Paul Boyd usenet.dont.work@plusnet said:When I first left full-time education with a nice shiny BTEC HND, I
worked for about 6 months as a general labourer. I was also signed on
to the dole, and I declared the days I was working and the amount I
earned. The dole [1] was adjusted accordingly, often to zero in any one
week. It appears now that it isn't possible to do that - you are either
employed or on the dole, but you can't remain signed on even if you're
working short term. Therefore people don't bother getting short term
work because of the hassle in signing on and off. That can't be an
improvement, can it?
Indeed not. It's just typical government lunacy.
There is, apparantly, an even worse catch.
If you are ill, you can get invalidity benefit which is higher than 'the dole'
(I don't know by how much, but presumably a worthwhile amount). However, you
don't get this for some months.
Some people have long term conditions such as depression, back pain or 'chronic
tiredness syndrome' for which they have beed awarded invalidty benefit. These
conditions are often aggravated in unforseeable ways by types and amounts of
activity.
If, however, these people's condition appears to improve, and would like to try
to work again, they are faced with a dilemma.
If they sign off to try and work, and the effort worsens their condition, they
are now back on the lower rate of benefit for several months. Since people,
particularly people who are used to working and having a proper salary,
frequently build up debts whilst adjusting to their dramatically reduced income,
this can be too much of a risk if there is any doubt in their mind that they can
work for long enough to at least save to cover the shortfall.
Yet another piece of incredibly incompetant and short sighted rule making by the
government.