Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

long-cage trade-off's?

Started by dw · · Last activity · 9 posts · 616 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
7 June 2004
Last activity
11 June 2004
Original author
dw
Posts
9
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
616
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–9 of 9
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. On a road bike, do you give up shifting performance by going to a long
    cage rear DR to accommodate a big rear cog?

  2. "dw" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On a road bike, do you give up shifting performance by going to a long
    cage rear DR to accommodate a big rear cog?

    Little if any, in my experience. My needs are such that on my road bikes I
    will often run an XT (long-cage MTB) rear derailleur and cassette to be able
    to climb the mountains that surround us. So, I have bikes with Dura Ace
    short cage, Ultegra long cage and XT MTB long cage derailleurs. While there
    might be some mild 'performance' differences, at worst they are minor and
    affect nothing.

  3. (dw) may have said:

    On a road bike, do you give up shifting performance by going to a long
    cage rear DR to accommodate a big rear cog?

    If you go from a high-end short-cage to a cheap long-cage, of course.

    The question is too broad as posed. You might get a better answer if
    you added info detailing from which short-cage to which long-cage you
    intended to swap.

    --
    My email address is antispammed; pull WEEDS if replying via e-mail.
    Typoes are not a bug, they're a feature.
    Words processed in a facility that contains nuts.

  4. dw said:

    On a road bike, do you give up shifting performance by going to a long
    cage rear DR to accommodate a big rear cog?

    I don't think it makes a dime's worth of difference, especially these days with
    Hyperglide-type cogs. The shift takes place as the cog gates come around, and
    is not derailer dependent.

    Matt O.

  5. Werehatrack said:

    On 7 Jun 2004 08:07:38 -0700, [email hidden] (dw) may have said:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    On a road bike, do you give up shifting performance by going to a long
    cage rear DR to accommodate a big rear cog?


    I believe that campy long-cage derailleurs may have different slant
    angles from the medium and short-cage derailleurs. The pulley cage is
    said to be incompatible in the small parts catalogs. I saw a Chorus
    derailleur from the early 1990's where you could actually adjust the
    parallelogram slant. With early suntour derailleurs you could also do
    this.

    I would imagine that with a long-cage derailleur on a corncob
    sprocket, you may have to do some "overshift", especially if the chain
    is stretched and flexible, in order to complete the shift. This is
    pure imagination and i haven't verified it in practice.

    I think the main advantage of a short-cage derailleur is weight
    savings, not only in the derailleur itself, but also in the chain.
    Also, perhaps your chain life is extended (especially with indexed
    gears) because you may be able to still index-shift with a flexible
    chain and a short-cage derailleur. Is it good to be able to use a
    worn chain longer? Maybe not.

    Anyway, i don't buy short cage derailleurs any more. the advantages
    just aren't worth the costs of a knee surgery.

    - Don Gillies
    San Diego, CA

  6. dvwlt-<< On a road bike, do you give up shifting performance by going to a long
    cage rear DR to accommodate a big rear cog? >><BR><BR>

    Nope-

    Peter Chisholm
    Vecchio's Bicicletteria
    1833 Pearl St.
    Boulder, CO, 80302
    (303)440-3535
    http://www.vecchios.com
    "Ruote convenzionali costruite eccezionalmente bene"

  7. gillies-<< I believe that campy long-cage derailleurs may have different slant
    angles from the medium and short-cage derailleurs. The pulley cage is
    said to be incompatible in the small parts catalogs. >><BR><BR>

    Nope not true in actual experience. A 'long cage' body is the same as a 'short
    cage' except with different cage lengths.

    Peter Chisholm
    Vecchio's Bicicletteria
    1833 Pearl St.
    Boulder, CO, 80302
    (303)440-3535
    http://www.vecchios.com
    "Ruote convenzionali costruite eccezionalmente bene"

  8. Not really. It's the top pulley that does the shifting, and it's the
    same distance from the cog teeth and derailer body regardless of how far
    the other one. The only thing the lower pulley does is take up the slack
    on the chain.

    Using an inadequate derailer for your gearing will result in much worse
    shifting, trust me. There are times when I have had no other choice.

    - -

    "May you have the wind at your back.
    And a really low gear for the hills!"

    Chris Zacho ~ "Your Friendly Neighborhood Wheelman"

    Chris'Z Corner
    http://www.geocities.com/czcorner

  9. Chris-<< Not really. It's the top pulley that does the shifting, and it's the
    same distance from the cog teeth and derailer body regardless of how far
    the other one. The only thing the lower pulley does is take up the slack
    on the chain. >><BR><BR>

    Well said!!

    Peter Chisholm
    Vecchio's Bicicletteria
    1833 Pearl St.
    Boulder, CO, 80302
    (303)440-3535
    http://www.vecchios.com
    "Ruote convenzionali costruite eccezionalmente bene"

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.