Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Light & Motion "Vega" LED Headlight

Started by rdclark · · Last activity · 6 posts · 771 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
21 October 2005
Last activity
22 October 2005
Original author
rdclark
Posts
6
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
771
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–6 of 6
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Light and Motion Vega

    This is after four days with the unit.

    WARNING: This light interferes with my Supergo wireless
    HRM/cyclocomputer, adding some 50mph to the current speed. This is
    consistent and 100% repeatable. It does not seem to interfere with the
    HRM function, nor with the function of my other HRM (an Ekho) or any
    wired comp. I e-mailed Light & Motion on Tuesday and have received no
    response.

    This is a 3W Luxeon LED with an internal NiMH rechargeable battery. It
    sells for $150-180. It comes with a handlebar mount and thick spacers
    to adjust for bar diameter. I tried mounting it underneath the bar but
    my knee hit it when I stood up to pedal.

    For comparison, my old lights are a 15W NiteRider single-spot halogen,
    and a 12W-spot/12W-flood ViewPoint halogen. I also have a 1W Luxeon,
    the Performance version of the Nitehawk Emitter.

    First, the quality of the light from the Vega is different from
    halogens, white/blue instead of yellow. As a result, it is not as
    distinctly visible at dusk as a halogen, I'm guessing because there's
    less contrast between its light and the ambient light from the sky.

    In full darkness, the Vega projects a tight, bright beam that can easly
    light the pavement out to 30 feet or more in front of the bike. Aimed
    that way, there is not much spill to the sides.

    It's not as bright as the Niterider, but the main difference is that
    the Niterider throws more light to the sides.

    It's actually very competitive with the 12W spot on the ViewPoint,
    which has less flare than the NiteRider. Of course, the ViewPoint also
    has a flood (and a very heavy SLA battery that can barely run both
    lamps for an hour).

    The 1W setting on the Vega is about equivalent to the Emitter on high,
    as expected, but the Vega's light is whiter, the Emitter's bluer.

    The tiny Vega charger brought the battery to full initial charge in
    less than 2 hours. I have not tested run times, but after 1 hour on
    high ("4W" - they overdrive the LED, apparently) there was no visible
    dimming, and a recharge took less than an hour.

    As a road commuter light for urban/suburban riders I think this is a
    winner. It throws plenty of light for seeing obstacles and road-surface
    irregularities while riding 15mph. It had the *immense* advantages of
    being self-contained, light in weight (220 grams), and quick charging
    (with a charger small enough to bring along).

    However, if I spent a significant part of my commute on unlit country
    roads where very long throw and wider coverage were important, I might
    want two of these, aimed high and low. At which point other systems
    would be much more cost-effective.

    The wireless interference issue, along with L&M's lack of response to
    my e-mail, are also worth taking into account.

    RichC

  2. rdclark <[email hidden]> wrote:
    :> Light and Motion Vega
    :>
    :> This is after four days with the unit.
    :>
    :> WARNING: This light interferes with my Supergo wireless
    :> HRM/cyclocomputer, adding some 50mph to the current speed. This is
    :> consistent and 100% repeatable. It does not seem to interfere with
    :> the HRM function, nor with the function of my other HRM (an Ekho) or
    :> any wired comp. I e-mailed Light & Motion on Tuesday and have
    :> received no response.

    Seems like there is always something standing between me and the perfect
    light! 🙂

    :>
    :> This is a 3W Luxeon LED with an internal NiMH rechargeable battery.
    :> It sells for $150-180. It comes with a handlebar mount and thick
    :> spacers to adjust for bar diameter. I tried mounting it underneath
    :> the bar but my knee hit it when I stood up to pedal.
    :>
    :> For comparison, my old lights are a 15W NiteRider single-spot
    :> halogen, and a 12W-spot/12W-flood ViewPoint halogen. I also have a
    :> 1W Luxeon, the Performance version of the Nitehawk Emitter.
    :>
    :> First, the quality of the light from the Vega is different from
    :> halogens, white/blue instead of yellow. As a result, it is not as
    :> distinctly visible at dusk as a halogen, I'm guessing because there's
    :> less contrast between its light and the ambient light from the sky.
    :>
    :> In full darkness, the Vega projects a tight, bright beam that can
    :> easly light the pavement out to 30 feet or more in front of the
    :> bike. Aimed that way, there is not much spill to the sides.
    :>
    :> It's not as bright as the Niterider, but the main difference is that
    :> the Niterider throws more light to the sides.

    Isn't that good - more light to the sides?

