UK and Europe · Public discussion

Left turning buses

Started by Tim Woodall · · Last activity · 21 posts · 674 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
19 June 2007
Last activity
21 June 2007
Original author
Tim Woodall
Posts
21
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
674
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 21
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Bit of non-excitement from my commute today but shows how easily someone
    can get caught inside a left turning bus.

    http://www.woodall.me.uk/bus/

    is the frame by frame "adventure". If you go to about four seconds in
    (hopefully the controls are obvious) you can see that I hover behind the
    bus although it's not indicating to turn left and you could easily be
    fooled into thinking it's in the RH lane to go straight on. (LH lane is
    marked turn left only on the road)

    There's also a 30 second mpg of this clip. It's not so obvious here that
    I do actually wait behind the bus and it would have been easy for me to
    have got level with the front of the bus before it started to turn.

    https://www.woodall.me.uk/bus/bus.mpg (2883584 bytes)

    About 26 seconds into the clip the bus puts its left indicator on so it
    does work.

    Tim.

    p.s. As I post this I'm copying all the images up to the server so it
    will be a few minutes before the full 30 seconds frame by frame are
    available.

    --
    God said, "div D = rho, div B = 0, curl E = - @B/@t, curl H = J + @D/@t,"
    and there was light.

    http://tjw.hn.org/ http://www.locofungus.btinternet.co.uk/

  2. Tim Woodall said:


    https://www.woodall.me.uk/bus/bus.mpg(2883584 bytes)


    Should have been
    http://www.woodall.me.uk/bus/bus.mpg
    Tim.

  3. Tim Woodall said:

    Bit of non-excitement from my commute today but shows how easily someone
    can get caught inside a left turning bus.

    Out of interest, why do you record your journeys?

  4. Tim Woodall said:

    https://www.woodall.me.uk/bus/bus.mpg (2883584 bytes)

    http://www.woodall.me.uk/bus/bus.mpg (2883584 bytes)

    --
    Membrane

  5. Haggis McMutton said:

    Out of interest, why do you record your journeys?

    I record my commutes in central London because I'm fed up with the
    level of abuse and dangerous driving I come across. I hope it'll help
    avoid a my-word-against-his in the event I come a cropper.

    One of my colleagues was, just a couple of weeks ago, knocked down by
    a hit and run driver (heavily bruised and a bent wheel, but thankfully
    otherwise okay). Whilst the police were very sympathetic, there was
    little they could do without a numberplate or good description of the
    car. Had she had a camera, that might have been different.

    Most importantly, if a higher proportion of cyclists used cameras then
    I'm certain that drivers would generally be more careful passing bikes
    since there would be a real possibility that they're being recorded.

  6. thweylan said:
    Haggis McMutton said:

    Out of interest, why do you record your journeys?

    I record my commutes in central London because I'm fed up with the
    level of abuse and dangerous driving I come across. I hope it'll help
    avoid a my-word-against-his in the event I come a cropper.

    I had a load of abuse followed by the remains of a McDonalds hurled at me
    a while back. Wish I could have had that recorded.

  7. Membrane said:

    http://www.woodall.me.uk/bus/bus.mpg (2883584 bytes)

    I wondered if these cameras at full 640x480 resolution would allow
    number plates to be read so that they could be used to record for
    example a daily commute with the video serving as evidence in case of an
    hit and run accident or serious traffic offence etc.

    Having stepped though the frames of this video it would seem unlikely,
    only the license plate of the bus was decipherable, and even that one
    with difficulty. A bright sky causes vehicles to get very dark, and the
    strong JPEG compression distorts the image considerably unless you get
    very close, although this may have been negatively affected by
    transcoding from the presumed original AVI/MPEG-4 format to MPEG-1. I
    didn't manage to clear the image up noticeably with a quick dabble with
    image editing software.

    --
    Membrane

  8. Quoted message said:


    One of my colleagues was, just a couple of weeks ago, knocked down by
    a hit and run driver (heavily bruised and a bent wheel, but thankfully
    otherwise okay). Whilst the police were very sympathetic, there was
    little they could do without a numberplate or good description of the
    car. Had she had a camera, that might have been different.

    FWIW, I was recently deliberately knocked down and required hospital
    treatment, the police have the number plate and a good description of
    teh vehicle from me and at least two witnesses, but claim there is
    nothing they can do.

    regards, Ian SMith
    --
    |\ /| no .sig
    |o o|
    |/ \|

  9. Quoted message said:
    Haggis McMutton said:

    Out of interest, why do you record your journeys?

    I record my commutes in central London because I'm fed up with the
    level of abuse and dangerous driving I come across. I hope it'll help
    avoid a my-word-against-his in the event I come a cropper.

    The other thing I've noticed since I've started doing this is that I
    ride much more assertively and much more carefully.

