Road Cycling · Public discussion

Letter to Bicycling

Started by Claire Petersky · · Last activity · 34 posts · 1,386 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
10 April 2004
Last activity
17 April 2004
Original author
Claire Petersky
Posts
34
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,386
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 34
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I sat down to enjoy the latest issue of Bicycling and had
    the misfortune of stumbling into the "Style" section. What
    were you guys thinking?

    This woman looks like someone hit her hard in both eyes,
    she's got so much make-up on around them. She's wearing the
    most idiotic shoes -- who in their right mind would ever
    ever EVER where heels like that?! Or maybe that's the idea
    -- you want to show a female that looks like she's been
    physically abused, and wearing crippling footgear so she
    can't run away. Says something

    And who would ever wear any of those clothes in public,
    much less on a bike? "Uncomfortable" doesn't even begin
    describe how wretched they appear to be on the body, but
    "ugly" might help.

    And you know what, guys? I have wild curly hair like that
    myself, and I know, you've got to braid it to keep it under
    control for a long ride or it will be a tangled mess after
    50 or so miles.

    You guys must have had your oxygen supply cut off when you
    came up with this repulsive [censored]. Show us real women for
    your style section, women with muscles, women with scars on
    their knees and elbows, women who are fit, strong, and kick-
    ass, and don't have to have surgery to look like women.

    Feh.

    Warm Regards,

    Claire Petersky Please replace earthlink for mouse-potato
    and .net for .com Home of the meditative cyclist:
    home.earthlink.netWelcome.htm See the
    books I've set free at:
    bookcrossing.comCpetersky

  2. "Claire Petersky" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    news:YuYdc.107146$gA5.1416752@attbi_s03:

    Quoted message said:

    I sat down to enjoy the latest issue of Bicycling and had
    the misfortune of stumbling into the "Style" section. What
    were you guys thinking?

    Was this the April Fools issue?

  3. "Ken" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "Claire Petersky" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    news:YuYdc.107146$gA5.1416752@attbi_s03:

    Quoted message said:

    I sat down to enjoy the latest issue of Bicycling and
    had the misfortune of stumbling into the "Style"
    section. What were you guys thinking?

    Was this the April Fools issue?

    Alas, no.

    An acquaintance showed me this article.

    The feature was a model showing off designer clothes made
    from old inner tubes, not clothes you would wear to actually
    bicycle. The model did look rather, uh, extreme. I doubt
    Claire will be the only woman writing in. I doubt the
    editors will care.

  4. Who takes that magazine seriously, anyway?

    Quoted message said:

    I sat down to enjoy the latest issue of Bicycling and had
    the misfortune


    of

    Quoted message said:

    stumbling into the "Style" section. What were you guys
    thinking?

  5. "Gary Smiley" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:j12ec.114273$w54.825739@attbi_s01...

    Quoted message said:

    Who takes that magazine seriously, anyway?

    Quoted message said:

    I sat down to enjoy the latest issue of Bicycling and
    had the misfortune


    of

    Quoted message said:

    stumbling into the "Style" section. What were you guys
    thinking?



    I haven't seen it but I checked out the website. However I
    haven't found the style section. WHat's the date on the
    issue? In canada we get them later. Now I'm curious as to
    see that article.

  6. Sun, 11 Apr 2004 02:06:03 GMT,
    <[email hidden]>,

    Mike Kruger said:

    The feature was a model showing off designer clothes made
    from old inner tubes, not clothes you would wear to
    actually bicycle. The model did look rather, uh, extreme.

    People have been wearing fetish gear made from inner tubes
    for years already. Some very intricate and exacting work
    goes into the nicer pieces. Done well, it can be quite
    attractive.

    tubes. I've seen capes and kilts woven from strips. Heavy
    like armour. Also bodices, skirts, bikinis and accessories.

    the extremes are constantly pushing the fringe into the
    mainstream.
    --
    zk

  7. Sat, 10 Apr 2004 22:43:21 -0400,
    <[email hidden]>,

    Marlene Blanshay said:

    Now I'm curious as to see that article.

