General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

lat exercise options

Started by Paul Coene · · Last activity · 20 posts · 719 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
9 February 2005
Last activity
8 March 2005
Original author
Paul Coene
Posts
20
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
719
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 20
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Hello.

    I'm getting back into working out more (3 times a week). I have been
    doing inclined rows and dumbell rows to work my lats, but increasingly
    my chronically bad back is preventing me from doing these effectively.
    I have added back strengthening exercises to my regimen, but I still
    find one set of inclined rows to be uncomfortable, though I do arch my
    back slightly to maintain good form.

    I'd like to look into an option where I can do seated pulldowns to work
    my lats. This type of exervise will work my lats as well as inclined
    rows, yes?

    Can anyone suggest some equipment to allow me to add this? I was
    thinking of plopping a bowflex next to my bench and curl bar, but people
    here seems to believe in free weights or bowflex and nothing in between.

    Thanks in advance.

  2. "Paul Coene" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Hello.

    I'm getting back into working out more (3 times a week). I have been
    doing inclined rows and dumbell rows to work my lats, but increasingly
    my chronically bad back is preventing me from doing these effectively.
    I have added back strengthening exercises to my regimen, but I still
    find one set of inclined rows to be uncomfortable, though I do arch my
    back slightly to maintain good form.

    I'd like to look into an option where I can do seated pulldowns to
    work my lats. This type of exervise will work my lats as well as
    inclined rows, yes?

    Can anyone suggest some equipment to allow me to add this? I was
    thinking of plopping a bowflex next to my bench and curl bar, but
    people here seems to believe in free weights or bowflex and nothing in
    between.

    Everyone's bad back is different, but mine has responded very well to
    deadlifts using the technique taught in "Power To The People!" by Pavel
    Tsatsouline, see http://www.kbnj.com/ptp.htm - it's a different approach
    to deadlifting than most people take. Personally, I've never found a
    place for rows of any sort in my program and I have no plans to add
    them - you can be plenty strong in general without doing any sort of
    rowing motion.

    Scroll up a couple of threads and see where someone else asked about
    strengthening their lats and at least two of us have suggested
    deadlifting.

    -S-
    http://www.kbnj.com

  3. Paul Coene said:

    Hello.

    I'm getting back into working out more (3 times a week). I have been
    doing inclined rows and dumbell rows to work my lats, but increasingly
    my chronically bad back is preventing me from doing these effectively.
    I have added back strengthening exercises to my regimen, but I still
    find one set of inclined rows to be uncomfortable, though I do arch my
    back slightly to maintain good form.

    I'd like to look into an option where I can do seated pulldowns to work
    my lats. This type of exervise will work my lats as well as inclined
    rows, yes?

    Can anyone suggest some equipment to allow me to add this? I was
    thinking of plopping a bowflex next to my bench and curl bar, but people
    here seems to believe in free weights or bowflex and nothing in between.

    Thanks in advance.

    I can agree that deadlifts were very good for my lower back, but I'll
    have to disagree that you need to buy a book. They're not exactly
    rocket surgery, and there's plenty of freely-available resources on
    the 'net.

    If it were me, I'd dump the rows completely for now, and take a week
    or two off. Then start with light deadlifts, and work up the weight
    over a few months. Pulldowns should not be a problem. And when the
    back feels strong, I'd think about working light rows back in.

    -----------
    Proton Soup

    "Thanks for noticing that I didn't actually say anything." - Mike Lane

  4. "Proton Soup" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Paul Coene said:

    Hello.

    I'm getting back into working out more (3 times a week). I have been
    doing inclined rows and dumbell rows to work my lats, but increasingly
    my chronically bad back is preventing me from doing these effectively.
    I have added back strengthening exercises to my regimen, but I still
    find one set of inclined rows to be uncomfortable, though I do arch my
    back slightly to maintain good form.

    I'd like to look into an option where I can do seated pulldowns to
    work
    my lats. This type of exervise will work my lats as well as inclined
    rows, yes?

    Can anyone suggest some equipment to allow me to add this? I was
    thinking of plopping a bowflex next to my bench and curl bar, but
    people
    here seems to believe in free weights or bowflex and nothing in
    between.

    Thanks in advance.