    :>
    :> It's actually very competitive with the 12W spot on the ViewPoint,
    :> which has less flare than the NiteRider. Of course, the ViewPoint
    :> also has a flood (and a very heavy SLA battery that can barely run
    :> both lamps for an hour).
    :>
    :> The 1W setting on the Vega is about equivalent to the Emitter on
    :> high, as expected, but the Vega's light is whiter, the Emitter's
    :> bluer.

    Interesting. I thought the Emitter's light was pretty white. And that lady
    on the website thought the Vega was blueish. So my concept of white must be
    skewwed badly! 🙂

    :>
    :> As a road commuter light for urban/suburban riders I think this is a
    :> winner. It throws plenty of light for seeing obstacles and
    :> road-surface irregularities while riding 15mph. It had the *immense*
    :> advantages of being self-contained, light in weight (220 grams), and
    :> quick charging (with a charger small enough to bring along).
    :>
    :> However, if I spent a significant part of my commute on unlit country
    :> roads where very long throw and wider coverage were important, I
    :> might want two of these, aimed high and low. At which point other
    :> systems would be much more cost-effective.

    Why not one on each side of center? More light to the sides and a somewhat
    stronger beam down center?

    :>
    :> The wireless interference issue, along with L&M's lack of response to
    :> my e-mail, are also worth taking into account.
    :>

    I hope that interference issue is a fluke.....BTW, can you see your
    cyclocomputer at night? That was one problem I had when night riding...then
    other was not being able to see my chainrings on front and cogs in rear.
    I've gotten used to that.

  3. Totally OT, but I'll chip in my .02$

    Me and the wife bought a set of those LED Xmas lights last year to try 'em
    out...

    I think they interfere with RF fields...and vice versa.

    We put 'em up on the fireplace mantel, a few feet from the entertainment
    unit. One by one, starting with the LED bulb closest to the TV, they would
    "fizzle" and go out. Each time an LED went, there would be a corresponding
    blip of static on the TV. Is this something the manufacturers of
    "super-bright" LED's should be telling us??? Could you be riding along in
    the dark, talking on your cellphone, and suddenly your fancy new LED bicycle
    light winks out???

    F.U.D...since 1929

  4. I've found that my Lightbrain PWM Controller does the same to a Polar 725
    HRM. With the Controller operating and my DIY lights on, Heartrate was
    showing at 180% of max (without even my HRM belt on) and speed was 28 km/hr
    with the bike in the shed on a workstand. These readings varied as I set
    the lights at various levels. Cute. Just don't use the HRM at night - you
    can't see it anyway.
    Bob C
    "rdclark" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Light and Motion Vega

    This is after four days with the unit.

    WARNING: This light interferes with my Supergo wireless
    HRM/cyclocomputer, adding some 50mph to the current speed. This is
    consistent and 100% repeatable. It does not seem to interfere with the
    HRM function, nor with the function of my other HRM (an Ekho) or any
    wired comp. I e-mailed Light & Motion on Tuesday and have received no
    response.

    This is a 3W Luxeon LED with an internal NiMH rechargeable battery. It
    sells for $150-180. It comes with a handlebar mount and thick spacers
    to adjust for bar diameter. I tried mounting it underneath the bar but
    my knee hit it when I stood up to pedal.

    For comparison, my old lights are a 15W NiteRider single-spot halogen,
    and a 12W-spot/12W-flood ViewPoint halogen. I also have a 1W Luxeon,
    the Performance version of the Nitehawk Emitter.

    First, the quality of the light from the Vega is different from
    halogens, white/blue instead of yellow. As a result, it is not as
    distinctly visible at dusk as a halogen, I'm guessing because there's
    less contrast between its light and the ambient light from the sky.

    In full darkness, the Vega projects a tight, bright beam that can easly
    light the pavement out to 30 feet or more in front of the bike. Aimed
    that way, there is not much spill to the sides.

    It's not as bright as the Niterider, but the main difference is that
    the Niterider throws more light to the sides.

    It's actually very competitive with the 12W spot on the ViewPoint,
    which has less flare than the NiteRider. Of course, the ViewPoint also
    has a flood (and a very heavy SLA battery that can barely run both
    lamps for an hour).

    The 1W setting on the Vega is about equivalent to the Emitter on high,
    as expected, but the Vega's light is whiter, the Emitter's bluer.

    The tiny Vega charger brought the battery to full initial charge in
    less than 2 hours. I have not tested run times, but after 1 hour on
    high ("4W" - they overdrive the LED, apparently) there was no visible
    dimming, and a recharge took less than an hour.

