Road Cycling · Public discussion

Lance Will Have Problems In July

Started by Richard Longwood · · Last activity · 53 posts · 2,094 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
2 May 2004
Last activity
11 May 2004
Original author
Richard Longwood
Posts
53
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
2,094
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 53
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Stage 5 - May 2: Lausanne-Lausanne ITT, 20 km

    Results
    1 Tyler Hamilton (USA) Phonak Hearing Systems 26.29
    2 Bradley McGee (Aus) FDJeux.com 0.35
    3 Ronny Scholz (Ger) Gerolsteiner 0.53
    4 Ivan Basso (Ita) Team CSC 0.57
    5 Stefano Garzelli (Ita) Vini Caldirola-Nobili Rubinetterrie 1.00
    6 Rubens Bertogliati (Swi) Saunier Duval-Prodir
    7 Carlos Sastre (Spa) Team CSC
    8 Marco Pinotti (Ita) Lampre
    9 Fabian Jeker (Swi) Saunier Duval-Prodir 1.13
    10 Jörg Jaksche (Ger) Team CSC
    11 Yuriy Krivtsov (Ukr) Ag2r-Prevoyance 1.21
    12 Alexandre Moos (Swi) Phonak Hearing Systems 1.22

    Final general classification

    1 Tyler Hamilton (USA) Phonak Hearing Systems
    2 Fabian Jeker (Swi) Saunier Duval-Prodir 1.42
    3 Leonardo Piepoli (Ita) Saunier Duval-Prodir 2.17
    4 Tadej Valjavec (Slo) Phonak Hearing Systems 2.18
    ....
    7 Ivan Basso (Ita) Team CSC 3.30
    8 Francisco Mancebo (Spa) Illes Balears-Banesto
    9 Bradley McGee (Aus) FDJeux.com

  2. And Tyler won this race last year, too. Tyler's got to get through a
    tour without crashing.

    Richard Longwood said:

    Stage 5 - May 2: Lausanne-Lausanne ITT, 20 km

    Results
    1 Tyler Hamilton (USA) Phonak Hearing Systems 26.29
    2 Bradley McGee (Aus) FDJeux.com 0.35
    3 Ronny Scholz (Ger) Gerolsteiner 0.53
    4 Ivan Basso (Ita) Team CSC 0.57
    5 Stefano Garzelli (Ita) Vini Caldirola-Nobili Rubinetterrie 1.00
    6 Rubens Bertogliati (Swi) Saunier Duval-Prodir
    7 Carlos Sastre (Spa) Team CSC
    8 Marco Pinotti (Ita) Lampre
    9 Fabian Jeker (Swi) Saunier Duval-Prodir 1.13
    10 Jörg Jaksche (Ger) Team CSC
    11 Yuriy Krivtsov (Ukr) Ag2r-Prevoyance 1.21
    12 Alexandre Moos (Swi) Phonak Hearing Systems 1.22

    Final general classification

    1 Tyler Hamilton (USA) Phonak Hearing Systems
    2 Fabian Jeker (Swi) Saunier Duval-Prodir 1.42
    3 Leonardo Piepoli (Ita) Saunier Duval-Prodir 2.17
    4 Tadej Valjavec (Slo) Phonak Hearing Systems 2.18
    ...
    7 Ivan Basso (Ita) Team CSC 3.30
    8 Francisco Mancebo (Spa) Illes Balears-Banesto
    9 Bradley McGee (Aus) FDJeux.com

  3. And so does Lance.

    "Richard Adams" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    And Tyler won this race last year, too. Tyler's got to get through a
    tour without crashing.

