Okay, I know I don't exactly establish myself as being sensible when I admit that I just read, from start to finish, two threads regarding doping, started by B. Lafferty, but...
having done so, I must say that Lafferty must be the goofiest, imaginative, delusional SOB I've ever had the pleasure to not meet. That, or he's the all-time most successful troll in the history of r.b.r. and he's just playing us.
<[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Okay, I know I don't exactly establish myself as being sensible when I admit that I just read, from start to finish, two threads regarding doping, started by B. Lafferty, but...
having done so, I must say that Lafferty must be the goofiest, imaginative, delusional SOB I've ever had the pleasure to not meet. That, or he's the all-time most successful troll in the history of r.b.r. and he's just playing us.
Okay, I know I don't exactly establish myself as being sensible when I admit that I just read, from start to finish, two threads regarding doping, started by B. Lafferty, but...
having done so, I must say that Lafferty must be the goofiest, imaginative, delusional SOB I've ever had the pleasure to not meet. That, or he's the all-time most successful troll in the history of r.b.r. and he's just playing us.
Part of the measure of a troll is the number of posts. Success increases as the number of posts decrease; poor score here. He resembles more a net-crank. Single topic, cannot manage being shown to be incorrect; turns nasty at those times.
"Michael Press" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
In article <[email hidden]>,
Quoted message said:
Okay, I know I don't exactly establish myself as being sensible when I admit that I just read, from start to finish, two threads regarding doping, started by B. Lafferty, but...
having done so, I must say that Lafferty must be the goofiest, imaginative, delusional SOB I've ever had the pleasure to not meet. That, or he's the all-time most successful troll in the history of r.b.r. and he's just playing us.
Part of the measure of a troll is the number of posts. Success increases as the number of posts decrease; poor score here. He resembles more a net-crank. Single topic, cannot manage being shown to be incorrect; turns nasty at those times.
-- Michael Press
Incorrect. I post on a variety of topics which the troglodytes here often morph into a Lance/Doping thread.
Incorrect. I post on a variety of topics which the troglodytes here often morph into a Lance/Doping thread.
You reply on a variety of topics, true...and commonly originate threads which have somewhat less than two dimensions. As any addiction program will tell you, admitting you have a problem is half the battle.
"Hi. I'm Brian and I'm a LancEPOaholic." "Hi, Brian!"
Okay, I know I don't exactly establish myself as being sensible when I admit that I just read, from start to finish, two threads regarding doping, started by B. Lafferty, but...
having done so, I must say that Lafferty must be the goofiest, imaginative, delusional SOB I've ever had the pleasure to not meet. That, or he's the all-time most successful troll in the history of r.b.r. and he's just playing us.
Why did you use the word "or"? "And" would work just as well.
Okay, I know I don't exactly establish myself as being sensible when I admit that I just read, from start to finish, two threads regarding doping, started by B. Lafferty, but...
having done so, I must say that Lafferty must be the goofiest, imaginative, delusional SOB I've ever had the pleasure to not meet. That, or he's the all-time most successful troll in the history of r.b.r. and he's just playing us.
Fred
A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject. [Winston Churchill]