UK and Europe · Public discussion

Lost in translation

Started by Tony Raven · · Last activity · 9 posts · 418 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
3 June 2005
Last activity
5 June 2005
Original author
Tony Raven
Posts
9
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
418
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–9 of 9
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Reading a report on the LCC list about another cyclist killed in the
    City (hit from behind by a motorbike while stationary at the side of the
    road) I realised that we need a dictionary to translate what they say
    into what they mean (a bit like a dictionary of cockney)

    For starters from that report we have:

    "the lack of a helmet could have been the
    'cause' of death" = He was killed by a motorbike*

    Other entried invited
    --
    Tony

    "Don't argue the matter, the difficulties will argue for themselves"
    -W.S. Churchill

    * "I found out during an informal chat with City Police about the latest
    cyclist fatality which happened about 6.30pm on 18 May at St Martin Le
    Grand (between St Paul's and Museum of London roundabout) just before
    the turn to Newgate. A cyclist had stopped apparently (maybe due to
    hearing a police siren?) and a motorcyclist went into the back of them
    propelling them forward. The cyclist died in a couple of hours, one
    police officer saying that the lack of a helmet could have been the
    'cause' of death. "

  2. "Tony Raven" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Reading a report on the LCC list about another cyclist killed in the
    City (hit from behind by a motorbike while stationary at the side of the
    road) I realised that we need a dictionary to translate what they say
    into what they mean (a bit like a dictionary of cockney)

    For starters from that report we have:

    "the lack of a helmet could have been the
    'cause' of death" = He was killed by a motorbike*

    "the cyclist was in collision with a car" = He was cycling quite correctly
    when a car pulled out of a side road without slowing, hit him and launched
    him into oblivion.

    "The accident was caused by a wet road" = Someone either didn't notice it
    was raining or hadn't the mental capacity to deduce that adhesion was
    reduced as a consequence.

    Pete

  3. Peter B said:

    "Tony Raven" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Reading a report on the LCC list about another cyclist killed in the
    City (hit from behind by a motorbike while stationary at the side of the
    road) I realised that we need a dictionary to translate what they say
    into what they mean (a bit like a dictionary of cockney)

    For starters from that report we have:

    "the lack of a helmet could have been the
    'cause' of death" = He was killed by a motorbike*

    "the cyclist was in collision with a car" = He was cycling quite correctly
    when a car pulled out of a side road without slowing, hit him and launched
    him into oblivion.

    "The accident was caused by a wet road" = Someone either didn't notice it
    was raining or hadn't the mental capacity to deduce that adhesion was
    reduced as a consequence.

    "You should've been wearing a helmet" = Because then the dopey goit
    wouldn't have hit you.

    R.

  4. Tony Raven said:

    Reading a report on the LCC list about another cyclist killed in the
    City (hit from behind by a motorbike while stationary at the side of the
    road) I realised that we need a dictionary to translate what they say
    into what they mean (a bit like a dictionary of cockney)

    For starters from that report we have:

    "the lack of a helmet could have been the
    'cause' of death" = He was killed by a motorbike*

    Other entried invited

    Speed is the cause of many accidents = Driving like a c*nt is the cause
    of many accidents, of which speed is just one aspect

  5. I put a selection of such translations on my website a while ago...

    For example,

    'to go out of control', as in 'the vehicle went out of control' = The
    driver lost control of the vehicle.

    'I didn't see you' = 1) I didn't look. 2) I looked but as you are only
    a cyclist I decided to pull out anyway.

    'occasionally drift over the speed limit' = 'habitually and wilfully
    flout the speed limit.

    http://www.thebikezone.org.uk/thebikezone/thinkingcyclist/dictionary.html

  6. Quoted message said:

    'occasionally drift over the speed limit' = 'habitually and wilfully
    flout the speed limit.

    As in "I just drifted over the 30 limit".

    Well, to get nicked you have to be doing 35 in most police force areas
    (10% + 2mph). Most car speedometers are around 10% "fast", so that
    means you just drifted up to 37 or 38mph. That'll be £60 please, thank
    you for playing.

  7. Gets my vote since i hate speed cameras or as they insist on calling them
    "Enforsement cameras"

    Yeah right ...tomato tomAto!

    RobD

    "Chris" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Tony Raven said:

    Reading a report on the LCC list about another cyclist killed in the
    City (hit from behind by a motorbike while stationary at the side of the
    road) I realised that we need a dictionary to translate what they say
    into what they mean (a bit like a dictionary of cockney)

    For starters from that report we have:

    "the lack of a helmet could have been the
    'cause' of death" = He was killed by a motorbike*

    Other entried invited

    Speed is the cause of many accidents = Driving like a c*nt is the cause
    of many accidents, of which speed is just one aspect

  8. I submit that on or about Sat, 04 Jun 2005 20:16:18 GMT, the person
    known to the court as "Sniper8052(L96A1)" <[email hidden]>
    made a statement (<[email hidden]> in
    Your Honour's bundle) to the following effect:

    Quoted message said:

    The police officer was reporting not the view of The City Police - other
    than they had been told - but the opinion of the pathologist who
    examined the body. Who said "...a helmet would have saved his life"

    Pathologist? Or coroner? Coroners are notoriously prone to True
    Believerism, pathologists less so.

    Guy
    --
    http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk

    "To every complex problem there is a solution which is
    simple, neat and wrong" - HL Mencken

  9. Just zis Guy said:

    I submit that on or about Sat, 04 Jun 2005 20:16:18 GMT, the person
    known to the court as "Sniper8052(L96A1)" <[email hidden]>
    made a statement (<[email hidden]> in
    Your Honour's bundle) to the following effect:

    Quoted message said:

    The police officer was reporting not the view of The City Police - other
    than they had been told - but the opinion of the pathologist who
    examined the body. Who said "...a helmet would have saved his life"

    Pathologist? Or coroner? Coroners are notoriously prone to True
    Believerism, pathologists less so.

    Guy
    --
    http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk

    "To every complex problem there is a solution which is
    simple, neat and wrong" - HL Mencken

    Pathologist was the word used in our conversation and I was talking with
    a senior officer directly involved.

    Sniper8052

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.