UK and Europe · Public discussion

lockup strategies

Started by Michael Klontzas · · Last activity · 20 posts · 656 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
30 November 2005
Last activity
2 December 2005
Original author
Michael Klontzas
Posts
20
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
656
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 20
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. As some of you may know, recently my bike was damaged beyond repair by a
    brain-dead thief who didn't realise you can't use an aluminium frame as
    lever to break a d-lock without destroying the frame. Now I am in the
    process of buying a new bike and I am reconsidering my lockup strategy.
    What are your thoughts on that? Not locking up in public places or using
    a second, cheap bike for riding down the pub are not options here
    unfortunately.

    Up to now, I used a long (29cm) d-lock through frame/front wheel/rails
    and a cheap coil lock through rear wheel/frame/rails. The d-lock was
    placed in such a way (tight fit with key-hole facing the spokes) that
    tampering with the key-hole or forcing the lock open was made very
    difficult. As I found out, a thief will still consider cutting through
    the coil lock (trivial as we know) and use the frame to twist the d-lock
    until it gives in, although the damage caused in the process may render
    the whole exercise pointless.

    So, how about:
    * replacing the coil lock above with one more d-lock. This would make
    using the twist trick harder. I've seen other bikes locked up this way
    but there is there a weight penalty of course. Considering that, unlike a
    coil lock, the d-lock is not flexible, do you think this would make using
    certain bike stands impractical?

    * swapping the coil lock and the d-lock around. The idea here is that
    this should make blindingly obvious that the much thinner tubes of the
    rear triangle cannot take the stresses of twisting the d-lock, so there
    is no point in even trying.

    * attaching a note explaining that aluminium frames get *very* easily
    damaged beyond repair. This however could infuriate some thieves.

    All this with proper insurance of course. I am considering the CTC/LCC
    recommended policy here: http://www.butterworthinsurance.co.uk/ However,
    I'll have to contact them about a term saying:

    'Machines must be kept in a secured building, not communal entrance or
    hallway, and not left in the open overnight, (11pm to 6am).'

    which could be read to mean a bike is not covered after drink up time,
    even if it is normally kept at home. Any experience of this policy or
    alternative options?

    TIA

    --
    Michael Klontzas
    'If everything seems to be coming your way,
    you're probably in the wrong lane'
    (Borstelmann's Rule)

  2. "Michael Klontzas" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    As some of you may know, recently my bike was damaged beyond repair by a
    brain-dead thief who didn't realise you can't use an aluminium frame as
    lever to break a d-lock without destroying the frame. Now I am in the
    process of buying a new bike and I am reconsidering my lockup strategy.
    What are your thoughts on that? Not locking up in public places or using
    a second, cheap bike for riding down the pub are not options here
    unfortunately.

    Up to now, I used a long (29cm) d-lock through frame/front wheel/rails
    and a cheap coil lock through rear wheel/frame/rails. The d-lock was
    placed in such a way (tight fit with key-hole facing the spokes) that
    tampering with the key-hole or forcing the lock open was made very
    difficult. As I found out, a thief will still consider cutting through
    the coil lock (trivial as we know) and use the frame to twist the d-lock
    until it gives in, although the damage caused in the process may render
    the whole exercise pointless.

    So, how about:
    * replacing the coil lock above with one more d-lock. This would make
    using the twist trick harder. I've seen other bikes locked up this way
    but there is there a weight penalty of course. Considering that, unlike a
    coil lock, the d-lock is not flexible, do you think this would make using
    certain bike stands impractical?

    * swapping the coil lock and the d-lock around. The idea here is that
    this should make blindingly obvious that the much thinner tubes of the
    rear triangle cannot take the stresses of twisting the d-lock, so there
    is no point in even trying.

    * attaching a note explaining that aluminium frames get *very* easily
    damaged beyond repair. This however could infuriate some thieves.

    All this with proper insurance of course. I am considering the CTC/LCC
    recommended policy here: http://www.butterworthinsurance.co.uk/ However,
    I'll have to contact them about a term saying:

    'Machines must be kept in a secured building, not communal entrance or
    hallway, and not left in the open overnight, (11pm to 6am).'

    which could be read to mean a bike is not covered after drink up time,
    even if it is normally kept at home. Any experience of this policy or
    alternative options?