    I was planning to scope it out at Safeway later tonight.
    --
    zk

  8. Mike Kruger said:

    An acquaintance showed me this article.

    The feature was a model showing off designer clothes made
    from old inner tubes, not clothes you would wear to
    actually bicycle. The model did look rather, uh, extreme.
    I doubt Claire will be the only woman writing in. I doubt
    the editors will care.

    They'll be laughing all the way to the bank, as more people
    buy the magazine to see what all the fuss is about. This is
    textbook lowest common denominator marketing, like making
    slasher movies so "smart people with a keen sense of irony"
    can "laugh at how stupid they are." Don't take the bait.

    Matt O.

  9. Claire Petersky said:

    I sat down to enjoy the latest issue of Bicycling and had
    the misfortune of stumbling into the "Style" section. What
    were you guys thinking?

    I have yet to see any evidence that the people who produce
    bicycling are more than casually acquainted with this
    'thinking' thing that you postulate. Or maybe they are
    simply thinking about the clean green feel of the
    advertisers dollars as they roll gleefully in them.

    Quoted message said:

    Feh.

    You're welcome to borrow my Cycling + issues when I'm done
    with them. That should help wash some of the taste out of
    your mouth.

    --
    Dane Jackson - z u v e m b i @ u n i x b i g o t s . o r g
    Thus spake the master programmer: "After three days without
    programming, life becomes meaningless." -- Geoffrey James,
    "The Tao of Programming"

  10. Dane Jackson <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    You're welcome to borrow my Cycling + issues when I'm done
    with them. That should help wash some of the taste out of
    your mouth.

    Even though it costs between $7 and $8 per issue at Borders,
    I buy Cycling + every once in a while just to see what a
    well done bicycling magazine should look like. I get the
    impression that the folks at Cycling + actually ride bikes
    and have a clue what their readers are interested in.

    [censored] Durbin

  11. "Claire Petersky" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:YuYdc.107146$gA5.1416752@attbi_s03...

    Quoted message said:

    I sat down to enjoy the latest issue of Bicycling and had
    the misfortune


    of

    Quoted message said:

    stumbling into the "Style" section. What were you guys
    thinking?

    I didn't realise that cyclists still read Buy-cycling.

  12. Ken said:

    "Claire Petersky" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    news:YuYdc.107146$gA5.1416752@attbi_s03:

    Quoted message said:

    I sat down to enjoy the latest issue of Bicycling and had
    the misfortune of stumbling into the "Style" section. What
    were you guys thinking?

    Was this the April Fools issue?

    Not much different from the March Fools issue, or the
    February Fools issue. And so on.

    --
    -------------+ Frank Krygowski [To reply, omit what's
    between "at" and "cc"]

  13. araby said:

    I didn't realise that cyclists still read Buy-cycling.

    Weirdly enough, I now have a subscription, for the first
    time in years. It comes at no charge, courtesy of the
    rapidly deteriorating League of American Bicyclists.

    This is nicely symbolic of the changes produced by the
    League's new, self-perpetuating board of directors.

    See labreform.orglabreform.org

    --
    -------------+ Frank Krygowski [To reply, omit what's
    between "at" and "cc"]

  14. "araby" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Claire Petersky" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    message news:YuYdc.107146$gA5.1416752@attbi_s03...

    Quoted message said:

    I sat down to enjoy the latest issue of Bicycling and
    had the misfortune of stumbling into the "Style"
    section. What were you guys thinking?

    I didn't realise that cyclists still read Buy-cycling.

    It's among the magazines that my kids sell to support their
    youth organization, Camp Fire. I subscribed this year.

    --
    Warm Regards,

    Claire Petersky
    Please replace earthlink for mouse-potato and .net for .com
    Home of the meditative cyclist:
    home.earthlink.netWelcome.htm
    See the books I've set free at: bookcrossing.comCpetersky

  15. If it wasn't the 'April Fools' issue then maybe it was the
    February Fools or the March Hare or the May Fool-U issue.

    I'm sure you get the point - don't buy cycling magazine.

