Mad Cow---can you get from eating steak?



M

Minnime

Guest
First of all I am not panicing, nor worrying. I think the US beef supply is safe and this was an
isolated incident. However I am reading conflicting stories on how Mad Cow can be transferred to
humans. I have read that hamburger could be suspect, yet steak is not. Muscle is not. Was the
problem in britain that people were eating(yuck) the brain and spinal cord? Very confused so someone
enlighten me please.
 
On Fri, 26 Dec 2003 03:04:53 GMT, "Minnime" <[email protected]>
wrote:

>First of all I am not panicing, nor worrying. I think the US beef supply is safe and this was an
>isolated incident. However I am reading conflicting stories on how Mad Cow can be transferred to
>humans. I have read that hamburger could be suspect, yet steak is not. Muscle is not. Was the
>problem in britain that people were eating(yuck) the brain and spinal cord? Very confused so
>someone enlighten me please.

Yet another Mad Cow thread.

There's plenty of information out there on the internet to supply you with more than enough reading
for a night. Look up "mad cow AMR spinal tissue" in Google News.

-sw
 
"Minnime" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...
> First of all I am not panicing, nor worrying. I think the US beef supply is safe and this was an
> isolated incident. However I am reading conflicting stories on how Mad Cow can be transferred to
> humans. I have read that hamburger could be suspect, yet steak is not. Muscle is not. Was the
> problem in britain that people were eating(yuck) the brain and spinal cord? Very confused so
> someone enlighten me please.

Mad cow is also found in the intestines. It's thought that the Brits got it from eating sausages
made with casings made from cow intestines. Ironicallly, they were probably pork sausages...
 
The first cut on a beef carcass is to split it in halves by a band saw, exposing the spinal cord.
Actually the cut splits the animal in half down the spine.

Did you ever notice that fatty substance in the little round notch in the bone of a T Bone steak??
We like to refer to it as marrow (not). It is actually SPINAL CORD.

Minnime <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:p[email protected]...
> First of all I am not panicing, nor worrying. I think the US beef supply
is
> safe and this was an isolated incident. However I am reading conflicting stories on how Mad Cow
> can be transferred to humans. I have read that hamburger could be suspect, yet steak is not.
> Muscle is not. Was the
problem
> in britain that people were eating(yuck) the brain and spinal cord? Very confused so someone
> enlighten me please.
>
>

-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1
Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
 
Read this article, and you think the meat supply is safe???

http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=104-12242003

Minnime <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:p[email protected]...
> First of all I am not panicing, nor worrying. I think the US beef supply
is
> safe and this was an isolated incident. However I am reading conflicting stories on how Mad Cow
> can be transferred to humans. I have read that hamburger could be suspect, yet steak is not.
> Muscle is not. Was the
problem
> in britain that people were eating(yuck) the brain and spinal cord? Very confused so someone
> enlighten me please.
>
>

-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1
Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
 
On Thu, 25 Dec 2003 22:27:13 -0800, "Diggery Dew"
<[email protected]> wrote:

>Did you ever notice that fatty substance in the little round notch in the bone of a T Bone steak??
>We like to refer to it as marrow (not). It is actually SPINAL CORD.

That complete ********.

I like how everyone suddenly becomes an expert on Mad Cow. This is why you shouldn't beleive or
trust anything you read on Usenet.

Responsible people are wise enough to rely on credible sources instead, which is why I suggested the
OP go and search the net, rather than relying on rumores and the recent wave of misinformation on
the subject.

-sw

>
>Minnime <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:p[email protected]...
>> First of all I am not panicing, nor worrying. I think the US beef supply
>is
>> safe and this was an isolated incident. However I am reading conflicting stories on how Mad Cow
>> can be transferred to humans. I have read that hamburger could be suspect, yet steak is not.
>> Muscle is not. Was the
>problem
>> in britain that people were eating(yuck) the brain and spinal cord? Very confused so someone
>> enlighten me please.
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1
>Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
 
"Minnime" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...
> First of all I am not panicing, nor worrying. I think the US beef supply is safe

First: two books you need to read: "Fast Food Nation" and "Slaughterhouse". Deregulation and
unscrupulous appointments to the regulatory commissions under the Reagan/Bush regimes totally ruined
the "wholesomeness" of the US meat industry.

