General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Mark Thorson's Lies About Cell Tech

Started by Jan · · Last activity · 9 posts · 419 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
27 December 2003
Last activity
28 December 2003
Original author
Jan
Posts
9
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
419
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–9 of 9
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. In light of the information shared above, the focus on microcystin in

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    blue-green algaecertainly appears to be a

    vicious obsession.

    Why Mr. Thorson spends so much lime and energy bashing Cell Tech and SuperBlue-Green Algae
    remains a mystery to me and many other scientists who have the background to properly interpret
    the scientific literature

    He does not appear to be interested in discovering the truth

    since it has been conveyed to him

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    many times

    Mr. Thorson makes a concerted and unsolicited effort to track down and forward his postings to
    anyone he suspects to be interested or involved with Super Blue Green Algae. I


    suppose

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    that this is an unfortunate side tofreedom of speech which, when coupled


    with

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    the power of the internet, allows someone to spread

    erroneous statements

    (YOU KNEW THEY WERE ERRONEROUS!!)

    The Anatoxin-a Primer implied that Super Blue Green Algae from Klamath Lake,

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    produced by Cell Tech, contains anatoxin-a (a neurotoxin I characterized as addictive), and that
    Cell Tech deliberately avoids testing for this toxin because anatoxin-a is responsible for the
    effects reported by SBGA users. I have since been advised that Cell Tech conducts regular tests
    that would disclose anatoxin-a, and that this toxin has never been found in Super Blue Green
    Algae. I had no basis for the suggestions I made in the Anatoxin-a Primer, and I hereby retract
    it in full.


    Then I find you worked for IBM who also LIED to their workers, causing CANCER Back to my
    killfil you go.

    Jan

  2. Quoted message said:

    Then I find you worked for IBM who also LIED to their workers, causing


    CANCER

    Quoted message said:

    Back to my killfil you go.

    Jan

    Lies cause cancer?

    --
    "The emperor is naked!"
    "No he isn't, he's merely endorsing a clothing-optional lifestyle!"

    to email me
    Please remove "all your clothes"

    Doug

  3. Jan the Accuser said:

    In light of the information shared above, the focus on microcystin in

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    blue-green algaecertainly appears to be a

    vicious obsession.

    Why Mr. Thorson spends so much lime and energy bashing Cell Tech and SuperBlue-Green Algae
    remains a mystery to me and many other scientists who have the background to properly interpret
    the scientific literature

    He does not appear to be interested in discovering the truth

    since it has been conveyed to him

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    many times

    Mr. Thorson makes a concerted and unsolicited effort to track down and forward his postings to
    anyone he suspects to be interested or involved with Super Blue Green Algae. I


    suppose

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    that this is an unfortunate side tofreedom of speech which, when coupled


    with

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    the power of the internet, allows someone to spread

    erroneous statements

    (YOU KNEW THEY WERE ERRONEROUS!!)

    Just because the hired spokesman for an algae says they are erroneous does not mean they are.

    No statement that I made about Cell Tech or there algae is untrue, therefore no statement I made
    about them is a lie.

    If you disagree, let's see that statement. Let's see an example of one of these lies you
    claim I told.

    Quoted message said:

    The Anatoxin-a Primer implied that Super Blue Green Algae from Klamath Lake,

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    produced by Cell Tech, contains anatoxin-a (a neurotoxin I characterized as addictive), and
    that Cell Tech deliberately avoids testing for this toxin because anatoxin-a is responsible for
    the effects reported by SBGA users. I have since been advised that Cell Tech conducts regular
    tests that would disclose anatoxin-a, and that this toxin has never been found in Super Blue
    Green Algae. I had no basis for the suggestions I made in the Anatoxin-a Primer, and I hereby
    retract it in full.

    Nothing in the retraction says that any of these statements were false or untrue. None of these
    statements were false or untrue, therefore none of these statements were lies.

    If you disagree, why don't you post an example of one of these statements you claim are lies.

    Why don't you do that, Jan?

    Is it because you can't?

    Because none of these statements are lies?

    Because your accusation against me is itself a LIE?

    Quoted message said:

    Then I find you worked for IBM who also LIED to their workers, causing CANCER Back to my
    killfil you go.

    Jan

    This is your response when backed into a corner.

    You can't provide an example of EVEN ONE statement I made which is a lie. So you pretend you can't
    even see my postings.

    You are despicable human being.

  4. Cell tech said to him.

    Quoted message said:

    In light of the information shared above, the focus on microcystin in


    blue-green algaecertainly appears to be a vicious obsession.

    Quoted message said:

    He does not appear to be interested in discovering the truth

    Quoted message said:

    ince it has been conveyed to him

    many times

    Quoted message said:

    the power of the internet, allows someone to spread erroneous statements

    Quoted message said:

    The Anatoxin-a Primer implied that Super Blue Green Algae from Klamath Lake,


    produced by Cell Tech, contains anatoxin-a (a neurotoxin I characterized asaddictive), and
    that Cell Tech

    ***deliberately**** avoids testing for this

    Quoted message said:

    toxin

    THERE IS THE LIE!!!!!

    You did NOT know they ***deliberately** did not test, YOU MADE IT UP!!!

    MAKING THINGS UP WITHOUT KNOWING IS LYING.

    End of story.

    Then you worked at IBM and were a part of the company that KNEW their production caused CANCER.

    What a hypocrite.

    Jan

  5. "Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:20031227150154.13604.00001594@mb-
    m10.aol.com... [...]

    Quoted message said:


    Then you worked at IBM and were a part of the company that KNEW their production caused CANCER.

