"Carl Sundquist" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
"Dashi Toshii" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:>
> Here in eastern Washington State it didn't rain at all in July and
most
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:days
> were in the mid 90's and 100's.
>
> Don't tell G.W. about global warming through.
>
From 1996 through 2001, around here (Arkansas) 100+ degree days in
July,
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:Quoted message said:August, and September were pretty common. As in more than half of the
days.
Quoted message said:Last year I don't think we cracked 100 even once, and this year only a couple of times so far.
So what's your point?
My point is/was that Marlene's statement that it was "terribly hot 78 -
82
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:degrees" where she is, is pretty comfortable riding weather here.
I just got back from a training ride, it was about 86F, very comfortable
and
Quoted message said:I set a new PR.
Plus I think that G.W. is an idiot for not signing the Kyoto Protocol concerning global warming.
When it is apparent to anyone with half a
brain
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:that global warming is taking place.
The glacier's in Glacier National Park has just about disappeared, the Anartica ice shelf is
receding fast.
We can not continually destroy the environment in the name of
"progress",
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:wild life need a place to live, their habitat needs to be protected.
Global warming is just one piece in the puzzle, and if it wasn't for
dumbass
Quoted message said:G.W. something positive could be done to halt or slow it down.
What was your point?
My point was that your hot summer is as much the fault of anything G.W.
has
Quoted message said:or has not done as the relatively cooler weather here.
Yes, IMO he was/is a dumbass for not signing the Kyoto agreement, but you look like a dumbass for
attributing the ice melting mentioned above as
being
Quoted message said:his responsibility.
It is his responsibility to do what is right for this nation and not just fo r special
interest groups.
He is directly responsibile for not supporting the conservation iniatives of past presidents and by
overturning or nullifying many of his predisessor's enviromental decisions, he shows his distain for
people interested in conservation.
You're right, I am a dumbass but that is one of the hazards of expressing my opinion on this
newsgroup. And I accept that label because I intend to express my opinion.
"WASHINGTON - The U.S. Senate Appropriations Committee today rejected Bush Administration proposals
to gut citizen enforcement of the Endangered Species Act and budget subterfuge that would have
significantly cut overall conservation spending, according to Defenders of Wildlife. The president's
budget proposal for fiscal year 2002 included a request for a "rider" on the Interior appropriation
that would have severely limited citizen oversight of the endangered species listing process, as
well as asking for major cuts in overall conservation funding that was part of a landmark
Congressional budget agreement last year. The Senate panel today sent its 2002 appropriations bill
to the full Senate without the requested rider, dubbed the "extinction rider" by environmentalists,
and with the vast majority of conservation funding intact."
Quoted message said:G.W. is enacting the current policy, however he is but one individual and easy to point at. Why
not try to heap much of the blame on industry CEOs
or
Quoted message said:even stockholders who don't seem to mind running or supporting businesses that have created many
of the problems?
Why? Because he is carrying the "big stick" and has the power, if not the guts, to do
something positive.
By the end of his four year term, this nation will be experiencing a two trillion dollar deficiet,
whereas when he took office we had a surplus.
How's your IRA and 401K doing, mine is down the tubes.
Dashii