>and this was an isolated incident. However I am reading conflicting stories on how Mad Cow can be
>transferred to humans. I have read that hamburger could be suspect, yet steak is not. Muscle is
>not. Was the problem in britain that people were eating(yuck) the brain and spinal cord? Very
>confused so someone enlighten me please.

Any meat that is contaminated with infected tissue could cause a problem. When you understand the
process of slaughtering, and the high incidence of contamination - with not only bodily fluids (e.g.
spinal fluid) but feces, blood and other tissues - you may better understand the real concern.

-L.
 
"Minnime" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:<[email protected]>... Was the problem
> in britain that people were eating(yuck) the brain and spinal cord? Very confused so someone
> enlighten me please.

Go to any real Mexican taco place and you'll see cabeza on the menu. Cabeza means head in Spanish,
but in this case it's the polite way to say brain. What is disgusting to one culture is a delicacy
in another. (I don't care how clean the meat supply is or isn't, that seems like pushing the
gambling envelope just a bit.)

Ken
 
"Minnime" <[email protected]> writes:

> I have read that hamburger could be suspect, yet steak is not. Muscle is not. Was the problem in
> britain that people were eating(yuck) the brain and spinal cord? Very confused so someone
> enlighten me please.

The answer to "can you get disease from eating steak" is yes.

From UPI, 12/24: "Infectious prions, thought to be the causative agent of mad cow and vCJD, are not
found in muscle tissue that comprises hamburgers and steaks, he said. They are generally located in
brain and spinal cord tissue. However, recent studies have suggested prions may occur, albeit in
smaller numbers, in muscle tissue, and bits of brain and spinal cord tissue have been detected in
hamburger meat."

The probability is extremely low, but not impossible.

I liken it to the old salmonella-in-eggs debate. CAN we contract salmonella from eggs? Of course.
But the likelihood that an egg might contain salmonella is extremely small – 0.005% (five one-
thousandths of one percent). At this rate, if you’re an average consumer, you might encounter a
contaminated egg once every 84 years.

The fatality rate for salmonella is much less than one percent of those who might contract it. It is
the very young, the very old, and the very immunocompromised that are at risk for death.

Same for BSE. As of December 1, 2003, a total of 153 cases had been reported worldwide; of these,
143 cases had occurred in the United Kingdom. The average annual death rate in the United States has
remained relatively stable at about one case per million population per year.

Until the time when the entire supply of US beef is considered suspect, I plan on eating the same
roasts, ribs, and steaks I always have. I will, though, probably grind my own hamburger if/when the
problem becomes more widespread. (Easily done even in a food processer if nothing else.) Many people
grind their own already against the risk of e. coli bacteria - and to guard against any mystery
ingredients being thrown in. (G)

Connie
*****************************************************
My mind is like a steel...um, whatchamacallit.
 
On 26 Dec 2003 01:48:34 -0800, [email protected] (-L.) wrote:

>"Minnime" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:<[email protected]>...
>> First of all I am not panicing, nor worrying. I think the US beef supply is safe
>
>First: two books you need to read: "Fast Food Nation" and "Slaughterhouse". Deregulation and
>unscrupulous appointments to the regulatory commissions under the Reagan/Bush regimes totally
>ruined the "wholesomeness" of the US meat industry.
>
>>and this was an isolated incident. However I am reading conflicting stories on how Mad Cow can be
>>transferred to humans. I have read that hamburger could be suspect, yet steak is not. Muscle is
>>not. Was the problem in britain that people were eating(yuck) the brain and spinal cord? Very
>>confused so someone enlighten me please.
>
>Any meat that is contaminated with infected tissue could cause a problem. When you understand
>the process of slaughtering, and the high incidence of contamination - with not only bodily
>fluids (e.g. spinal fluid) but feces, blood and other tissues - you may better understand the
>real concern.
>
>-L.

I have read Fast Food Nation.. the problem with this tome is. it is very full of unproven examples
and is in fact an attack on the food industry as a whole.. Peta's Ra Ra book so to speak.

