I'm not a cycle sports spectator nor anything like a competition cyclis so I just don't know why some cyclists shave their legs. I have hear stories about aerodynamics, the massage oil people uses rips hairs fro the legs and that's a lot more painful than shaving, but I don't know i any of these reasons are right. Does anyone know the definitive answer
I'm not a cycle sports spectator nor anything like a competition cyclist so I just don't know why some cyclists shave their legs. I have heard stories about aerodynamics, the massage oil people uses rips hairs from the legs and that's a lot more painful than shaving, but I don't know if any of these reasons are right. Does anyone know the definitive answer.
'Nowt to do with aerodynamics nor massage oil. Lots to do with road rash - if you come off, road rash is a lot easier to clean and heal with shaved legs. Oh, and nicely muscled legs look **soooooo* much nicer when smooth and tanned :-)
Cheers, helen s
--This is an invalid email address to avoid spam-- to get correct one remove fame & fortune h*$el*$$e*nd**$o$ts**i*$*$m*m$o*n*s@$*a$o*l.c**$om$
--Due to financial crisis the light at the end of the tunnel is switched off--
I'm not a cycle sports spectator nor anything like a competition cyclist so I just don't know why some cyclists shave their legs. I have heard stories about aerodynamics, the massage oil people uses rips hairs from the legs and that's a lot more painful than shaving, but I don't know if any of these reasons are right. Does anyone know the definitive answer.
--
Oily massage isn't all that comfortable if you're fairly hairy, that is true. But I think it might be more to do with if you fall off and end up with a graze (some more severe than others) then it's really quite painful if it's hairy to boot, cos it all gunges up together ickily?
I'm not a hairy bloke though. Or a bloke. So I wouldn't know from personal experience ;-)
In article <[email hidden]>, [email hidden] says...
Quoted message said:
I'm not a cycle sports spectator nor anything like a competition cyclist
Quoted message said:
so I just don't know why some cyclists shave their legs. I have heard stories about aerodynamics, the massage oil people uses rips hairs from the legs and that's a lot more painful than shaving, but I don't know if any of these reasons are right. Does anyone know the definitive answer.
I do mine because it looks good.
"Takes cover" :-)
-- Mark (MSA) This post is packaged by intellectual weight, not volume. Some settling of contents may have occurred during transmission
I'm not a hairy bloke though. Or a bloke. So I wouldn't know from personal experience ;-)
When I was cycle touring in New Zealand, I burned my leg, three days later at the most excellent A&E in Wanganui the staff nurse, whilst peeling off dead skin and general gunge that had formed on my 3x2 inch wound said I should have shaved my legs like a real cyclist, would have made her job much easier.
Lots to do with road rash - if you come off, road rash is a lot easier to clean and heal with shaved legs.
Following that logic; do racers also shave their arms? As these can also get cuts and grazes.
Chris Boardman shaved his for the hour record attempt for aerodymanic reasons. I met an Australian Audaxer in the Pyrnenees who had shaved his arms so that application of sunblock was easier.
I'm not a cycle sports spectator nor anything like a competition cyclist so I just don't know why some cyclists shave their legs. I have heard stories about aerodynamics, the massage oil people uses rips hairs from the legs and that's a lot more painful than shaving, but I don't know if any of these reasons are right. Does anyone know the definitive answer.
I seem to remember seeing a table figures for the differences in aerodynamic drag from different things, leg shaving, tight vs flappy jersey, hat / bald head vs hair, beard vs clean shaven. All these things do make a slight difference. Not that I'd shave my legs, and if I ever had to, I'd write "shaven under duress" all over my legs in marker pen...
"Skunk" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
I'm not a cycle sports spectator nor anything like a competition cyclist so I just don't know why some cyclists shave their legs. I have heard stories about aerodynamics, the massage oil people uses rips hairs from the legs and that's a lot more painful than shaving, but I don't know if any of these reasons are right. Does anyone know the definitive answer.
