Lance, Lance

In article <[email hidden]>,
[email hidden] says...

Quoted message said:

The Lance Armstrong "story" has the smell of bogusness. Is it possible
that he and his "handlers" have crafted a saga that targets Americans
and citizens worldwide that have, in these very troubled and uncertain
times, a need for superheroes, to give purpose and assurance to
uncertain lives and weak psyches.

I have several additional questions:

1) How did Lance Armstrong beat his testicular cancer which, as he's
often stated, had spread to his lungs, brains and other areas of his
body?

Read the book.

Quoted message said:

2) What treatment(s) were used in his "miraculous" cure?

Read the book.

Quoted message said:

3) Why have we not heard about persons with similarly serious cancers
overcoming their
afflictions?

They were not in the public light before their cancer. Otherwise you would
hear about them.

Quoted message said:

4) How, without using steroidal-type chemicals, has he been able to
WIN 7 TDF RACES IN A ROW, in the face of competitors who were as
determined as he is and who doubtless as strong and conditioned (or
steroided) as Armstrong?

He is more dedicated to winning the TDF than the other guys. He prepares
better and is blessed with good genes.

Now put your tin foil hat back on and crawl back under your rock.
--------------
Alex

In article <[email hidden]>,
[email hidden] says...

Quoted message said:

The Lance Armstrong "story" has the smell of bogusness. Is it possible
that he and his "handlers" have crafted a saga that targets Americans
and citizens worldwide that have, in these very troubled and uncertain
times, a need for superheroes, to give purpose and assurance to
uncertain lives and weak psyches.

I have several additional questions:

1) How did Lance Armstrong beat his testicular cancer which, as he's
often stated, had spread to his lungs, brains and other areas of his
body?

Read the book.

Quoted message said:

2) What treatment(s) were used in his "miraculous" cure?

Read the book.

Quoted message said:

3) Why have we not heard about persons with similarly serious cancers
overcoming their
afflictions?

They were not in the public light before their cancer. Otherwise you would
hear about them.

Quoted message said:

4) How, without using steroidal-type chemicals, has he been able to
WIN 7 TDF RACES IN A ROW, in the face of competitors who were as
determined as he is and who doubtless as strong and conditioned (or
steroided) as Armstrong?

He is more dedicated to winning the TDF than the other guys. He prepares
better and is blessed with good genes.

Now put your tin foil hat back on and crawl back under your rock.
--------------
Alex

In article <[email hidden]>,
[email hidden] says...

Quoted message said:

The Lance Armstrong "story" has the smell of bogusness. Is it possible
that he and his "handlers" have crafted a saga that targets Americans
and citizens worldwide that have, in these very troubled and uncertain
times, a need for superheroes, to give purpose and assurance to
uncertain lives and weak psyches.

I have several additional questions:

1) How did Lance Armstrong beat his testicular cancer which, as he's
often stated, had spread to his lungs, brains and other areas of his
body?

Read the book.

Quoted message said:

2) What treatment(s) were used in his "miraculous" cure?

Read the book.

Quoted message said:

3) Why have we not heard about persons with similarly serious cancers
overcoming their
afflictions?

They were not in the public light before their cancer. Otherwise you would
hear about them.

Quoted message said:

4) How, without using steroidal-type chemicals, has he been able to
WIN 7 TDF RACES IN A ROW, in the face of competitors who were as
determined as he is and who doubtless as strong and conditioned (or
steroided) as Armstrong?

He is more dedicated to winning the TDF than the other guys. He prepares
better and is blessed with good genes.

Now put your tin foil hat back on and crawl back under your rock.
--------------
Alex

In article <[email hidden]>,
[email hidden] says...

Quoted message said:

The Lance Armstrong "story" has the smell of bogusness. Is it possible
that he and his "handlers" have crafted a saga that targets Americans
and citizens worldwide that have, in these very troubled and uncertain
times, a need for superheroes, to give purpose and assurance to
uncertain lives and weak psyches.

I have several additional questions:

1) How did Lance Armstrong beat his testicular cancer which, as he's
often stated, had spread to his lungs, brains and other areas of his
body?

Read the book.

Quoted message said:

2) What treatment(s) were used in his "miraculous" cure?

Read the book.

Quoted message said:

3) Why have we not heard about persons with similarly serious cancers
overcoming their
afflictions?

They were not in the public light before their cancer. Otherwise you would
hear about them.

