General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Meths in Coke Bottles.

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 49 posts · 881 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
21 May 2006
Last activity
29 May 2006
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
49
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
881
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 49
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. In my perpetual batle against weight and size [1] I want to ditch my
    1ltr SIGG and keep meths for a nine day motorcycling trip in two or
    more 250ml pop bottles. That has a slight weight advantage and will
    allow me to stow meths in tight spaces and discard bottles as they
    empty (and, I suppose, replace my 'fuel bottles' as and when).

    Good idea?

    [1] Kit, not my own!

  2. Quoted message said:

    In my perpetual batle against weight and size [1] I want to ditch my
    1ltr SIGG and keep meths for a nine day motorcycling trip in two or
    more 250ml pop bottles. That has a slight weight advantage and will
    allow me to stow meths in tight spaces and discard bottles as they
    empty (and, I suppose, replace my 'fuel bottles' as and when).

    Sounds O.K. to me. I've kept meths in pop bottles. The plastic's PET and
    isn't affected by meths.

    Jim Ford

  3. In article <[email hidden]>, Jim Ford
    <[email hidden]> writes

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    In my perpetual batle against weight and size [1] I want to ditch my
    1ltr SIGG and keep meths for a nine day motorcycling trip in two or
    more 250ml pop bottles. That has a slight weight advantage and will
    allow me to stow meths in tight spaces and discard bottles as they
    empty (and, I suppose, replace my 'fuel bottles' as and when).

    Sounds O.K. to me. I've kept meths in pop bottles. The plastic's PET
    and isn't affected by meths.

    Jim Ford

    Meths in a Coke bottle could be better than the original bottle the
    meths came it ! I had a new bottle of meths leak in the back of my car
    - what a pong :-(
    --
    Bill Grey
    http://www.billboy.co.uk

  4. In article <[email hidden]>,
    [email hidden] writes

    Quoted message said:

    In my perpetual batle against weight and size [1] I want to ditch my
    1ltr SIGG and keep meths for a nine day motorcycling trip in two or
    more 250ml pop bottles. That has a slight weight advantage and will
    allow me to stow meths in tight spaces and discard bottles as they
    empty (and, I suppose, replace my 'fuel bottles' as and when).

    Good idea?


    I use small Robinsons Fruit Shoot bottles for meths without problems.
    Their cap has a drinking spout and that works well for pouring too.

    I always wrap them in a cheap thin freezers bags but have not had a leak
    yet.

    --

    Dominic Sexton

  5. Quoted message said:

    Meths in a Coke bottle could be better than the original bottle the
    meths came it ! I had a new bottle of meths leak in the back of my car
    - what a pong :-(

    I would agree, the bottles you buy meths in are not at all suitable for
    carrying the stuff, too fragile.

    The PET bottles are really extremly tough, fill one with water and you
    can play footbal with it, jump on them etc.

  6. The bottles (PET) that fizzy drinks come in are enormously strong. I
    used to work where we had dry ice and tried putting some in a 1L PET
    bottle. It went banana shaped before it went off with a thunderous bang
    - I'd say at least as loud as a maroon! I wouldn't have wanted to be
    within 25 meters of it.

    Jim Ford

  7. [email hidden] said...

    Quoted message said:

    In my perpetual batle against weight and size [1] I want to ditch my
    1ltr SIGG and keep meths for a nine day motorcycling trip in two or
    more 250ml pop bottles. That has a slight weight advantage and will
    allow me to stow meths in tight spaces and discard bottles as they
    empty (and, I suppose, replace my 'fuel bottles' as and when).

    Good idea?


    I can't see why it wouldn't be a good idea - meths is sold in similar
    bottles anyway, isn't it?

    --
    To reply see 'from' in headers; lose the domain, and insert dots and @
    where common sense dictates.

  8. [email hidden] said...

    Quoted message said:

    I had a new bottle of meths leak in the back of my car
    - what a pong :-(


    Vile, isn't it.
    --
    To reply see 'from' in headers; lose the domain, and insert dots and @
    where common sense dictates.

  9. Quoted message said:

    In my perpetual batle against weight and size [1] I want to ditch my
    1ltr SIGG and keep meths for a nine day motorcycling trip in two or
    more 250ml pop bottles. That has a slight weight advantage and will
    allow me to stow meths in tight spaces and discard bottles as they
    empty (and, I suppose, replace my 'fuel bottles' as and when).

    Good idea?

    [1] Kit, not my own!


    Take the labels off.

    IMHO if some toerag steals it they don't (quite) deserve to go blind.

