General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Lowepro camera bags

Started by Paul Gretton · · Last activity · 11 posts · 562 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
11 August 2005
Last activity
13 August 2005
Original author
Paul Gretton
Posts
11
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
562
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–11 of 11
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Have any of you used the Lowepro D-Res 25 AW or D-Res 200 AW camera
    bags?
    http://www.lowepro.com/Products/Camera_Pouches/allWeather/D-Res_25_AW.aspx
    http://www.lowepro.com/Products/Camera_Pouches/allWeather/D-Res_200_AW.aspx

    How waterproof are they with the attached "All Weather Cover"? This
    doesn't in fact look like it would be very waterproof.

    Cheers, Paul

  2. Paul Gretton said:

    Have any of you used the Lowepro D-Res 25 AW or D-Res 200 AW camera
    bags?
    http://www.lowepro.com/Products/Camera_Pouches/allWeather/D-Res_25_AW.aspx
    http://www.lowepro.com/Products/Camera_Pouches/allWeather/D-Res_200_AW.aspx

    How waterproof are they with the attached "All Weather Cover"? This
    doesn't in fact look like it would be very waterproof.

    HI,

    I've used 2 smaller versions which don't come with the cover. I've
    been impressed, and they've taken good care of my little digitals.
    They're not waterproof, though, and in heavy rain the camera will get
    very wet.

    If you or anyone manage to find a genuinely w/proof small, padded
    camera bag then please post here - I'm still looking.

    Best wishes,
    --
    ,,
    (**)PeeWiglet~~
    / \ / \ pee AT [guessthisbit].co.uk

    "I know how hard it is for you to put food on your family."
    g.w.AT [guessthisbit].com

  3. Peewiglet said:
    Paul Gretton said:

    Have any of you used the Lowepro D-Res 25 AW or D-Res 200 AW camera
    bags?

    If you or anyone manage to find a genuinely w/proof small, padded
    camera bag then please post here - I'm still looking.

    I have a Lowe Nova Micro bag - this is quite big, not really a belt
    bag at all. I once tripped in a stream and fell on it, pushing the
    entire bag (with camera) under water. It was underwater for a few
    seconds, and partially under water for another 10 seconds or so.
    The camera stayed completely dry, no water got in through the zips
    at all. I was quite impressed. Don't know how it would stand up
    to hours of drizzle though - I found it a bit big to carry around
    and now tend to keep the camera (Nikon 995) in a drybag inside
    my rucksac.

    Berghaus make something called a Dry Pocket which is of dry-bag
    construction with a folding top. It claims to have a full
    waterproof closure, and is intended to be clipped on a belt.
    Unfortunately my camera's a bit too big to go in comfortably
    so I haven't tested it under rain. Worth a look, though.
    There's also a version with hard sides rather than padding.

    -adrian

  4. [email hidden] said...

    Quoted message said:

    If you or anyone manage to find a genuinely w/proof small, padded
    camera bag then please post here - I'm still looking.


    When I was regularly changing nappies I discovered nappy sacks. These,
    for the uninitiated, are natty little placcy bags with tie handles.
    They are also about as waterproof as it's possible to get...
    --
    To reply see 'from' in headers; lose the domain, and insert dots and @
    where common sense dictates.

  5. Adrian Godwin said:

    Berghaus make something called a Dry Pocket which is of dry-bag
    construction with a folding top. It claims to have a full
    waterproof closure, and is intended to be clipped on a belt.
    Unfortunately my camera's a bit too big to go in comfortably
    so I haven't tested it under rain. Worth a look, though.
    There's also a version with hard sides rather than padding.

    Many thanks, Adrian - I'll look that up.

    Best wishes,
    --
    ,,
    (**)PeeWiglet~~
    / \ / \ pee AT [guessthisbit].co.uk

    "The most important job is not to be governor, or first lady in my case."
    g.w.AT [guessthisbit].com
    This signature was made by SigChanger.
    You can find SigChanger at: http://www.phranc.nl/

  6. Fran said:

    [email hidden] said...

    Quoted message said:

    If you or anyone manage to find a genuinely w/proof small, padded
    camera bag then please post here - I'm still looking.


    When I was regularly changing nappies I discovered nappy sacks. These,
    for the uninitiated, are natty little placcy bags with tie handles.
    They are also about as waterproof as it's possible to get...

