Road Cycling · Public discussion

Lance all alone

Started by Michael Thomas · · Last activity · 29 posts · 1,039 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
9 July 2005
Last activity
12 July 2005
Original author
Michael Thomas
Posts
29
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,039
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–29 of 29
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Mark Janeba said:
    Ewoud Dronkert said:
    Quoted message said:

    Christy Anderson was going on like she knew something about how
    Savoldelli' legs were shot from the Giro.

    He was still the last DSC rider with Armstrong.

    Quoted message said:

    But perhaps it was a tactical decision to save strength for the
    Discovery train in the real mountains.

    We are all (including T-mobile) lulled into a false sense of possibility.

    Armstrong's investment on the 2001 Alpe d'Huez stage again pays off.
    Remembering that faked bad day, nobody is sure what to make of it when
    Armstrong doesn't dominate. Is he weak or is he just calculating?

    When Kloden went away today, at first it looked serious - and Armstrong
    didn't respond. Was he (correctly) figuring Kloden couldn't gain much
    time, or was he tired from covering Vino's attacks? Armstrong's rivals
    have to deal with the doubt that he's just biding his time, and that the
    domination could begin at any moment.

    Armstrong is very good on tactics, but a master of psychological warfare.

    Mark

    I'm pretty sure no one will fall for that 'gimp act' after the Alpe-
    he could be bleeding from his ears and I think no one would take it
    seriously. He' d have to keel over for anyone to think, okay he's not
    faking.

  2. Quoted message said:
    Mark Janeba said:
    Ewoud Dronkert said:

    On Sat, 09 Jul 2005 16:39:26 +0000, [email hidden] wrote:

    >Christy Anderson was going on like she knew something about how
    >Savoldelli' legs were shot from the Giro.

    He was still the last DSC rider with Armstrong.

    >But perhaps it was a tactical decision to save strength for the
    >Discovery train in the real mountains.

    We are all (including T-mobile) lulled into a false sense of possibility.

    Armstrong's investment on the 2001 Alpe d'Huez stage again pays off.
    Remembering that faked bad day, nobody is sure what to make of it when
    Armstrong doesn't dominate. Is he weak or is he just calculating?

    When Kloden went away today, at first it looked serious - and Armstrong
    didn't respond. Was he (correctly) figuring Kloden couldn't gain much
    time, or was he tired from covering Vino's attacks? Armstrong's rivals
    have to deal with the doubt that he's just biding his time, and that the
    domination could begin at any moment.

    Armstrong is very good on tactics, but a master of psychological warfare.

    Mark

    I'm pretty sure no one will fall for that 'gimp act' after the Alpe-
    he could be bleeding from his ears and I think no one would take it
    seriously. He' d have to keel over for anyone to think, okay he's not
    faking.

    Did Ullrich attack today?

  3. RicodJour said:

    Kloden lost 2 minutes to Armstrong in the opening TT which was only 19
    km. There's a 55 km TT still to come. He's not giving up time
    willingly, but it's far from panic time.

    Dude,
    You are still missing the point. It's not about ONE challenger from
    TMO, it's about the combination of Ullrich, Vino and Kloden that makes
    it unpredictable. If they don't stuff it up.

    And I got an answer to my question today...

  4. Ernst Noch said:


    ???
    Your scenario, would be a disadvantage for the three teams, not for
    Armstrong - each team would have to attack and possibly tow LA up the
    mountain.
    The advantage TMO has in this scenario is that they can decide whether
    the second rider attacks or not.
    And you saw today what can happen. One rider goes up, and the others
    just test with short accelerations if LA can follow or not, if he can,
    they stop, if not, they are away.
    Did you notice how often Vino looked back when attacking? And JU did the
    same at one point.

    Really? Because I'm thinking 3 good GC contenders with their own
    support crew is better than 3 GC contenders all on the same team.

    I'm not saying that the way things are set up now isn't dangerous for
    DSC et. al. but when Ullrich and Vino have to set back to let Kloden
    gain time it's not to their advantage.

    D

  5. David Ferguson said:

    On Sat, 09 Jul 2005 19:36:38 +0200, Ernst Noch <[email hidden]> wrote:

    Quoted message said:

    Really? Because I'm thinking 3 good GC contenders with their own
    support crew is better than 3 GC contenders all on the same team.

    I'm not saying that the way things are set up now isn't dangerous for
    DSC et. al. but when Ullrich and Vino have to set back to let Kloden
    gain time it's not to their advantage.


    I don't think there a much situations where they'd have to do this.
    All this will happen on steep roads, where drafting is not an advantage.
    If one of the three will drop Lance on a hill, that will mean Lance is
    shot, otherwise he'd never let that happen. And they all know this!
    So, they then can try to drop him also, or wait for him to react - he
    will not need being towed uphill if he is still able to give something.
    The advantage is, one team alone has three weapons on their discretion.

    Btw. I still think LA will crush them all on the next occasion.

  6. Mark Janeba said:
    Quoted message said:

    I agree Armstrong and Discovery didn't look so good TODAY. My point is
    that his HISTORY of playing possum in past tours leaves that little bit
    of doubt in the rival's minds.

    Bob Schwartz said:

    There is no doubt. DSC sucked today. Why do people have so
    much trouble believing that?

    Something to do with the Liggett commentary perhaps. I reckon I'll be able
    to compress the audio component of the tour avi files by 80% quite easily.

  7. I'm sure that there's nothing wrong with Lance. There's absolutely
    no doubt that he will once again demonstrate for all "better racing
    through chemistry" and win a seventh tour. No question. No one else
    has ever come close to this, and I cannot believe it is only training,
    so I'm sure that whatever it is will see Lance to another win. Talking
    about him being isolated is silly. He did fine, even without teammates.
    His time gap is completely insignificant. Most riders might need a
    team around them, but he doesn't.

    Donald Munro said:
    Mark Janeba said:
    Quoted message said:

    I agree Armstrong and Discovery didn't look so good TODAY. My point is
    that his HISTORY of playing possum in past tours leaves that little bit
    of doubt in the rival's minds.


    Bob Schwartz said:

    There is no doubt. DSC sucked today. Why do people have so
    much trouble believing that?

    Something to do with the Liggett commentary perhaps. I reckon I'll be able
    to compress the audio component of the tour avi files by 80% quite easily.

  8. The Litwaks said:

    I'm sure that there's nothing wrong with Lance. There's absolutely
    no doubt that he will once again demonstrate for all "better racing
    through chemistry" and win a seventh tour. No question. No one else
    has ever come close to this, and I cannot believe it is only training,
    so I'm sure that whatever it is will see Lance to another win. Talking
    about him being isolated is silly. He did fine, even without teammates.
    His time gap is completely insignificant. Most riders might need a
    team around them, but he doesn't.


    By your rationale he is stil the best then. As surely you don't think
    all of the other riders are clean and he is the only one?

    You can't prove a negative but passing umpteen hundred drug tests is
    about the best we're going to do for now.

    D

  9. Almost - only one other guy with him at Courchevel. 🙂

    R

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.