    TIA

    --
    Michael Klontzas
    'If everything seems to be coming your way,
    you're probably in the wrong lane'
    (Borstelmann's Rule)

    You need to try out several insurance comapnies to see what the detail of
    their policy is.

    The two D-lock strategy seems a step in the right direction. Bear in mind
    you'll need to see what the minimum locking requirements are of any
    insurance policy you take out and do *at least* that. The one The Unfit
    Family has is a basic 'must be locked to an immovable object with a D-lock"
    one, which we've got on our household contents insurance. When we went away
    to France, we made sure we'd checked with the insurance company before we
    went off so that 1. said company knew we were going 2. still covered bikes
    3. any other requirements. One of the quirks of ours is that if we go away
    anywhere in the car, if we leave the bikes *in* the *locked* car overnight,
    they are not covered by insurance if nicked. BUT, if we have them *on* the
    car via the towbar-mounted bike carrier (which is locked to the towbar), and
    lock them to the tow-bar with D-locks, then they *are* covered... go figure
    the quirks of insurance!

    Thankfully where I live, the risk of theft is small. What I do is use a
    D-lock to lock main frame to bike stand and then one cable lock around front
    wheel, frame & bike stand & second cable lock around rear wheel, frame &
    bike stand. Indeed, many the time I find mine can be the only bike that is
    locked in a whole row of sheffield stands!

    Cheers, helen s

  3. "Michael Klontzas" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    As some of you may know, recently my bike was damaged beyond repair by a
    brain-dead thief who didn't realise you can't use an aluminium frame as
    lever to break a d-lock without destroying the frame. Now I am in the
    process of buying a new bike and I am reconsidering my lockup strategy.
    What are your thoughts on that? Not locking up in public places or using
    a second, cheap bike for riding down the pub are not options here
    unfortunately.

    My method is to secure my rear wheel with a D-Lock with little room for
    getting anything in between. My front wheel is then secured to frame and
    railings with a cable lock. I also have a favourite place to lock up in
    Kingston, which is right in front of a taxi rank. Basically, there is
    someone watching my bike all day! I certainly would never consider locking
    my bike up in public overnight due to theft and vandalism. I would consider
    getting a folding bike or a 'pub' bike if I had to leave out regularly in a
    station car park or such.

    Quoted message said:


    'Machines must be kept in a secured building, not communal entrance or
    hallway, and not left in the open overnight, (11pm to 6am).'

    which could be read to mean a bike is not covered after drink up time,
    even if it is normally kept at home. Any experience of this policy or
    alternative options?

    This makes me wonder what my default AA policy covers. To be honest, I just
    got insured and didn't even look at the small print. Now I can't find it,
    will have to dig it out I guess.

  4. in message <[email hidden]>, Michael Klontzas

    (') said:

    As some of you may know, recently my bike was damaged beyond repair by
    a brain-dead thief who didn't realise you can't use an aluminium frame
    as lever to break a d-lock without destroying the frame. Now I am in
    the process of buying a new bike and I am reconsidering my lockup
    strategy. What are your thoughts on that? Not locking up in public
    places or using a second, cheap bike for riding down the pub are not
    options here unfortunately.

    Up to now, I used a long (29cm) d-lock through frame/front wheel/rails
    and a cheap coil lock through rear wheel/frame/rails.

    Apart from the various locking options people will no doubt suggest, how
    about getting a cheap old road bike, converting it to a fixie, and
    locking it with a piece of string?

    Leaving a good bike locked up where tealeaves abound is going to lead to
    it being vandalised beyond repair, even if it isn't stolen. And it's so
    damned unpleasant when your favourite bike is trashed or stolen, I
    simply would not do it.

    --
    [email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/

    ;; Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.

  5. "Michael Klontzas" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    As some of you may know, recently my bike was damaged beyond repair by a
    brain-dead thief who didn't realise you can't use an aluminium frame as
    lever to break a d-lock without destroying the frame. Now I am in the
    process of buying a new bike and I am reconsidering my lockup strategy.
    What are your thoughts on that? Not locking up in public places or using
    a second, cheap bike for riding down the pub are not options here
    unfortunately.

