode his best P-R ever. I really feel sorry for him.
Anyone know what was up with the Michaelsen bike change late in P-R? It wasn't clear if he had a mechanical or just wanted a faster bike (deep section carbon wheels) for the finale.
He had a flat tire.
Quoted message said:
Anyway, he slipped and fell on his butt trying to do a cross-like bike exchange, then he promptly crashed the new bike in the first pave corner. If that was a strategic move, it backfired big time, especially considering the circumstances.
It wasn't. The bike wasn't his own. After the crash on the borrowed bike he had to wait for a new bike. While dooing that he was caught by Boonen.
Too bad for him he would have finnished 2nd in his last race ever. As he said: "I had diamonds in my legs". He was clearly the strongest man in the race, and would easyly have beaten Fletcha and Wesseman in the sprint or left them if the tactics would have allowed him. He rode his best P-R ever. I really feel sorry for him.
On Apr 16, 12:57 am, "Richard Cheese" <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:
Were all the other rider who preceded him traveling as fast? Did they crash as hard?
"Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote in messagenews:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
"Bret" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Anyone know what was up with the Michaelsen bike change late in P-R? It wasn't clear if he had a mechanical or just wanted a faster bike (deep section carbon wheels) for the finale. Anyway, he slipped and fell on his butt trying to do a cross-like bike exchange, then he promptly crashed the new bike in the first pave corner. If that was a strategic move, it backfired big time, especially considering the circumstances.
Quoted message said:
The pave' was covered in sand. I'm quite sure that anyone traveling as fast as he was going there would have crashed as hard.- Hide quoted text -
Was it just me watching the actual racing? NO - the compressed TV coverage on Versus STILL managed to get O'Grady going around that same corner with comments from our intrepid announcers about how he had to be extra careful because of all of the sand covering the pave there.
But you may demonstrate that you didn't actually watch the racing all you want.
Anyone know what was up with the Michaelsen bike change late in P-R? It wasn't clear if he had a mechanical or just wanted a faster bike (deep section carbon wheels) for the finale. Anyway, he slipped and fell on his butt trying to do a cross-like bike exchange, then he promptly crashed the new bike in the first pave corner. If that was a strategic move, it backfired big time, especially considering the circumstances.
Quoted message said:
The pave' was covered in sand. I'm quite sure that anyone traveling as fast as he was going there would have crashed as hard.
If he was taking that corner faster than the others it was only because he was trying to chase back on.
Certainly. What the hell else would it have been? He's an expert rider hyped to the gills with being near the front and simply made a judgement error.
Quoted message said:
My question, which you didn't address, was whether that situation was a tactical blunder or the necessary result of a mechancal problem.
How the hell would any of us know what the strategy behind that was? But as a guess - if he had mechanical problems I would have assumed that he would have been a great deal further back than he was. That would imply that this was a tactical change designed to give him a faster bike in the last 20 km of the race. However, it is possible that their testing led them to discover that frames may not take that much pounding and it was a strategic change to make sure that he didn't have a frame fallure in front of the entire cycling universe. That's not as far fetched as it would be if he were riding a steel bike.
On Apr 16, 12:11 am, Morten Reippuert Knudsen<[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:
Bret said:
Anyone know what was up with the Michaelsen bike change late in P-R? It wasn't clear if he had a mechanical or just wanted a faster bike (deep section carbon wheels) for the finale.
Quoted message said:
He had a flat tire.
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Anyway, he slipped and fell on his butt trying to do a cross-like bike exchange, then he promptly crashed the new bike in the first pave corner. If that was a strategic move, it backfired big time, especially considering the circumstances.
Quoted message said:
It wasn't. The bike wasn't his own. After the crash on the borrowed bike he had to wait for a new bike. While dooing that he was caught by Boonen.
Quoted message said:
Too bad for him he would have finnished 2nd in his last race ever. As he said: "I had diamonds in my legs". He was clearly the strongest man in the race, and would easyly have beaten Fletcha and Wesseman in the sprint or left them if the tactics would have allowed him. He rode his best P-R ever. I really feel sorry for him.
Thanks for clearing that up. I felt bad for him too. It reminded me some of Rasmussen's famous TT implosion.
Rassmussen wasn't fast enough and blew up trying to be better than he could be. Michaelsen was fast enough to beat everyone but O'Grady and had some bad luck and then tried to catch up too fast. Perfectly understandable and really sad for such a quality rider.
The pave' was covered in sand. I'm quite sure that anyone traveling as fast as he was going there would have crashed as hard.
