Paul Rooney said:'Nature' doesn't *do* anything.
Exactly.
Quoted message said:Birds exist by random chance, and are able, by random chance, to build nests.
Not exactly random, that's a speciality that they've evolved. I know that evolution depends on
random mutations, but those mutations that work best tend to be most successful, so if building a
nest is what a bird needs to do then random mutations that favour good nest building will tend to
survive through selective breeding (most birds probably prefer to choose good nest builders to be
their mates).
Anyway, whatever the cause, birds decide to build nests, they choose a spot to build them and they
choose the materials to construct them, so a nest is "designed" and results from conscious
decisions.
Quoted message said:So saith science. The usual distinction is between the natural and the man-made.
It used to be. Man was conveniently considered to be separat from the rest of the natural world by
his ability to create tools. Unfortunately this trait has now been recognised in other species so
the diividing line is not so clear cut anymore.
The bottom line is that the notion that man is somehow different from all the other animals stemmed
from strong religious beliefs, back in the days when it was heresy to consider the idea that man
evolved from other animals. Man was something special, something different from the rest of nature.
Of course that's complete twaddle. Man is an animal just like any other and we're as much a part of
nature as every other animal, so all these man vs. nature arguments are fundamentally flawed. In
principle a human building a computer is no different from a bird building a nest, they only differ
in the level of complexity involved.
Animals make a mess of the world just as humans do, they just make a small mess, not a huge
mess like us.
Paul
--
Calendars for 2004
wildwales.fsnet.co.ukcal.htmlOpen ↗
wilderness-wales.co.ukwilderness-wales.co.ukOpen ↗
photosig.comuserphotosOpen ↗