    Up to now, I used a long (29cm) d-lock through frame/front wheel/rails
    and a cheap coil lock through rear wheel/frame/rails. The d-lock was
    placed in such a way (tight fit with key-hole facing the spokes) that
    tampering with the key-hole or forcing the lock open was made very
    difficult. As I found out, a thief will still consider cutting through
    the coil lock (trivial as we know) and use the frame to twist the d-lock
    until it gives in, although the damage caused in the process may render
    the whole exercise pointless.

    So, how about:
    * replacing the coil lock above with one more d-lock. This would make
    using the twist trick harder. I've seen other bikes locked up this way
    but there is there a weight penalty of course. Considering that, unlike a
    coil lock, the d-lock is not flexible, do you think this would make using
    certain bike stands impractical?

    * swapping the coil lock and the d-lock around. The idea here is that
    this should make blindingly obvious that the much thinner tubes of the
    rear triangle cannot take the stresses of twisting the d-lock, so there
    is no point in even trying.

    * attaching a note explaining that aluminium frames get *very* easily
    damaged beyond repair. This however could infuriate some thieves.

    All this with proper insurance of course. I am considering the CTC/LCC
    recommended policy here: http://www.butterworthinsurance.co.uk/ However,
    I'll have to contact them about a term saying:

    'Machines must be kept in a secured building, not communal entrance or
    hallway, and not left in the open overnight, (11pm to 6am).'

    which could be read to mean a bike is not covered after drink up time,
    even if it is normally kept at home. Any experience of this policy or
    alternative options?

    I was going to take out a policy with CTC/LCC and I e-mailed asking for a
    copy of the terms and conditions of the policy. They never replied. When
    people don't reply to someone who is going to give them money it does make
    me wonder what response I would get if I was trying to claim money from
    them.

    So I just added the bike to my household contents policy, giving details of
    the bike and its value. This then covers it for an agreed sum if nicked
    while outside the house. Maybe you could do the same?

    Derek.

  6. Simon Brooke said:

    Apart from the various locking options people will no doubt suggest, how
    about getting a cheap old road bike, converting it to a fixie, and
    locking it with a piece of string?

    I wish I could have two or more bikes for different purposes but that is
    not an option here. If you mean that would be the only bike, having
    recently upgraded from a cheap MTB to a mid-range hybrid, I must say they
    a cheap bike simply doesn't feel the same. Somehow I am not comfortable
    with the idea of this compromise and having some thieves tell me what I
    should ride. I agree it is a good way to maintain peace of mind though.

    Quoted message said:

    Leaving a good bike locked up where tealeaves abound is going to lead to
    it being vandalised beyond repair, even if it isn't stolen. And it's so
    damned unpleasant when your favourite bike is trashed or stolen, I
    simply would not do it.

    Yes, I know and I wouldn't do it with a really expensive bike either.
    Even if you ride door-to-door however there are times you can't avoid
    locking up in a public place. Often after work a friend may suggest going
    to, say, the cinema. If I say no, because I have to get the bike back
    home first, then I am building my life around the bike, rather than the
    other way round.

    --
    Michael Klontzas
    'If everything seems to be coming your way,
    you're probably in the wrong lane'
    (Borstelmann's Rule)

  7. DiddyS400 said:

    "Michael Klontzas" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Any experience of this policy or
    alternative options?

    I was going to take out a policy with CTC/LCC and I e-mailed asking for a
    copy of the terms and conditions of the policy. They never replied. When
    people don't reply to someone who is going to give them money it does make
    me wonder what response I would get if I was trying to claim money from
    them.

    True. It looks like I'll have to look around. I am sure there must be
    some sort of online service somewhere comparing rates or at least listing
    some options. I'll try to find out. If anyone has done this already, or
    he/she is happy with their current policy, please let us know.

    Quoted message said:

    So I just added the bike to my household contents policy, giving details of
    the bike and its value. This then covers it for an agreed sum if nicked
    while outside the house. Maybe you could do the same?

    Sadly, I can't do that because the household is already covered but bikes
    are excluded and I have no control over the policy.

    --
    Michael Klontzas
    'If everything seems to be coming your way,
    you're probably in the wrong lane'
    (Borstelmann's Rule)

  8. On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 18:02:58 +0000 (UTC), wafflycat wrote:

    [useful advice snipped]

    Thanks for the advice. Yes, I'll have to shop around but it may prove
    difficult to find policies specifically designed for bikes.

