Landis Situation Survey

Quoted message said:

http://FreeOnlineSurveys.com/rendersurvey.asp?sid=fw59hmkm0kazold302089

limited to first 50 responders...

Getting a few responses already, will post the results when either it
reaches 50 or participation dies off. No later than a few days...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

http://FreeOnlineSurveys.com/rendersurvey.asp?sid=fw59hmkm0kazold302089

limited to first 50 responders...

Getting a few responses already, will post the results when either it
reaches 50 or participation dies off. No later than a few days...

The suspense is agonizing.

R

On 15 May 2007 10:44:31 -0700, RicodJour <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Getting a few responses already, will post the results when either it
reaches 50 or participation dies off. No later than a few days...

The suspense is agonizing.

R

Positively yawn inducing. Almost enough to make me want to go there
and respond, but that may kill the 'participation dies off' option.

Curtis L. Russell
Odenton, MD (USA)
Just someone on two wheels...

On May 15, 11:53 am, Curtis L. Russell <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

On 15 May 2007 10:44:31 -0700, RicodJour <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Getting a few responses already, will post the results when either it
reaches 50 or participation dies off. No later than a few days...

Quoted message said:

The suspense is agonizing.

Quoted message said:

R

Positively yawn inducing. Almost enough to make me want to go there
and respond, but that may kill the 'participation dies off' option.

It's at 35 responders already, your agony/ennui will end soon.

Quoted message said:

On May 15, 11:53 am, Curtis L. Russell <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

On 15 May 2007 10:44:31 -0700, RicodJour <[email hidden]>
wrote:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> Getting a few responses already, will post the results when either it
> reaches 50 or participation dies off. No later than a few days...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

The suspense is agonizing.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

R

Quoted message said:

Positively yawn inducing. Almost enough to make me want to go there
and respond, but that may kill the 'participation dies off' option.

It's at 35 responders already, your agony/ennui will end soon.

I took the test. I answered yes to all. What's my score?
--
Marty

Quoted message said:

On May 15, 11:53 am, Curtis L. Russell <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

On 15 May 2007 10:44:31 -0700, RicodJour <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

> Getting a few responses already, will post the results when either it
> reaches 50 or participation dies off. No later than a few days...
The suspense is agonizing.
R

Positively yawn inducing. Almost enough to make me want to go there
and respond, but that may kill the 'participation dies off' option.

It's at 35 responders already, your agony/ennui will end soon.

Your puny quiz is no match for the inexorable force of my ennui!

Marty said:

I took the test. I answered yes to all. What's my score?

11:1 with at least one trace of synthetic metabolites.

Fred Fredburger said:

Your puny quiz is no match for the inexorable force of my ennui!

Only if ennui is the plural for enema.

Quoted message said:

http://FreeOnlineSurveys.com/rendersurvey.asp?sid=fw59hmkm0kazold302089

limited to first 50 responders...

Results are in. Luckily, I took the results last night when it hit 50
- once it goes over 50, the "free" survey suddenly requires you to pay
to see the results.
-----------------
1) Did Floyd Landis dope during the 2006 TdF?
YES: 27
NO: 23

2) Should the results be thrown out due to lab irregularities?
YES: 35
NO: 15

3) Should [censored] Pound lose his WADA chair due to his public statements
in this case?
YES: 38
NO: 12

4) Do you believe there is some type of conspiracy by the USADA
against Landis (e.g. the "get Floyd to get Lance" theory)?
YES: 17
NO: 33

5) Do you think a majority of the top 20 GC riders in the 2006 TdF
used some form of dope during the event?
YES: 32
NO: 18
--------------------

Interpretation - while split on the question of FL's doping, most are
in agreement that the results are invalid, Pound is out-of-control,
there's no conspiracy, and that a majority of the GC riders doped.

In article <[email hidden]>,

Fred Fredburger said:

Quoted message said:

On May 15, 11:53 am, Curtis L. Russell <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

On 15 May 2007 10:44:31 -0700, RicodJour <[email hidden]>
wrote:

>> Getting a few responses already, will post the results when either it
>> reaches 50 or participation dies off. No later than a few days...
> The suspense is agonizing.
> R
Positively yawn inducing. Almost enough to make me want to go there
and respond, but that may kill the 'participation dies off' option.

It's at 35 responders already, your agony/ennui will end soon.

