MFW & "Killfiles"!!

On Thu, 28 Apr 2005 02:02:39 -0000, [email hidden] (Runs With Knives)

Quoted message said:

In article <[email hidden]>,

JMW said:

[email hidden] (Runs With Knives) wrote:

[snip]

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

This is a perfect example of why I have you kill-filed, Charles. Far
too much utter and complete nonsense, like this thread-starter.

Then why, pray tell, are you feeding the troll?

I would've thought the follow-up to which you responded would've made
that self-evident. Since that's apparently not the case, please see
my other follow-up to "Charles" for a clarification.

Ironic how both he and you seem to have misinterpreted the nature of
my participation in this thread. Gives one cause to wonder... Oh
well, it doesn't really matter.

Don't be offended Jim, you are out of your depth with John "Enforcer"
Williams, the Group's oldest and most prolific "troll".

The " nature of your participation is this thread" is patently obvious
to all of us, it is only you that appears confused old chap!! ;o)

On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 23:19:51 -0500, Proton Soup <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

Lee Michaels said:

"Proton Soup" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 10:24:19 -0400, "Lee Michaels"
<[email hidden]> wrote:

>
>"Steve Freides" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
>news:[email hidden]...
>> "Charles" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
>> news:[email hidden]...
>>> In conjunction with another established contributor here, who is a
>>> great deal more technically able than I could ever hope to be, we have
>>> conducted a thorough survey into the use of "killfiles"!!
>>>
>>> The results have been very illuminating and prove beyond any doubt,
>>> that which I have maintained for a very long time, that most of the
>>> people who claim to use the dreaded "killfiles" are being economical
>>> with the truth.
>>>
>>> During a survey carried out on contributions posted over the past
>>> three months, it has been proved conclusively that only two people
>>> among the regular contributors here, are actually making genuine use
>>> of "killfiles".
>>>
>>> I'm not going to name those two in order to avoid causing further
>>> friction, but the game is quite clearly up for those *alleged*
>>> "killfilers", who should really start being a great deal more honest
>>> if they are to retain any credibility.
>>
>> Charles, I didn't bother to participate in your earlier discussion, but
>> I
>> make heavy use of my killfile in this and other newsgroups, and I am a
>> "regular contributor" here. I use it mostly for spam, typically
>> killfiling all messages from a sender who simultaneously posts to this
>> and
>> a lot of other newsgroups, but I have also used it to remove the
>> messages
>> from several regulars here whose contributions I find contribute nothing
>> I
>> ever wish to read.
>>
>Which is an intelligent way to manage your time.
>
>I find it ironic that some folks feel the need to digest every message on
>usenet. Do they watch every commercial on TV? Do they read every ad or
>story in a newspaper? We all edit our existence in one way or another. It
>is a rational, intelligent way to respond to information glut.
>
>Unless, of course, you are a troll trying to whip up business on a slow
>day.
>And I find it ironic that this so called "survey" took place in places
>unknown or unseen by almost everybody on this forum. Indicating clearly
>that
>Chucky is hearing voices again. But how else would he be able to get some
>folks together for a "discussion, survey or research"?
>
>And as for a test of authenticity, who cares? Just because I ignore most
>ads
>or writers in a newspaper, I do look at things that interest me or I find
>to
>be particularly topical. Does that make me "unauthentic" in some fashion?
>I
>read what interests me. I never consult with the mentally ill or
>incompetent
>when making important decisions in my life.
>
>Being able to edit your environment is a basic skill of human beings. And
>a
>sign of higher intelligence. Something that Chucky knows nothing about.
>(hint, trolling is not a sign of higher intelligence)
>
>Unless, of course, he decides to do some more fantasy play at "research".
>Here is a litttle hint chucky. Legitimate research does not include the
>voices you hear in your head.

If I were one of those big supp companies that pumps the NO releasers,
or a major manufacturer of cheaply made exercise machines, I think I'd
hire a few people to go out and troll all the places where people can
actually get helpful (and free) information that steers them away from
my inferior and useless products.

Which raises the question, who has chucky been working for?

Life Extension Foundation? 😉

Outstanding response Mr Soup, well done. That will have the lads and
lasses rocking in the aisles!! ;o)

Runs With Knives said:

JMW said:

[email hidden] (Runs With Knives) wrote:

[snip]

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

This is a perfect example of why I have you kill-filed, Charles.
Far too much utter and complete nonsense, like this
thread-starter.

Then why, pray tell, are you feeding the troll?

I would've thought the follow-up to which you responded would've made
that self-evident. Since that's apparently not the case, please see
my other follow-up to "Charles" for a clarification.

Your purpose, if evident, was naïve. In your follow up, you wrote:
"No, Charles, I followed up to you, this one time, because I believe
everybody deserves at least *one* chance."

Hudson has been given many, many chances. Despite his claims of
a noble purpose for his actions, his goal is singular: petty revenge.
As an example, Keith Hobman gave Hudson numerous chances, even to
the point that Hobman was criticized for it. Keith finally threw
up his hands and left the group because he knew that Hudson would
never change.

I have finally surrendered to the fact that there is nothing I can
do to stop Hudson's childish behavior, and I have also come to the
realization that his motives are sufficiently clear that I need not
respond to his repeated accusations against me. However, I
also realize that the less others respond to him, the more pathetic
his efforts appear. Every time someone responds to him, it
gives a brief aura of legitimacy to his actions, as well as giving
him an opportunity to regurgitate his claims of justification.
That was the reason for my comment about "feeding the troll."

Quoted message said:

Ironic how both he and you seem to have misinterpreted the nature of
my participation in this thread. Gives one cause to wonder...

Wonder what?

Quoted message said:

Oh well, it doesn't really matter.

Then why did you write it?

DZ said:

Charles said:

(Runs With Knives) said:

Goodbye, Charles.

Goodbye Jim, I'll miss the contribution you have made to my life;
parting is such sweet sorrow!! <sob>

[Don't call me, I'll contact you!!]

Funny!

heh

<bowing graciously> ;o)

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

I never consult with the mentally ill or incompetent

when making important decisions in my life.>

So you leave ALL of your immediate family out of important decisions?

Quoted message said:

And a sign of higher intelligence.>

Again, where's the relevance to your gene pool?

Is it that hard for you to post on Usenet? Don't get me wrong, I really
don't mind. You being a moron because of your inability to post correctly
removes credibility from your liberal dribble you puke up.

So...carry on.
--
-Larry

Ok, being a newbe to newsgroups here, how does one go about this kill
file??

Rick
No one is listening until you fart.

"Steve Freides" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"Charles" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Charles, I didn't bother to participate in your earlier discussion, but I
make heavy use of my killfile in this and other newsgroups, and I am a
"regular contributor" here. I use it mostly for spam, typically
killfiling all messages from a sender who simultaneously posts to this and
a lot of other newsgroups, but I have also used it to remove the messages
from several regulars here whose contributions I find contribute nothing I
ever wish to read.

-S-
http://www.kbnj.com

"Rick" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Ok, being a newbe to newsgroups here, how does one go about this kill
file??

Don't top post here.

It is a newsreader setting.

In MS outlook or outlook express, go to message at the top of your page
while the offending poster is selected. On the drop down menu, select Block
Sender. It is that easy.

If you have another rewsreader, consult your help files.