Quoted message said:

4) How, without using steroidal-type chemicals, has he been able to
WIN 7 TDF RACES IN A ROW, in the face of competitors who were as
determined as he is and who doubtless as strong and conditioned (or
steroided) as Armstrong?

He is more dedicated to winning the TDF than the other guys. He prepares
better and is blessed with good genes.

Now put your tin foil hat back on and crawl back under your rock.
--------------
Alex

Quoted message said:

You suggest the Armstrong story has been spun to give the "impression
of a miraculous cure." I demure. Mr. Armstrong's recovery has
consistantly attributed to the drug cocktail. This fact is made
abundantly clear in the Bristol Meyers - Squibb commercials you
reference. I find it difficult to understand how anyone who watched
those commercial's could walk away with the "impression of a miraculous
cure". It is my opinion that it if anyone is spinning it is you,
and a weak strawman at that.

I don't think you understand what I said at all.
Please don't demure on my account.

Steve

--
Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS
http://www.dentaltwins.com
Brooklyn, NY
718-258-5001

Quoted message said:

You suggest the Armstrong story has been spun to give the "impression
of a miraculous cure." I demure. Mr. Armstrong's recovery has
consistantly attributed to the drug cocktail. This fact is made
abundantly clear in the Bristol Meyers - Squibb commercials you
reference. I find it difficult to understand how anyone who watched
those commercial's could walk away with the "impression of a miraculous
cure". It is my opinion that it if anyone is spinning it is you,
and a weak strawman at that.

I don't think you understand what I said at all.
Please don't demure on my account.

Steve

--
Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS
http://www.dentaltwins.com
Brooklyn, NY
718-258-5001

Quoted message said:

You suggest the Armstrong story has been spun to give the "impression
of a miraculous cure." I demure. Mr. Armstrong's recovery has
consistantly attributed to the drug cocktail. This fact is made
abundantly clear in the Bristol Meyers - Squibb commercials you
reference. I find it difficult to understand how anyone who watched
those commercial's could walk away with the "impression of a miraculous
cure". It is my opinion that it if anyone is spinning it is you,
and a weak strawman at that.

I don't think you understand what I said at all.
Please don't demure on my account.

Steve

--
Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS
http://www.dentaltwins.com
Brooklyn, NY
718-258-5001

Fenimore a écrit :

Quoted message said:

3) Why have we not heard about persons with similarly serious cancers
overcoming their
afflictions?

I guess you're using the royal we, because many people know examples.
In particular, runner Steve Scott was diagnosed with testicular cancer
when he was in his mid 30's, recovered, and ran a 4:08 mile two
years after his diagnosis. He ran a 4:10 mile at 40 years old, which
is one of the fastest times in history for that age category.
http://running.syr.edu/column/19980112.html

-ilan

Fenimore a écrit :

Quoted message said:

3) Why have we not heard about persons with similarly serious cancers
overcoming their
afflictions?

I guess you're using the royal we, because many people know examples.
In particular, runner Steve Scott was diagnosed with testicular cancer
when he was in his mid 30's, recovered, and ran a 4:08 mile two
years after his diagnosis. He ran a 4:10 mile at 40 years old, which
is one of the fastest times in history for that age category.
http://running.syr.edu/column/19980112.html

-ilan

Fenimore a écrit :

Quoted message said:

3) Why have we not heard about persons with similarly serious cancers
overcoming their
afflictions?

I guess you're using the royal we, because many people know examples.
In particular, runner Steve Scott was diagnosed with testicular cancer
when he was in his mid 30's, recovered, and ran a 4:08 mile two
years after his diagnosis. He ran a 4:10 mile at 40 years old, which
is one of the fastest times in history for that age category.
http://running.syr.edu/column/19980112.html

-ilan

Fenimore a écrit :

Quoted message said:

3) Why have we not heard about persons with similarly serious cancers
overcoming their
afflictions?

I guess you're using the royal we, because many people know examples.
In particular, runner Steve Scott was diagnosed with testicular cancer
when he was in his mid 30's, recovered, and ran a 4:08 mile two
years after his diagnosis. He ran a 4:10 mile at 40 years old, which
is one of the fastest times in history for that age category.
http://running.syr.edu/column/19980112.html

-ilan

Fenimore a écrit :

Quoted message said:

3) Why have we not heard about persons with similarly serious cancers
overcoming their
afflictions?

