I read once that "mayonnaise purists" insist on wooden spoons instead of
whisks or food processors which are probably much more commonly used than
wooden spoons for making mayonnaise among the relative few who still make
mayonnaise (I only make mayonnaise once in a while). The site
http://haverchuk.blogspot.com/2006/02/will-real-mayonnaise-please.html also
kinda indicates this as well (at least the person writing it seems to
believe so).
Why? It seems to me that unless mayonnaise made with a wooden spoon is
either better (either in flavor or consistency), or if a wooden spoon forms
the emulsion faster than either a whisk or a food processor, or if a wooden
spoon forms a more stable emulsion, I really don't see how a wooden spoon
can lay claim to being a better tool for making mayonnaise.
If all you have is a wooden spoon, then it is obviously a better tool. If
whisks cost $200,000, then the wooden spoon is the better tool, but last
time I was at the store, they were out of the solid gold ones with the jewel
encrusted handles, and the regular whisks were just a few dollars. If you
were to buy a food processor for just making mayonnaise, that is probably a
bit pricey for that particular unitasker (unless you have a business that
sells homemade mayo).
Well, anyway, after all that blather, my question is, why is a wooden spoon
a better tool for making mayonnaise? Or is it just an attempt to hold on to
a "tradition."
Brian Christiansen