    The thought of the peer review "you should have been riding further
    out", "you shouldn't have gone through that gap" if I do come a
    cropper even if it's "not my fault(tm)" makes me take that extra bit
    of care and doesn't actually affect my journey times (at least the
    effect is well below the noise).

    (The camera sometimes makes it look worse than it is - sometimes I'll
    be moving out and then suddenly there's a motorbike next to me. In
    actual fact I've seen the motorbike and I'm moving out behind it but
    because the field of view isn't very wide the first you see of the
    motorbike it looks like I'm about to hit it)

    And it gives you the ability to review what went wrong when you do
    have a near miss.

    http://www.woodall.me.uk/journey/20070604/
    was a classic left hook. You can be sure that had we collided the car
    would have been indicating for ages and I had "deliberately" ridden
    into the side of it.

    (sorry I don't have an mpg for that one - I hadn't worked out how to
    do that at the time - I might still have the original avi)

    At the time this happened, while I was doing an emergency stop I could
    see the indicator on the car flashing and I was thinking "how did I
    miss that earlier" (and the whole thing took less than 4 seconds - it
    felt a lot longer than that at the time.)

    In actual fact it wasn't that close - I probably had another ten or so
    feet of braking room - enough that I didn't actually have to put a
    foot down - but while I was braking I really didn't think I would make
    it. (You can tell when you're really braking hard on the Brompton
    because the bike starts to fold up under you)

    Tim.

  10. Ian Smith said:

    FWIW, I was recently deliberately knocked down and required hospital
    treatment, the police have the number plate and a good description of
    teh vehicle from me and at least two witnesses, but claim there is
    nothing they can do.

    regards, Ian SMith

    How on earth do they figure that out? Surely they have all the info
    they need? Or do all crimes have to be committed on camera, in front
    of several police officers, in order to remove any possible doubt?

    Rob

  11. 20 Jun 2007 said:
    Ian Smith said:

    FWIW, I was recently deliberately knocked down and required hospital
    treatment, the police have the number plate and a good description of
    teh vehicle from me and at least two witnesses, but claim there is
    nothing they can do.

    How on earth do they figure that out? Surely they have all the info
    they need? Or do all crimes have to be committed on camera, in front
    of several police officers, in order to remove any possible doubt?

    Registered to a non-existent address, untaxed, uninsured and too much
    bother, I think.

    regards, Ian SMith
    --
    |\ /| no .sig
    |o o|
    |/ \|

  12. On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 13:09:22 -0000 someone who may be
    [email hidden] wrote this:-

    Quoted message said:

    How on earth do they figure that out? Surely they have all the info
    they need? Or do all crimes have to be committed on camera, in front
    of several police officers, in order to remove any possible doubt?

    That rather depends on what the alleged crime is and who the alleged
    victim is.

    --
    David Hansen, Edinburgh
    I will *always* explain revoked encryption keys, unless RIP prevents me
    http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2000/00023--e.htm#54

  13. <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Haggis McMutton said:

    Out of interest, why do you record your journeys?

    I record my commutes in central London because I'm fed up with the
    level of abuse and dangerous driving I come across. I hope it'll help
    avoid a my-word-against-his in the event I come a cropper.

    One of my colleagues was, just a couple of weeks ago, knocked down by
    a hit and run driver (heavily bruised and a bent wheel, but thankfully
    otherwise okay). Whilst the police were very sympathetic, there was
    little they could do without a numberplate or good description of the
    car. Had she had a camera, that might have been different.

    Most importantly, if a higher proportion of cyclists used cameras then
    I'm certain that drivers would generally be more careful passing bikes
    since there would be a real possibility that they're being recorded.

    I'm with you, there - for some it's simply because there's likely no
    consequences. Last week, a group of yobs (I call them that because I didn't
    really get a good look at them, until they screeched off into the distance,
    it's based on their actions...) hurled a bottle (I'm guessing it was one of
    those glass Lucozade bottles, that have plastic on the outside) at me whilst
    cycling.

    It hit somewhere on the frame (took me a few seconds to realise what had
    happened) and splashed everywhere. When I got home, that was the enduring
    annoyance - having to clean some sticky, fruit energy drink from my bike. I
    wished I'd had the presence of mind to remember the reg number before they
    screeched off and 'round a corner. But in the end, I suspect I'd have only
    got fobbed off by the Police if I'd reported it.

  14. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Haggis McMutton said:

    Out of interest, why do you record your journeys?


    I record my commutes in central London because I'm fed up with the
    level of abuse and dangerous driving I come across. I hope it'll help
    avoid a my-word-against-his in the event I come a cropper.

    wot he said.

    Quoted message said:


    The other thing I've noticed since I've started doing this is that I
    ride much more assertively and much more carefully.

    I have noticed exactly the same with myself.