    Then Jan owned and operated 2 daycare centers that she KNEW was contaminated with carcinogens.

    Quoted message said:

    What a hypocrite.

  6. (Jan) said:

    Cell tech said to him.

    Quoted message said:

    In light of the information shared above, the focus on microcystin in


    blue-green algaecertainly appears to be a vicious obsession.

    Quoted message said:

    He does not appear to be interested in discovering the truth

    Quoted message said:

    ince it has been conveyed to him

    many times

    Quoted message said:

    the power of the internet, allows someone to spread erroneous statements

    Quoted message said:

    The Anatoxin-a Primer implied that Super Blue Green Algae from Klamath Lake,


    produced by Cell Tech, contains anatoxin-a (a neurotoxin I characterized asaddictive), and that
    Cell Tech

    ***deliberately**** avoids testing for this

    Quoted message said:

    toxin

    THERE IS THE LIE!!!!!

    You did NOT know they ***deliberately** did not test, YOU MADE IT UP!!!

    MAKING THINGS UP WITHOUT KNOWING IS LYING.

    End of story.

    Then you worked at IBM and were a part of the company that KNEW their production caused CANCER.

    What a hypocrite.

    Jan

    "THERE IS THE LIE!!!!!" (says Jan Drew)

    Person X works for IBM. Does this make person X responsible for all this company does ? No. But Jan
    Drew implies that.

    "MAKING THINGS UP WITHOUT KNOWING IS LYING." (says Jan Drew)

    Jan Drew proves himself to be a rotten demagogic liar.

    q.e.d.

    Aribert Deckers
    --
    World Conference "Health Care Systems: Public and Private Management"

    ariplex.comama p0.htm

  7. Jan said:
    Quoted message said:

    The Anatoxin-a Primer implied that Super Blue Green Algae from Klamath Lake,


    produced by Cell Tech, contains anatoxin-a (a neurotoxin I characterized asaddictive), and that
    Cell Tech

    ***deliberately**** avoids testing for this

    Quoted message said:

    toxin

    THERE IS THE LIE!!!!!

    That is the lie? Would you please post THE WHOLE ORIGINAL sentence which is the lie? That should be
    easy to find in Google, because you know it contains the word "deliberately".

    Not this sentence -- unless you are claiming that this sentence is a lie. Why don't you post the
    ORIGINAL statement that this sentence is referring to, if that statement is a lie?

    Why don't you do that, Jan? Why don't you post this LIE, so you can prove your accusation?

    Quoted message said:

    You did NOT know they ***deliberately** did not test, YOU MADE IT UP!!!

    MAKING THINGS UP WITHOUT KNOWING IS LYING.

    End of story.

    Then you worked at IBM and were a part of the company that KNEW their production caused CANCER.

    What a hypocrite.

    Jan

    Let's see the WHOLE ORIGINAL SENTENCE which used the word "delibrately" which is a LIE.

    Why won't you do that, Jan?

    Is it because if you did, everybody would see that the original statement was obviously NOT A LIE?

    And then everybody would see that it is Jan Drew who is the LIAR?

  8. Jan the Accuser said:
    Quoted message said:

    The Anatoxin-a Primer implied that Super Blue Green Algae from Klamath Lake,


    produced by Cell Tech, contains anatoxin-a (a neurotoxin I characterized asaddictive), and that
    Cell Tech

    ***deliberately**** avoids testing for this

    Quoted message said:

    toxin

    THERE IS THE LIE!!!!!

    Well, Jan, where is the lie?

    You say that there is a lie in the file "An Anatoxin-A Primer" which is a lie.

    Let's see that lie. Post the WHOLE ORIGINAL STATEMENT from that file which is a lie.

    Why don't you do that, Jan?

    Is it because if you did, everybody would see that this statement is OBVIOUSLY NOT A LIE?

    Is it because if you did, everybody would see the Jan Drew has FALSELY ACCUSED me of being a LIAR?

    Is it because if you did, everybody would see that it is Jan Drew who is the LIAR?

    Is that it, Jan?

    Is that why you won't post this LIE you claim I told?

    You are a despicable human being.

  9. Jan the Accuser said:
    Quoted message said:

    The Anatoxin-a Primer implied that Super Blue Green Algae from Klamath Lake,


    produced by Cell Tech, contains anatoxin-a (a neurotoxin I characterized asaddictive), and that
    Cell Tech

    ***deliberately**** avoids testing for this

    Quoted message said:

    toxin

    THERE IS THE LIE!!!!!

    Well, Jan, what exactly do the statements referred to by this statement say? What is the original
    statement which is a lie?

    You say that there is a lie in the file "An Anatoxin-A Primer". Let's see that lie. Post a
    WHOLE ORIGINAL STATEMENT from that file which is a lie. Not the whole file, just a statement
    which is a LIE.

    Certainly, you know where that part is, don't you Jan? Or do you just accuse people of being liars
    without regard to whether they've lied or not.

    Why don't you post this part, Jan? Then you'd prove that I'd lied, by posting the actual lie itself,
    rather than merely a statement that refers to the (alleged) lie.

    Why don't you do that, Jan?

    Is it because if you did, everybody would see that this statement is OBVIOUSLY NOT A LIE?

    Is it because if you did, everybody would see the Jan Drew has FALSELY ACCUSED me of being a LIAR?

    Is it because if you did, everybody would see that it is Jan Drew who is the LIAR?

    Is that it, Jan?

    Is that why you won't post this LIE you claim I told?

    You are a despicable human being.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.