But the Slaughterhouse book is a bit more interesting.

I disagree with the Dregulation statement though.. I mean if this is indeed the problem.. then
why was it not "fixed" under the Clinton administration.. Sounds very much like pointing
fingures to me..

Concerned.. Of course I am concerned.. I mean you have ONE example of Mad Cow Disease in the US and
Canada.. But for the last four years you have deer population also contracting Chronic Wasting
Disease which is somewhat simular..

Kit
 
"Kitanis" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On 26 Dec 2003 01:48:34 -0800, [email protected] (-L.) wrote:
>
> >"Minnime" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:<[email protected]>...
> >> First of all I am not panicing, nor worrying. I think the US beef
supply is
> >> safe
> >
> >First: two books you need to read: "Fast Food Nation" and "Slaughterhouse". Deregulation and
> >unscrupulous appointments to the regulatory commissions under the Reagan/Bush regimes totally
> >ruined the "wholesomeness" of the US meat industry.
> >
> >>and this was an isolated incident. However I am reading conflicting stories on how Mad Cow can
> >>be transferred to humans. I have read that hamburger could be suspect, yet steak is not. Muscle
> >>is not. Was the
problem
> >> in britain that people were eating(yuck) the brain and spinal cord?
Very
> >> confused so someone enlighten me please.
> >
> >Any meat that is contaminated with infected tissue could cause a problem. When you understand the
> >process of slaughtering, and the high incidence of contamination - with not only bodily fluids
> >(e.g. spinal fluid) but feces, blood and other tissues - you may better understand the real
> >concern.
> >
> >-L.
>
>
> I have read Fast Food Nation.. the problem with this tome is. it is very full of unproven examples
> and is in fact an attack on the food industry as a whole.. Peta's Ra Ra book so to speak.
>
> But the Slaughterhouse book is a bit more interesting.
>
> I disagree with the Dregulation statement though.. I mean if this is indeed the problem.. then
> why was it not "fixed" under the Clinton administration.. Sounds very much like pointing
> fingures to me..
>
> Concerned.. Of course I am concerned.. I mean you have ONE example of Mad Cow Disease in the US
> and Canada.. But for the last four years you have deer population also contracting Chronic Wasting
> Disease which is somewhat simular..

http://www.nytimes.com/2003/12/25/national/25WARN.html

The magnitude of the problem has yet to be comprehended. The problem with BSE is it is not a
"disease" in the sense of how we view and treat illnesses. Making the meat supply safe (again) will
take years and cause much political upheaval as it did once before. We just never learn.

Paul
 
"Paul M. Cook©®" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> The magnitude of the problem has yet to be comprehended. The problem with BSE is it is not a
> "disease" in the sense of how we view and treat illnesses. Making the meat supply safe (again)
> will take years and cause much political upheaval as it did once before. We just never learn.
>

As long as americans prefer quantity over quality and support 'corporations über alles', we'll
continue to be offered **** at a cheap price. I don't see any reason to panic over one case of mad
cow, but it's a good reason to pause for thought.

You reap what you sow.

Jack WalMart
 
Kitanis <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...
> On 26 Dec 2003 01:48:34 -0800, [email protected] (-L.) wrote:
>
> >"Minnime" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >news:<[email protected]>...
> >> First of all I am not panicing, nor worrying. I think the US beef supply is safe
> >
> >First: two books you need to read: "Fast Food Nation" and "Slaughterhouse". Deregulation and
> >unscrupulous appointments to the regulatory commissions under the Reagan/Bush regimes totally
> >ruined the "wholesomeness" of the US meat industry.
> >
> >>and this was an isolated incident. However I am reading conflicting stories on how Mad Cow can
> >>be transferred to humans. I have read that hamburger could be suspect, yet steak is not. Muscle
> >>is not. Was the problem in britain that people were eating(yuck) the brain and spinal cord? Very
> >>confused so someone enlighten me please.
> >
> >Any meat that is contaminated with infected tissue could cause a problem. When you understand the
> >process of slaughtering, and the high incidence of contamination - with not only bodily fluids
> >(e.g. spinal fluid) but feces, blood and other tissues - you may better understand the real
> >concern.
> >
> >-L.
>
>
> I have read Fast Food Nation.. the problem with this tome is. it is very full of unproven examples

Unproven examples such as what? - The lists of names of people who have died from contaminated food
or testimonials from their families, and the first-hand accounts of workers maimed in the
slaughterhouses, or the stories of the small-scale rancers put out of business by large corporations
and factory farms? The boojk has literally about 50 pages of documentation and references. It is a
very well-researched book.