    I can agree that deadlifts were very good for my lower back, but I'll
    have to disagree that you need to buy a book. They're not exactly
    rocket surgery, and there's plenty of freely-available resources on
    the 'net.

    I did not suggest a "need to buy a book." I try to talk about my
    experience - the book I recommended is the book I used to learn to
    deadlift. Your mileage may vary and all that.

    Steve "touchy" Freides
    http://www.kbnj.com

    Quoted message said:


    If it were me, I'd dump the rows completely for now, and take a week
    or two off. Then start with light deadlifts, and work up the weight
    over a few months. Pulldowns should not be a problem. And when the
    back feels strong, I'd think about working light rows back in.

    -----------
    Proton Soup

    "Thanks for noticing that I didn't actually say anything." - Mike Lane

  5. Paul Coene said:

    Hello.

    I'm getting back into working out more (3 times a week). I have been
    doing inclined rows and dumbell rows to work my lats, but increasingly
    my chronically bad back is preventing me from doing these effectively. I
    have added back strengthening exercises to my regimen, but I still find
    one set of inclined rows to be uncomfortable, though I do arch my back
    slightly to maintain good form.

    I'd like to look into an option where I can do seated pulldowns to work
    my lats. This type of exervise will work my lats as well as inclined
    rows, yes?

    Can anyone suggest some equipment to allow me to add this? I was
    thinking of plopping a bowflex next to my bench and curl bar, but people
    here seems to believe in free weights or bowflex and nothing in between.

    Thanks in advance.

    I think people are misunderstanding my question. I want to know if
    people can recommend an exercise for my lats that won't hurt my back
    while I am doing it. I'll address getting my back in shape separately.
    The pulldowns seem to be done well while seated, instead of standing
    inclined, so I was looking for maybe some advice on equipment for that
    (bowflex, etc).

  6. "Paul Coene" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Paul Coene said:

    Hello.

    I'm getting back into working out more (3 times a week). I have been
    doing inclined rows and dumbell rows to work my lats, but increasingly my
    chronically bad back is preventing me from doing these effectively. I
    have added back strengthening exercises to my regimen, but I still find
    one set of inclined rows to be uncomfortable, though I do arch my back
    slightly to maintain good form.

    I'd like to look into an option where I can do seated pulldowns to work
    my lats. This type of exervise will work my lats as well as inclined
    rows, yes?

    Can anyone suggest some equipment to allow me to add this? I was
    thinking of plopping a bowflex next to my bench and curl bar, but people
    here seems to believe in free weights or bowflex and nothing in between.

    Thanks in advance.

    I think people are misunderstanding my question. I want to know if people
    can recommend an exercise for my lats that won't hurt my back while I am
    doing it. I'll address getting my back in shape separately. The pulldowns
    seem to be done well while seated, instead of standing inclined, so I was
    looking for maybe some advice on equipment for that (bowflex, etc).

    You could try bench pulls: lie face down on a (high) bench, barbell under
    the bench, pull up to touch the bench and lower.

    But the problem with this is that if you get strong, then you risk rib
    injuries, and if you don't keep the bar controlled all the time (especially
    lowering) you will get rib injuries.

    Or you could get an overhead pulley and a weight stack, which has to be
    cheaper than a bowflex and will do you seated pulldowns.

    Peter

  7. Paul Coene said:
    Paul Coene said:

    Hello.

    I'm getting back into working out more (3 times a week). I have been
    doing inclined rows and dumbell rows to work my lats, but increasingly
    my chronically bad back is preventing me from doing these effectively. I
    have added back strengthening exercises to my regimen, but I still find
    one set of inclined rows to be uncomfortable, though I do arch my back
    slightly to maintain good form.

    I'd like to look into an option where I can do seated pulldowns to work
    my lats. This type of exervise will work my lats as well as inclined
    rows, yes?

    Can anyone suggest some equipment to allow me to add this? I was
    thinking of plopping a bowflex next to my bench and curl bar, but people
    here seems to believe in free weights or bowflex and nothing in between.

    Thanks in advance.

    I think people are misunderstanding my question. I want to know if
    people can recommend an exercise for my lats that won't hurt my back
    while I am doing it. I'll address getting my back in shape separately.
    The pulldowns seem to be done well while seated, instead of standing
    inclined, so I was looking for maybe some advice on equipment for that
    (bowflex, etc).

