Letter in defence

"Simon Mason" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Since I had a letter published in our local rag complaining about car drivers not giving way to
cyclists on roundabouts, there have been numerous anti bike letters, along the lines of "you don't
pay any road tax, so we can knock you down."

I wonder if they would drive straight into a car if they noticed it had no tax disc?

"Adrian Boliston" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

I wonder if they would drive straight into a car if they noticed it had no

tax

Quoted message said:

disc?

classic cars must be fair game too

"Simon Mason" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Since I had a letter published in our local rag complaining about car drivers not giving way to
cyclists on roundabouts, there have been

numerous

Quoted message said:

anti bike letters, along the lines of "you don't pay any road tax, so we

can

Quoted message said:

knock you down." In tonight's edition I was therefore pleased to see the local CTC rep sticking
up for us:

simonmason.karoo.netzctc.htmOpen ↗

I really don't know what's happened to this country over the last year or so in terms of paying for
things. It seems everything we now do has to be paid for individually rather than through tax and if
we don't directly benefit we feel cheated that someone else might. I'm taling about schools,
universities, NHS, roads, firefighters etc etc. Really annoying.

Contrary to what car drivers think, there is no such thing as 'road tax'. It's called vehicle excise
duty and does not, contrary to what most people think, directly pay for the provision of roads and
their maintenance. Just because someone is paying 'road tax' doesn't mean they have any more rights
than cyclists.

Allen

Simon Mason said:

Since I had a letter published in our local rag complaining about car drivers not giving way to
cyclists on roundabouts, there have been numerous anti bike letters, along the lines of "you don't
pay any road tax, so we can knock you down." In tonight's edition I was therefore pleased to see
the local CTC rep sticking up for us:

simonmason.karoo.netzctc.htmOpen ↗

On Mon, 10 Feb 2003 18:58:02 +0000, Allen Foster

bigal@REMOVE_THISnewtownbreda.demANDTHISon.co.uk said:

Contrary to what car drivers think, there is no such thing as 'road tax'. It's called vehicle
excise duty

I refer the honourable gentleman to my earlier answer:
<http://www.chapmancentral.com/Web/public.nsf/Documents/Bicycles_And_Vehicle_Excise_Duty>

Quite why we've arrived at the state where people apparently believe that "I've paid for this road
and I'm bloody well going to use all of it" I don't know; it does appear that people are by and
large more self-obsessed than they were twenty years ago (to pluck a figure form the air). Luckily
most cyclists seem immune to this :-)

Guy
===
** WARNING ** This posting may contain traces of irony. chapmancentral.comchapmancentral.comOpen ↗ (BT ADSL and
dynamic DNS permitting)
NOTE: BT Openworld have now blocked port 25 (without notice), so old mail addresses may no longer
work. Apologies.

"Just zis Guy, you know?" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Quite why we've arrived at the state where people apparently believe that "I've paid for this road
and I'm bloody well going to use all of it" I don't know; it does appear that people are by and
large more self-obsessed than they were twenty years ago (to pluck a figure form the air). Luckily
most cyclists seem immune to this :-)

I know it would be an exercise in futility but wouldn't you just love to ask one of the bleaters to
come up with a document that actually says they have some special rights to use roads that are
exclusive to motorists? S'pose you'd just get a typical uk.tosspot sort of an answer.

Pete

Allen Foster deftly scribbled:

A little amendment may be in order

Quoted message said:

Contrary to what car drivers think, there is no such thing as 'road

^^^^ some

Quoted message said:

tax'. It's called vehicle excise duty and does not, contrary to what most people think, directly
pay for the provision of roads and their maintenance. Just because someone is paying 'road tax'
doesn't mean they have any more rights than cyclists.

--
...................................Paul-[censored] Seti 1401 wu in 10052 hours
setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edusetiathome.ssl.berkeley.eduOpen ↗ graffiti.virgin.netIndex.htmOpen ↗

Just zis Guy said:

Quite why we've arrived at the state where people apparently believe "I've paid for this road and
I'm bloody well going to use all of it"

The way I look at it, motorists pay to use the roads, but they damn well should do as (in most
cases) their car is taking up space on a road even when not in use. They need to pay for such items
useless to a cyclist such as pay and display meters, parking wardens, motorways etc. Also the fact
that they drive massive ugly machines belching out fumes. Why that should be a right is quite
beyond me.

Also cars tend to destroy and take chunks out of the road quite a bit. I find gaping potholes appear
overnight on my daily route! They actually get patched up quite quickly, but I suppose this _is_
london. When I say patched I mean bodged and not at all smoothed.

Maybe I'm just incredibly naive and ignorant (only just being old enough to learn to drive, not that
I have done so). Anyway s a good job I'm not crosspoting to uk.tosspot I suppose.