If he was taking that corner faster than the others it was only because he was trying to chase back on. My question, which you didn't address, was whether that situation was a tactical blunder or the necessary result of a mechancal problem.
Dumbass -
If a racer crashes and there's no one else involved, then it's his/her fault. Especially if other people were making it around the turn w/out crashing.
The pave' was covered in sand. I'm quite sure that anyone traveling as fast as he was going there would have crashed as hard.
Quoted message said:
If he was taking that corner faster than the others it was only because he was trying to chase back on. My question, which you didn't address, was whether that situation was a tactical blunder or the necessary result of a mechancal problem.
Dumbass -
If a racer crashes and there's no one else involved, then it's his/her fault. Especially if other people were making it around the turn w/out crashing.
thanks,
K. Gringioni.
True, but I was still interested in the events leading up to the crash. If the bike change wasn't really necessary, then that would have compounded the mistake. Based on what Morten said, that wasn't the case.
And his last day as a pro too. I nearly fell out of my chair when he crashed.
Yes he rode pefectly and would have finnished 2nd without doubt. He was clearly the strongest rider that day. (Feltcha, Weseman and Leukenamns said they let O'Grady go because they feared that it was CSC's way of setting Michalsen up). He would easyly have beaten Fletcha, Weseman and Leukemans in a sprint. However i think that he would have left them on the cobbels once O'grady had a gap arround 45 sec.
On Apr 17, 12:42 am, Morten Reippuert Knudsen<[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
And his last day as a pro too. I nearly fell out of my chair when he crashed.
Yes he rode pefectly and would have finnished 2nd without doubt. He was clearly the strongest rider that day. (Feltcha, Weseman and Leukenamns said they let O'Grady go because they feared that it was CSC's way of setting Michalsen up). He would easyly have beaten Fletcha, Weseman and Leukemans in a sprint. However i think that he would have left them on the cobbels once O'grady had a gap arround 45 sec.
Dumbass -
What a load of baloney. If he could have left them whenever he wanted, then he would have done it instead of waiting for O'Grady to do something.
"Kurgan Gringioni" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
On Apr 17, 12:42 am, Morten Reippuert Knudsen<[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
And his last day as a pro too. I nearly fell out of my chair when he crashed.
Yes he rode pefectly and would have finnished 2nd without doubt. He was clearly the strongest rider that day. (Feltcha, Weseman and Leukenamns said they let O'Grady go because they feared that it was CSC's way of setting Michalsen up). He would easyly have beaten Fletcha, Weseman and Leukemans in a sprint. However i think that he would have left them on the cobbels once O'grady had a gap arround 45 sec.
What a load of baloney. If he could have left them whenever he wanted, then he would have done it instead of waiting for O'Grady to do something.
We are simply stunned with all of your poignant knowledge.
"Kurgan Gringioni" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
On Apr 17, 12:42 am, Morten Reippuert Knudsen<[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:
[email hidden] <[email hidden]> wrote: > And his last day as a pro too. I nearly fell out of my chair when he > crashed.
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Yes he rode pefectly and would have finnished 2nd without doubt. He was clearly the strongest rider that day. (Feltcha, Weseman and Leukenamns said they let O'Grady go because they feared that it was CSC's way of setting Michalsen up). He would easyly have beaten Fletcha, Weseman and Leukemans in a sprint. However i think that he would have left them on the cobbels once O'grady had a gap arround 45 sec.
Quoted message said:
What a load of baloney. If he could have left them whenever he wanted, then he would have done it instead of waiting for O'Grady to do something.
We are simply stunned with all of your poignant knowledge.
Jackass -
You're the one who's making noise about how much O'Grady "deserved" it.
You're the one who's making noise about how much O'Grady "deserved" it.
thanks,
K. Gringioni.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
O'Grady did deserve it because he rode his ass off, especially the last 23Km and had a better race than anyone else. Gotta throw in a little kudos for Riis and the rest of the team for executing plan B, ulike Disco who apparently failed to execute any of their plans:
Discovery Channel had a largely unsuccessful Paris-Roubaix on Sunday, causing directeur sportif Dirk Demol to question why none of the designated team leaders made the early breakaway of 34 riders containing eventual winner Stuart O'Grady from arch rival Team CSC.
MRKnudsen said that Michaelson was the strongest and the reason O'Grady won was because everyone was sitting on him.
It has happend in this race before, most obvious was 1996 and 2001. One could add 97 as well although that result wasn't dictated by team tactics. Then there was the year when ballerini wasn't allowed to bridge to his teammate in the front.