    Quoted message said:

    Thankfully where I live, the risk of theft is small. What I do is use a
    D-lock to lock main frame to bike stand and then one cable lock around front
    wheel, frame & bike stand & second cable lock around rear wheel, frame &
    bike stand. Indeed, many the time I find mine can be the only bike that is
    locked in a whole row of sheffield stands!

    As I found out, this wouldn't be good enough in London sadly. My
    impression is the two cable locks would delay a thief with a cutter by
    1-2 minutes and then it all depends on how much twisting the d-lock would
    take -- another 5 minutes maximum I would guess, possibly a lot less. A
    long tube can offer a lot of leverage. The problem with this strategy is
    that a thief really needs to carry one, simple tool. The bike itself is
    the second tool! I wouldn't be surprised if this was the method of choice
    for complete amateur thieves. In this sense, flexible, really heavy duty
    locks are probably a better idea.

    Datatagging is another idea. Many insurance companies offer discounts,
    which means datatagging may pay for itself over time, but there are so
    many systems around and I am wondering how successful it would be in
    deterring a thief -- it may even infuriate some of them! More research
    required.

    --
    Michael Klontzas
    'If everything seems to be coming your way,
    you're probably in the wrong lane'
    (Borstelmann's Rule)

  9. Quoted message said:

    If we leave the bikes *in* the *locked* car overnight, they are not
    covered by insurance if nicked. BUT, if we have them *on* the car via the
    towbar-mounted bike carrier (which is locked to the towbar), and lock them
    to the tow-bar with D-locks, then they *are* covered... go figure the
    quirks of insurance!

    Yeah, if we go camping our valuables are not insured if they're locked in
    the car but OK protected by the massive security of a zip and two layers of
    nylon.

  10. Michael Klontzas said:

    I wish I could have two or more bikes for different purposes but that is
    not an option here.

    Is that for reasons of storage? If so, a folder like a Brompton gets
    around that problem at home and also solves many security problems. No
    need to lock it, you just fold it up and take it in, where it fits under
    a desk or in a cupboard.

    Quoted message said:

    Yes, I know and I wouldn't do it with a really expensive bike either.
    Even if you ride door-to-door however there are times you can't avoid
    locking up in a public place. Often after work a friend may suggest going
    to, say, the cinema. If I say no, because I have to get the bike back
    home first, then I am building my life around the bike, rather than the
    other way round.

    Bromptons and similar really do give you a lot more flexibility in this
    regard. I typically don't bother taking a lock with me on at least 50%
    of the journeys that involve parking away from home.

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
    Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
    Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
    net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/

  11. Michael Klontzas said:

    Thanks for the advice. Yes, I'll have to shop around but it may prove
    difficult to find policies specifically designed for bikes.

    IME these are rather overpriced. We've come off the CTC and now have a
    home contents policy that covers the bikes well (at least as far as we
    can tell from looking at the policy). This is effectively free with the
    house contents, where CTC's was £350 a year for ~£5,000 worth of bikes,
    and not particularly thievable ones at that.

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
    Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
    Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
    net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/

  12. Peter Clinch said:
    Michael Klontzas said:

    I wish I could have two or more bikes for different purposes but that is
    not an option here.

    Is that for reasons of storage? If so, a folder like a Brompton gets
    around that problem at home and also solves many security problems. No
    need to lock it, you just fold it up and take it in, where it fits under
    a desk or in a cupboard.

    That is an idea for a second bike. I know Brompton owners are very
    proud of their bikes but would it perform anything like a hybrid bike?
    I mean, what does it feel like when you ride 1 hour each way --
    something I have to do quite often. I understand they can be quite
    pricey too -- not to mention the specially designed bags etc.

    Quoted message said:

    Bromptons and similar really do give you a lot more flexibility in this
    regard. I typically don't bother taking a lock with me on at least 50%
    of the journeys that involve parking away from home.

    Out of interest, why would you need to lock up if you carry it with
    you.

    BTW, someone I know of managed to lose three Bromptons. One from inside
    his house, one together with his car and once he was beaten up and
    robbed in the middle of the street. No prices for guessing what bike he
    bought next!