    Pullups/chinups. If you're not strong enough for that, some kind of
    pulldown device will have to do. You might also be able to do a
    one-armed bent-over dumbell row with one arm on a bench to take the
    stress off the back. http://www.exrx.net/Lists/ExList/BackWt.html
    But it's probably not going to hit the lats very hard.

    -----------
    Proton Soup

    "Thanks for noticing that I didn't actually say anything." - Mike Lane

  8. Proton Soup said:
    Paul Coene said:


    I think people are misunderstanding my question. I want
    to know if people can recommend an exercise for my lats
    that won't hurt my back while I am doing it. I'll
    address getting my back in shape separately.
    The pulldowns seem to be done well while seated, instead
    of standing inclined, so I was looking for maybe some
    advice on equipment for that (bowflex, etc).

    Pullups/chinups. If you're not strong enough for that,
    some kind of pulldown device will have to do. You might
    also be able to do a one-armed bent-over dumbell row with
    one arm on a bench to take the stress off the back.
    http://www.exrx.net/Lists/ExList/BackWt.html
    But it's probably not going to hit the lats very hard.

    It will if you use weights that are heavy enough. Most
    don't, though.

    Chest-supported T-bar rows are good, but not all gyms
    have those devices.

  9. "Proton Soup" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Paul Coene said:
    Paul Coene said:

    Hello.

    I'm getting back into working out more (3 times a week). I have been
    doing inclined rows and dumbell rows to work my lats, but increasingly
    my chronically bad back is preventing me from doing these effectively. I
    have added back strengthening exercises to my regimen, but I still find
    one set of inclined rows to be uncomfortable, though I do arch my back
    slightly to maintain good form.

    I'd like to look into an option where I can do seated pulldowns to work
    my lats. This type of exervise will work my lats as well as inclined
    rows, yes?

    Can anyone suggest some equipment to allow me to add this? I was
    thinking of plopping a bowflex next to my bench and curl bar, but people
    here seems to believe in free weights or bowflex and nothing in between.

    Thanks in advance.

    I think people are misunderstanding my question. I want to know if
    people can recommend an exercise for my lats that won't hurt my back
    while I am doing it. I'll address getting my back in shape separately.
    The pulldowns seem to be done well while seated, instead of standing
    inclined, so I was looking for maybe some advice on equipment for that
    (bowflex, etc).

    Pullups/chinups. If you're not strong enough for that, some kind of
    pulldown device will have to do. You might also be able to do a
    one-armed bent-over dumbell row with one arm on a bench to take the
    stress off the back. http://www.exrx.net/Lists/ExList/BackWt.html
    But it's probably not going to hit the lats very hard.

    Will if you do it with decent weight and form (i.e. without the throwing the
    upper body about shown in the exrx clip, follow the text instructions). On
    the other hand you then have a fair amount of twist that your back has to be
    able to cope with; enough that I notice I'm having to do a bit of work to
    hold things in place, anyway.

    Peter

  10. Proton Soup said:
    Paul Coene said:
    Paul Coene said:

    Hello.

    I'm getting back into working out more (3 times a week). I have


    been

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    doing inclined rows and dumbell rows to work my lats, but


    increasingly

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    my chronically bad back is preventing me from doing these


    effectively. I

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    have added back strengthening exercises to my regimen, but I still


    find

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    one set of inclined rows to be uncomfortable, though I do arch my


    back

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    slightly to maintain good form.

    I'd like to look into an option where I can do seated pulldowns to


    work

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    my lats. This type of exervise will work my lats as well as


    inclined

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    rows, yes?

    Can anyone suggest some equipment to allow me to add this? I was
    thinking of plopping a bowflex next to my bench and curl bar, but


    people

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    here seems to believe in free weights or bowflex and nothing in


    between.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    Thanks in advance.

    I think people are misunderstanding my question. I want to know if
    people can recommend an exercise for my lats that won't hurt my back

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    while I am doing it. I'll address getting my back in shape


    separately.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    The pulldowns seem to be done well while seated, instead of


    standing

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    inclined, so I was looking for maybe some advice on equipment for


    that

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    (bowflex, etc).