    Andy

  10. On 21 May 2006 08:38:27 -0700, [email hidden] wrote:

    |In my perpetual batle against weight and size [1] I want to ditch my
    |1ltr SIGG and keep meths for a nine day motorcycling trip in two or
    |more 250ml pop bottles. That has a slight weight advantage and will
    |allow me to stow meths in tight spaces and discard bottles as they
    |empty (and, I suppose, replace my 'fuel bottles' as and when).
    |
    |Good idea?

    *Very Bad Idea*,
    Kids might think it is a new flavour of pop and drink it.
    We killed lots of kids through doing this sort of thing, many years ago.
    Heard of one case in ?Spain? last year, the kid only just survived
    --
    Dave Fawthrop <dave hyphenologist co uk> Google Groups is IME the *worst*
    method of accessing usenet. GG subscribers would be well advised get a
    newsreader, say Agent, and a newsserver, say news.individual.net. These
    will allow them: to see only *new* posts, a killfile, and other goodies.

  11. On Sun, 21 May 2006 18:31:19 +0100, Fran <[email hidden]>
    wrote:

    [email hidden] said...
    |> In my perpetual batle against weight and size [1] I want to ditch my
    |> 1ltr SIGG and keep meths for a nine day motorcycling trip in two or
    |> more 250ml pop bottles. That has a slight weight advantage and will
    |> allow me to stow meths in tight spaces and discard bottles as they
    |> empty (and, I suppose, replace my 'fuel bottles' as and when).
    |>
    |> Good idea?
    |>
    |I can't see why it wouldn't be a good idea - meths is sold in similar
    |bottles anyway, isn't it?

    I have one in the garage ATM
    No kid would think that was pop and poison themselves.
    --
    Dave Fawthrop <dave hyphenologist co uk> Google Groups is IME the *worst*
    method of accessing usenet. GG subscribers would be well advised get a
    newsreader, say Agent, and a newsserver, say news.individual.net. These
    will allow them: to see only *new* posts, a killfile, and other goodies.

  12. [email hidden] said...

    Quoted message said:

    On 21 May 2006 08:38:27 -0700, [email hidden] wrote:

    |In my perpetual batle against weight and size [1] I want to ditch my
    |1ltr SIGG and keep meths for a nine day motorcycling trip in two or
    |more 250ml pop bottles. That has a slight weight advantage and will
    |allow me to stow meths in tight spaces and discard bottles as they
    |empty (and, I suppose, replace my 'fuel bottles' as and when).
    |
    |Good idea?

    *Very Bad Idea*,
    Kids might think it is a new flavour of pop and drink it.
    We killed lots of kids through doing this sort of thing, many years ago.
    Heard of one case in ?Spain? last year, the kid only just survived


    Give over, no one's going to try drinking the stuff once they've had a
    chance to smell it, and besides which, the OP isn't likely to be in the
    company of these children, is he.
    --
    To reply see 'from' in headers; lose the domain, and insert dots and @
    where common sense dictates.

  13. On Sun, 21 May 2006 20:07:38 +0100, Fran <[email hidden]>
    wrote:

    [email hidden] said...
    |> On 21 May 2006 08:38:27 -0700, [email hidden] wrote:
    |>
    |> |In my perpetual batle against weight and size [1] I want to ditch my
    |> |1ltr SIGG and keep meths for a nine day motorcycling trip in two or
    |> |more 250ml pop bottles. That has a slight weight advantage and will
    |> |allow me to stow meths in tight spaces and discard bottles as they
    |> |empty (and, I suppose, replace my 'fuel bottles' as and when).
    |> |
    |> |Good idea?
    |>
    |> *Very Bad Idea*,
    |> Kids might think it is a new flavour of pop and drink it.
    |> We killed lots of kids through doing this sort of thing, many years ago.
    |> Heard of one case in ?Spain? last year, the kid only just survived
    |>
    |Give over, no one's going to try drinking the stuff once they've had a
    |chance to smell it, and besides which, the OP isn't likely to be in the
    |company of these children, is he.

    Kids do not associate smells with danger as well a we do

    *************************************
    ***IT IS A VERY VERY VERY BAD IDEA***
    *************************************

    Just not worth taking that sort of risk when the alternative is unutterably
    simple and available from many places.

    Sitting on the desk in front of me, it lives on a high shelf in the garage.
    Plastic bottle of Methylated spirits properly labled with all the warnings,
    child proof top, one of those squeeze at the side things. Do not drink in
    English and Braille. Warning triangle. Corrugated sides. Not sure where I
    got it, maybe a chemist.
    --
    Dave Fawthrop <dave hyphenologist co uk> Google Groups is IME the *worst*
    method of accessing usenet. GG subscribers would be well advised get a
    newsreader, say Agent, and a newsserver, say news.individual.net. These
    will allow them: to see only *new* posts, a killfile, and other goodies.

