Professional Cycling · Public discussion

Landis back from... hip injury?

Started by helmutRoole2 · · Last activity · 11 posts · 1,791 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Professional Cycling
Published
16 February 2009
Last activity
19 February 2009
Original author
helmutRoole2
Posts
11
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,791
Views / 30 days
20

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–11 of 11
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Did it seem to anyone else that Phil Ligget, Paul Sherwin, Rob Roll, et al were implying that Landis was returning from hip surgery and not a drug suspension?

    To be fair, I did hear them mention the drug suspension once, but after that they regarded as Landis returning from injury. They also referred to him as the Tour champion over and over and over... Plus, the repeated footage of him standing atop the Tour podium.

  2. helmutRoole2 said:

    Did it seem to anyone else that Phil Ligget, Paul Sherwin, Rob Roll, et al were implying that Landis was returning from hip surgery and not a drug suspension?

    To be fair, I did hear them mention the drug suspension once, but after that they regarded as Landis returning from injury. They also referred to him as the Tour champion over and over and over... Plus, the repeated footage of him standing atop the Tour podium.

    Heh, they also called it 'hiatus'. Or maybe they used that for Tyler?

    It's probably part of the contract, which I can understand from the broadcaster's point-of-view. It's still sad that P&P apparently can be bought to say such [censored].

  3. Farce. It's the only way to describe cycling.

  4. sure it's a lot of spin and selective reporting. do you expect them to call attention to widespread doping in their sport? liggett, et al. are paid to promote the sport, not give it a blacker eye. people want heros and flandis' testosterone-fueled ride in 2006 was pretty heroic

    helmutRoole2 said:

    Did it seem to anyone else that Phil Ligget, Paul Sherwin, Rob Roll, et al were implying that Landis was returning from hip surgery and not a drug suspension?

    To be fair, I did hear them mention the drug suspension once, but after that they regarded as Landis returning from injury. They also referred to him as the Tour champion over and over and over... Plus, the repeated footage of him standing atop the Tour podium.

  5. i imagine they were frustrated at not being able to include f. l. in that "new, clean" generation of riders like ricco. ah, [censored], well, some of the other new, clean generation, like that lance guy who has never tested positive for anything.

  6. helmutRoole2 said:

    Did it seem to anyone else that Phil Ligget, Paul Sherwin, Rob Roll, et al were implying that Landis was returning from hip surgery and not a drug suspension?

    To be fair, I did hear them mention the drug suspension once, but after that they regarded as Landis returning from injury. They also referred to him as the Tour champion over and over and over... Plus, the repeated footage of him standing atop the Tour podium.


    Given that David Millar is treated like the second coming of Christ, would you expect anything less?

    As for Landis' and that whole debacle, he did his time and judging by the paperwork the lab in Paris should do theirs too... But, the guy is also coming back from having his hip/thigh bastardised with chisels and circular saws, which is a little more traumatic to the body that a two year suspension don't ya think?

  7. swampy1970 said:

    Given that David Millar is treated like the second coming of Christ, would you expect anything less?

    As for Landis' and that whole debacle, he did his time and judging by the paperwork the lab in Paris should do theirs too... But, the guy is also coming back from having his hip/thigh bastardised with chisels and circular saws, which is a little more traumatic to the body that a two year suspension don't ya think?

    but less than 2 years, Landis hoping to be found not guilty had expected to come back on the next Tour. So his none appearance was more from suspension than medical reason. Do you forget his mountain bike race?

  8. Just look at "Armstrong gets rid of Catlin" thread and oh!-man's posts... That's what you get with journalism like this and Phil's and Paul's view of the cycling world.

  9. Andrija said:

    Just look at "Armstrong gets rid of Catlin" thread and oh!-man's posts... That's what you get with journalism like this and Phil's and Paul's view of the cycling world.

    Good point. Very good point. That, and the fact that women never listen.

  10. These guys are being payed big bucks to comment in a very specific way. Money will always win out.

  11. swampy1970 said:

    Given that David Millar is treated like the second coming of Christ, would you expect anything less?

    As for Landis' and that whole debacle, he did his time and judging by the paperwork the lab in Paris should do theirs too... But, the guy is also coming back from having his hip/thigh bastardised with chisels and circular saws, which is a little more traumatic to the body that a two year suspension don't ya think?

    No and No

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.