In a recent message <[email hidden]>,
Gordon <[email hidden]> wrote.
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:The RA says that if you come across a blocked right of way
you are entitled to remove the obstruction. Oddly enough,
it appears that you can only do this if you come across an
obstruction during the course of a walk (you are not
allowed to remove such an obstruction if the sole purpose
of the walk was do this, if understand it correctly).
Quoted message said:I'm puzzled by all the macho talk about hacking barbed wire
across ROW, anyway. In 32 years of hill and country walking
the only ROW I have found blocked are those which are
overgrown or diverted because my map was out of date. ;-)
Macho, moi? No, just fed up. I don't get my routes out of
books and before I go out for a ramble I plot a track using
Fugawi, send it to the Geko and then walk it. From the map
it's not possible to get much idea of what one is likely to
encounter in advance and by the time one comes up against an
obstacle it's too late to do anything but go round or go
through. In these circumstances I go through, if possible. I
believe it's important to do this. The only complaint I have
ever made to a county rights-of-way department about the
deliberate obliteration of a footpath wasn't even
acknowledged, let alone dealt with.
I could avoid all of these problems by getting my walks from
books, I suppose [1]. But why should I? One of the pleasures
of walking routes that one has planned oneself is finding
oneself off the beaten track. Damn it, I want to do it *my*
way, not *his* way <g>.
Note [1]. Actually, I'm not sure this is the case. *Are*
there any books with circular walks of about 30 to 35 km in
length around the high ground of Berkshire, Oxfordshire,
Wiltshire and Hampshire?
Regards, Nick.
--
Nick Hopton and Anne Hopton Caversham, Reading, England
<[email hidden]