I guess you're using the royal we, because many people know examples.
In particular, runner Steve Scott was diagnosed with testicular cancer
when he was in his mid 30's, recovered, and ran a 4:08 mile two
years after his diagnosis. He ran a 4:10 mile at 40 years old, which
is one of the fastest times in history for that age category.
http://running.syr.edu/column/19980112.html

-ilan

Fenimore a écrit :

Quoted message said:

3) Why have we not heard about persons with similarly serious cancers
overcoming their
afflictions?

I guess you're using the royal we, because many people know examples.
In particular, runner Steve Scott was diagnosed with testicular cancer
when he was in his mid 30's, recovered, and ran a 4:08 mile two
years after his diagnosis. He ran a 4:10 mile at 40 years old, which
is one of the fastest times in history for that age category.
http://running.syr.edu/column/19980112.html

-ilan

Fenimore a écrit :

Quoted message said:

3) Why have we not heard about persons with similarly serious cancers
overcoming their
afflictions?

I guess you're using the royal we, because many people know examples.
In particular, runner Steve Scott was diagnosed with testicular cancer
when he was in his mid 30's, recovered, and ran a 4:08 mile two
years after his diagnosis. He ran a 4:10 mile at 40 years old, which
is one of the fastest times in history for that age category.
http://running.syr.edu/column/19980112.html

-ilan

Fenimore a écrit :

Quoted message said:

3) Why have we not heard about persons with similarly serious cancers
overcoming their
afflictions?

I guess you're using the royal we, because many people know examples.
In particular, runner Steve Scott was diagnosed with testicular cancer
when he was in his mid 30's, recovered, and ran a 4:08 mile two
years after his diagnosis. He ran a 4:10 mile at 40 years old, which
is one of the fastest times in history for that age category.
http://running.syr.edu/column/19980112.html

-ilan

Dans le message de
news:[email hidden],
Fenimore <[email hidden]> a réfléchi, et puis a déclaré :

Quoted message said:

The Lance Armstrong "story" has the smell of bogusness. Is it
possible that he and his "handlers" have crafted a saga that targets
Americans and citizens worldwide that have, in these very troubled
and uncertain times, a need for superheroes, to give purpose and
assurance to uncertain lives and weak psyches.

I have several additional questions:

1) How did Lance Armstrong beat his testicular cancer which, as he's
often stated, had spread to his lungs, brains and other areas of his
body?

2) What treatment(s) were used in his "miraculous" cure?

3) Why have we not heard about persons with similarly serious cancers
overcoming their
afflictions?

4) How, without using steroidal-type chemicals, has he been able to
WIN 7 TDF RACES IN A ROW, in the face of competitors who were as
determined as he is and who doubtless as strong and conditioned (or
steroided) as Armstrong?

You are out of touch. Lots of cancer patients are cured. Lots. Not that
many have the publicity machines to make as much of it, or the physical
attributes to display it. Armstrong has made the most of both.

It would be nice to remember that his is far from the only success story :
be that in overcoming the disease, riding better than others, or making
money.

It is not about the bike, but about PR. And you, clearly, just shy away
from knowledge, probably figure cancer is infectious, and have a heart of
ceramic.
--
Bonne route !

Sandy
Verneuil-sur-Seine FR

Dans le message de
news:[email hidden],
Fenimore <[email hidden]> a réfléchi, et puis a déclaré :

Quoted message said:

The Lance Armstrong "story" has the smell of bogusness. Is it
possible that he and his "handlers" have crafted a saga that targets
Americans and citizens worldwide that have, in these very troubled
and uncertain times, a need for superheroes, to give purpose and
assurance to uncertain lives and weak psyches.

I have several additional questions:

1) How did Lance Armstrong beat his testicular cancer which, as he's
often stated, had spread to his lungs, brains and other areas of his
body?

2) What treatment(s) were used in his "miraculous" cure?

3) Why have we not heard about persons with similarly serious cancers
overcoming their
afflictions?

4) How, without using steroidal-type chemicals, has he been able to
WIN 7 TDF RACES IN A ROW, in the face of competitors who were as
determined as he is and who doubtless as strong and conditioned (or
steroided) as Armstrong?

You are out of touch. Lots of cancer patients are cured. Lots. Not that
many have the publicity machines to make as much of it, or the physical
attributes to display it. Armstrong has made the most of both.

It would be nice to remember that his is far from the only success story :
be that in overcoming the disease, riding better than others, or making
money.

