Road Cycling · Public discussion

Lance Will Have Problems In July

Started by Richard Longwoo · · Last activity · 50 posts · 2,534 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
2 May 2004
Last activity
11 May 2004
Original author
Richard Longwoo
Posts
50
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
2,534
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 50
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Stage 5 - May 2: Lausanne-Lausanne ITT, 20 km

    Results 1 Tyler Hamilton (USA) Phonak Hearing Systems 26.29
    2 Bradley McGee (Aus) FDJeux.com 0.35 3 Ronny Scholz (Ger)
    Gerolsteiner 0.53 4 Ivan Basso (Ita) Team CSC 0.57 5 Stefano
    Garzelli (Ita) Vini Caldirola-Nobili Rubinetterrie 1.00 6
    Rubens Bertogliati (Swi) Saunier Duval-Prodir 7 Carlos
    Sastre (Spa) Team CSC 8 Marco Pinotti (Ita) Lampre 9 Fabian
    Jeker (Swi) Saunier Duval-Prodir 1.13 10 Jörg Jaksche (Ger)
    Team CSC 11 Yuriy Krivtsov (Ukr) Ag2r-Prevoyance 1.21 12
    Alexandre Moos (Swi) Phonak Hearing Systems 1.22

    Final general classification

    1 Tyler Hamilton (USA) Phonak Hearing Systems 2 Fabian Jeker
    (Swi) Saunier Duval-Prodir 1.42 3 Leonardo Piepoli (Ita)
    Saunier Duval-Prodir 2.17 4 Tadej Valjavec (Slo) Phonak
    Hearing Systems 2.18 ... 7 Ivan Basso (Ita) Team CSC 3.30 8
    Francisco Mancebo (Spa) Illes Balears-Banesto 9 Bradley
    McGee (Aus) FDJeux.com

  2. And Tyler won this race last year, too. Tyler's got to get
    through a tour without crashing.

    Richard Longwood said:

    Stage 5 - May 2: Lausanne-Lausanne ITT, 20 km

    Results 1 Tyler Hamilton (USA) Phonak Hearing Systems
    26.29 2 Bradley McGee (Aus) FDJeux.com 0.35 3 Ronny Scholz
    (Ger) Gerolsteiner 0.53 4 Ivan Basso (Ita) Team CSC 0.57 5
    Stefano Garzelli (Ita) Vini Caldirola-Nobili Rubinetterrie
    1.00 6 Rubens Bertogliati (Swi) Saunier Duval-Prodir 7
    Carlos Sastre (Spa) Team CSC 8 Marco Pinotti (Ita) Lampre
    9 Fabian Jeker (Swi) Saunier Duval-Prodir 1.13 10 Jörg
    Jaksche (Ger) Team CSC 11 Yuriy Krivtsov (Ukr) Ag2r-
    Prevoyance 1.21 12 Alexandre Moos (Swi) Phonak Hearing
    Systems 1.22

    Final general classification

    1 Tyler Hamilton (USA) Phonak Hearing Systems 2 Fabian
    Jeker (Swi) Saunier Duval-Prodir 1.42 3 Leonardo Piepoli
    (Ita) Saunier Duval-Prodir 2.17 4 Tadej Valjavec (Slo)
    Phonak Hearing Systems 2.18 ... 7 Ivan Basso (Ita) Team
    CSC 3.30 8 Francisco Mancebo (Spa) Illes Balears-Banesto 9
    Bradley McGee (Aus) FDJeux.com

  3. Blast, Sod and Balls. :-( Please indicate in the subject
    when posts contain results. If I'd have known I certainly
    wouldn't have read your post til after I'd watched the
    recorded Time Trial

    Thanks Jan

  4. And so does Lance.

    "Richard Adams" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    And Tyler won this race last year, too. Tyler's got to get
    through a tour without crashing.