    "Ken" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...
    | "Claire Petersky" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    | news:YuYdc.107146$gA5.1416752@attbi_s03:
    | > I sat down to enjoy the latest issue of Bicycling and
    | > had the misfortune of stumbling into the "Style"
    | > section. What were you guys thinking?
    |
    | Was this the April Fools issue?

  16. frkrygow' 'frkrygow said:
    araby said:

    I didn't realise that cyclists still read Buy-cycling.

    Weirdly enough, I now have a subscription, for the first
    time in years. It comes at no charge, courtesy of the
    rapidly deteriorating League of American Bicyclists.

    See, they have to give it away...

    Matt O.

  17. censored Durbin said:
    Dane Jackson said:

    You're welcome to borrow my Cycling + issues when I'm
    done with them. That should help wash some of the taste
    out of your mouth.

    Even though it costs between $7 and $8 per issue at
    Borders, I buy Cycling + every once in a while just to see
    what a well done bicycling magazine should look like. I
    get the impression that the folks at Cycling + actually
    ride bikes and have a clue what their readers are
    interested in.

    I can't find any shops in the Seattle area that carry C+
    unfortunately. I did manage to pick up a copy when I was out
    visiting my brother in Philly a while ago. I was very
    favorably impressed with it and have been wrestling with
    whether to subscribe or not till recently.

    At least one of the contributers (Scott Munn ?) to C+
    appears to be a uk.rec.cycling poster. Heh, evidently one
    of Guy's quotes about helmets made it into C+ via that
    channel. I've been lurking on ur.cycling for a bit, and the
    denizens seem to carry a fairly good opinion of the
    magazine. My first issue (May) is supposed to be arriving
    in the mail soon.

    --
    Dane Jackson - z u v e m b i @ u n i x b i g o t s . o r g
    Unix is the worst operating system; except for all others.
    -- Berry Kercheval

  18. "Claire Petersky" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:4ucec.120004$JO3.81907@attbi_s04...

    Quoted message said:

    "araby" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:oebec.86-
    [email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Claire Petersky" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    message news:YuYdc.107146$gA5.1416752@attbi_s03...

    Quoted message said:

    I sat down to enjoy the latest issue of Bicycling and
    had the


    misfortune

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    of stumbling into the "Style" section. What were you
    guys thinking?

    I didn't realise that cyclists still read Buy-cycling.

    It's among the magazines that my kids sell to support
    their youth organization, Camp Fire. I subscribed
    this year.


    Campfire! Like the campfire girls? I seem to remember ads
    for the campfire girls on tv when I was very young, but not
    anymore.I guess it's just Campfire now, for boys and girls.

    As for the magazine, it's not Cyclesport but it'snot as bad
    as it used to be. They actually have some good articles,
    like one on the website for climbing workouts.

  19. I got my subscription the same way last year. I remembered
    "Bicycling" from the early 90s, when it seemed like a
    pretty good magazine. I was surprised at how bad it is now.
    They were always pushing expensive stuff that an ordinary
    bicyclist could not afford, but they used to have some good
    articles. Now you're lucky if there is one decent article
    in an issue.

    MP

    On Sun, 11 Apr 2004 10:11:33 -0400, "frkrygow"

    frkrygow'@omitcc.ysu.edu said:
    araby said:

    I didn't realise that cyclists still read Buy-cycling.

    Weirdly enough, I now have a subscription, for the first
    time in years. It comes at no charge, courtesy of the
    rapidly deteriorating League of American Bicyclists.

    This is nicely symbolic of the changes produced by the
    League's new, self-perpetuating board of directors.

    See labreform.orglabreform.org

  20. And don't forget the chainring tattoo, either!

    Bicycling has don this before, back when their subscription
    base was suffering. my guess is they may be in dire
    straights again. Hence the "swimsuit issue". I don't bother
    with this mag anymore. AFAIK, it's just another narrow-
    minded racer mag.

    If so, you can bask in that, at least :-#)

    - -

    "May you have the wind at your back. And a really low gear
    for the hills!"

    Chris Zacho ~ "Your Friendly Neighborhood Wheelman"

    Chris'Z Corner geocities.comczcorner

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.