Mountain Bikes · Public discussion

Lefty

Started by Bhubb · · Last activity · 33 posts · 2,826 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Mountain Bikes
Published
21 October 2003
Last activity
22 October 2003
Original author
Bhubb
Posts
33
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
2,826
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–33 of 33
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. "Phil, Squid-in-Training" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    But, it may go by the sensor so fast the mechanical switch may not have


    time

    Quoted message said:

    to fully engage before loosing the magnetic field. Maybe not likely,


    but

    Quoted message said:

    possible.

    I'm pretty sure the pickup is electric, not mechanical. If you hear


    clicky

    Quoted message said:

    noises inside your pickup, then it's either mechanical or broken.

    --
    Phil, Squid-in-Training

    Listen closely. The one on my cateye enduro 2 makes a very very quiet click when the sensor goes by
    - and yes, I'm pretty sure the magnet and sensor aren't hitting!

    If it is mechanical, I'm not 100% sure why - you think they'd just use the electrical field. Might
    help them avoid interference from HRMs and the like, though...

    Jon Bond

  2. "di" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:Cvalb.6611$B_2.6270@okepread02...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    My computer gives very specific directions to mount it near the hub. I may work further up,
    but there is a difference. The magnet will fly by the pickup a lot faster if it is near the
    rim.

    It will be travelling faster, but it will still go around the same number of times in a given
    interval. That is all the computer cares


    about.

    Quoted message said:


    But, it may go by the sensor so fast the mechanical switch may not have


    time

    Quoted message said:

    to fully engage before loosing the magnetic field. Maybe not likely,


    but

    Quoted message said:

    possible.

    Should that happen, fit a stronger magnet. I fit a couple small, round shaped 'rare earth'
    (neodymium (sp?)) ones out of an old small headphone set - just wrapped a strip of I/tube rubber
    around them and the spokes, and zip-tied each end or the rolled rubber 'tube'.

    To solve any problem like this fitting one, you need to first look at the problem, then apply
    generous doses of imagination and common sense. It's easy to find the materials.

    Shaun aRe

  3. "Phil, Squid-in-Training" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    But, it may go by the sensor so fast the mechanical switch may not have


    time

    Quoted message said:

    to fully engage before loosing the magnetic field. Maybe not likely,


    but

    Quoted message said:

    possible.

    I'm pretty sure the pickup is electric, not mechanical. If you hear


    clicky

    Quoted message said:

    noises inside your pickup, then it's either mechanical or broken.

    They are (all I've seen) electro mechanical devices known as 'reed switches' - a glass tube inside
    which is one (or 2 opposite each other, connected together) static contact 'rod', and a flexible,
    springy one that is either a magnet itself, or made of a ferric material. I haven't come across one
    in this application that uses a hall effect or similar.

    Shaun aRe

  4. "Jon Bond" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    If it is mechanical, I'm not 100% sure why - you think they'd just use the electrical field.

    Too much physical bulk for signal-out level using a coil, coils are a lot more costly to
    manufacture, and the signal would be somewhat sinusoidal, hence more difficult to read accurately by
    a processor without being pre-processed. Hall effect would need a little more in the way of
    circuitry and cost more also. Reed switches are cheap, reliable, and give a direct on-off output
    signal of whatever level is desired (feed it 3 volts, that's the return signal level), within the
    current/voltage parameters the reed switch can handle (which is much more than could be required of
    it for these jobs).

    Quoted message said:

    Might help them avoid interference from HRMs and the like, though...

    I really do not believe that is the issue.

    Shaun aRe

  5. Shaun Rimmer said:

    "Jon Bond" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    If it is mechanical, I'm not 100% sure why - you think they'd just use the electrical field.

    Too much physical bulk for signal-out level using a coil, coils are a lot more costly to
    manufacture, and the signal would be somewhat sinusoidal, hence more difficult to read accurately
    by a processor without being pre-processed. Hall effect would need a little more in the way of
    circuitry and cost more also. Reed switches are cheap, reliable, and give a direct on-off output
    signal of whatever level is desired (feed it 3 volts, that's the return signal level), within the
    current/voltage parameters the reed switch can handle (which is much more than could be required
    of it for these jobs).

    I dunno about any of the above kefuffle. But I do know that most cycle computer sensors have a tiny
    magnet inside that moves when the wheel magnet goes by, thus completing a circuit and sending one
    unit of information back to the handlebars.

    Sysiphean torture, sounds like.

    A

  6. "Anthony Sloan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Shaun Rimmer said:

    "Jon Bond" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    If it is mechanical, I'm not 100% sure why - you think they'd just use


    the

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    electrical field.

    Too much physical bulk for signal-out level using a coil, coils are a


    lot

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    more costly to manufacture, and the signal would be somewhat sinusoidal, hence more difficult to
    read accurately by a processor without being pre-processed. Hall effect would need a little more
    in the way of


    circuitry

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    and cost more also. Reed switches are cheap, reliable, and give a direct on-off output signal of
    whatever level is desired (feed it 3 volts,


    that's

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    the return signal level), within the current/voltage parameters the reed switch can handle
    (which is much more than could be required of it for


    these

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    jobs).