  14. Dave Fawthrop said:

    Sitting on the desk in front of me, it lives on a high shelf in the garage.
    Plastic bottle of Methylated spirits properly labled with all the warnings,
    child proof top, one of those squeeze at the side things. Do not drink in
    English and Braille. Warning triangle. Corrugated sides.

    Exactly the sort of thing any kid would find interesting. The number of
    times I saw school kids look at the most dangerously labelled thing I
    had out on the bench and say "what would happen if I drank some of
    that?" was unbelievable.

  15. Thanks to everyone! I've read and noted every post which confirms what
    I'd hoped.

    I find the the bottles meths come in leak like crazy whereas pop
    bottles seem bulletproof. I was just worried about the meths reacting
    with the plastic, which clearly isn't a problem after all.

    Dave Fawthrop said:

    *Very Bad Idea*,
    Kids might think it is a new flavour of pop and drink it.
    We killed lots of kids through doing this sort of thing, many years ago.
    Heard of one case in ?Spain? last year, the kid only just survived

    Dave, it's going to be pop bottles not alcopop bottles.

    Anyway I hate kids. Noisy, irritatingly energetic and often surly.
    Whilst exterminating children wouldn't be a primary aim of my meths
    storage method, one or two neutralized children _would_ be a bonus. Can
    you advise of the minimum fatal dosage I'd need to administer?

    Seriously. There will be no possibility a child could have contact with
    these bottles.

  16. On 21 May 2006 13:13:03 -0700, "AndyP" <[email hidden]> wrote:

    |Dave Fawthrop wrote:
    |> Sitting on the desk in front of me, it lives on a high shelf in the garage.
    |> Plastic bottle of Methylated spirits properly labled with all the warnings,
    |> child proof top, one of those squeeze at the side things. Do not drink in
    |> English and Braille. Warning triangle. Corrugated sides.
    |
    |Exactly the sort of thing any kid would find interesting. The number of
    |times I saw school kids look at the most dangerously labelled thing I
    |had out on the bench and say "what would happen if I drank some of
    |that?" was unbelievable.

    But the result would not be your fault.
    --
    Dave Fawthrop <dave hyphenologist co uk> Google Groups is IME the *worst*
    method of accessing usenet. GG subscribers would be well advised get a
    newsreader, say Agent, and a newsserver, say news.individual.net. These
    will allow them: to see only *new* posts, a killfile, and other goodies.

  17. Quoted message said:

    In my perpetual batle against weight and size [1] I want to ditch my
    1ltr SIGG and keep meths for a nine day motorcycling trip in two or
    more 250ml pop bottles. That has a slight weight advantage and will
    allow me to stow meths in tight spaces and discard bottles as they
    empty (and, I suppose, replace my 'fuel bottles' as and when).

    Good idea?

    The bottles should take it okay (Trangia's own fuel bottles are plastic
    IIRC). However, if you're looking to cut weight/bulk then moving to
    gas, paraffin or petrol should lighten the total fuel load as they pack
    more stove-releasable energy into the same volume of fuel. Assuming
    you're using a trangia or similar meths stove, you can also save quite a
    bit of weight and bulk with a lighter stove. If you like the stability
    and stormproofing of a Trangia you can run on gas with the converter
    from Primus or Markill (Markill one half the price though not "official"😉.

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
    Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
    Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
    net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/

  18. Dave Fawthrop said:

    But the result would not be your fault.

    So that's all right then!

    Would it be the OP's "fault" if some oik raided his panniers, stole a
    bottle of purple pop and indulged? And what if he kept /matches and
    sharp knives/ in his camping gear too? Horrors!

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
    Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
    Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
    net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/

  19. The message <[email hidden]>
    from [email hidden] contains these words:

    Quoted message said:

    and discard bottles

    All along both sides of the road? Our country is soon going to be no
    more than one big land fill.

    If these are PET bottle, stamp on them, flatten, and put them to
    recycling when you find a facility.

    Richard

  20. In message <[email hidden]>, Jim Ford
    <[email hidden]> writes

    Quoted message said:

    The bottles (PET) that fizzy drinks come in are enormously strong. I
    used to work where we had dry ice and tried putting some in a 1L PET
    bottle. It went banana shaped before it went off with a thunderous bang
    - I'd say at least as loud as a maroon! I wouldn't have wanted to be
    within 25 meters of it.

    Jim Ford

    Now that sounds like fun.

    We've been experimenting with water rockets made from fizzy drink
    bottles over the last few weeks. They take 120 psi with ease when hooked
    up to a compressor. I haven't actually had one fail (yet).

    Somebody has built a 3 stage water rocket from pop bottles:

    http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/pagrosse/h2orocketsi.htm

    Regards
    --
    Neil Pugh

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.