    Pullups/chinups. If you're not strong enough for that, some kind of
    pulldown device will have to do. You might also be able to do a
    one-armed bent-over dumbell row with one arm on a bench to take the
    stress off the back. http://www.exrx.net/Lists/ExList/BackWt.html
    But it's probably not going to hit the lats very hard.

    Thr problem with that exercise is that most people don't use strict
    form. In fact, very few. Especially when they use heavy weight. It then
    becomes a convoluted contortionist movement often with no eccentric
    component.

    Another option is the chest-supported T-bar row.

  11. Peter Allen said:

    "Proton Soup" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 19:37:37 GMT, Paul Coene
    Pullups/chinups. If you're not strong enough for that, some kind


    of

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    pulldown device will have to do. You might also be able to do a
    one-armed bent-over dumbell row with one arm on a bench to take the
    stress off the back. http://www.exrx.net/Lists/ExList/BackWt.html
    But it's probably not going to hit the lats very hard.

    Will if you do it with decent weight and form (i.e. without the


    throwing the

    Quoted message said:

    upper body about shown in the exrx clip, follow the text


    instructions). On

    Quoted message said:

    the other hand you then have a fair amount of twist that your back


    has to be

    Quoted message said:

    able to cope with; enough that I notice I'm having to do a bit of


    work to

    Quoted message said:

    hold things in place, anyway.

    Exactly, hence my comment on the exercise becoming a contortionist
    movement. But using the heaviest weight possible often conflicts with
    good form execution. I call it the 'Ego Isoform.' It seems to be
    upregulated in a section of the population.

  12. "elzinator" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Peter Allen said:

    "Proton Soup" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 19:37:37 GMT, Paul Coene
    Pullups/chinups. If you're not strong enough for that, some kind


    of

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    pulldown device will have to do. You might also be able to do a
    one-armed bent-over dumbell row with one arm on a bench to take the
    stress off the back. http://www.exrx.net/Lists/ExList/BackWt.html
    But it's probably not going to hit the lats very hard.

    Will if you do it with decent weight and form (i.e. without the


    throwing the

    Quoted message said:

    upper body about shown in the exrx clip, follow the text


    instructions). On

    Quoted message said:

    the other hand you then have a fair amount of twist that your back


    has to be

    Quoted message said:

    able to cope with; enough that I notice I'm having to do a bit of


    work to

    Quoted message said:

    hold things in place, anyway.

    Exactly, hence my comment on the exercise becoming a contortionist
    movement. But using the heaviest weight possible often conflicts with
    good form execution. I call it the 'Ego Isoform.' It seems to be
    upregulated in a section of the population.

    When is that not true?

    At least in this case, if you have your knees locked out straight, then you
    can look in a mirror and watch your head and other shoulder staying still.
    If they are, then any form errors at least aren't cheating the weight up.

    Peter

  13. "Paul Coene" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Paul Coene said:

    Hello.

    I'm getting back into working out more (3 times a week). I have been
    doing inclined rows and dumbell rows to work my lats, but
    increasingly my chronically bad back is preventing me from doing
    these effectively. I have added back strengthening exercises to my
    regimen, but I still find one set of inclined rows to be
    uncomfortable, though I do arch my back slightly to maintain good
    form.

    I'd like to look into an option where I can do seated pulldowns to
    work my lats. This type of exervise will work my lats as well as
    inclined rows, yes?

    Can anyone suggest some equipment to allow me to add this? I was
    thinking of plopping a bowflex next to my bench and curl bar, but
    people here seems to believe in free weights or bowflex and nothing
    in between.

    Thanks in advance.

    I think people are misunderstanding my question. I want to know if
    people can recommend an exercise for my lats that won't hurt my back
    while I am doing it. I'll address getting my back in shape
    separately. The pulldowns seem to be done well while seated, instead
    of standing inclined, so I was looking for maybe some advice on
    equipment for that (bowflex, etc).

    I understood your question fine the first time. Rows are, for some
    people, just plain hard on the back. Elzi mentions why - it's hard to
    keep good form and somehow doing them with a light enough weight doesn't
    always translate into gradually improving form - or you need a heavier
    weight for your lats than your back can handle - or whatever, rows
    aren't working for you, so you want to try something else - that's good.