--

-Alex

----------------------------------
[email hidden]

alexpg.ath.cxcyclingOpen ↗ westerleycycling.org.ukwesterleycycling.org.ukOpen ↗
----------------------------------

A certain Allen Foster, of uk.rec.cycling "fame", writes :

Quoted message said:

Contrary to what car drivers think, there is no such thing as 'road tax'. It's called vehicle
excise duty and does not, contrary to what most people think, directly pay for the provision of
roads and their maintenance. Just because someone is paying 'road tax' doesn't mean they have any
more rights than cyclists.

I agree Allan and hear this "argument" all the time. The motorists who use it do not understand
fundamentally what a tax is. They think it is a charge which they pay to receive a service.
Assuredly, if a motorist used that line in front of a judge following an accident, I'd hope the
penalty to be damning.

--
George H.W. Bush, as Presidential Nominee for the Republican party; 1987-AUG-27: "No, I don't know
that Atheists should be considered as citizens, nor should they be considered as patriots. This is
one nation under God."

Alex Graham <[email hidden]> wrote:

| Just zis Guy, you know? wrote:
|
| > Quite why we've arrived at the state where people apparently believe "I've paid for this road
| > and I'm bloody well going to use all of it"
|
| The way I look at it, motorists pay to use the roads, but they damn well should do as (in most
| cases) their car is taking up space on a road even when not in use. They need to pay for such
| items useless to a cyclist such as pay and display meters, parking wardens, motorways etc. Also
| the fact that they drive massive ugly machines belching out fumes. Why that should be a right is
| quite beyond me.

A good, albeit not true, reply to this, or so I think, is that a pro rata Bike Excise Duty would
cost more to collect than the revenue raised, so we all pay for using the roads, don't we. There's
no answer to that, that I can see, that justifies any kind of priority except over pedestrians. You
can then go on, truthfully, about Council Tax paying for the road upkeep etc.

--
Patrick Herring, Sheffield, UK anweald.co.ukanweald.co.ukOpen ↗

As an owner of a 60's mini cooper (exellent condition i might add) and also a cyclist, does that
mean I'm fair game to tax paying motorists twice over? And why is it that my mini is exempt from
road tax? By the way the ownership of the car has upset my neighbour on several occasions and has
led to her calling me "an iresponisble young hoodlum who should pay his road tax". What really upset
her is the fact the police will not do anything about it. :o)

Gadget

Chesney Christ said:

I agree Allan and hear this "argument" all the time. The motorists who use it do not understand
fundamentally what a tax is. They think it is a charge which they pay to receive a service.

Using that arguement, since I pay more tax the most people presumably I should get priority over
most of them on hospital waiting lists and pick of the school places for my children. Must try that
line next time a motorist complains - "Would you mind moving your car out of the way of my bicycle,
I pay more tax than you"

Tony

--
raven-family.comraven-family.comOpen ↗

"I don't want any yes-men around me. I want everybody to tell me the truth even if it costs them
their job."

Samuel Goldwyn

In "]news:[email hidden], Patrick Herring <[email hidden]> typed:

Quoted message said:

A good, albeit not true, reply to this, or so I think, is that a pro rata Bike Excise Duty would
cost more to collect than the revenue raised,

I was in dicussions with DfT last year on this very issue; their officer actually advised that
charging tax on bikes *had* once been considered (many years ago I would think) - but it was soon
realised, that it would not be a viable proposition

so we all pay for using the roads, don't we. There's no answer

Quoted message said:

to that, that I can see, that justifies any kind of priority except over pedestrians.

Bicycles and their accessories (apart from h*lm*ts) are subject to VAT. We *do* pay for the road
infrastructure when we go to the LBS (apart from those who try and smuggle bikes in via the USA -
although last time someone suggested trying this I remember some group posters saying it was not on
and they would even turn them in to HMCE!)

Alex

"Stephen (aka steford)" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

I really don't know what's happened to this country over the last year or

so

Quoted message said:

in terms of paying for things. It seems everything we now do has to be

paid

Quoted message said:

for individually rather than through tax and if we don't directly benefit

we

Quoted message said:

feel cheated that someone else might. I'm taling about schools, universities, NHS, roads,
firefighters etc etc. Really annoying.

Heard at a recent Premier division football match.

A) Sit Down!!

B) (resuming his seat - expletives deleted) I paid xx for this seat -- I'll stand if I want.

C) I paid the same and want to see the match

D) Sit down (addressed to three guys in front of him who were now standing)

3 Guys) Tough. We paid xx & we will stand if we want.

Neighbours) Applause.

Lesson -- paying may secure additional rights but does not relieve you of responsibilities.