    Richard Longwood said:

    Stage 5 - May 2: Lausanne-Lausanne ITT, 20 km

    Results 1 Tyler Hamilton (USA) Phonak Hearing Systems
    26.29 2 Bradley McGee (Aus) FDJeux.com 0.35 3 Ronny
    Scholz (Ger) Gerolsteiner 0.53 4 Ivan Basso (Ita) Team
    CSC 0.57 5 Stefano Garzelli (Ita) Vini Caldirola-Nobili
    Rubinetterrie 1.00 6 Rubens Bertogliati (Swi) Saunier
    Duval-Prodir 7 Carlos Sastre (Spa) Team CSC 8 Marco
    Pinotti (Ita) Lampre 9 Fabian Jeker (Swi) Saunier Duval-
    Prodir 1.13 10 Jörg Jaksche (Ger) Team CSC 11 Yuriy
    Krivtsov (Ukr) Ag2r-Prevoyance 1.21 12 Alexandre Moos
    (Swi) Phonak Hearing Systems 1.22

    Final general classification

    1 Tyler Hamilton (USA) Phonak Hearing Systems 2 Fabian
    Jeker (Swi) Saunier Duval-Prodir 1.42 3 Leonardo Piepoli
    (Ita) Saunier Duval-Prodir 2.17 4 Tadej Valjavec (Slo)
    Phonak Hearing Systems 2.18 ... 7 Ivan Basso (Ita) Team
    CSC 3.30 8 Francisco Mancebo (Spa) Illes Balears-Banesto
    9 Bradley McGee (Aus) FDJeux.com

  5. Richard Adams said:

    And Tyler won this race last year, too. Tyler's got to get
    through a tour without crashing.

    And the heavily cobbled stage at the beginning of the Tour
    is not going to help him.

    Quoted message said:
    Richard Longwood said:

    Stage 5 - May 2: Lausanne-Lausanne ITT, 20 km

    Results 1 Tyler Hamilton (USA) Phonak Hearing Systems
    26.29 2 Bradley McGee (Aus) FDJeux.com 0.35 3 Ronny
    Scholz (Ger) Gerolsteiner 0.53 4 Ivan Basso (Ita) Team
    CSC 0.57 5 Stefano Garzelli (Ita) Vini Caldirola-Nobili
    Rubinetterrie 1.00 6 Rubens Bertogliati (Swi) Saunier Duval-
    Prodir 7 Carlos Sastre (Spa) Team CSC 8 Marco Pinotti
    (Ita) Lampre 9 Fabian Jeker (Swi) Saunier Duval-Prodir
    1.13 10 Jörg Jaksche (Ger) Team CSC 11 Yuriy Krivtsov
    (Ukr) Ag2r-Prevoyance 1.21 12 Alexandre Moos (Swi) Phonak
    Hearing Systems 1.22

    Final general classification

    1 Tyler Hamilton (USA) Phonak Hearing Systems 2 Fabian
    Jeker (Swi) Saunier Duval-Prodir 1.42 3 Leonardo Piepoli
    (Ita) Saunier Duval-Prodir 2.17 4 Tadej Valjavec (Slo)
    Phonak Hearing Systems 2.18 ... 7 Ivan Basso (Ita) Team
    CSC 3.30 8 Francisco Mancebo (Spa) Illes Balears-Banesto
    9 Bradley McGee (Aus) FDJeux.com

  6. Jan said:

    Please indicate in the subject when posts contain results.
    If I'd have known I certainly wouldn't have read your post
    til after I'd watched the recorded Time Trial

    I don't quite understand why someone would record a TT for
    later viewing and blind the results in the meantime.

  7. "Robert Chung" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Jan said:

    Please indicate in the subject when posts contain
    results. If I'd have known I certainly wouldn't have
    read your post til after I'd watched the recorded
    Time Trial

    I don't quite understand why someone would record a TT for
    later viewing and blind the results in the meantime.

    Because I was unable to watch it live on TV. !! Makes
    perfect sense to me... don't you ever tape programmes to
    watch later?

    .Jan

  8. "Robert Chung" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Jan said:

    Please indicate in the subject when posts contain
    results. If I'd have known I certainly wouldn't have
    read your post til after I'd watched the recorded
    Time Trial

    I don't quite understand why someone would record a TT for
    later viewing and blind the results in the meantime.

    Because I was unable to watch it live on TV. !! Makes
    perfect sense to me... don't any of you ever tape programmes
    to watch later?

    .Jan

  9. Jan said:

    "Robert Chung" <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:


    I don't quite understand why someone would record a TT
    for later viewing and blind the results in the meantime.

