Let your 7 year-old cycle without a helmet but you should have one on.
Australia and New Zealand · Public discussion
Let your 7 year-old
Thread navigation
Jump through the discussion
Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.
Thread details
What we know about this thread
- Original section
- Australia and New Zealand
- Published
- 10 April 2006
- Last activity
- 10 April 2006
- Original author
- elmsater
- Posts
- 7
- Discussion status
- Public discussion
- Total views
- 759
- Views / 30 days
- 0
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
-
-
elmsater said:
Let your 7 year-old cycle without a helmet but you should have one on.
Thanks for that....
-
"elmsater" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
Let your 7 year-old cycle without a helmet but you should have one on.
I never knew trolls could be completely transparent.
-
elmsater said:
Let your 7 year-old cycle without a helmet but you should have one on.
I don't have a 7 year old, only a 2 year old. Should I let him cycle
without 3.5 helmets? We need to know now! -
elmsater said:
Let your 7 year-old cycle without a helmet but you should have one on.
would that sig be an anogram of "Lame Setr" ???
-
Graeme Dods said:
elmsater said:
Let your 7 year-old cycle without a helmet but you should have one on.
I don't have a 7 year old, only a 2 year old. Should I let him cycle
without 3.5 helmets? We need to know now!
Oh my god...I have a 2 and 3 quarter year old and a 1 year old. How
many helmets don't I need? Is this going to be on the 2005-2006 tax
return? Panic!--
BeanRemove "yourfinger" before replying
-
flyingdutch said:
would that sig be an anogram of "Lame Setr" ???
boxtard alert
Active in the last 60 minutes
Active in this thread
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.