I was always told it was because it made it much less painful when the plaster cast came off.
I'm not a cycle sports spectator nor anything like a competition cyclist so I just don't know why some cyclists shave their legs. I have heard stories about aerodynamics, the massage oil people uses rips hairs from the legs and that's a lot more painful than shaving, but I don't know if any of these reasons are right. Does anyone know the definitive answer.
Some think its all to do with road rash but they are wusses. If you can't take a bit of elastoplast pulling out the hairs you shouldn't call yourself a cyclist ;-) Sissies say because it looks pretty. others do it because the embrocation was easier to massage in and and easier to wash off. When I raced (if you could call it that) I did it because everyone else did.
'Nowt to do with aerodynamics nor massage oil. Lots to do with road rash - if you come off, road rash is a lot easier to clean and heal with shaved legs.
butbutbut ... surely a Helmet would have protected against that?
-dan
-- "please make sure that the person is your friend before you confirm"
I seem to remember seeing a table figures for the differences in aerodynamic drag from different things, leg shaving, tight vs flappy jersey, hat / bald head vs hair, beard vs clean shaven.
I'd be interested to see this. I was told at university that golf balls had dimples and tennis balls had hair precisely so that they would go faster. (It's to do with lowering the speed at which the flow of air around the ball becomes turbulent.) I don't see why this shouldn't also apply to hairy legs, although perhaps the legs would have to be travelling at super-human speeds for the hair to become advantageous.
It was the first piece of advice i was given when i started riding wit my new club at the start of this season
I have never had a serious crash on a road bike and the chances are tha i will have a big crash at some time in the future, i am only 20 so man years to come
Having a leg massage with hair makes no difference in my opinion a all. The only reason to do with massages is that it makes the masseur job easier
I have been told that road rash does indeed hurt when it comes t peeling bits of skin and plasters off. Also there is less chance o infection with no hair, and the legs clean up quicker
I agree it is not the best look to have when you are walking around th uni campus in shorts with no hair on your legs!
I'm not a cycle sports spectator nor anything like a competition cyclist so I just don't know why some cyclists shave their legs. I have heard stories about aerodynamics, the massage oil people uses rips hairs from the legs and that's a lot more painful than shaving, but I don't know if any of these reasons are right. Does anyone know the definitive answer.
Yes, it's because leg hairs get caught in the bottle cage and front mech. Well, that seems no more silly than the road rash theory to me. Wouldn't the hair be ripped off along with the skin? Or if the graze wasn't bad enough to do that then would there be a problem anyway?
I'd be interested to see this. I was told at university that golf balls
had dimples and tennis balls had hair precisely so that they would go faster. (It's to do with lowering the speed at which the flow of air around the ball becomes turbulent.)
I read something recently (was it here?) about swimmers shaving off all body hair up to and including their eyebrows for aerodynamic* advantage only for some scientist to discover that eyebrow hairs actually help to *reduce* drag in the water - a bit like an otter's fur.
d. (*no, I don't mean aerodynamic do I - whatever the water equivalent is)
In article <[email hidden]>, usenet- [email hidden] says...
Quoted message said:
I'm not a cycle sports spectator nor anything like a competition cyclist so I just don't know why some cyclists shave their legs. I have heard stories about aerodynamics, the massage oil people uses rips hairs from the legs and that's a lot more painful than shaving, but I don't know if any of these reasons are right. Does anyone know the definitive answer.
'cos that's what cyclists do and your not a real cyclist unless you do! What more reason is needed?
I read something recently (was it here?) about swimmers shaving off all body hair up to and including their eyebrows for aerodynamic* advantage only for some scientist to discover that eyebrow hairs actually help to *reduce* drag in the water - a bit like an otter's fur.
"I read somewhere that" swimmers will shave shortly before a race, because the resultant stinging when they hit the water will make them go faster.
No, I've no idea if this is true.
-dan
-- "please make sure that the person is your friend before you confirm"