    Because I was unable to watch it live on TV. !! Makes
    perfect sense to me... don't you ever tape programmes to
    watch later?

    Road stages, yes, because I'm interested in the tactics,
    strategy, attacks, counters, collusion, and back-stabbing
    (especially the latter). Rarely TTs, but perhaps I'm
    missing something. Since I'm interested in the tactics,
    strategy, etc., I don't particularly worry if I learn the
    result ahead of time.

  10. And now Tyler thinks he can win:

    "My objective remains the Tour de France, I'll target a podium place but I also believe that I can win. I had to fight for victory here for Phonak."

  11. "Robert Chung" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Jan said:

    "Robert Chung" <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:


    I don't quite understand why someone would record a TT
    for later viewing and blind the results in the
    meantime.

    Because I was unable to watch it live on TV. !! Makes
    perfect sense to me... don't you ever tape programmes to
    watch later?

    Road stages, yes, because I'm interested in the tactics,
    strategy, attacks, counters, collusion, and back-stabbing
    (especially the latter).

    Agreed

    Quoted message said:

    Rarely TTs, but perhaps I'm missing something. Since I'm
    interested in the tactics, strategy, etc., I don't
    particularly worry if I learn the result ahead of time.

    We like shouting at the TV set and the commentator (
    usually DD). Difficult if not impossible if you already
    know the result.

    Jan

    Jan

  12. Jan said:

    "Robert Chung" <[email hidden]> wrote in message -"]news:[email hidden]-
    berlin.de...

    Quoted message said:
    Jan said:

    Please indicate in the subject when posts contain
    results. If I'd have known I certainly wouldn't have
    read your post til after I'd watched the recorded Time
    Trial

    I don't quite understand why someone would record a TT
    for later viewing and blind the results in the meantime.

    Because I was unable to watch it live on TV. !! Makes
    perfect sense to me... don't any of you ever tape
    programmes to watch later?


    Yep, but if it's a cycling race and I don't want to know the
    result I'd never come on r.b.r before watching it given the
    normal etiquette of posting the podium in the header...

    Regards! Stephen

  13. "Steve McGinty" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Jan said:

    "Robert Chung" <[email hidden]> wrote in message -"]news:[email hidden]-
    berlin.de...

    Quoted message said:

    Jan wrote:

    > Please indicate in the subject when posts contain
    > results. If I'd have known I certainly wouldn't have
    > read your post til after


    I'd

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > watched the recorded Time Trial

    I don't quite understand why someone would record a TT
    for later


    viewing

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    and blind the results in the meantime.

    Because I was unable to watch it live on TV. !! Makes
    perfect sense to me... don't any of you ever tape
    programmes to


    watch

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    later?


    Yep, but if it's a cycling race and I don't want to know
    the result I'd never come on r.b.r before watching it
    given the normal etiquette of posting the podium in the
    header...

    Regards! Stephen

    um??? Have you actually read the subject header to
    this post????

    Jan

  14. "Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    um??? Have you actually read the subject header to this
    post????

    It is common for people in rbr to post the winners, and
    frequently the whole podium, in the header. In that case,
    your whole weekend would have been ruined anyway.

  15. "Carl Sundquist" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message -"]news:[email hidden]-
    berlin.de...

    Quoted message said:

    um??? Have you actually read the subject header to this
    post????

    It is common for people in rbr to post the winners, and
    frequently the


    whole

    Quoted message said:

    podium, in the header. In that case, your whole weekend
    would have been ruined anyway.

    No it only ruined Sunday!!LOL The heading was actually
    "Lance will have problems in July" , There was no mention of
    the Tour of Romandy. If there had of been, I wouldn't have
    opened the post But thats by the by now. Looking ahead,
    Would it be to much to ask for people not to actually post
    the results in the headings. Other NGs I read ( not cycling)
    will usually say something along the lines of "result of
    ??????? (inc.spoiler)" then type the result further down the
    page, so one can't accidently read
    it.iyswim

    Jan

  16. On 05/02/2004 03:29 PM, in article
    [email hidden], "Jan" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:


    "Carl Sundquist" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message -"]news:[email hidden]-
    berlin.de...

