Surprisingly, pretty darn good!
I think it's a flourless cake, ramekin size. Not sure what was in the
chocolate 'lava', but no SA reaction.
Thank goodness the nearest Ruby Tuesday is about 40 miles and a ferry ride
away! :-)
Steve
General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion
LC Lava cake at Ruby Tuesday
Thread navigation
Jump through the discussion
Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.
Thread details
What we know about this thread
- Original section
- General fitness, health and nutrition
- Published
- 9 October 2004
- Last activity
- 12 October 2004
- Original author
- Scionyx
- Posts
- 6
- Discussion status
- Public discussion
- Total views
- 629
- Views / 30 days
- 0
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
-
-
"Scionyx" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<_pU9d.96799$He1.82533@attbi_s01>...
Quoted message said:
Surprisingly, pretty darn good!
I think it's a flourless cake, ramekin size. Not sure what was in the
chocolate 'lava', but no SA reaction.Thank goodness the nearest Ruby Tuesday is about 40 miles and a ferry ride
away! :-)Steve
Oh why cant we have ruby tuesdays where I live! If you get no NA
reaction that is killer. Let me ask this, do they post the carb
breakdown anywhere, not just net carbs? -
NO, they list Total Calories/Fat gms/Net Carb gms/Fiber gms.
http://www.rubytuesday.com/menu/pdf/smartEatingGuide.pdfSo the lava cake is 632/40/14/10. Reverse figuring would put it at 24 or
more (SA's not listed, etc.)For a while, they had these number right in the menu, now it's in a book on
the table. Guess too many people were discouraged by things like New
Orleans Salmon at >800 Calories. :-)Steve
"mark v." <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
"Scionyx" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:<_pU9d.96799$He1.82533@attbi_s01>...Quoted message said:
Surprisingly, pretty darn good!
I think it's a flourless cake, ramekin size. Not sure what was in the
chocolate 'lava', but no SA reaction.Thank goodness the nearest Ruby Tuesday is about 40 miles and a ferry
ride
away! :-)Steve
Oh why cant we have ruby tuesdays where I live! If you get no NA
reaction that is killer. Let me ask this, do they post the carb
breakdown anywhere, not just net carbs? -
Geez! For 632 calories is SHOULD be good!
Scionyx said:
NO, they list Total Calories/Fat gms/Net Carb gms/Fiber gms.
http://www.rubytuesday.com/menu/pdf/smartEatingGuide.pdfSo the lava cake is 632/40/14/10. Reverse figuring would put it at 24 or
more (SA's not listed, etc.)For a while, they had these number right in the menu, now it's in a book on
the table. Guess too many people were discouraged by things like New
Orleans Salmon at >800 Calories. :-)Steve
"mark v." <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
"Scionyx" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:<_pU9d.96799$He1.82533@attbi_s01>...Quoted message said:
Surprisingly, pretty darn good!
I think it's a flourless cake, ramekin size. Not sure what was in the
chocolate 'lava', but no SA reaction.Thank goodness the nearest Ruby Tuesday is about 40 miles and a ferry
ride
away! :-)Steve
Oh why cant we have ruby tuesdays where I live! If you get no NA
reaction that is killer. Let me ask this, do they post the carb
breakdown anywhere, not just net carbs?--
jmk in NC -
jmk wrote:
|| Geez! For 632 calories is SHOULD be good!That's a friggin meal by itself!
||
|| On 10/11/2004 12:14 PM, Scionyx wrote:
||| NO, they list Total Calories/Fat gms/Net Carb gms/Fiber gms.
||| http://www.rubytuesday.com/menu/pdf/smartEatingGuide.pdf
|||
||| So the lava cake is 632/40/14/10. Reverse figuring would put it at
||| 24 or more (SA's not listed, etc.)
|||
||| For a while, they had these number right in the menu, now it's in a
||| book on the table. Guess too many people were discouraged by
||| things like New Orleans Salmon at >800 Calories. :-)
|||
||| Steve
|||
|||
||| "mark v." <[email hidden]> wrote in message
||| news:[email hidden]...
|||
|||| "Scionyx" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
|||| news:<_pU9d.96799$He1.82533@attbi_s01>...
||||
||||| Surprisingly, pretty darn good!
|||||
||||| I think it's a flourless cake, ramekin size. Not sure what was
||||| in the chocolate 'lava', but no SA reaction.
|||||
||||| Thank goodness the nearest Ruby Tuesday is about 40 miles and a
||||| ferry ride
||||| away! :-)
|||||
||||| Steve
||||
|||| Oh why cant we have ruby tuesdays where I live! If you get no NA
|||| reaction that is killer. Let me ask this, do they post the carb
|||| breakdown anywhere, not just net carbs?
|||
|||
|||
||
||
|| --
|| jmk in NC -
"Roger Zoul" <[email hidden]> wrote
Quoted message said:
jmk wrote:
|| Geez! For 632 calories is SHOULD be good!That's a friggin meal by itself!
It just about is! I'd be happy, though, having a salad - easy on the
dressing - with the cake for dessert (and most of the calories!), just for
fun. Hmmm.... I'll have to check to see if there is a Ruby Tuesday in my
neck of the woods...HG
Active in the last 60 minutes
Active in this thread
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.