    Deadlifts could be good for you - yes, they will work your back while
    also working your lats, but there's nothing wrong with that. It's
    possible that your back won't like deadlifts, either, but they're such a
    great exercise, I think it's worth the effort to give them a try.

    -S-
    http://www.kbnj.com

  14. Peter Allen said:

    "elzinator" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Peter Allen said:

    "Proton Soup" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...
    > On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 19:37:37 GMT, Paul Coene
    > Pullups/chinups. If you're not strong enough for that, some kind


    of

    Quoted message said:

    > pulldown device will have to do. You might also be able to do a
    > one-armed bent-over dumbell row with one arm on a bench to take the
    > stress off the back. http://www.exrx.net/Lists/ExList/BackWt.html
    > But it's probably not going to hit the lats very hard.

    Will if you do it with decent weight and form (i.e. without the


    throwing the

    Quoted message said:

    upper body about shown in the exrx clip, follow the text


    instructions). On

    Quoted message said:

    the other hand you then have a fair amount of twist that your back


    has to be

    Quoted message said:

    able to cope with; enough that I notice I'm having to do a bit of


    work to

    Quoted message said:

    hold things in place, anyway.

    Exactly, hence my comment on the exercise becoming a contortionist
    movement. But using the heaviest weight possible often conflicts with
    good form execution. I call it the 'Ego Isoform.' It seems to be
    upregulated in a section of the population.

    When is that not true?

    Plenty of times. I saw several examples this evening at the gym. (I
    train with some intelligent and self-secure powerlifters)

    Quoted message said:

    At least in this case, if you have your knees locked out straight, then you
    can look in a mirror and watch your head and other shoulder staying still.
    If they are, then any form errors at least aren't cheating the weight up.

    But if you don't really see your shoulders move, does that mean they
    don't move?
    Theory of Relative Training

    (and post-WO punchiness)

    ------------------------------
    Reality is an illusion created by an intelligence deficiency.

  15. Paul Coene said:

    Hello.

    I'm getting back into working out more (3 times a week). I have been
    doing inclined rows and dumbell rows to work my lats, but increasingly
    my chronically bad back is preventing me from doing these effectively. I
    have added back strengthening exercises to my regimen, but I still find
    one set of inclined rows to be uncomfortable, though I do arch my back
    slightly to maintain good form.

    I'd like to look into an option where I can do seated pulldowns to work
    my lats. This type of exervise will work my lats as well as inclined
    rows, yes?

    Can anyone suggest some equipment to allow me to add this? I was
    thinking of plopping a bowflex next to my bench and curl bar, but people
    here seems to believe in free weights or bowflex and nothing in between.

    Thanks in advance.

    Chin ups, one arm dumbbell rows, you can buy a plate loaded (you use
    your own plates to weight it) lat pulldown machine with a low pulley for
    seated rows for less than the price of a bowflex...

    --
    spammage trappage: replace fishies_ with yahoo

    I'm going to die rather sooner than I'd like. I tried to protect my
    neighbours from crime, and became the victim of it. Complications in
    hospital following this resulted in a serious illness. I now need a bone
    marrow transplant. Many people around the world are waiting for a marrow
    transplant, too. Please volunteer to be a marrow donor:
    http://www.abmdr.org.au/
    http://www.marrow.org/

  16. Paul Coene said:

    I think people are misunderstanding my question. I want to know if
    people can recommend an exercise for my lats that won't hurt my back
    while I am doing it.

    Chinups? Pullups? Pulldowns?

    Quoted message said:

    , so I was looking for maybe some advice on equipment for that
    (bowflex, etc).

    Disregard any advice from anyone who would advise
    you to get a bowflex.

    --
    Helgi Briem hbriem AT simnet DOT is

  17. "elzinator" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Peter Allen said:

    "elzinator" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Exactly, hence my comment on the exercise becoming a contortionist
    movement. But using the heaviest weight possible often conflicts with
    good form execution. I call it the 'Ego Isoform.' It seems to be
    upregulated in a section of the population.

    When is that not true?

