General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Leonids 2004

Started by Paul Saunders · · Last activity · 306 posts · 9,183 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
18 October 2004
Last activity
3 November 2004
Original author
Paul Saunders
Posts
306
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
9,183
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–40 of 306
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. W. D. Grey said:

    What the hell we're in the UK so lets talk UKspeak then.

    UTC is used all the time in Britain, can't just shake your arms in the
    air with a gernashing of teeth and awailin moan thus declaring that
    such foul notions shudst not despoil our fair and pleasant land.

    That was in the days when witches were rampant and curmudgeonly
    wraiths were banished to live south of the Watford Gap.

    SteveO

    NE Climbers & walkers chat forum;
    http://www.thenmc.org.uk/phpBB2/index.php

    NMC website: http://www.thenmc.org.uk

  2. (Norman) said:
    Quoted message said:

    and the software package is called PTBSync


    Whats wrong with the Windows time adjustment in Control Panel?

    its made by M$oft ;-)

    SteveO

    NE Climbers & walkers chat forum;
    http://www.thenmc.org.uk/phpBB2/index.php

    NMC website: http://www.thenmc.org.uk

  3. David said:

    "Fran" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    [email hidden] said...

    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>, Paul Saunders
    <[email hidden]> writes
    >Astronomy needs this kind of standardisation, otherwise we'd get really
    >confused!

    Astronomers might - but we're not star gazers so familiar terms will do
    best.


    And in any case, if it's GMT they mean, why not just say so?
    It's a universally accepted term, after all.

    Quoted message said:

    Universally accepted but not thought up by the Yanks - I expect UTC was and
    of course we have to keep the Yanks happy so please use it and drop the
    centuries old term GMT!

    For a fuller explanation of the difference (such as it is) betwen UTC
    and GMT see this page:

    http://www.npl.co.uk/time/time_scales.html
    --
    Phil Cook looking north over the park to the "Westminster Gasworks"

  4. W. D. Grey said:

    This is becoming silly.

    What the hell we're in the UK so lets talk UKspeak then.

    The Leonids will be visible all over the world. I got the info from an
    astronomical website, which usually refer to time as UTC (much better
    than giving American times). I just cut and pasted the data.

    Paul
    --
    http://www.wilderness-wales.co.uk
    http://www.wildwales.fsnet.co.uk

  5. GSV Three Minds in a Can said:
    Quoted message said:

    I did, until it started locking up my computer every time it tried to
    synchronise.

    Maybe you were trying to synch with a time server that wasn't talking
    to you?

    Probably, that's why I tried others, the software gave a choice of a
    number of different sources, but I kept having problems with different
    ones so I gave up in the end.

    Quoted message said:

    You mentioned 1998 or summat - I thought everything was ATX standard
    with standby by then. 8>. Mine all were.

    I can't remember if it was or not, but I build my own computers so they
    tend to be a mixture of all sorts of things.

    Now I think about it, I remember that the power supply conked out after
    a couple of years. When I tried to replace it I was given an ATX one
    which wouldn't fit, so the original definitely wasn't. I ended up
    replacing it with a power supply from an older computer.

    Paul
    --
    http://www.wilderness-wales.co.uk
    http://www.wildwales.fsnet.co.uk

  6. In article <[email hidden]>,
    SteveO@?.?.invalid writes

    Quoted message said:

    UTC is used all the time in Britain, can't just shake your arms in the
    air with a gernashing of teeth and awailin moan thus declaring that
    such foul notions shudst not despoil our fair and pleasant land.

    So is GMT and lot more frequently.
    --
    Bill Grey
    http://www.billboy.co.uk

  7. In article <[email hidden]>, Paul Saunders
    <[email hidden]> writes

    Quoted message said:

    The Leonids will be visible all over the world.


    But you're talking to us and we're in the UK at least most of the
    posters to the NG are.
    --
    Bill Grey
    http://www.billboy.co.uk

  8. In article <[email hidden]>, Phil Cook
    <[email hidden]> writes

    Quoted message said:

    For a fuller explanation of the difference (such as it is) betwen UTC
    and GMT see this page:

    Thanks Phil I'm sure you mean well. I and (I suspect others) aren't
    interested in the respective differences if any. An argument has
    developed - not uncommon - in this NG propagated by pseudo scientists
    who think every one should speak their language.

    It wasn't I who asked "Wossat?"

    The bottom line is - everyone on the NG would know what is meant by GMT
    but only a select few would know about UTC.
    --
    Bill Grey
    http://www.billboy.co.uk

  9. W. D. Grey said:
    Quoted message said:

    UTC is used all the time in Britain,

    Quoted message said:

    So is GMT and lot more frequently.

    But we're talking about astronomy here, in which UTC is used more
    frequently.

    Paul
    --
    http://www.wilderness-wales.co.uk
    http://www.wildwales.fsnet.co.uk

  10. W. D. Grey said:
    Quoted message said:

    The Leonids will be visible all over the world.

    Quoted message said:

    But you're talking to us and we're in the UK at least most of the
    posters to the NG are.

    As I said, I just cut and pasted it. I would have changed it to GMT if
    I'd expected it to cause so much fuss.

    Paul
    --
    http://www.wilderness-wales.co.uk
    http://www.wildwales.fsnet.co.uk

  11. Paul Saunders said:
    W. D. Grey said:
    Quoted message said:

    UTC is used all the time in Britain,

    Quoted message said:

    So is GMT and lot more frequently.

    But we're talking about astronomy here, in which UTC is used more
    frequently.