>and is in fact an attack on the food industry as a whole.. Peta's Ra Ra book so to speak.

The author Eric Schlosser has no connection to PeTA or any other animal welfare or animal rights
group, so I guess you are completely off-base.

>
> But the Slaughterhouse book is a bit more interesting.

You obviously haven't read either book. Gail Eisnitz is associated with the Humane Farming
Association, and her book is much less well-documented, and more of a "one person" account of the
slaughterhouse business.

>
> I disagree with the Dregulation statement though.. I mean if this is indeed the problem.. then why
> was it not "fixed" under the Clinton administration..

They tried to "fix it" and most of what was changed was then relegislated once he was out of office.
Read FFN again. It discusses this.

Sounds very much like pointing fingures to me..

Well, they deserve to have fingers pointed at them. The incidence of meat-borne food poisioning
skyrocketed after line speeds increased, the regulations pertaining to contaminated meat (and the
decontamination of same) essentially became non-existent, and the food supply became a cess-pool. If
you think the meat supply is wholesome in this country, by all means, continue to eat it. AFAIC,
it's natural sleection in action.

>
> Concerned.. Of course I am concerned.. I mean you have ONE example of Mad Cow Disease in the US
> and Canada..

One documented. How many other cows have slipped though undetected?

>But for the last four years you have deer population also contracting Chronic Wasting Disease which
>is somewhat simular..

Deer are not a farmed meat animal, for the most part, so that is a non-issue.

-L.
 
Ken wrote:
>
> "Minnime" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:<[email protected]>... Was the problem
> > in britain that people were eating(yuck) the brain and spinal cord? Very confused so someone
> > enlighten me please.
>
> Go to any real Mexican taco place and you'll see cabeza on the menu. Cabeza means head in Spanish,
> but in this case it's the polite way to say brain. What is disgusting to one culture is a delicacy
> in another. (I don't care how clean the meat supply is or isn't, that seems like pushing the
> gambling envelope just a bit.)
>
> Ken

Anyone who has eaten hamburger in any form in the US has eaten brain and spinal cord. The removal of
such material is hardly surgically precise.
 
Ken <[email protected]> wrote:
>"Minnime" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:<[email protected]>... Was the problem
>> in britain that people were eating(yuck) the brain and spinal cord? Very confused so someone
>> enlighten me please.
>
>Go to any real Mexican taco place and you'll see cabeza on the menu. Cabeza means head in Spanish,
>but in this case it's the polite way to say brain.

No, it's literally "head". Whole cow head, skinned, with the tongue, eyes, and ears removed, it's
cooked in a barbacoa pit for 12-18 hours and then pulled like pork. It's mostly cheek.

In taquerias, asking for cabeza gets you cheek meat. The logistical failings of slow-cooking whole
cow heads to sell a few tacos a week are pretty obvious.

I couldn't say that the brain is never eaten as part of a whole cabeza at a fiesta, though, but even
Mexicans would look at you funny if you asked for it.

--Blair "Taco Schidt."
 
I read Fast Food Nation and I didnt find it to be an attack on the food industry. I thought it was
factual and to the point. Seeing how immigrant slaughterhouse employees are treated disgusted me
more than the sanitary conditions.