T

Gadget said:

As an owner of a 60's mini cooper (exellent condition i might add) and also a cyclist, does that
mean I'm fair game to tax paying motorists twice over? And why is it that my mini is exempt from
road tax?

All vehicles are exempt from Road Tax, as it doesn't exist. Some are also exempt from Vehicle
Excise Duty ;-)

--
Guy
===
I wonder if you wouldn't mind piecing out our imperfections with your thoughts; and while you're
about it perhaps you could think when we talk of bicycles, that you see them printing their proud
wheels i' the receiving earth; thanks awfully.

highwaycode.gov.uk09.shtmlOpen ↗ highwaycode.gov.uk09.shtmlOpen ↗

Allen Foster <bigal@REMOVE_THISnewtownbreda.demANDTHISon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

Contrary to what car drivers think, there is no such thing as 'road tax'. It's called vehicle
excise duty and does not, contrary to what most people think, directly pay for the provision of
roads and their maintenance. Just because someone is paying 'road tax' doesn't mean they have any
more rights than cyclists.

Allen

Hmmm. On new toll roads where the charge is specifically for driving along that bit of road what
will the position of cyclists be? Will we also have to pay to use the road or will we get free
access? Do they have nice cycleways or lanes alongside that keep us and the cars apart? If not, does
the payment of a toll permit drivers to be angrier at having to slow down to overtake us?

I can see a whole new anti-cyclist mentality developing....

- Richard

"Simon Mason" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Since I had a letter published in our local rag complaining about car drivers not giving way to
cyclists on roundabouts, there have been

numerous

Quoted message said:

anti bike letters, along the lines of "you don't pay any road tax, so we

can

Quoted message said:

knock you down." In tonight's edition I was therefore pleased to see the local CTC rep sticking
up for us:

simonmason.karoo.netzctc.htmOpen ↗

--
Simon Mason Anlaby East Yorkshire. 53°44'N 0°26'W simonmason.karoo.netsimonmason.karoo.netOpen ↗

My view on this is that as I own, and pay vehicle excise duty for both a car and motorbike, then I
have already covered the 'moral arguement' that motorists may use when I'm out on my bike. Not only
have I 'covered the cost' twice already, but I'm being considerate enough to leave the polluting,
road/family destroying machines at home whilst travelling and taking up a whole lot less road space
to boot. This turns the whole point around and then asks of them, "what the hell are you playing at,
out in your car ?"....in theory, they should look all embarrassed and shuffle off to buy a bike,
then ride it!! - Can't wait.. 8-D. Cheers, Dave.

Dave said:

My view on this is that as I own, and pay vehicle excise duty for both a car and motorbike, then I
have already covered the 'moral arguement' that motorists may use when I'm out on my bike. Not
only have I 'covered the cost' twice already, but I'm being considerate enough to leave the
polluting, road/family destroying machines at home whilst travelling and taking up a whole lot
less road space to boot. This turns the whole point around and then asks of them, "what the hell
are you playing at, out in your car ?"....in theory, they should look all embarrassed and shuffle
off to buy a bike, then ride it!! - Can't wait.. 8-D.

It works for me :-)

That's been my take as well, FWIW - what happens is that the uk.tosspot [censored] then start chiding me
for failing to obey red traffic lights or use lights (also wrong on both counts) to which my counter
involves cagers who exceed speed limits and park illegally. And eventually they run out of arguments
and resort to abuse, at which point I shrug my shoulders and walk away.

--
Guy
===
I wonder if you wouldn't mind piecing out our imperfections with your thoughts; and while you're
about it perhaps you could think when we talk of bicycles, that you see them printing their proud
wheels i' the receiving earth; thanks awfully.

highwaycode.gov.uk09.shtmlOpen ↗ highwaycode.gov.uk09.shtmlOpen ↗

"Just zis Guy, you know?" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Dave said:

My view on this is that as I own, and pay vehicle excise duty for both a car and motorbike, then
I have already covered the 'moral arguement' that motorists may use when I'm out on my bike. Not
only have I 'covered the cost' twice already, but I'm being considerate enough to leave the
polluting, road/family destroying machines at home whilst travelling and taking up a whole lot
less road space to boot. This turns the whole point around and then asks of them, "what the hell
are you playing at, out in your car ?"....in theory, they should look all embarrassed and
shuffle off to buy a bike, then ride it!! - Can't wait.. 8-D.

It works for me :-)

That's been my take as well, FWIW - what happens is that the uk.tosspot [censored] then start chiding
me for failing to obey red traffic lights or use lights (also wrong on both counts) to which my
counter involves cagers who exceed speed limits and park illegally. And eventually they run out of
arguments and resort to abuse, at which point I shrug my shoulders and

walk

Quoted message said:

away.

--
Guy
===

yeah, the human state, I love it!!