    Richard Longwood said:

    Stage 5 - May 2: Lausanne-Lausanne ITT, 20 km

    Results
    1 Tyler Hamilton (USA) Phonak Hearing Systems 26.29
    2 Bradley McGee (Aus) FDJeux.com 0.35
    3 Ronny Scholz (Ger) Gerolsteiner 0.53
    4 Ivan Basso (Ita) Team CSC 0.57
    5 Stefano Garzelli (Ita) Vini Caldirola-Nobili Rubinetterrie 1.00
    6 Rubens Bertogliati (Swi) Saunier Duval-Prodir
    7 Carlos Sastre (Spa) Team CSC
    8 Marco Pinotti (Ita) Lampre
    9 Fabian Jeker (Swi) Saunier Duval-Prodir 1.13
    10 Jörg Jaksche (Ger) Team CSC
    11 Yuriy Krivtsov (Ukr) Ag2r-Prevoyance 1.21
    12 Alexandre Moos (Swi) Phonak Hearing Systems 1.22

    Final general classification

    1 Tyler Hamilton (USA) Phonak Hearing Systems
    2 Fabian Jeker (Swi) Saunier Duval-Prodir 1.42
    3 Leonardo Piepoli (Ita) Saunier Duval-Prodir 2.17
    4 Tadej Valjavec (Slo) Phonak Hearing Systems 2.18
    ...
    7 Ivan Basso (Ita) Team CSC 3.30
    8 Francisco Mancebo (Spa) Illes Balears-Banesto
    9 Bradley McGee (Aus) FDJeux.com


  4. Richard Adams said:

    And Tyler won this race last year, too. Tyler's got to get through a
    tour without crashing.

    And the heavily cobbled stage at the beginning of the Tour is not going to
    help him.

    Quoted message said:
    Richard Longwood said:

    Stage 5 - May 2: Lausanne-Lausanne ITT, 20 km

    Results
    1 Tyler Hamilton (USA) Phonak Hearing Systems 26.29
    2 Bradley McGee (Aus) FDJeux.com 0.35
    3 Ronny Scholz (Ger) Gerolsteiner 0.53
    4 Ivan Basso (Ita) Team CSC 0.57
    5 Stefano Garzelli (Ita) Vini Caldirola-Nobili Rubinetterrie 1.00
    6 Rubens Bertogliati (Swi) Saunier Duval-Prodir
    7 Carlos Sastre (Spa) Team CSC
    8 Marco Pinotti (Ita) Lampre
    9 Fabian Jeker (Swi) Saunier Duval-Prodir 1.13
    10 Jörg Jaksche (Ger) Team CSC
    11 Yuriy Krivtsov (Ukr) Ag2r-Prevoyance 1.21
    12 Alexandre Moos (Swi) Phonak Hearing Systems 1.22

    Final general classification

    1 Tyler Hamilton (USA) Phonak Hearing Systems
    2 Fabian Jeker (Swi) Saunier Duval-Prodir 1.42
    3 Leonardo Piepoli (Ita) Saunier Duval-Prodir 2.17
    4 Tadej Valjavec (Slo) Phonak Hearing Systems 2.18
    ...
    7 Ivan Basso (Ita) Team CSC 3.30
    8 Francisco Mancebo (Spa) Illes Balears-Banesto
    9 Bradley McGee (Aus) FDJeux.com

  5. Blast, Sod and Balls. :-(
    Please indicate in the subject when posts contain results.
    If I'd have known I certainly wouldn't have read your post til after I'd
    watched the recorded Time Trial

    Thanks
    Jan

  6. Jan said:

    Please indicate in the subject when posts contain results.
    If I'd have known I certainly wouldn't have read your post til after I'd
    watched the recorded Time Trial

    I don't quite understand why someone would record a TT for later viewing
    and blind the results in the meantime.

  7. "Robert Chung" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Jan said:

    Please indicate in the subject when posts contain results.
    If I'd have known I certainly wouldn't have read your post til after I'd
    watched the recorded Time Trial

    I don't quite understand why someone would record a TT for later viewing
    and blind the results in the meantime.

    Because I was unable to watch it live on TV. !!
    Makes perfect sense to me... don't you ever tape programmes to watch later?

    ..Jan

  8. "Robert Chung" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Jan said:

    Please indicate in the subject when posts contain results.
    If I'd have known I certainly wouldn't have read your post til after I'd
    watched the recorded Time Trial

    I don't quite understand why someone would record a TT for later viewing
    and blind the results in the meantime.

