UK and Europe · Public discussion

London start for 2007 TdF

Started by Mike Causer · · Last activity · 16 posts · 698 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
6 July 2005
Last activity
6 July 2005
Original author
Mike Causer
Posts
16
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
698
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–16 of 16
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. According to Cyclingnews.com quoting Het Nieuwsblad

    http://www.cyclingnews.com/road/2005/tour05/news/?id=/news/2005/jul05/jul06news5

    Article right at the bottom

    Mike

  2. "Mike Causer" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    According to Cyclingnews.com quoting Het Nieuwsblad

    http://www.cyclingnews.com/road/2005/tour05/news/?id=/news/2005/jul05/jul06news5

    Article right at the bottom

    Mike

    Oh happy day!!!

    Cheers, helen s

  3. Mike Causer said:

    According to Cyclingnews.com quoting Het Nieuwsblad


    http://www.cyclingnews.com/road/2005/tour05/news/?id=/news/2005/jul05/jul06news5

    Quoted message said:


    Article right at the bottom

    One rather wonder whether that will still be the case tomorrow, given recent
    events in Singapore...

    --
    Dave Larrington - <http://www.legslarry.beerdrinkers.co.uk/>
    Odd, is it not, how all roads lead inexorably to David Icke?

  4. Dave Larrington said:
    Mike Causer said:

    According to Cyclingnews.com quoting Het Nieuwsblad


    http://www.cyclingnews.com/road/2005/tour05/news/?id=/news/2005/jul05/jul06news5

    Quoted message said:


    Article right at the bottom

    One rather wonder whether that will still be the case tomorrow, given
    recent events in Singapore...

    The Grauniad think it will make no difference:

    http://sport.guardian.co.uk/cycling/story/0,10482,1349612,00.html#article_continue

    Oh, hang on. They misspelled Leiden. B*gger.

    Mike

  5. Mike Causer said:

    Oh, hang on. They misspelled Leiden.

    Probably had a few jars at lunchtime...

    Guy
    --
    May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after posting.
    http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk

    88% of helmet statistics are made up, 65% of them at CHS, Puget Sound

  6. Just zis Guy said:
    Mike Causer said:

    Oh, hang on. They misspelled Leiden.

    Probably had a few jars at lunchtime...

    They have quite a capacity for it. Still, they're on charge accounts I
    expect.

    Colin

  7. Colin Blackburn said:
    Just zis Guy said:
    Mike Causer said:

    Oh, hang on. They misspelled Leiden.

    Probably had a few jars at lunchtime...

    They have quite a capacity for it. Still, they're on charge accounts I
    expect.

    Currently, yes, but I think that their regulators are taking a negative
    view of this.

    R.

  8. Richard said:
    Colin Blackburn said:
    Just zis Guy said:

    On Wed, 06 Jul 2005 14:19:30 +0100, Mike Causer
    <[email hidden]> wrote:

    > Oh, hang on. They misspelled Leiden.

    Probably had a few jars at lunchtime...

    They have quite a capacity for it. Still, they're on charge accounts I
    expect.

    Currently, yes, but I think that their regulators are taking a negative
    view of this.

    Are you positive? A potential flashpoint for a breakdown in relations, then.

    --
    Nobby

  9. in message <[email hidden]>, Richard

    (') said:
    Colin Blackburn said:
    Just zis Guy said:

    On Wed, 06 Jul 2005 14:19:30 +0100, Mike Causer
    <[email hidden]> wrote:

    > Oh, hang on. They misspelled Leiden.

    Probably had a few jars at lunchtime...

    They have quite a capacity for it. Still, they're on charge accounts I
    expect.

    Currently, yes, but I think that their regulators are taking a negative
    view of this.

    Are you positive? Got your ear to the ground?

    --
    [email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/
    /-\ You have discovered a security flaw in a Microsoft product. You
    |-| can report this issue to our security tesm. Would you like to
    | | * Be completely ignored (default)?
    | | * Receive a form email full of platitudes about how much we care?
    \_/ * Spend hours helping us fix this problem for free?

  10. Richard said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > Oh, hang on. They misspelled Leiden.
    Probably had a few jars at lunchtime...


    They have quite a capacity for it. Still, they're on charge accounts I
    expect.


    Currently, yes, but I think that their regulators are taking a negative
    view of this.

    They seem to have generated a bit of controversy, anyway. Maybe they
    have an alternate agenda?

    Guy
    --
    May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after posting.
    http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk

    88% of helmet statistics are made up, 65% of them at CHS, Puget Sound

  11. Just zis Guy said:
    Richard said:
    Quoted message said:

    >>Oh, hang on. They misspelled Leiden.
    >
    >Probably had a few jars at lunchtime...

    They have quite a capacity for it. Still, they're on charge accounts I
    expect.

