General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Marathon DNF rates?

Started by Harold Buck · · Last activity · 15 posts · 350 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
6 October 2004
Last activity
12 October 2004
Original author
Harold Buck
Posts
15
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
350
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–15 of 15
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I just ran the Milwaukee Marathon on Sunday (I'm hoping to put together
    a race report, but to make a long story short: I was a little slower
    than I'd hoped, but felt good and ran every step. I also felt like I
    could have kept going another 5 miles if needed, which is good since I'm
    doing a 50K on 10/24 and was using this as a training run).

    Anyway, the DNF rate for this race was around 28% (2500 runners, 1800
    finishers). That seemed really high to me. What are typical DNF rates
    for Marathons? Are they higher or lower for the big races like Chicago
    and New York?

    --Harold Buck

    "I used to rock and roll all night,
    and party every day.
    Then it was every other day. . . ."
    -Homer J. Simpson

  2. If you think that number is high, check out the impotency percentage.

  3. Harold Buck <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    Anyway, the DNF rate for this race was around 28% (2500 runners, 1800
    finishers). That seemed really high to me. What are typical DNF rates
    for Marathons? Are they higher or lower for the big races like Chicago
    and New York?

    Marathon organizers tend to like to boast of high numbers;
    it could well be there were 2500 registered runners of whom
    only 80-85& showed up and the percentage of DNFs could be
    around 10%, which would in my hunch be about average for
    an "entry level" marathon of that size.

    Anders

  4. Harold Buck <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    Anyway, the DNF rate for this race was around 28% (2500 runners, 1800
    finishers). That seemed really high to me. What are typical DNF rates
    for Marathons? Are they higher or lower for the big races like Chicago
    and New York?

    Probably different for each race. The last marathon I ran had about
    100 starters, and less than 50 finishers. Of course this was a MANS
    race, where no wussies were allowed. A real hilly course only run by
    maniacs like me, with a rep for killing off the punks. Of course it
    was a springtime marathon and the temps topped 90', so the whimps went
    down like tin soldiers.

  5. Were there actually 2500 starters? or just 2500 registered & ?? many
    non-starters?
    bj

    "Harold Buck" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I just ran the Milwaukee Marathon on Sunday (I'm hoping to put together
    a race report, but to make a long story short: I was a little slower
    than I'd hoped, but felt good and ran every step. I also felt like I
    could have kept going another 5 miles if needed, which is good since I'm
    doing a 50K on 10/24 and was using this as a training run).

    Anyway, the DNF rate for this race was around 28% (2500 runners, 1800
    finishers). That seemed really high to me. What are typical DNF rates
    for Marathons? Are they higher or lower for the big races like Chicago
    and New York?

    --Harold Buck

    "I used to rock and roll all night,
    and party every day.
    Then it was every other day. . . ."
    -Homer J. Simpson

  6. In article <fRS8d.6628$r3.1162@trnddc05>,

    bj said:

    Were there actually 2500 starters? or just 2500 registered & ?? many
    non-starters?

    I'm not sure. I think they had 2500 registered; I don't know how many
    no-shows there were.

    --Harold Buck

    "I used to rock and roll all night,
    and party every day.
    Then it was every other day. . . ."
    -Homer J. Simpson

  7. Harold Buck <[email hidden]> wrote: What are typical DNF
    rates

    Quoted message said:

    for Marathons? Are they higher or lower for the big races like Chicago
    and New York?


    Harold: I can't answer the question, but have been wondering the same
    thing. Last Sunday, while you were in Milwaukee, I was running in
    Minneapolis. The field was limited to 10,000 runners. The paper said
    that 10,300+ toed the line, but only 7300+ finished. And it was and
    ideal day for running: low humidity, light breezes and 44F at the
    start.

    It is interesting, because last year (same course, same weather) the
    field was limited to 8800 runners, and 7093 finished, which means that
    they added 1200 runners, but only 200 finishers.

    Maybe people who sign up late (who would have been denied entry the
    previous year) are just people who also don't get their training miles
    in. I can't imagine.

    Brian Jones

  8. In article <[email hidden]>,

    (Brian Jones) said:


    Maybe people who sign up late (who would have been denied entry the
    previous year) are just people who also don't get their training miles
    in. I can't imagine.

    Milwaukee did have a lot of people sign up in the last month. I myself
    only signed up about 6 weeks out, but I'd been planning on doing the
    race for 15 months and just held off because I knew it wouldn't close
    and that way if something came up I wouldn't be out the cash.

