Jim Flom said:<[email hidden]> wrote in message
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:I don't get it. Are you implying the high Austrian medal count is
fishy because of this dope bust?
Yes, I am.
2002 winter Olympics -- Austria -- 12th (11 of their 17 medals were bronze).
1998 -- nagano -- Austria -- 8th (9 of 17 are bronze)
1994 -- Lillehammer -- Austria -- 9th (4 of the scant 9 medals are bronze)
2006 -- Torino -- Austria (currently 4th with 16 medals already, only three
of which are bronze).
Truly, an argument worthy of Antoine Vayer. Maybe you should
stick to sermons and leave the science to the amateurs. 11 of the 17
Austrian medals are in alpine skiing, an event that the Austrians
are historically strong in, and that is not very strongly influenced
by blood doping, EPO etc (what the XC team was probably doing).
It is not a huge surprise that Michaela Dorfmeister, Hermann Maier,
and Benjamin Raich are winning medals, because they have been
really good at their sport for some time. Of course, they might be
doping, just like any dedicated athlete, or even Bode Miller, but the
XC ski team bust doesn't increase the evidence for it.
Want some fishy numbers? US Winter Olympic medals:
<http://www.darmoni.net/johiver.htm>
3rd 12 - 1980 Lake Placid (1st had 22)
4th 8 - 1984 Sarajevo (1st had 24)
9th 6 - 1988 Calgary (1st had 29)
6th 11 - 1992 Albertville (1st had 26)
5th 13 - 1994 Lillehammer (1st had 26)
5th 13 - 1998 Nagano (1st had 29)
2nd 34 - 2002 Salt Lake City (1st had 35)
34 medals in 2002? Second in medal count by just one, when the US
was usually a factor of 2 behind first place? Even accounting for the
home field advantage and more medals being awarded, it's clear
evidence of foul play. Call [censored] Pound and have him take all the
medals away retroactively. Lock 'em up and throw away the key.