"Kitanis" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On 26 Dec 2003 01:48:34 -0800, [email protected] (-L.) wrote:
>
> >"Minnime" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:<[email protected]>...
> >> First of all I am not panicing, nor worrying. I think the US beef
supply is
> >> safe
> >
> >First: two books you need to read: "Fast Food Nation" and "Slaughterhouse". Deregulation and
> >unscrupulous appointments to the regulatory commissions under the Reagan/Bush regimes totally
> >ruined the "wholesomeness" of the US meat industry.
> >
> >>and this was an isolated incident. However I am reading conflicting stories on how Mad Cow can
> >>be transferred to humans. I have read that hamburger could be suspect, yet steak is not. Muscle
> >>is not. Was the
problem
> >> in britain that people were eating(yuck) the brain and spinal cord?
Very
> >> confused so someone enlighten me please.
> >
> >Any meat that is contaminated with infected tissue could cause a problem. When you understand the
> >process of slaughtering, and the high incidence of contamination - with not only bodily fluids
> >(e.g. spinal fluid) but feces, blood and other tissues - you may better understand the real
> >concern.
> >
> >-L.
>
>
> I have read Fast Food Nation.. the problem with this tome is. it is very full of unproven examples
> and is in fact an attack on the food industry as a whole.. Peta's Ra Ra book so to speak.
>
> But the Slaughterhouse book is a bit more interesting.
>
> I disagree with the Dregulation statement though.. I mean if this is indeed the problem.. then
> why was it not "fixed" under the Clinton administration.. Sounds very much like pointing
> fingures to me..
>
> Concerned.. Of course I am concerned.. I mean you have ONE example of Mad Cow Disease in the US
> and Canada.. But for the last four years you have deer population also contracting Chronic Wasting
> Disease which is somewhat simular..
>
> Kit
 
Paul M. Cook©® <[email protected]> wrote:
>The magnitude of the problem has yet to be comprehended. The problem with BSE is it is not a
>"disease" in the sense of how we view and treat illnesses. Making the meat supply safe (again) will
>take years and cause much political upheaval as it did once before. We just never learn.

I disagree. It is very easy to stop. Keep the stalls clean and don't feed animal matter to cows.
They're not designed to eat the stuff in the first place, and it affects the flavor adversely in
the second. But it's a way to improve profits, so the Right will insist that it can't possibly be a
bad thing.

--Blair "The political upheaval I'll go with."
 
On 12/26/2003 8:00 PM, in article
[email protected], "Minnime"
<[email protected]> opined:

> I read Fast Food Nation and I didnt find it to be an attack on the food industry. I thought it was
> factual and to the point. Seeing how immigrant slaughterhouse employees are treated disgusted me
> more than the sanitary conditions.

Why'd you leave out the word "illegal?"

>
> "Kitanis" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> On 26 Dec 2003 01:48:34 -0800, [email protected] (-L.) wrote:
>>
>>> "Minnime" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:<[email protected]>...
>>>> First of all I am not panicing, nor worrying. I think the US beef
> supply is
>>>> safe
>>>
>>> First: two books you need to read: "Fast Food Nation" and "Slaughterhouse". Deregulation and
>>> unscrupulous appointments to the regulatory commissions under the Reagan/Bush regimes totally
>>> ruined the "wholesomeness" of the US meat industry.
>>>
>>>> and this was an isolated incident. However I am reading conflicting stories on how Mad Cow can
>>>> be transferred to humans. I have read that hamburger could be suspect, yet steak is not. Muscle
>>>> is not. Was the
> problem
>>>> in britain that people were eating(yuck) the brain and spinal cord?
> Very
>>>> confused so someone enlighten me please.
>>>
>>> Any meat that is contaminated with infected tissue could cause a problem. When you understand
>>> the process of slaughtering, and the high incidence of contamination - with not only bodily
>>> fluids (e.g. spinal fluid) but feces, blood and other tissues - you may better understand the
>>> real concern.
>>>
>>> -L.
>>
>>
>> I have read Fast Food Nation.. the problem with this tome is. it is very full of unproven
>> examples and is in fact an attack on the food industry as a whole.. Peta's Ra Ra book so
>> to speak.
>>
>> But the Slaughterhouse book is a bit more interesting.
>>
>> I disagree with the Dregulation statement though.. I mean if this is indeed the problem.. then
>> why was it not "fixed" under the Clinton administration.. Sounds very much like pointing fingures
>> to me..
>>
>> Concerned.. Of course I am concerned.. I mean you have ONE example of Mad Cow Disease in the US
>> and Canada.. But for the last four years you have deer population also contracting Chronic
>> Wasting Disease which is somewhat simular..
>>
>> Kit
>
>