    --Harold Buck

    "I used to rock and roll all night,
    and party every day.
    Then it was every other day. . . ."
    -Homer J. Simpson

  9. << Subject: Re: Marathon DNF rates?
    From: [email hidden] (Anders Lustig)
    Date: Wed, Oct 6, 2004 12:45 AM
    Message-id: <[email hidden]>

    Harold Buck <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    Anyway, the DNF rate for this race was around 28% (2500 runners, 1800
    finishers). That seemed really high to me. What are typical DNF rates
    for Marathons? Are they higher or lower for the big races like Chicago
    and New York?

    Marathon organizers tend to like to boast of high numbers;
    it could well be there were 2500 registered runners of whom
    only 80-85& showed up and the percentage of DNFs could be
    around 10%, which would in my hunch be about average for
    an "entry level" marathon of that size.

    Anders

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    <BR><BR>

    By way of comparision, Boston had about 3000 "no-shows" this year, out of about
    20,000 registered. Of those who did run, about 93% finished, in spite of the
    heat. In a typical year, 95% of starters finish Boston.

    Robert Walter, CA

  10. In article <[email hidden]>,

    (RWalter2) said:


    Marathon organizers tend to like to boast of high numbers;
    it could well be there were 2500 registered runners of whom
    only 80-85& showed up and the percentage of DNFs could be
    around 10%, which would in my hunch be about average for
    an "entry level" marathon of that size.

    They actually have something like 2650 runners listed as registered, but
    I figured out that they have the relay runners included in there. There
    were 147 relay teams that finished, most with 3 or 4 runners, so I'm
    sure that factors in somehow. That would likely put the DNF rate at
    closer to 10% if there were 600 relay runners. There were also
    wheelchair racers, but I didn't check how many.

    --Harold Buck

    "I used to rock and roll all night,
    and party every day.
    Then it was every other day. . . ."
    -Homer J. Simpson

  11. "Harold Buck" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Milwaukee did have a lot of people sign up in the last month. I myself
    only signed up about 6 weeks out, but I'd been planning on doing the
    race for 15 months and just held off because I knew it wouldn't close
    and that way if something came up I wouldn't be out the cash.

    --Harold Buck

    BTW, I missed your race report - what's the Milwaukee course like? I'm
    looking to do my first marathon, but probably not until summer or fall 2006.
    The ones up north are either too soon after winter (Journeys & Green Bay),
    too difficult for a first timer (Paavo), or hard to get into (Grandma's).
    Mad City is late May which might or might not work depending on what the
    winter is like.

    Jenn

  12. In article <[email hidden]>,

    JMA said:

    BTW, I missed your race report - what's the Milwaukee course like? I'm
    looking to do my first marathon, but probably not until summer or fall 2006.
    The ones up north are either too soon after winter (Journeys & Green Bay),
    too difficult for a first timer (Paavo), or hard to get into (Grandma's).
    Mad City is late May which might or might not work depending on what the
    winter is like.

    I haven't done it yet. I'll try to get it up in the next few days.

    --Harold Buck

    "I used to rock and roll all night,
    and party every day.
    Then it was every other day. . . ."
    -Homer J. Simpson

  13. Harold Buck said:

    Anyway, the DNF rate for this race was around 28% (2500 runners, 1800
    finishers). That seemed really high to me. What are typical DNF rates
    for Marathons? Are they higher or lower for the big races like Chicago
    and New York?

    --Harold Buck

    Our race director posted on our website 2200 individuals registered
    and 1800 finished. The rest were relay runners. Don't know how many
    started.

    Jim Schmidt
    http://my.execpc.com/~silkey/JimboWis.htm

  14. << e'lay's runners. Don't know how many
    started. >>

    Seventeen, last I
    Heard, minus one,
    Were, last I
    Heard, headed
    Heaven
    Word...
    E'lay stayed
    Behind.
    _______
    Blog, or dog? Who knows. But if you see my lost pup, please ping me!
    <A
    HREF="http://journals.aol.com/virginiaz/DreamingofLeonardo">http://journal
    s.aol.com/virginiaz/DreamingofLeonardo</A>

  15. << I
    Heard, headed
    Heaven
    Word... >>

    ....sworth say,
    "Prelude,"
    & I replied,
    Only
    The beginning....
    Super
    8*

    [Hey!]

    ~ waves ~

    _______
    Blog, or dog? Who knows. But if you see my lost pup, please ping me!
    <A
    HREF="http://journals.aol.com/virginiaz/DreamingofLeonardo">http://journal
    s.aol.com/virginiaz/DreamingofLeonardo</A>

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.