    Hmmm... I might look into that, but I suspect it could look a little
    odd hanging from my waistband! 🙂

    Best wishes,
    --
    ,,
    (**)PeeWiglet~~
    / \ / \ pee AT [guessthisbit].co.uk

    //SigChanger V2.1.0 - Variable signatures
    This signature was made by SigChanger.
    You can find SigChanger at: http://www.phranc.nl/

  7. [email hidden] said...

    Quoted message said:
    Fran said:

    [email hidden] said...

    Quoted message said:

    If you or anyone manage to find a genuinely w/proof small, padded
    camera bag then please post here - I'm still looking.


    When I was regularly changing nappies I discovered nappy sacks. These,
    for the uninitiated, are natty little placcy bags with tie handles.
    They are also about as waterproof as it's possible to get...

    Hmmm... I might look into that, but I suspect it could look a little
    odd hanging from my waistband! 🙂


    In the pouring rain, who on earth cares? I tend to take a few nappy
    sacks out with me in my pack now, even though my children are all beyond
    that stage. They (no, not the children) can be tied up fairly tightly
    and more or less airtight at that, so are lighter to carry around than a
    shovel... They're also useful as grubby underwear and socks bags for
    those occasions when a change of clothes has happened. The best thing
    about them I reckon is that they're versatile. I wouldn't want to use
    them for food, but they're cheap (I often find them in my local £ shop)
    and very light (the box they come in probably weighs more than the
    contents) and disposable. I doubt if they're biodegradable, but you
    can't have everything.

    --
    To reply see 'from' in headers; lose the domain, and insert dots and @
    where common sense dictates.

  8. "Paul Gretton" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    Have any of you used the Lowepro D-Res 25 AW or D-Res 200 AW camera
    bags?
    http://www.lowepro.com/Products/Camera_Pouches/allWeather/D-Res_25_AW.a
    spx
    http://www.lowepro.com/Products/Camera_Pouches/allWeather/D-Res_200_AW.
    aspx

    How waterproof are they with the attached "All Weather Cover"? This
    doesn't in fact look like it would be very waterproof.

    I have one (not sure which model) which I use with my Olympus C-740. I
    don't recall using the cover in serious rain, but it looks to be made of
    waterproof material (it doesn't need to be breathable after all). The
    elastic along the edge means it does enclose the pack pretty well.
    Obviously it is not going to protect the back of the pack though.

    The double velcro belt fixing on these is what sold it to me. It is very
    secure and means you can attach it without undoing your belt.

    John

  9. There are in fact camera bags that are to all intents and purposes
    completely waterproof, at least in the heaviest rain as opposed to
    actually being submersible. They are made by the same firm (Ortlieb)
    that makes a leading range of waterproof bike saddlebags.

    http://www.ortlieb.de/_list.php?lang=en&produkt=9&pname=camera%20bags

    I'm asking about the Lowepro's only because I have not been able to
    find an Ortlieb locally that is of the right size for my camera. The
    Lowepro's are easily available.

  10. On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 21:29:28 +0100, Peewiglet <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:


    I've used 2 smaller versions which don't come with the cover. I've
    been impressed, and they've taken good care of my little digitals.
    They're not waterproof, though, and in heavy rain the camera will get
    very wet.

    I use the small non-waterproof one, and it's fine, even vaguely
    waterproof for short light showers. In heavy rain I just put it in my
    rucksack!

    S.

    --
    Oppose ID cards and the database state - sign the pledge at
    http://www.pledgebank.com/refuse

  11. In article <[email hidden]>,
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    Have any of you used the Lowepro D-Res 25 AW or D-Res 200 AW camera
    bags?
    http://www.lowepro.com/Products/Camera_Pouches/allWeather/D-Res_25_AW.aspx
    http://www.lowepro.com/Products/Camera_Pouches/allWeather/D-Res_200_AW.aspx

    How waterproof are they with the attached "All Weather Cover"? This
    doesn't in fact look like it would be very waterproof.

    Cheers, Paul


    They should be pretty waterproof, although you couldn't submerge them!
    The waterproof cover is pretty much the same as the waterproof rucksack
    covers you get with some rucksacks. It's basically a totally waterproof
    piece of material that covers the entire case except for part of the
    back. The zip is completely covered.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.