    --
    Michael Klontzas

  13. Quoted message said:

    That is an idea for a second bike. I know Brompton owners are very
    proud of their bikes but would it perform anything like a hybrid bike?

    Depends what you want performance-wise, really. I use mine as a general
    hack bike and I'm happy with it for that, though there's a higher
    performance machine sat in the garage. For road use the gear range
    isn't as good as on a hybrid, but that's only a problem if the roads
    you're using need that bigger range. They don't work as well if you
    like to get out of the seat a lot of the time, but I solve that problem
    by not getting out of the seat...

    Quoted message said:

    I understand they can be quite
    pricey too -- not to mention the specially designed bags etc.

    Depends on one's idea of "pricey". The typical basic model is ~£470,
    the minimum spec vanilla is about £360 though AFAICT most Brom owners
    here consider that one a false economy. My next door neighbour bought
    the £470 model and reckoned it had paid for itself in purely financial
    terms within a year.

    You don't have to use Brompton's own bags (neighbour doesn't, a friend
    with a Brom didn't use a B-Bag for years though he has one now), but if
    you do you'll find they work brilliantly and incredibly conveniently.

    Quoted message said:

    Out of interest, why would you need to lock up if you carry it with
    you.

    They're a bit heavy to carry around more than, say, 50m. A more typical
    strategy is fold it up and carry it in and then leave it somewhere safe
    (at Tescos the folk on the customer service desk keep an eye on it, for
    example). But sometimes it's easiest just to lock it (say, for visiting
    4 shops inside a shopping centre, I'll lock it outside).

    There are bikes like the Birdy which do ride better, though don't fold
    quite as well and cost a fair deal more. But if I was getting a
    one-bike-fits-all a Birdy would be very high on the Possibles list.

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
    Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
    Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
    net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/

  14. I have found https://www.pavilioninsurance.com/payment/products/locklist.asp?product=Cycle&promCode=
    a rule of thumb guide. Type of lock to value of bike.
    Ian

  15. Michael Klontzas made some suggestions regarding securing bike.

    Whatever you do, don't do what I've genuinely seen. A bike with its
    wheels (stil in frame) fastened together with a bungee strap, and the
    strap locked to the fence. You wonder about some people...

    I hope your replacement bike lasts you a long time.

    PhilD

    --
    <><

  16. PhilD said:

    Michael Klontzas made some suggestions regarding securing bike.
    Whatever you do, don't do what I've genuinely seen. A bike with its
    wheels (stil in frame) fastened together with a bungee strap, and the
    strap locked to the fence. You wonder about some people...

    Another favourite. A cable lock twisted around seemingly holding
    everything together. Then you look closely and you realise they missed
    the railings completely!

    Quoted message said:

    I hope your replacement bike lasts you a long time.

    Thanks.

    --
    Michael Klontzas

  17. Peter Clinch wrote (of Bromptons):

    Quoted message said:

    Depends on one's idea of "pricey". The typical basic model is ~£470,
    the minimum spec vanilla is about £360 though AFAICT most Brom owners
    here consider that one a false economy. My next door neighbour bought
    the £470 model and reckoned it had paid for itself in purely financial
    terms within a year.

    Does anyone have a copy of A to B from October 2004 handy? I vaguely
    remember reading about a Brompton trike conversion, and the A to B
    website tells me that it was in that issue. I'd look it up myself, but
    I've lent all my back issues to a colleague who's looking at electric bikes.

    I've been looking around for a while [1] for a second hand trike for
    winter commuting. I might be persuaded to buy a Brompton and convert
    it, depending on the cost of conversion. ISTR it was a custom job, though.

    [1] A couple of years. Most have been further away than I've been
    willing to travel to pick them up. A few months ago a touring trike was
    advertised in Cycle, it was the right size, the right price, and local.
    I phoned up and found that it had also been advertised in the Tricycle
    Association Gazette, which had been published a couple of weeks before
    Cycle. By the time I saw the ad, it had already been bought by someone
    who had driven all the way down from Hull to collect it :-(

    --
    Danny Colyer (my reply address is valid but checked infrequently)
    <URL:http://www.colyer.plus.com/danny/>
    Subscribe to PlusNet <URL:http://www.colyer.plus.com/referral/>
    "He who dares not offend cannot be honest." - Thomas Paine

  18. Danny Colyer said:

    Does anyone have a copy of A to B from October 2004 handy? I vaguely
    remember reading about a Brompton trike conversion, and the A to B
    website tells me that it was in that issue. I'd look it up myself, but
    I've lent all my back issues to a colleague who's looking at electric bikes.

