UK and Europe · Public discussion

Letter from MP

Started by Martin Dann · · Last activity · 8 posts · 332 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
25 May 2007
Last activity
30 May 2007
Original author
Martin Dann
Posts
8
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
332
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–8 of 8
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Found a letter addressed to my when I got home from work this evening,
    send from my mp.

    Dear ....

    New Highway Code

    Thank you for you communication.....

    My Liberal Democrats colleagues and I are great supporters of cycling.......

    Although on the face of it, the draft ....

    My colleague Tom Brake MP, The former Liberal Democrat Transport
    Spokesman and a regular cyclist, has echoed cyclists' concerns. He
    recently wrote to the Department for Transport to confirm that these
    rules are solely advisory and , if they were not observed by cyclists,
    would not lead to claims of cyclists' "contributory negligence". I know
    from my dealing with Sustrans and other Bristol based cycling groups
    that there are mixec views on helmets and I mudy admit that whenever I
    use my own bike I choose not to wear one.

    Thank you for ....

    Yours sincerely

  2. "Tom Brake MP.... regular cyclist"...along with his colleagues John Wheels &
    Martin Bottom-Bracket...

    I'll get me coat...
    "Martin Dann" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Found a letter addressed to my when I got home from work this evening,
    send from my mp.

    Dear ....

    New Highway Code

    Thank you for you communication.....

    My Liberal Democrats colleagues and I are great supporters of
    cycling.......

    Although on the face of it, the draft ....

    My colleague Tom Brake MP, The former Liberal Democrat Transport Spokesman
    and a regular cyclist, has echoed cyclists' concerns. He recently wrote to
    the Department for Transport to confirm that these rules are solely
    advisory and , if they were not observed by cyclists, would not lead to
    claims of cyclists' "contributory negligence". I know from my dealing with
    Sustrans and other Bristol based cycling groups that there are mixec views
    on helmets and I mudy admit that whenever I use my own bike I choose not
    to wear one.

    Thank you for ....

    Yours sincerely

  3. spokes said:

    "Tom Brake MP.... regular cyclist"...along with his colleagues John Wheels &
    Martin Bottom-Bracket...

    I'll get me coat...

    http://www.theyworkforyou.com/mp/tom_brake/carshalton_and_wallington

    The New Scientist used to (may still do) write about the amount of
    people whose names related to their jobs.
    e.g. When I broke my arm and wrist a few years ago, the broken bone
    doctor's name was Mr Hand

    Martin.

  4. Martin Dann said:
    spokes said:

    "Tom Brake MP.... regular cyclist"...along with his colleagues John Wheels &
    Martin Bottom-Bracket...

    I'll get me coat...

    Quoted message said:

    http://www.theyworkforyou.com/mp/tom_brake/carshalton_and_wallington

    Quoted message said:

    The New Scientist used to (may still do) write about the amount of
    people whose names related to their jobs.
    e.g. When I broke my arm and wrist a few years ago, the broken bone
    doctor's name was Mr Hand

    A computer company I once worked for had a lot of trouble with a
    secret government research centre which used our computers to simulate
    the performance of secret new warplane designs. One of their new
    designs kept getting shot down despite there being nothing else around
    doing any shooting at the time. Because it was top secret national
    security stuff the core dumps they sent us had all the secret bits
    relating to the plane's performance cut out of them with scissors. We
    could never find anything wrong.

    So we had to visit the site to find out what was going on. Turned out
    to be very simple. After takeoff, and before ramping up to its
    terrific supersonic speeds, this plane fired a quick burst from its
    guns just to check them out. Then the pilot opened up the engines and
    ran into his own bullets from behind.

    While we were there we met the nice man in charge of this secret
    government research centre, Dr Nutter.

    --
    Chris Malcolm [email hidden] DoD #205
    IPAB, Informatics, JCMB, King's Buildings, Edinburgh, EH9 3JZ, UK
    [http://www.dai.ed.ac.uk/homes/cam/]

  5. Chris Malcolm wrote on 26/05/2007 09:54 +0100:

    Quoted message said:


    So we had to visit the site to find out what was going on. Turned out
    to be very simple. After takeoff, and before ramping up to its
    terrific supersonic speeds, this plane fired a quick burst from its
    guns just to check them out. Then the pilot opened up the engines and
    ran into his own bullets from behind.

    Many years ago I was asked to tender for some MoD work but declined as
    what they wanted done needed the laws of physics rewriting if it was to
    work - which we told them. Two years later I was contacted again and
    told they were re-letting the contract and they had been specifically
    told to get us to bid. I told them we had no bid then and would no bid
    now because it broke the laws of physics and asked why they had bothered
    asking us. The man on the phone explained that the group they had let
    the contract to had got nowhere. Because we had no bid last time and
    explained the problems it was clear that we understood them and the
    other bidders didn't so they would like us to take over the work. We no
    bid much to their disappointment! Which was a pity as it would have
    been a big contract.

    --
    Tony

    "The most savage controversies are those about matters as to which there
    is no good evidence either way."
    - Bertrand Russell

  6. Martin Dann said:

    The New Scientist used to (may still do) write about the amount of
    people whose names related to their jobs.

    'Twas NS who coined the phrase "nominative determinism" for the above
    phenomenon.

    Graeme

  7. In article said:
    Martin Dann said:

    The New Scientist used to (may still do) write about the amount of
    people whose names related to their jobs.

    'Twas NS who coined the phrase "nominative determinism" for the above
    phenomenon.

    And they've given up writing about it. At least five times....

  8. On Fri, 25 May 2007 21:31:57 GMT, Martin Dann <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    Found a letter addressed to my when I got home from work this evening,
    send from my mp.

    Got my reply tonight. I was expecting a form letter. I was pleased
    that mine had (1) a grammatical error and (2) a reference to a remark
    I'd made inmy letter about an occasion when we'd been at the same
    function.

    She also said there was a real debate going on and she'd pasedmy
    letter onto the DfT and will contact me when she'sgot a response.

    She's marginal Labour.

    Tim

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.