    Because I was unable to watch it live on TV. !!
    Makes perfect sense to me... don't any of you ever tape programmes to watch
    later?

    ..Jan

  9. Jan said:

    "Robert Chung" <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:


    I don't quite understand why someone would record a TT for later
    viewing and blind the results in the meantime.

    Because I was unable to watch it live on TV. !!
    Makes perfect sense to me... don't you ever tape programmes to watch
    later?

    Road stages, yes, because I'm interested in the tactics, strategy,
    attacks, counters, collusion, and back-stabbing (especially the latter).
    Rarely TTs, but perhaps I'm missing something. Since I'm interested in the
    tactics, strategy, etc., I don't particularly worry if I learn the result
    ahead of time.

  10. "Robert Chung" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Jan said:

    "Robert Chung" <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:


    I don't quite understand why someone would record a TT for later
    viewing and blind the results in the meantime.

    Because I was unable to watch it live on TV. !!
    Makes perfect sense to me... don't you ever tape programmes to watch
    later?

    Road stages, yes, because I'm interested in the tactics, strategy,
    attacks, counters, collusion, and back-stabbing (especially the latter).

    Agreed

    Quoted message said:

    Rarely TTs, but perhaps I'm missing something. Since I'm interested in the
    tactics, strategy, etc., I don't particularly worry if I learn the result
    ahead of time.

    We like shouting at the TV set and the commentator ( usually DD).
    Difficult if not impossible if you already know the result.

    Jan

    Jan

  11. And now Tyler thinks he can win:

    "My objective remains the Tour de France, I'll target a podium place
    but I also believe that I can win. I had to fight for victory here
    for Phonak."

    --

  12. Jan said:

    "Robert Chung" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Jan said:

    Please indicate in the subject when posts contain results.
    If I'd have known I certainly wouldn't have read your post til after I'd
    watched the recorded Time Trial

    I don't quite understand why someone would record a TT for later viewing
    and blind the results in the meantime.

    Because I was unable to watch it live on TV. !!
    Makes perfect sense to me... don't any of you ever tape programmes to watch
    later?


    Yep, but if it's a cycling race and I don't want to know the result
    I'd never come on r.b.r before watching it given the normal etiquette
    of posting the podium in the header...

    Regards!
    Stephen

  13. "Steve McGinty" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Jan said:

    "Robert Chung" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Jan wrote:

    > Please indicate in the subject when posts contain results.
    > If I'd have known I certainly wouldn't have read your post til after


    I'd

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > watched the recorded Time Trial

    I don't quite understand why someone would record a TT for later


    viewing

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    and blind the results in the meantime.

    Because I was unable to watch it live on TV. !!
    Makes perfect sense to me... don't any of you ever tape programmes to


    watch

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    later?


    Yep, but if it's a cycling race and I don't want to know the result
    I'd never come on r.b.r before watching it given the normal etiquette
    of posting the podium in the header...

    Regards!
    Stephen

    um??? Have you actually read the subject header to this post????

    Jan

  14. "Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    um??? Have you actually read the subject header to this post????

    It is common for people in rbr to post the winners, and frequently the whole
    podium, in the header. In that case, your whole weekend would have been
    ruined anyway.

  15. "Carl Sundquist" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    um??? Have you actually read the subject header to this post????

    It is common for people in rbr to post the winners, and frequently the


    whole

    Quoted message said:

    podium, in the header. In that case, your whole weekend would have been
    ruined anyway.

    No it only ruined Sunday!!LOL
    The heading was actually "Lance will have problems in July" , There was no
    mention of the Tour of Romandy. If there had of been, I wouldn't have opened
    the post
    But thats by the by now.
    Looking ahead, Would it be to much to ask for people not to actually post
    the results in the headings.
    Other NGs I read ( not cycling) will usually say something along the lines
    of "result of ??????? (inc.spoiler)"
    then type the result further down the page, so one can't accidently read
    it.iyswim

    Jan

  16. On 05/02/2004 03:29 PM, in article
    [email hidden], "Jan" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:


    "Carl Sundquist" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    um??? Have you actually read the subject header to this post????