    Quoted message said:

    um??? Have you actually read the subject header to this
    post????

    It is common for people in rbr to post the winners, and
    frequently the


    whole

    Quoted message said:

    podium, in the header. In that case, your whole weekend
    would have been ruined anyway.

    No it only ruined Sunday!!LOL The heading was actually
    "Lance will have problems in July" , There was no mention
    of the Tour of Romandy. If there had of been, I wouldn't
    have opened the post But thats by the by now. Looking
    ahead, Would it be to much to ask for people not to
    actually post the results in the headings. Other NGs I
    read ( not cycling) will usually say something along the
    lines of "result of ??????? (inc.spoiler)" then type the
    result further down the page, so one can't accidently read
    it.iyswim

    RBR is NOT "other newsgroups" ...

    The standard practice in this group is to post the entire
    podium in the Subject field.

    If you don't want to see results of a particular race in
    this newsgroup, then don't READ this newsgroup until after
    you've watched your tape of the race in question.

    Learn it. Live it. Love it.

    --
    Steven L. Sheffield stevens at veloworks dot com veloworks
    at worldnet dot ay tea tee dot net bellum pax est libertas
    servitus est ignoratio vis est ess ay ell tea ell ay kay ee
    sea aye tee why you ti ay aitch aitch tee tea pea colon [for
    word] slash [four ward] slash double-you double-yew double-
    ewe dot veloworks dot com [four word] slash

  17. "Steven L. Sheffield" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On 05/02/2004 03:29 PM, in article [email hidden]-

    berlin.de said:


    "Carl Sundquist" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message -"]news:[email hidden]-
    berlin.de...
    >
    >
    > um??? Have you actually read the subject header to
    > this post????
    >

    It is common for people in rbr to post the winners, and
    frequently the


    whole

    Quoted message said:

    podium, in the header. In that case, your whole weekend
    would have been ruined anyway.

    No it only ruined Sunday!!LOL The heading was actually
    "Lance will have problems in July" , There was


    no

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    mention of the Tour of Romandy. If there had of been, I
    wouldn't have


    opened

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    the post But thats by the by now. Looking ahead, Would
    it be to much to ask for people not to actually


    post

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    the results in the headings. Other NGs I read ( not
    cycling) will usually say something along the


    lines

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    of "result of ??????? (inc.spoiler)" then type the
    result further down the page, so one can't
    accidently read
    it.iyswim

    RBR is NOT "other newsgroups" ...

    The standard practice in this group is to post the entire
    podium in the Subject field.

    Just out of curiosity ......Why?????? Is it an American sort
    of custom- for want of a better word?? Jan

  18. "Steven L. Sheffield" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On 05/02/2004 03:29 PM, in article [email hidden]-

    berlin.de said:


    "Carl Sundquist" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message -"]news:[email hidden]-
    berlin.de...
    >
    >
    > um??? Have you actually read the subject header to
    > this post????
    >

    It is common for people in rbr to post the winners, and
    frequently the


    whole

    Quoted message said:

    podium, in the header. In that case, your whole weekend
    would have been ruined anyway.

    No it only ruined Sunday!!LOL The heading was actually
    "Lance will have problems in July" , There was


    no

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    mention of the Tour of Romandy. If there had of been, I
    wouldn't have


    opened

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    the post But thats by the by now. Looking ahead, Would
    it be to much to ask for people not to actually


    post

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    the results in the headings. Other NGs I read ( not
    cycling) will usually say something along the


    lines

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    of "result of ??????? (inc.spoiler)" then type the
    result further down the page, so one can't
    accidently read
    it.iyswim

    RBR is NOT "other newsgroups" ...

    The standard practice in this group is to post the entire
    podium in the Subject field.

    Just out of curiosity ......Why?????? Is it an American sort
    of custom- for want of a better word?? Jan

  19. "Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    The standard practice in this group is to post the
    entire podium in the Subject field.

    Just out of curiosity ......Why?????? Is it an American
    sort of custom-


    for

    Quoted message said:

    want of a better word?? Jan

    What makes you think it is just Americans who do it?

  20. Carl Sundquist said:

    What makes you think it is just Americans who do it?

    Yes.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.