    As a road commuter light for urban/suburban riders I think this is a
    winner. It throws plenty of light for seeing obstacles and road-surface
    irregularities while riding 15mph. It had the *immense* advantages of
    being self-contained, light in weight (220 grams), and quick charging
    (with a charger small enough to bring along).

    However, if I spent a significant part of my commute on unlit country
    roads where very long throw and wider coverage were important, I might
    want two of these, aimed high and low. At which point other systems
    would be much more cost-effective.

    The wireless interference issue, along with L&M's lack of response to
    my e-mail, are also worth taking into account.

    RichC

  5. rdclark said:

    Light and Motion Vega

    This is after four days with the unit.

    WARNING: This light interferes with my Supergo wireless
    HRM/cyclocomputer, adding some 50mph to the current speed. This is
    consistent and 100% repeatable. It does not seem to interfere with the
    HRM function, nor with the function of my other HRM (an Ekho) or any
    wired comp. I e-mailed Light & Motion on Tuesday and have received no
    response.

    try to separate them as far as possible. that's usually all it takes
    one on each side of the bar. the computer on the same side as the
    transmitter.
    other lights will it too any with electronics in them. I have a
    xenon flasher that would do it.
    Knight-Toolworks
    http://www.knight-toolworks.com
    affordable handmade wooden planes

  6. "rdclark" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Light and Motion Vega

    This is after four days with the unit.

    WARNING: This light interferes with my Supergo wireless
    HRM/cyclocomputer, adding some 50mph to the current speed. This is
    consistent and 100% repeatable. It does not seem to interfere with the
    HRM function, nor with the function of my other HRM (an Ekho) or any
    wired comp. I e-mailed Light & Motion on Tuesday and have received no
    response.

    This is a 3W Luxeon LED with an internal NiMH rechargeable battery. It
    sells for $150-180. It comes with a handlebar mount and thick spacers
    to adjust for bar diameter. I tried mounting it underneath the bar but
    my knee hit it when I stood up to pedal.

    For comparison, my old lights are a 15W NiteRider single-spot halogen,
    and a 12W-spot/12W-flood ViewPoint halogen. I also have a 1W Luxeon,
    the Performance version of the Nitehawk Emitter.

    First, the quality of the light from the Vega is different from
    halogens, white/blue instead of yellow. As a result, it is not as
    distinctly visible at dusk as a halogen, I'm guessing because there's
    less contrast between its light and the ambient light from the sky.

    In full darkness, the Vega projects a tight, bright beam that can easly
    light the pavement out to 30 feet or more in front of the bike. Aimed
    that way, there is not much spill to the sides.

    It's not as bright as the Niterider, but the main difference is that
    the Niterider throws more light to the sides.

    It's actually very competitive with the 12W spot on the ViewPoint,
    which has less flare than the NiteRider. Of course, the ViewPoint also
    has a flood (and a very heavy SLA battery that can barely run both
    lamps for an hour).

    The 1W setting on the Vega is about equivalent to the Emitter on high,
    as expected, but the Vega's light is whiter, the Emitter's bluer.

    The tiny Vega charger brought the battery to full initial charge in
    less than 2 hours. I have not tested run times, but after 1 hour on
    high ("4W" - they overdrive the LED, apparently) there was no visible
    dimming, and a recharge took less than an hour.

    As a road commuter light for urban/suburban riders I think this is a
    winner. It throws plenty of light for seeing obstacles and road-surface
    irregularities while riding 15mph. It had the *immense* advantages of
    being self-contained, light in weight (220 grams), and quick charging
    (with a charger small enough to bring along).

    However, if I spent a significant part of my commute on unlit country
    roads where very long throw and wider coverage were important, I might
    want two of these, aimed high and low. At which point other systems
    would be much more cost-effective.

    The wireless interference issue, along with L&M's lack of response to
    my e-mail, are also worth taking into account.

    RichC

    Interesting.
    I would think a lot of devices that use PWM (pulse width modulation) for
    controlling the light power and intensity would have this problem too. The
    transistors used to drive the LED(s) can generate a lot of RFI and jam out
    things up close to them. The wireless cycle-computers usually have very
    weak transmitters in their sensors, so that two people riding side by side
    don't interfere with each other. I remember being on a organozed ride once
    where at the starting line my HRM and cycle-computer both were jammed out by
    all the other riders around me. After we started the units started working
    Ok again.
    You might try moving the things farther apart, and ensure the wheel sensor
    pickup/transmitter is as close to the bike computer as possible and in a
    straight line too.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.