    Plenty of times. I saw several examples this evening at the gym. (I
    train with some intelligent and self-secure powerlifters)

    I meant things can always be done with poor form, not everyone does some
    things with poor form...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    At least in this case, if you have your knees locked out straight, then
    you
    can look in a mirror and watch your head and other shoulder staying still.
    If they are, then any form errors at least aren't cheating the weight up.

    But if you don't really see your shoulders move, does that mean they
    don't move?
    Theory of Relative Training

    Well, it does if there's something behind you which you can see in the
    mirror and wrt which your shoulder and head can be seen to be fixed.

    all lifts are both good and bad lifts until observed.
    Theory of Quantum Training.

    Peter

  18. Peter Allen said:

    "elzinator" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Peter Allen said:

    "elzinator" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...
    >
    > Exactly, hence my comment on the exercise becoming a


    contortionist

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > movement. But using the heaviest weight possible often conflicts


    with

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > good form execution. I call it the 'Ego Isoform.' It seems to be
    > upregulated in a section of the population.

    When is that not true?

    Plenty of times. I saw several examples this evening at the gym. (I
    train with some intelligent and self-secure powerlifters)

    I meant things can always be done with poor form, not everyone does


    some

    Quoted message said:

    things with poor form...

    I misinterpreted. Scuse'

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    At least in this case, if you have your knees locked out straight,


    then

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    you
    can look in a mirror and watch your head and other shoulder staying


    still.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    If they are, then any form errors at least aren't cheating the


    weight up.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    But if you don't really see your shoulders move, does that mean


    they

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    don't move?
    Theory of Relative Training

    Well, it does if there's something behind you which you can see in


    the

    Quoted message said:

    mirror and wrt which your shoulder and head can be seen to be fixed.

    all lifts are both good and bad lifts until observed.
    Theory of Quantum Training.

    Yes, that was the implied point of my comment.

  19. Paul Coene said:
    Paul Coene said:

    Hello.

    I'm getting back into working out more (3 times a week). I have been
    doing inclined rows and dumbell rows to work my lats, but increasingly
    my chronically bad back is preventing me from doing these effectively.
    I have added back strengthening exercises to my regimen, but I still
    find one set of inclined rows to be uncomfortable, though I do arch my
    back slightly to maintain good form.

    I'd like to look into an option where I can do seated pulldowns to
    work my lats. This type of exervise will work my lats as well as
    inclined rows, yes?

    Can anyone suggest some equipment to allow me to add this? I was
    thinking of plopping a bowflex next to my bench and curl bar, but
    people here seems to believe in free weights or bowflex and nothing in
    between.

    Thanks in advance.

    I think people are misunderstanding my question. I want to know if
    people can recommend an exercise for my lats that won't hurt my back
    while I am doing it. I'll address getting my back in shape separately.
    The pulldowns seem to be done well while seated, instead of standing
    inclined, so I was looking for maybe some advice on equipment for that
    (bowflex, etc).

    Are you strong enough to do chinups?

  20. "elzinator" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Peter Allen said:

    "elzinator" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 21:25:07 -0000, Peter Allen wrote:
    >"elzinator" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    >news:[email hidden]...
    >>
    >> Exactly, hence my comment on the exercise becoming a


    contortionist

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >> movement. But using the heaviest weight possible often conflicts


    with

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >> good form execution. I call it the 'Ego Isoform.' It seems to be
    >> upregulated in a section of the population.
    >
    >When is that not true?

    Plenty of times. I saw several examples this evening at the gym. (I
    train with some intelligent and self-secure powerlifters)

    I meant things can always be done with poor form, not everyone does


    some

    Quoted message said:

    things with poor form...

    I misinterpreted. Scuse'

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >At least in this case, if you have your knees locked out straight,


    then

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >you
    >can look in a mirror and watch your head and other shoulder staying


    still.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >If they are, then any form errors at least aren't cheating the


    weight up.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    But if you don't really see your shoulders move, does that mean


    they

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    don't move?
    Theory of Relative Training

    Well, it does if there's something behind you which you can see in


    the

    Quoted message said:

    mirror and wrt which your shoulder and head can be seen to be fixed.

    all lifts are both good and bad lifts until observed.
    Theory of Quantum Training.

    Yes, that was the implied point of my comment.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.