    Then there are cases where UTC is used but it is called GMT >:-)

    It's a bit like Celcius and Centigrade. The numbers are the same but
    the specific scientific derivation of those numbers is different. Most
    of the time when you see UTC you can assume GMT but don't ecxpect a
    non english reader to know what GMT means.
    --
    Phil Cook looking north over the park to the "Westminster Gasworks"

  12. W. D. Grey said:

    In article <[email hidden]>, Phil Cook
    <[email hidden]> writes

    Quoted message said:

    For a fuller explanation of the difference (such as it is) betwen UTC
    and GMT see this page:

    Thanks Phil I'm sure you mean well. I and (I suspect others) aren't
    interested in the respective differences if any. An argument has
    developed - not uncommon - in this NG propagated by pseudo scientists
    who think every one should speak their language.

    It wasn't I who asked "Wossat?"

    No but you were the one who insisted that UTC is not a familiar term.

    Quoted message said:

    The bottom line is - everyone on the NG would know what is meant by GMT
    but only a select few would know about UTC.

    <rant>
    What's a metre? A funny unit of length used by forrriners? Get real
    UTC is understood by the world. Step outside of these insular self
    infatuated islands and you find a whole load of different terms for
    things that you know well. Thinking of terms encountered in walking
    for example: couloir, arette, gendarme. The net is by it's nature
    international, just because this is a uk.* group doesn't mean we have
    exclusively UK based readers.
    </rant>

    Sorry, I think I'll go have a lie down now, I've been on the go since
    about 05.30 (BST)
    --
    Phil Cook looking north over the park to the "Westminster Gasworks"

  13. In article <[email hidden]>, Paul Saunders
    <[email hidden]> writes

    Quoted message said:

    But we're talking about astronomy here, in which UTC is used more
    frequently.

    Good night!
    --
    Bill Grey
    http://www.billboy.co.uk

  14. Bitstring <[email hidden]>, from the wonderful
    person W. D. Grey <[email hidden]> said

    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>, Phil Cook
    <[email hidden]> writes

    Quoted message said:

    For a fuller explanation of the difference (such as it is) betwen UTC
    and GMT see this page:

    Thanks Phil I'm sure you mean well. I and (I suspect others) aren't
    interested in the respective differences if any. An argument has
    developed - not uncommon - in this NG propagated by pseudo scientists
    who think every one should speak their language.

    It wasn't I who asked "Wossat?"

    The bottom line is - everyone on the NG would know what is meant by GMT
    but only a select few would know about UTC.

    So you are a proponent of 'dumbing down' then?? Heck, only a select few
    know what a Leonid is .. the rest are coming expecting to see small
    Lions.

    --
    GSV Three Minds in a Can
    Outgoing Msgs are Turing Tested,and indistinguishable from human typing.

  15. Bitstring <[email hidden]>, from the wonderful person
    Paul Saunders <[email hidden]> said
    <snip>

    Quoted message said:

    Now I think about it, I remember that the power supply conked out after
    a couple of years. When I tried to replace it I was given an ATX one
    which wouldn't fit, so the original definitely wasn't. I ended up
    replacing it with a power supply from an older computer.

    Hmm, an Astronomer, photographer, and builds own computers. If you read
    SF and play computer games too, you are me, and I claim my £5.

    --
    GSV Three Minds in a Can
    Outgoing Msgs are Turing Tested,and indistinguishable from human typing.

  16. W. D. Grey said:

    The bottom line is - everyone on the NG would know what is meant by GMT
    but only a select few would know about UTC.

    Now everyone in the NG is knows about UTC

    Result!

    SteveO

    NE Climbers & walkers chat forum;
    http://www.thenmc.org.uk/phpBB2/index.php

    NMC website: http://www.thenmc.org.uk

  17. On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 09:37:15 +0100, Gordon <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    I am under the impression that "zulu" referred to local time in military
    context, as in: "We will rendezvous at 08:00 zulu".
    --

    Not Local time but GMT (or maybe UTC!)

    Judith

  18. In article <[email hidden]>, Gordon
    <[email hidden]> writes

    Quoted message said:

    I am under the impression that "zulu" referred to local time in military
    context, as in: "We will rendezvous at 08:00 zulu".

    In a web site I looked at it gave zulu as GMT
    --
    Bill Grey
    http://www.billboy.co.uk

  19. The message <[email hidden]>
    from Katherine <[email hidden]> contains these words:

    Quoted message said:

    Now in this case, we Americans go our own way (as we seem to have done
    so recently in another arena with rather disastrous results) and use
    fahrenheit. Why I have no idea. We can't even agree to use the metric
    system. (It was at one time labelled a communist plot.)

    Blame us Brits. Much of Americana is borrowed from Britain of days past.
    Not that Fahrenheit is actually out of use for much of our population.
    It still gets a daily mention on most weather forecasts.

    --
    Roger Chapman so far this year 69 summits
    New - 47 (Marilyns 13, Sweats 5, Outlying Fells 35)
    Repeats - 22( Marilyns 7, Sweats 16, Wainwrights 16)

  20. The message <[email hidden]>
    from Phil Cook <[email hidden]> contains these words:

    Quoted message said:

    It's a bit like Celcius and Centigrade. The numbers are the same but
    the specific scientific derivation of those numbers is different.

    I am not aware that there is anything different between Celcius and
    centigrade. My (admittedly rather ancient) reference book has it that
    centigrade was abandoned because of those strange foreigners who might
    have mistaken it for a rightangle. Celcius is in any event a sop to non
    scientists who don't want or indeed need to express temperature in
    degrees Kelvin.

    --
    Roger Chapman so far this year 69 summits
    New - 47 (Marilyns 13, Sweats 5, Outlying Fells 35)
    Repeats - 22( Marilyns 7, Sweats 16, Wainwrights 16)

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.