"Jason" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:Anyone have an opinion on the Marin Rift Zone '03 compared
to an '04 model. I noticed that the '03 didn't come with
disc brakes, is this a problem? Any other major
difference's. Can't decide if it is OK to get a second
hand '03 for maybe £800-900 or get an new '04 for £1500...
The brakes depend on where and when you ride, the gnarlier
and wetter the downhill the more suited disc brakes become.
Bear in mind so long as the '03 has disc hubs (and I'd guess
it has) you can fit a set of Hope Mini Monos for £200. If
you mainly ride dryish XC trails then the lack of discs
isn't a problem and you can always add them later if you
feel you'd benefit.
The S/H solution depends on the usage the bikes had, if you
can get one that's had little use for £800 then spend
another £200 on the brakes you're still quids in, the money
saved could be invested in a better fork than the Skareb for
instance should you find it lacking.
However, a bike that's been well used for a year will have
seen off the chainrings, cassette and chain, and perhaps
have serious rim wear if not disc equipped, not a problem if
recently replaced but will eat into your S/H bargain if you
have to replace them shortly.
You could end up with a bike that's had a little use but is
fitted with kit that suits you for the same price as a brand
new bike that you may want to upgrade as some components
don't suit you. Yer pays yer money ;-)
AFAIK the '04 fork has 100mm of travel against the '03s
80mm, but you need to verify this.
Personally I'd be reluctant to pay full price on a new mtb
if I could, without too much trouble, locate a very good S/H
one or could find a deal on last years model.
Review at: bikemagic.commpOpen ↗
s/RGN/1/RCN/57/RPN/15465/v/2/sp/
--
Regards, Pete