Road Cycling · Public discussion

Liggett blushes

Started by Jay Hill · · Last activity · 9 posts · 479 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
27 July 2007
Last activity
28 July 2007
Original author
Jay Hill
Posts
9
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
479
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–9 of 9
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. After Andreu's piece about electronic shifting, Phil said, roughly,
    "that's a shocking revelation." They're straining today.

  2. Jay Hill said:


    After Andreu's piece about electronic shifting, Phil said, roughly,
    "that's a shocking revelation." They're straining today.

    Liggett and Sherwen's credulous commentary over the past 2 decades could
    be seens as virtually complicit with the rise of doping in the
    professional peloton. They have their cycling video business to promote ...

    Proposed RBR rule addition 1: When Phil or Paul describes a riding feat
    as "incredible" or "simply unbelievable", it probably is.

    Proposed RBR rule addition 2: When Phil or Paul make a definitive
    statement ("that's such and such a rider", "we're passing through
    <place>", "he's at the back of the field", it is probably incorrect.

  3. "Stu Fleming" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Jay Hill said:


    After Andreu's piece about electronic shifting, Phil said, roughly,
    "that's a shocking revelation." They're straining today.

    Liggett and Sherwen's credulous commentary over the past 2 decades could
    be seens as virtually complicit with the rise of doping in the
    professional peloton. They have their cycling video business to promote
    ...

    Proposed RBR rule addition 1: When Phil or Paul describes a riding feat as
    "incredible" or "simply unbelievable", it probably is.

    Proposed RBR rule addition 2: When Phil or Paul make a definitive
    statement ("that's such and such a rider", "we're passing through
    <place>", "he's at the back of the field", it is probably incorrect.

    I'd apply addition 2 to just Phil, not both.

    Greg
    --
    "What have you got in that paper bag?
    Is it a dose of Vitamin C?
    Ain't got no time for Western medicine
    I am Damo Suzuki" - Mark E Smith

  4. Phil: "He's going to come in under 8 minutes!"
    Paul: "Well, he's going to come in under 9 minutes..."

  5. Jay Hill said:

    After Andreu's piece about electronic shifting, Phil said, roughly,
    "that's a shocking revelation." They're straining today.

    Is that complicit sob andreu still commentating ?????

  6. In article <[email hidden]>,
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:
    Jay Hill said:

    After Andreu's piece about electronic shifting, Phil said, roughly,
    "that's a shocking revelation." They're straining today.

    Is that complicit sob andreu still commentating ?????

    The sad and unfortunate answer is yes.

    S.

  7. Stu Fleming said:
    Jay Hill said:


    After Andreu's piece about electronic shifting, Phil said, roughly,
    "that's a shocking revelation." They're straining today.

    Today he said "Karpets is on fire!" and then caught himself and muttered
    something about how that sounded odd.

    Mark J.

  8. In article <[email hidden]>,
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:
    Stu Fleming said:
    Jay Hill said:


    After Andreu's piece about electronic shifting, Phil said, roughly,
    "that's a shocking revelation." They're straining today.

    Today he said "Karpets is on fire!" and then caught himself and muttered
    something about how that sounded odd.

    Mark J.

    Karpets is flying?

    S.

  9. in message <[email hidden]>, samson

    (') said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:
    Stu Fleming said:

    Jay Hill wrote:
    >
    > After Andreu's piece about electronic shifting, Phil said, roughly,
    > "that's a shocking revelation." They're straining today.

    Today he said "Karpets is on fire!" and then caught himself and muttered
    something about how that sounded odd.

    Karpets is flying?

    Flying Karpets.

    --
    [email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/

    'You cannot put "The Internet" into the Recycle Bin.'

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.