    I dunno about any of the above kefuffle. But I do know that most cycle computer sensors have a
    tiny magnet inside that moves when the wheel magnet goes by, thus completing a circuit and sending
    one unit of information back to the handlebars.

    Sysiphean torture, sounds like.

    That "kefuffle" made perfect sense to me. A reed switch is a "tiny magnet" or magnetic strip of
    metal encased in a glass tube. We use them for position sensors. You can also find them in security
    systems as window and door open/close sensors.

    Mike

  7. "Anthony Sloan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Shaun Rimmer said:

    "Jon Bond" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    If it is mechanical, I'm not 100% sure why - you think they'd just use


    the

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    electrical field.

    Too much physical bulk for signal-out level using a coil, coils are a


    lot

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    more costly to manufacture, and the signal would be somewhat sinusoidal, hence more difficult to
    read accurately by a processor without being pre-processed. Hall effect would need a little more
    in the way of


    circuitry

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    and cost more also. Reed switches are cheap, reliable, and give a direct on-off output signal of
    whatever level is desired (feed it 3 volts,


    that's

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    the return signal level), within the current/voltage parameters the reed switch can handle
    (which is much more than could be required of it for


    these

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    jobs).

    I dunno about any of the above kefuffle.

    It ain't 'kefuffle', it's correct - thos sorta thing is part of my job.

    Quoted message said:

    But I do know that most cycle computer sensors have a tiny magnet inside that moves when the wheel
    magnet goes by,

    Magnetic reed switch - some have magnets and one contact (only work with magnet facing one way),
    some have magnets and two contacts (work with magnet either way around), yet others just ferrous
    metal (work with magnet either way around)

    Quoted message said:

    thus completing a circuit and sending one unit of information back to the handlebars.

    Sysiphean torture, sounds like.

    Sounds like a reed switch to me.

    Shaun aRe

  8. Michael Dart said:


    That "kefuffle" made perfect sense to me.

    Mike

    Bully for you. The cookie can be claimed at our corporate offices. ;*)

    A

  9. Shaun Rimmer said:


    It ain't 'kefuffle', it's correct - thos sorta thing is part of my job.

    Quoted message said:

    Shaun aRe


    C'mon, admit it. You were waggling around your knowledge in order to show off.

    ;*)

    I knew what you were getting at but, and I mean this kindly, it was a trifle obtuse. Best thing to
    do for the uninformed public (me) is to describe the thing in plain english, then drop in the lingo.
    If it's a tiny magnet, that's a good enough description for a usenet group concerning itself with
    mountain biking.

    Respects,

    A

  10. "Anthony Sloan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Michael Dart said:


    That "kefuffle" made perfect sense to me.

    Mike

    Bully for you. The cookie can be claimed at our corporate offices. ;*)

    A

    White chocolate chip and Macadamia nut?!

    Mike - mmmmmm...

  11. "Anthony Sloan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Shaun Rimmer said:


    It ain't 'kefuffle', it's correct - thos sorta thing is part of my job.

    Quoted message said:

    Shaun aRe


    C'mon, admit it. You were waggling around your knowledge in order to show off.

    ;*)

    AND to be helpful (killin' 2 birds with 1 stone, heheheheheh....).

    Quoted message said:

    I knew what you were getting at but, and I mean this kindly, it was a trifle obtuse. Best thing to
    do for the uninformed public (me) is to describe the thing in plain english, then drop in the
    lingo. If it's a tiny magnet, that's a good enough description for a usenet group concerning
    itself with mountain biking.

    Yeah, you'd think, but, 'bollox'! Someone woulda jumped up and said 'You don't know what you're on
    about you clueless idiot', before commencing to fill in the details where I'd left them out. I was
    just being pro-active (does that make 3 birds/ 1stone? Heheheheh......).

    Shaun aRe

  12. Shaun Rimmer said:

    Yeah, you'd think, but, 'bollox'! Someone woulda jumped up and said 'You don't know what you're on
    about you clueless idiot', before commencing to fill in the details where I'd left them out. I was
    just being pro-active (does that make 3 birds/ 1stone? Heheheheh......).

    Shaun aRe

    I hear you there. 'Tis the double edged sword of Usenet, it is.

    Shame about all them birds, good for the stones though.

    A

  13. "Anthony Sloan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Shaun Rimmer said:

    Yeah, you'd think, but, 'bollox'! Someone woulda jumped up and said 'You don't know what you're
    on about you clueless idiot', before commencing


    to

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    fill in the details where I'd left them out. I was just being pro-active (does that make 3
    birds/ 1stone? Heheheheh......).

    Shaun aRe

    I hear you there. 'Tis the double edged sword of Usenet, it is.

    I am impervious to Usenet 'weapons'. ',;~}~

    Quoted message said:

    Shame about all them birds, good for the stones though.

    They make for good pie.

    Shaun aRe - If you can't blind 'em with science, poke their beady eyes out.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.