It is not about the bike, but about PR. And you, clearly, just shy away
from knowledge, probably figure cancer is infectious, and have a heart of
ceramic.
--
Bonne route !

Sandy
Verneuil-sur-Seine FR

Dans le message de
news:[email hidden],
Fenimore <[email hidden]> a réfléchi, et puis a déclaré :

Quoted message said:

The Lance Armstrong "story" has the smell of bogusness. Is it
possible that he and his "handlers" have crafted a saga that targets
Americans and citizens worldwide that have, in these very troubled
and uncertain times, a need for superheroes, to give purpose and
assurance to uncertain lives and weak psyches.

I have several additional questions:

1) How did Lance Armstrong beat his testicular cancer which, as he's
often stated, had spread to his lungs, brains and other areas of his
body?

2) What treatment(s) were used in his "miraculous" cure?

3) Why have we not heard about persons with similarly serious cancers
overcoming their
afflictions?

4) How, without using steroidal-type chemicals, has he been able to
WIN 7 TDF RACES IN A ROW, in the face of competitors who were as
determined as he is and who doubtless as strong and conditioned (or
steroided) as Armstrong?

You are out of touch. Lots of cancer patients are cured. Lots. Not that
many have the publicity machines to make as much of it, or the physical
attributes to display it. Armstrong has made the most of both.

It would be nice to remember that his is far from the only success story :
be that in overcoming the disease, riding better than others, or making
money.

It is not about the bike, but about PR. And you, clearly, just shy away
from knowledge, probably figure cancer is infectious, and have a heart of
ceramic.
--
Bonne route !

Sandy
Verneuil-sur-Seine FR

Dans le message de
news:[email hidden],
Fenimore <[email hidden]> a réfléchi, et puis a déclaré :

Quoted message said:

The Lance Armstrong "story" has the smell of bogusness. Is it
possible that he and his "handlers" have crafted a saga that targets
Americans and citizens worldwide that have, in these very troubled
and uncertain times, a need for superheroes, to give purpose and
assurance to uncertain lives and weak psyches.

I have several additional questions:

1) How did Lance Armstrong beat his testicular cancer which, as he's
often stated, had spread to his lungs, brains and other areas of his
body?

2) What treatment(s) were used in his "miraculous" cure?

3) Why have we not heard about persons with similarly serious cancers
overcoming their
afflictions?

4) How, without using steroidal-type chemicals, has he been able to
WIN 7 TDF RACES IN A ROW, in the face of competitors who were as
determined as he is and who doubtless as strong and conditioned (or
steroided) as Armstrong?

You are out of touch. Lots of cancer patients are cured. Lots. Not that
many have the publicity machines to make as much of it, or the physical
attributes to display it. Armstrong has made the most of both.

It would be nice to remember that his is far from the only success story :
be that in overcoming the disease, riding better than others, or making
money.

It is not about the bike, but about PR. And you, clearly, just shy away
from knowledge, probably figure cancer is infectious, and have a heart of
ceramic.
--
Bonne route !

Sandy
Verneuil-sur-Seine FR

Dans le message de
news:[email hidden],
Fenimore <[email hidden]> a réfléchi, et puis a déclaré :

Quoted message said:

The Lance Armstrong "story" has the smell of bogusness. Is it
possible that he and his "handlers" have crafted a saga that targets
Americans and citizens worldwide that have, in these very troubled
and uncertain times, a need for superheroes, to give purpose and
assurance to uncertain lives and weak psyches.

I have several additional questions:

1) How did Lance Armstrong beat his testicular cancer which, as he's
often stated, had spread to his lungs, brains and other areas of his
body?

2) What treatment(s) were used in his "miraculous" cure?

3) Why have we not heard about persons with similarly serious cancers
overcoming their
afflictions?

4) How, without using steroidal-type chemicals, has he been able to
WIN 7 TDF RACES IN A ROW, in the face of competitors who were as
determined as he is and who doubtless as strong and conditioned (or
steroided) as Armstrong?

You are out of touch. Lots of cancer patients are cured. Lots. Not that
many have the publicity machines to make as much of it, or the physical
attributes to display it. Armstrong has made the most of both.

It would be nice to remember that his is far from the only success story :
be that in overcoming the disease, riding better than others, or making
money.

It is not about the bike, but about PR. And you, clearly, just shy away
from knowledge, probably figure cancer is infectious, and have a heart of
ceramic.
--
Bonne route !

Sandy
Verneuil-sur-Seine FR