    It is common for people in rbr to post the winners, and frequently the


    whole

    Quoted message said:

    podium, in the header. In that case, your whole weekend would have been
    ruined anyway.

    No it only ruined Sunday!!LOL
    The heading was actually "Lance will have problems in July" , There was no
    mention of the Tour of Romandy. If there had of been, I wouldn't have opened
    the post
    But thats by the by now.
    Looking ahead, Would it be to much to ask for people not to actually post
    the results in the headings.
    Other NGs I read ( not cycling) will usually say something along the lines
    of "result of ??????? (inc.spoiler)"
    then type the result further down the page, so one can't accidently read
    it.iyswim

    RBR is NOT "other newsgroups" ...

    The standard practice in this group is to post the entire podium in the
    Subject field.

    If you don't want to see results of a particular race in this newsgroup,
    then don't READ this newsgroup until after you've watched your tape of the
    race in question.

    Learn it. Live it. Love it.

    --
    Steven L. Sheffield
    stevens at veloworks dot com
    veloworks at worldnet dot ay tea tee dot net
    bellum pax est libertas servitus est ignoratio vis est
    ess ay ell tea ell ay kay ee sea aye tee why you ti ay aitch
    aitch tee tea pea colon [for word] slash [four ward] slash double-you
    double-yew double-ewe dot veloworks dot com [four word] slash

  17. "Steven L. Sheffield" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On 05/02/2004 03:29 PM, in article
    [email hidden], "Jan" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:


    "Carl Sundquist" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...
    >
    >
    > um??? Have you actually read the subject header to this post????
    >

    It is common for people in rbr to post the winners, and frequently the


    whole

    Quoted message said:

    podium, in the header. In that case, your whole weekend would have been
    ruined anyway.

    No it only ruined Sunday!!LOL
    The heading was actually "Lance will have problems in July" , There was


    no

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    mention of the Tour of Romandy. If there had of been, I wouldn't have


    opened

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    the post
    But thats by the by now.
    Looking ahead, Would it be to much to ask for people not to actually


    post

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    the results in the headings.
    Other NGs I read ( not cycling) will usually say something along the


    lines

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    of "result of ??????? (inc.spoiler)"
    then type the result further down the page, so one can't accidently read
    it.iyswim

    RBR is NOT "other newsgroups" ...

    The standard practice in this group is to post the entire podium in the
    Subject field.

    Just out of curiosity ......Why?????? Is it an American sort of custom- for
    want of a better word??
    Jan

  18. "Steven L. Sheffield" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On 05/02/2004 03:29 PM, in article
    [email hidden], "Jan" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:


    "Carl Sundquist" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...
    >
    >
    > um??? Have you actually read the subject header to this post????
    >

    It is common for people in rbr to post the winners, and frequently the


    whole

    Quoted message said:

    podium, in the header. In that case, your whole weekend would have been
    ruined anyway.

    No it only ruined Sunday!!LOL
    The heading was actually "Lance will have problems in July" , There was


    no

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    mention of the Tour of Romandy. If there had of been, I wouldn't have


    opened

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    the post
    But thats by the by now.
    Looking ahead, Would it be to much to ask for people not to actually


    post

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    the results in the headings.
    Other NGs I read ( not cycling) will usually say something along the


    lines

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    of "result of ??????? (inc.spoiler)"
    then type the result further down the page, so one can't accidently read
    it.iyswim

    RBR is NOT "other newsgroups" ...

    The standard practice in this group is to post the entire podium in the
    Subject field.

    Just out of curiosity ......Why?????? Is it an American sort of custom- for
    want of a better word??
    Jan

  19. "Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    The standard practice in this group is to post the entire podium in the
    Subject field.

    Just out of curiosity ......Why?????? Is it an American sort of custom-


    for

    Quoted message said:

    want of a better word??
    Jan

    What makes you think it is just Americans who do it?

  20. Carl Sundquist said:

    What makes you think it is just Americans who do it?

    Yes.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.