Your puny quiz is no match for the inexorable force of my ennui!

http://www.houseoflyrics.com/lyrics/iggy_pop/im_bored.html

--
tanx,
Howard

Never take a tenant with a monkey.

remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?

Howard Kveck said:

In article <[email hidden]>,

Fred Fredburger said:

Quoted message said:

On May 15, 11:53 am, Curtis L. Russell <[email hidden]>
wrote:
> On 15 May 2007 10:44:31 -0700, RicodJour <[email hidden]>
> wrote:
>
>>> Getting a few responses already, will post the results when either it
>>> reaches 50 or participation dies off. No later than a few days...
>> The suspense is agonizing.
>> R
> Positively yawn inducing. Almost enough to make me want to go there
> and respond, but that may kill the 'participation dies off' option.
It's at 35 responders already, your agony/ennui will end soon.

Your puny quiz is no match for the inexorable force of my ennui!

http://www.houseoflyrics.com/lyrics/iggy_pop/im_bored.html

That was perfect!

in message <[email hidden]>,

Howard Kveck (') said:

In article <[email hidden]>,

Fred Fredburger said:

Quoted message said:

On May 15, 11:53 am, Curtis L. Russell <[email hidden]>
wrote:
> On 15 May 2007 10:44:31 -0700, RicodJour <[email hidden]>
> wrote:
>
>>> Getting a few responses already, will post the results when either
>>> it reaches 50 or participation dies off. No later than a few
>>> days...
>> The suspense is agonizing.
>> R
> Positively yawn inducing. Almost enough to make me want to go there
> and respond, but that may kill the 'participation dies off' option.

It's at 35 responders already, your agony/ennui will end soon.

Your puny quiz is no match for the inexorable force of my ennui!

http://www.houseoflyrics.com/lyrics/iggy_pop/im_bored.html

Pah! Johnny-come-latelies. You want the real thing:

last.fmI'm+BoredOpen ↗

--
[email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/
"The result is a language that... not even its mother could
love. Like the camel, Common Lisp is a horse designed by
committee. Camels do have their uses."
;; Scott Fahlman, 7 March 1995

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

http://FreeOnlineSurveys.com/rendersurvey.asp?sid=fw59hmkm0kazold302089

limited to first 50 responders...

Results are in. Luckily, I took the results last night when it hit 50
- once it goes over 50, the "free" survey suddenly requires you to pay
to see the results.
-----------------
1) Did Floyd Landis dope during the 2006 TdF?
YES: 27
NO: 23

2) Should the results be thrown out due to lab irregularities?
YES: 35
NO: 15

3) Should [censored] Pound lose his WADA chair due to his public statements
in this case?
YES: 38
NO: 12

4) Do you believe there is some type of conspiracy by the USADA
against Landis (e.g. the "get Floyd to get Lance" theory)?
YES: 17
NO: 33

5) Do you think a majority of the top 20 GC riders in the 2006 TdF
used some form of dope during the event?
YES: 32
NO: 18
--------------------

Interpretation - while split on the question of FL's doping, most are
in agreement that the results are invalid, Pound is out-of-control,
there's no conspiracy, and that a majority of the GC riders doped.

Uh, yeah. That's what some number of people think. So what. We all know this and
we all know what opinion is worth.

What's with the fascination with what people think. I'd rather hear what people
who know know.

Ron

In article <[email hidden]>,

Simon Brooke said:

in message <[email hidden]>,

Howard Kveck (') said:

In article <[email hidden]>,
Fred Fredburger <[email hidden]> wrote:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Your puny quiz is no match for the inexorable force of my ennui!

http://www.houseoflyrics.com/lyrics/iggy_pop/im_bored.html

Pah! Johnny-come-latelies. You want the real thing:

last.fmI'm+BoredOpen ↗

Ahh yes, the Bonzos. Great stuff. I love "The Intro and the Outro". "Count Basie
Orchestra on triangle." Nice. But what the hell, there's always this:

http://www.houseoflyrics.com/lyrics/buzzcocks/boredom.html

http://www.houseoflyrics.com/lyrics/clash/im_so_bored_with_the_usa.html

http://www.houseoflyrics.com/lyrics/adverts/bored_teenagers.html

http://www.houseoflyrics.com/lyrics/paul_westerberg/a_star_is_bored.html

--
tanx,
Howard

Never take a tenant with a monkey.

remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?