--
========================================================
"Michael, we're bigger than U. S. Steel," Hyman Roth.
========================================================
 
On 12/26/2003 6:25 PM, in article [email protected],
"Blair P. Houghton" <[email protected]> opined:

> Paul M. Cook©® <[email protected]> wrote:
>> The magnitude of the problem has yet to be comprehended. The problem with BSE is it is not a
>> "disease" in the sense of how we view and treat illnesses. Making the meat supply safe (again)
>> will take years and cause much political upheaval as it did once before. We just never learn.
>
> I disagree. It is very easy to stop. Keep the stalls clean and don't feed animal matter to cows.
> They're not designed to eat the stuff in the first place, and it affects the flavor adversely in
> the second.

Shut up asswipe, you don't know jack **** about beef.

Washington State borders canada, I'm sure it will be traced there.

But it's a
> way to improve profits, so the Right will insist that it can't possibly be a bad thing.

So why is the *left* getting their asses kicked in every election?

Let's see: Clinton Gore Sharpton Dean Davis Daschel

Ho ho ho, hee, hee, hee, u one funny Monkey Boy Blair.

>
> --Blair "The political upheaval I'll go with."

--
 
illegal or legal---no human being deserves to be treated to the conditions and abuse the face. ****
these people are only trying to feed their family, yet when they get an injury that keeps the out of
work they have no medical and risk being fired, etc.

"The Wolf" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:BC124D1E.4AF7A%[email protected]...
> On 12/26/2003 8:00 PM, in article [email protected], "Minnime"
> <[email protected]> opined:
>
> > I read Fast Food Nation and I didnt find it to be an attack on the food industry. I thought it
> > was factual and to the point. Seeing how
immigrant
> > slaughterhouse employees are treated disgusted me more than the sanitary conditions.
>
> Why'd you leave out the word "illegal?"
>
> >
> > "Kitanis" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> >> On 26 Dec 2003 01:48:34 -0800, [email protected] (-L.) wrote:
> >>
> >>> "Minnime" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:<[email protected]>...
> >>>> First of all I am not panicing, nor worrying. I think the US beef
> > supply is
> >>>> safe
> >>>
> >>> First: two books you need to read: "Fast Food Nation" and "Slaughterhouse". Deregulation and
> >>> unscrupulous appointments to the regulatory commissions under the Reagan/Bush regimes totally
> >>> ruined the "wholesomeness" of the US meat industry.
> >>>
> >>>> and this was an isolated incident. However I am reading conflicting stories on how Mad Cow
> >>>> can be transferred to humans. I have read that hamburger could be suspect, yet steak is not.
> >>>> Muscle is not. Was the
> > problem
> >>>> in britain that people were eating(yuck) the brain and spinal cord?
> > Very
> >>>> confused so someone enlighten me please.
> >>>
> >>> Any meat that is contaminated with infected tissue could cause a problem. When you understand
> >>> the process of slaughtering, and the high incidence of contamination - with not only bodily
> >>> fluids (e.g. spinal fluid) but feces, blood and other tissues - you may better understand the
> >>> real concern.
> >>>
> >>> -L.
> >>
> >>
> >> I have read Fast Food Nation.. the problem with this tome is. it is very full of unproven
> >> examples and is in fact an attack on the food industry as a whole.. Peta's Ra Ra book so to
> >> speak.
> >>
> >> But the Slaughterhouse book is a bit more interesting.
> >>
> >> I disagree with the Dregulation statement though.. I mean if this is indeed the problem.. then
> >> why was it not "fixed" under the Clinton administration.. Sounds very much like pointing
> >> fingures to me..
> >>
> >> Concerned.. Of course I am concerned.. I mean you have ONE example of Mad Cow Disease in the US
> >> and Canada.. But for the last four years you have deer population also contracting Chronic
> >> Wasting Disease which is somewhat simular..
> >>
> >> Kit
> >
> >
>
> --
> ========================================================
> "Michael, we're bigger than U. S. Steel," Hyman Roth.
> ========================================================