    Hmm. I thought I had, but most of my back issues aren't where I thought
    they were. If it's the one with IR176 stuff in, I lent it to a manager at
    work, but I don't know where the rest are.

    Quoted message said:

    I've been looking around for a while [1] for a second hand trike for
    winter commuting. I might be persuaded to buy a Brompton and convert
    it, depending on the cost of conversion. ISTR it was a custom job, though.

    I think it was. There was a DiBlasi folding trikes in the same issue, I think:
    http://www.diblasi.co.uk/Folding_Tricycles.asp?Prd=Tricycles&Pag=Gruppo&Lng=En

    Quoted message said:


    [1] A couple of years. Most have been further away than I've been
    willing to travel to pick them up. A few months ago a touring trike was
    advertised in Cycle, it was the right size, the right price, and local.
    I phoned up and found that it had also been advertised in the Tricycle
    Association Gazette, which had been published a couple of weeks before
    Cycle. By the time I saw the ad, it had already been bought by someone
    who had driven all the way down from Hull to collect it :-(

    --
    Danny Colyer (my reply address is valid but checked infrequently)
    <URL:http://www.colyer.plus.com/danny/>
    Subscribe to PlusNet <URL:http://www.colyer.plus.com/referral/>
    "He who dares not offend cannot be honest." - Thomas Paine

  19. I said:
    Quoted message said:

    I've been looking around for a while [1] for a second hand trike for
    winter commuting. I might be persuaded to buy a Brompton and convert
    it, depending on the cost of conversion. ISTR it was a custom job, though.

    and Alan Braggins responded:

    Quoted message said:

    I think it was. There was a DiBlasi folding trikes in the same issue, I think:
    http://www.diblasi.co.uk/Folding_Tricycles.asp?Prd=Tricycles&Pag=Gruppo&Lng=En

    Looks interesting, thanks.

    --
    Danny Colyer (my reply address is valid but checked infrequently)
    <URL:http://www.colyer.plus.com/danny/>
    Subscribe to PlusNet <URL:http://www.colyer.plus.com/referral/>
    "He who dares not offend cannot be honest." - Thomas Paine

  20. In message <[email hidden]>,

    Quoted message said:

    Thankfully where I live, the risk of theft is small. What I do is use a
    D-lock to lock main frame to bike stand and then one cable lock around
    front wheel, frame & bike stand & second cable lock around rear wheel,
    frame & bike stand. Indeed, many the time I find mine can be the only
    bike that is locked in a whole row of sheffield stands!

    At work, I attach my bike to a railing in the car park beneath the
    office block. I think there are some Sheffield stands in the delivery
    yard above, but they're open to the elements and not near the entrance
    that I use.

    First I detach the front wheel (both wheels have quick release skewers),
    and use an Abus Granit D-lock to attach this, the frame and the rear
    wheel to the railing. Then I take the seat post and saddle off, too
    (there's a quick release clamp). All this can be done in about 30
    seconds.

    The car park isn't visible to passers by and even though it's mainly
    used only by other cyclists, drivers and facilities staff who work in
    the office blocks above, at least two bikes have been reported stolen
    from it in recent months. Some contractors may use it - but they only
    get in if the security man in the yard lets them.

    I go through the same routine when I attach the bike to the roadside
    railing outside the swimming pool where I swim 3-4 times a week. If it's
    raining I fasten a plastic bag over the open end of the tube with an
    elastic band.

    One disadvantage of the lock is the weight, but it means I can stop
    virtually anywhere and fasten the bike to something. Another is the
    chipped paint work on the bike frame. The bike is a 1986 Evans and,
    according to a work colleague, looks 'very old fashioned'. Maybe that's
    why I still have it.

    --
    congokid
    Good restaurants in London? Read my tips...
    http://congokid.com

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.