    Currently, yes, but I think that their regulators are taking a negative
    view of this.

    They seem to have generated a bit of controversy, anyway. Maybe they
    have an alternate agenda?

    Their position is static, they will directly resist any change. There'll
    be a lot of tension before long.

  12. Just zis Guy said:
    Richard said:
    Quoted message said:

    >>Oh, hang on. They misspelled Leiden.
    >
    >Probably had a few jars at lunchtime...

    They have quite a capacity for it. Still, they're on charge accounts I
    expect.

    Currently, yes, but I think that their regulators are taking a negative
    view of this.

    They seem to have generated a bit of controversy, anyway. Maybe they
    have an alternate agenda?

    Certainly they express a potential difference in opinion, that could
    leave things in a state of flux.

    R.

  13. Richard said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >>>Oh, hang on. They misspelled Leiden.
    >>Probably had a few jars at lunchtime...
    >They have quite a capacity for it. Still, they're on charge accounts I
    >expect.
    Currently, yes, but I think that their regulators are taking a negative
    view of this.


    They seem to have generated a bit of controversy, anyway. Maybe they
    have an alternate agenda?


    Certainly they express a potential difference in opinion, that could
    leave things in a state of flux.

    They are insulated from reality, and that impedes their progress
    towards enlightenment. They should be inducted into cycles, even just
    faraday, but they will resist it because they think it hertz. Watts
    the fuss about, I want to know? Are they ampered by their
    foolishness? Or do they think inverting their view would be too much
    of a volt-face?

    Guy
    --
    May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after posting.
    http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk

    88% of helmet statistics are made up, 65% of them at CHS, Puget Sound

  14. Just zis Guy said:
    Richard said:
    Quoted message said:

    >>>>Oh, hang on. They misspelled Leiden.
    >>>
    >>>Probably had a few jars at lunchtime...
    >>
    >>They have quite a capacity for it. Still, they're on charge accounts I
    >>expect.
    >
    >Currently, yes, but I think that their regulators are taking a negative
    >view of this.

    They seem to have generated a bit of controversy, anyway. Maybe they
    have an alternate agenda?

    Certainly they express a potential difference in opinion, that could
    leave things in a state of flux.

    They are insulated from reality, and that impedes their progress
    towards enlightenment. They should be inducted into cycles, even just
    faraday, but they will resist it because they think it hertz. Watts
    the fuss about, I want to know? Are they ampered by their
    foolishness? Or do they think inverting their view would be too much
    of a volt-face?

    Guy

    I dont have the capacity to handle this.

    come ohm guys

  15. dave said:
    Just zis Guy said:
    Richard said:

    >>>>>Oh, hang on. They misspelled Leiden.
    >>>>
    >>>>Probably had a few jars at lunchtime...
    >>>
    >>>They have quite a capacity for it. Still, they're on charge accounts I
    >>>expect.
    >>
    >>Currently, yes, but I think that their regulators are taking a negative
    >>view of this.
    >
    >They seem to have generated a bit of controversy, anyway. Maybe they
    >have an alternate agenda?

    Certainly they express a potential difference in opinion, that could
    leave things in a state of flux.

    They are insulated from reality, and that impedes their progress
    towards enlightenment. They should be inducted into cycles, even just
    faraday, but they will resist it because they think it hertz. Watts
    the fuss about, I want to know? Are they ampered by their
    foolishness? Or do they think inverting their view would be too much
    of a volt-face?

    Guy

    I dont have the capacity to handle this.

    come ohm guys

    If you think this is the way to conduct a thread, you should be in a field of
    good earth, somewhere. I'll join you in a mho.

    God, the sheer frequency of these puns hertz. I oscillate between enjoying them
    and groaning, but now it would take Henry VIII to induce me to read any more.
    Time to coil up with a good book before I blow a fuse.

  16. Just zis Guy said:
    Richard said:
    Quoted message said:

    >>>>Oh, hang on. They misspelled Leiden.
    >>>
    >>>Probably had a few jars at lunchtime...
    >>
    >>They have quite a capacity for it. Still, they're on charge accounts I
    >>expect.
    >
    >Currently, yes, but I think that their regulators are taking a negative
    >view of this.

    They seem to have generated a bit of controversy, anyway. Maybe they
    have an alternate agenda?

    Certainly they express a potential difference in opinion, that could
    leave things in a state of flux.

    They are insulated from reality, and that impedes their progress
    towards enlightenment. They should be inducted into cycles, even just
    faraday, but they will resist it because they think it hertz. Watts
    the fuss about, I want to know? Are they ampered by their
    foolishness? Or do they think inverting their view would be too much
    of a volt-face?

    SI, senor.

    I bow out gracefully to leave Guy triumphant on the field.

    R.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.