Road Cycling · Public discussion

Kunich's two percent

Started by ronaldo_jeremiah · · Last activity · 10 posts · 2,129 views

← Back to Road Cycling

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

01 / Original postKunich's two percentronaldo_jeremiah · 26 Jun 2008 02 / This pagePosts 1–10Page 1 of 1 · chronological order 03 / Latest replyPost #13Fred Fredburger · 26 Jun 2008

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
26 June 2008
Last activity
26 June 2008
Original author
ronaldo_jeremiah
Posts
10
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
2,129
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–10 of 10
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Original post
    ronaldo_jeremiah
    Archived post
    #1

    Tom, how did you come up with the assertion that "the human body has a
    difficult time detecting anything smaller than 2% variations
    successfully"?

    Did you just make that up, or did you actually have a real finding in
    mind that you then just mixed-up.

    If it's the latter, there's no shame in that. I mix things up myself
    from time to time.

    -rJND

    Report
  2. Scott
    Archived post
    #2

    On Jun 25, 6:48 pm, ronaldo_jeremiah <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    Tom, how did you come up with the assertion that "the human body has a
    difficult time detecting anything smaller than 2% variations
    successfully"?

    Did you just make that up, or did you actually have a real finding in
    mind that you then just mixed-up.

    If it's the latter, there's no shame in that.  I mix things up myself
    from time to time.

    -rJND

    This has TK written all over it:

    http://dilbert.com/strips/comic/2008-05-08/

    Report
  3. John Forrest Tomlinson
    Archived post
    #4
    ronaldo_jeremiah said:

    Tom, how did you come up with the assertion that "the human body has a
    difficult time detecting anything smaller than 2% variations
    successfully"?

    Did you just make that up,

    Dumbass,

    You know the answer

    Report
  4. Kurgan Gringioni
    Archived post
    #6

    On Jun 25, 5:48 pm, ronaldo_jeremiah <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    Tom, how did you come up with the assertion that "the human body has a
    difficult time detecting anything smaller than 2% variations
    successfully"?

    Did you just make that up, or did you actually have a real finding in
    mind that you then just mixed-up.

    Dumbass -

    When it comes to intellectual capacity, he could use himself as proof.

    thanks,

    K. Gringioni.

    Report
  5. Fred Fredburger
    Archived post
    #7
    Donald Munro said:
    Robert Chung said:

    Not quite. That's Dilbert. Tom's a [censored].

    Is a 2% increase in the size of a [censored] noticeable to
    [censored] users ?

    You're asking US?!?!

    Report
  6. Donald Munro
    Archived post
    #8
    Robert Chung said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Not quite. That's Dilbert. Tom's a [censored].

    Donald Munro said:
    Quoted message said:

    Is a 2% increase in the size of a [censored] noticeable to [censored] users ?

    Fred Fredburger said:

    You're asking US?!?!

    Why don't you ask Mrs Fredburger.

    Report
  7. Donald Munro
    Archived post
    #9
    Robert Chung said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Not quite. That's Dilbert. Tom's a [censored].

    Donald Munro said:
    Quoted message said:

    Is a 2% increase in the size of a [censored] noticeable to [censored] users ?

    Fred Fredburger said:

    You're asking US?!?!

    Why don't you ask Mrs Fredburger.

    Report
  8. Fred Fredburger
    Archived post
    #10
    Donald Munro said:
    Robert Chung said:
    Quoted message said:

    > Not quite. That's Dilbert. Tom's a [censored].

    Donald Munro said:
    Quoted message said:

    Is a 2% increase in the size of a [censored] noticeable to [censored] users ?

    Fred Fredburger said:

    You're asking US?!?!

    Why don't you ask Mrs Fredburger.

    I expect her (not inconsiderable) experience in the matter to be less
    than yours.

    Report
  9. Fred Fredburger
    Archived post
    #11
    Donald Munro said:
    Robert Chung said:
    Quoted message said:

    > Not quite. That's Dilbert. Tom's a [censored].

    Donald Munro said:
    Quoted message said:

    Is a 2% increase in the size of a [censored] noticeable to [censored] users ?

    Fred Fredburger said:

    You're asking US?!?!

    Why don't you ask Mrs Fredburger.

    I expect her (not inconsiderable) experience in the matter to be less
    than yours.

    Report
  10. Fred Fredburger
    Archived post
    #13
    Donald Munro said:
    Robert Chung said:
    Quoted message said:

    >>> Not quite. That's Dilbert. Tom's a [censored].

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Donald Munro wrote:
    >> Is a 2% increase in the size of a [censored] noticeable to [censored] users ?

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Fred Fredburger wrote:
    > You're asking US?!?!

    Donald Munro said:
    Quoted message said:

    Why don't you ask Mrs Fredburger.

    Fred Fredburger said:

    I expect her (not inconsiderable) experience in the matter to be less than
    yours.

    Dunno about [censored] but I require a 20% bigger fleshlight than Magilla.

    http://www.jstor.org/pss/1382229

    Report

Keep exploring

Browse the sectionRoad Cycling Return to CyclingForumsStart at the home page Search discussionsFind another thread

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.