    Quoted message said:

    The thought of the peer review "you should have been riding further
    out", "you shouldn't have gone through that gap" if I do come a
    cropper even if it's "not my fault(tm)" makes me take that extra bit
    of care and doesn't actually affect my journey times (at least the
    effect is well below the noise).

    I also think that if I am going to judge other road users
    on their skills, I should ride the best I can.

    I think that if you angled your camera slightly lower you
    would get a better chance of catching more number plates.

    I have started using www.betterdrivingplease.com to report
    both bad and noticeably good driving.
    I have also started posting some of the better shots of
    bad driving on youtube. (along with other bits caught on
    camera).

  15. Martin Dann said:

    I think that if you angled your camera slightly lower you
    would get a better chance of catching more number plates.

    Yes I'm trying to do that - but what happens is that the camera hits
    the spokes when I fold the Brompton and that causes the camera to
    point up and then I forget to point it down again.

    (Provided the wheel is in the "right" place (i.e. about 75% of its
    possible positions) the camera won't hit the spokes or will move the
    wheel to the right position but 95% of the time it seems to hit the
    spokes square on - I'm not sure if it is related to the hub dynamo)

    Tim.

  16. Membrane said:
    Membrane said:

    http://www.woodall.me.uk/bus/bus.mpg (2883584 bytes)

    I wondered if these cameras at full 640x480 resolution would allow
    number plates to be read so that they could be used to record for
    example a daily commute with the video serving as evidence in case of an
    hit and run accident or serious traffic offence etc.

    They are only any good for number plates up close. IMHO
    the OPs camera is pointing to high to capture close number
    plates.

  17. Quoted message said:
    Haggis McMutton said:

    Out of interest, why do you record your journeys?

    I record my commutes in central London because I'm fed up with the
    level of abuse and dangerous driving I come across. I hope it'll help
    avoid a my-word-against-his in the event I come a cropper.

    One of my colleagues was, just a couple of weeks ago, knocked down by
    a hit and run driver (heavily bruised and a bent wheel, but thankfully
    otherwise okay). Whilst the police were very sympathetic, there was
    little they could do without a numberplate or good description of the
    car. Had she had a camera, that might have been different.

    Most importantly, if a higher proportion of cyclists used cameras then
    I'm certain that drivers would generally be more careful passing bikes
    since there would be a real possibility that they're being recorded.

    Wonder if any car drivers have started doing the same, for a similar
    reason as you ;-)

  18. Ian Smith said:
    Quoted message said:


    One of my colleagues was, just a couple of weeks ago, knocked down by
    a hit and run driver (heavily bruised and a bent wheel, but thankfully
    otherwise okay). Whilst the police were very sympathetic, there was
    little they could do without a numberplate or good description of the
    car. Had she had a camera, that might have been different.

    FWIW, I was recently deliberately knocked down and required hospital
    treatment, the police have the number plate and a good description
    of teh vehicle from me and at least two witnesses, but claim there
    is nothing they can do.

    They're conspiring to pervert the course of justice then?

    Chris
    --
    Chris Eilbeck

  19. "Tim Woodall" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Bit of non-excitement from my commute today but shows how easily someone
    can get caught inside a left turning bus.

    http://www.woodall.me.uk/bus/

    is the frame by frame "adventure". If you go to about four seconds in
    (hopefully the controls are obvious) you can see that I hover behind the
    bus although it's not indicating to turn left and you could easily be
    fooled into thinking it's in the RH lane to go straight on. (LH lane is
    marked turn left only on the road)

    I can see why you thought the bus was going straight on

    Things i also noticed, just as the left rear light cluser becomes visible
    there is a short burst of light from one of the lights, the video isn't good
    enough quality to tell if it is a red or orange light. That turn looks like
    it would be impossible for the bus to take if it was entirley in the left
    hand lane.

    If that burst of light is the indicator then you just missed seeing it
    indicate (self cancel can be a [censored] at times at cancel due to the
    slightest movement, [also when it doesn't work and you end up driving for a
    few miles with the indicator on])
    If it was a brake light then the driver probably didn't signal at after
    placing the bus where it was needed to make the turn.

    Having looked at it carefully, the light is definately the brake light, and
    there is a sidelight out.

    If you have the time and either fleet nubmer or reg plate you may wish to
    give the driver a visit to the traffic managers office. 1 for the bus being
    in an unroadworthy condition (all fitted lights must have functional bulbs.
    Masking tape is one way of removing a light that the vehicle doesn't legally
    have to have) and 2 for failing to indicate intention (due to required road
    posistion it wasn't obvious to a following vehicle)

    Niall

  20. "Tim Woodall" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Bit of non-excitement from my commute today but shows how easily someone
    can get caught inside a left turning bus.

    Carry a hammer, and if the bus, or any other vehicle turns without giving
    you enough room, hit the side of the vehicle with the hammer, just to let
    the driver know you are there.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.